Adjusted D.C. stadium deal could be approved soon
Via NBCWashington.com, D.C. Council chairperson Phil Mendelson reached an agreement with the team to adjust the financial terms of the deal struck between the Commanders and Mayor Muriel Bowser.
The revised agreement opens the door for D.C. Council to vote on the stadium proposal in 'a matter of days.'
The vote is expected to happen after public hearings set for July 29 and 30.
Bowser separately said she has no problem with the changes to the deal.
Having a vote and having a successful vote are two different things. But implicit in the new reports is the notion that the changes to the deal are more likely to get it done.
The goal is to get the stadium open by 2030. If the deal is approved by the end of the month, that timetable likely remains very realistic.
Coincidentally or not, progress has been made in the aftermath of President Trump insisting that the team change its name, and then suggesting that he may refrain from helping the team get a deal done if it doesn't. Through it all, the Commanders have remained quiet.
And while it appears a stadium deal may be finalized without the team being squeezed to change its name, it's safe to assume that the Commander-in-Chief will periodically rattle the R-word cage.
If only to distract from the E-word.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
NFL star Von Miller mistakenly calls Commanders by former name as Trump threatens stadium deal
NFL veteran Von Miller referenced his new team by their former name after President Donald Trump threatened to block federal support for the Commanders' new stadium project in Washington D.C. over his desire to reinstate the Redskins name. Speaking to the media after training camp on Thursday, Miller expressed the motivation behind his desire to return to the gridiron. "My 15th year in the league, it never gets old – especially being out of work for four months, perspective kind of changes a little bit. You know, back when you were young it was like, 'Man why do we gotta go to OTAs? Man, I wish I was home.' And then you're sitting on the couch for four months, and it's like, 'Man, I wish I was at OTAs.'" But in his message to the media, Miller referenced the team as the Redskins. "It's good dropping the kids off, and it's good picking the kids up from school, but I wanna go to work. The Washington Redskins called me a month and a half ago and started talking, and agreed to come here to Washington about a week and a day ago, and here I am. Excited to be here." The slip-up comes as President Trump has called on the team to revert to its former name, which was dropped in 2020. "My statement on the Washington Redskins has totally blown up, but only in a very positive way," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. "I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington. The Team would be much more valuable, and the Deal would be more exciting for everyone." Commanders general manager Adam Peters said earlier this week that issues like the stadium rights "don't really make it to us." "We're just trying to focus on what's going on here and getting ready for the season." A vote on the deal that would allow the Commanders to return to their former home at RFK Stadium is set to take place on Aug. 1. The deal includes a $3.7 billion redevelopment project featuring a new stadium, housing units, retail space and parkland. The plan to move back to D.C. from the Maryland suburbs is estimated to be around 2030 – that is, if the legislation is approved. The White House has made it clear that the president's comments on the NFL team are legitimate. "The president was serious," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Monday. "Sports is one of the many passions of this president, and he wants to see the name of that team changed."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Warns AI Will ‘Totally Take Some Jobs' But Worries ‘The World is Not Ready for' This Much Greater Threat
Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has become one of the most influential voices in artificial intelligence (AI), known for his candid assessments of both the promise and disruption brought by new technologies. In a recent Bloomberg interview, Altman addressed the looming impact of AI and robotics on