&w=3840&q=100)
Why leaving Kuldeep Yadav out of playing 11 for 2nd Test can hurt India?
Edgbaston favours spin, data proves it
Over the past two decades, Edgbaston has been one of the more spinner-friendly pitches in England. It is the only English venue this century where opposition spinners have taken over 90 wickets at a strike rate below 60 and an average under 30. Visiting slow bowlers have averaged 29.4 per wicket at this ground — the best among all English venues. The match-winning impact of spin was evident during Australia's 2023 victory here, when Nathan Lyon returned two four-wicket hauls to script the visitors' success.
Statistically, Edgbaston offers the best strike rate for visiting spinners (55.1) among all Test grounds in England since 2000. Against that backdrop, Kuldeep's absence feels puzzling, especially considering his strengths in breaking partnerships and his ability to operate in long spells.
Kuldeep's numbers demand recognition
Kuldeep Yadav has been quietly effective in the longest format. He has taken 13 wickets in his last six Tests, and his overall average is an impressive 21.18 in 2024. What makes him especially valuable is his wrist-spin — a rare commodity in Test cricket, particularly in England, where a specialist wrist-spinner has not played a Test in five years.
Since the start of the Bazball era in June 2022, England have shown vulnerability to wrist-spin. They average only 30.9 against this variety in this period — a number that suggests this could have been an opportunity for India to challenge England's aggression with a bowler capable of turning the tide.
An Indian team insider reportedly said that Kuldeep has "been bowling at his peak" and that 'leaving him out in these conditions might be overly cautious.'
Bazball needs a disruptor, not a containment plan
What India need at Edgbaston is not containment, but disruption. England's approach under Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum has centred on relentless pressure with the bat, often scoring at over four runs per over. Their scoring rate in home Tests has crossed 4.5 on multiple occasions since 2022, and pacers — especially second-string ones — have often been taken apart. In fact, Edgbaston has the highest economy rate for visiting pacers (4.96) across all English venues during the Bazball era.
Kuldeep's skill set — flight, dip, and variations — makes him one of the few bowlers in India's ranks who could actually force a mistake rather than wait for one. Without Bumrah, that role becomes even more crucial.
England rarely fall twice
A deeper look at England's record under Stokes reveals a worrying trend for opponents. In their 21 home Tests since June 2022, England have only been bowled out twice in a match on two occasions. Unsurprisingly, they ended up winning both those Tests. The challenge of claiming 20 wickets against a Bazball unit is immense — and requires more attacking intent than India seem to have selected in their XI.
Conservative call could backfire
The choice to play it safe without Kuldeep appears to lean towards caution rather than strategy. It is a reflection of a defensive mindset in a format where aggression has increasingly been rewarded. R Ashwin, in a recent podcast, noted that 'Kuldeep deserves a consistent run because he's unique — you don't have another wrist-spinner like him in the country.'
If India fail to contain England's batting in the second Test, this selection decision will undoubtedly be one of the talking points. For a side already one down in the series and without their bowling spearhead, India might have just denied themselves a genuine wicket-taking option — and potentially, the chance to level the series.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
17 minutes ago
- India Today
No more experiments: India screams for a decisive path after the Manolo mishap
All good things come to an end. But Manolo Marquez's stint as India head coach? That never quite got months, eight matches, and just one win — against the Maldives in a friendly — was all it took for the AIFF to pull the plug on July 2. Officially, it was a 'mutual decision,' but let's be honest: the clock had been ticking since that 1-0 defeat to Hong Kong China in the Asian Cup now, the national team's situation looks like the footballing equivalent of a power cut: no spark, no direction, and no goals in three games. Dead last in their AFC Asia Cup Qualifiers group and losing to a side ranked 153rd in the world, India's big coaching experiment with Marquez — juggling club and country — has ended the way most bad ideas do. With regret and a long to-do list. Two jobs, one man, zero clarity From day one, Marquez's appointment was a head-scratcher. The man was coaching both FC Goa and the Indian national team at the same time. It was football's version of 'two jobs, one confused calendar,' and frankly, if it weren't tragic, it might've made a cracking Netflix docuseries. Managing a club like FC Goa is already a 24/7 hustle: training, matchdays, video analysis, team management. Rinse and repeat. Add a national team to the mix, and you've got chaos with an official India got was a part-time national coach for a full-time national problem. There were no consistent camps, no clear tactical direction, and definitely no continuity. By the time Marquez swapped his FC Goa cap for the Blue Tigers tracksuit, he was met with a team that looked completely lost. No rhythm, no identity, and certainly no clue in the final of the biggest red flags was his complete disregard for the I-League. While some of India's most promising players have come through that route, Marquez's selections stuck firmly within the ISL bubble. If you weren't in the glitz and lights of the top division, you basically didn't exist. That kind of tunnel vision cost India dearly, both in terms of squad depth and grassroots a last-gasp effort to fix the attacking drought, Marquez even convinced a 40-year-old Sunil Chhetri to come out of international retirement. And yes, while Chhetri remains a clinical finisher and a legend of the game, no country can sustainably depend on a veteran to save them every time the wheels fall off. It was a band-aid over a system that needed surgery. What next? The Khalid Jamil-sized solutionWith Marquez gone, the AIFF says it will soon advertise for a new coach. But India doesn't need another name — it needs a system. This isn't about a fancy resume or foreign flair. It's about understanding Indian football as it exists: layered, uneven, but brimming with raw Lopez Habas once showed interest — a serial winner in the ISL and now coaching Inter Kashi in the I-League. But even as proven names float around, India has had a history of letting go of those who understood the domestic Ashley Westwood, for example. A tactically astute coach, he gained deep experience in Indian football through stints at Bengaluru FC and others — and earned consistent praise for his structured, detail-oriented approach. So what did Indian football do? Let him go. What happened next? Westwood was roped in by Hong Kong. And what happened after that? He returned to beat India in the AFC qualifiers. Now that is a hard one to if India wants someone truly embedded in the local ecosystem, look no further than Khalid Jamil. He's coached teams across divisions, built underdog squads, and knows what it means to work with Indian talent — not around them. No drama, just honest football. That's the kind of blueprint India desperately intent among the Blue TigersThere's been growing chatter about how players seem more alive in ISL colours than when donning the national jersey. And honestly, it's not a motivation problem. It's a system problem. When there's no consistent vision or identity, it's hard to build pride or urgency around the shirt. This is where a coach like Jamil stands out. He builds teams, not around individual brilliance, but around collective intent, discipline, and the right manager, India could stop being a team that plays by reaction and start being one that plays with Marquez's departure shouldn't just mark the end of a disappointing tenure. It should force Indian football to stop repeating old mistakes: outsourcing identity, sidelining local leagues, and relying on short-term flashes. This is a reset moment. The to-do list is long, but so is the more borrowed time. No more half-measures. Indian football needs a coach, a system, and a plan. In that exact order.- Ends
Economic Times
19 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Shubman Gill channels his 'childhood' instincts to smash record double century
For Shubman Gill, the key to his historic double hundred at Lord's wasn't a new trick—but an old memory. The India skipper, who became the first Indian and Asian captain to score a Test double hundred in England, said returning to his childhood approach helped him rediscover his joy at the crease.'In this series, I tried to go back to my basics. I tried to bat like I used to in my childhood. I didn't think about having reached 35-40 runs or about playing long innings. I just wanted to enjoy my batting,' Gill told the host broadcaster after smashing 269 off 387 balls. His record-breaking innings powered India to 587 in the first innings of the second Test and broke multiple milestones along the way. It is now the highest Test score by an Indian on English soil, going past Sunil Gavaskar's 221 at The Oval in 1979, and also surpassed Virat Kohli's 254 as the highest by an Indian Test captain*. Also Read: Shubman Gill leads from the front, smashes maiden double century against England But behind the numbers was a cricketer who admitted he had lost something along the way. 'Sometimes, when you aren't scoring runs fluently, you stop enjoying your batting. You focus too much on the need to score runs. I felt I had lost that in my batting. I was so focused that I wasn't enjoying my batting as much.'Gill shared that post-IPL, he made technical changes to his game after a string of 30s and 40s without big conversions.'Yes, absolutely. I think at the end of the IPL and before this series, I worked a lot on this,' he said. Also Read: India vs England series opens with record-breaking Test viewership on JioHotstar 'I mainly worked on my initial movement and my setup. Before this, I felt my batting was going well. I was scoring 30-35-40 runs consistently in Test matches. But at some point, I was missing that peak concentration time. A lot of people say that when you focus too much, you sometimes miss your peak time.' Gill, who captained Gujarat Titans in IPL 2025, began red-ball preparation during the IPL itself, anticipating the technical shift required for the England series. 'Because the IPL setup, the white-ball setup, and what I wanted to do there were very different. So I thought that if I started my preparation from then itself, it would give me an edge when the time for the series came.'He admitted that switching formats isn't always smooth.'It is very difficult. Especially with the way T20 is played nowadays… it's easy to go from T20 to T20, but coming back from T20 to Tests is a bit difficult because you have been practising one way with your team and your instincts are tuned to that.''Controlling that and repeatedly telling your mind and body to adapt is challenging. That's why I started training for Tests during the IPL itself.' Recalling his conversation with team mentor Gautam Gambhir during tea on Day 1, Gill said: 'I came out and spoke to GG (Gautam Gambhir) Bhai. I told him, 'I'm not getting runs freely, even though I have a lot of shots in my armoury.' I also felt the ball was a bit soft… Still, my mindset was that if the wicket is good and I am set, no matter how long I bat, I shouldn't leave the match halfway.''In the last match, I learnt that under these conditions, there can be a collapse in the lower order at any time. So I tried to stay out there as long as I could.'At stumps on Day 2, England were 77/3, with India's pace unit putting the visitors on top. Gill underlined the team's bowling strategy moving forward.'I think once the ball gets a little old, it becomes difficult to take wickets. So, the more we consistently bowl in one area and frustrate their batsmen, the better it is for us.''We will try to make them score in only one area… I think our bowlers executed their plans really well.''(The pitch) doesn't have a lot for bowlers, but enough that if a batsman tries too hard, there are chances of getting out… We will try to frustrate them and not give them the opportunity to score.'\ (With inputs from PTI)
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Kasparov slams Carlsen for ‘revenge' mindset vs Gukesh, says Indian teenager has forced 'questions' on Magnus' dominance
D Gukesh scripted another monumental chapter in his young career on Thursday, defeating World No. 1 Magnus Carlsen in the sixth round of the Grand Chess Tour in Zagreb. The reigning world champion, who began the day as joint leader, now stands alone at the top of the standings with 10 points, capping off a remarkable run of wins against elite opposition. World champion D Gukesh vs Magnus Carlsen during Norway Chess last month. (X)(HT_PRINT) The 18-year-old Indian prodigy has already made headlines this year with his classical triumph over Carlsen in Norway Chess. But this latest result may carry even more weight. Not only did Gukesh beat the Norwegian with the white pieces in the rapid format, a time control often considered his own Achilles' heel, but he did so after Carlsen had publicly downplayed his rapid credentials. 'Gukesh hasn't done anything to indicate that he's going to do well (in rapid and blitz),' Carlsen had said ahead of the event. 'It remains to be proven that he's one of the best players in such a format… I hope for Gukesh's sake that he can play better.' Gukesh more than answered that challenge. After a first-round loss to Jan-Krzysztof Duda, the Indian teenager bounced back in extraordinary fashion, stringing together wins against Alireza Firouzja, R Praggnanandhaa, Nodirbek Abdusattorov, Fabiano Caruana, and now Carlsen. Former world champion Garry Kasparov, on commentary duty, didn't hold back in acknowledging the significance of the victory. 'Now we can question Magnus' domination,' Kasparov said. 'This is not just his second loss to Gukesh, it's a convincing loss. It's not a miracle or that Gukesh benefited from terrible mistakes. It was a real fight. And Magnus lost.' 'Resilience like computers' Kasparov further hailed Gukesh's mental strength and focus throughout the tournament. 'His resilience reminds me of computers. With computers, if you lose concentration, you're done. Gukesh is the kind of player you have to beat multiple times… Carlsen came here looking for revenge after Norway Chess, and that's never a good mindset.' With 21 rounds of blitz still to be played, Gukesh has already made a lasting impression, cementing his place among the world's elite and silencing doubters of his rapid prowess with a statement win over the best in the game.
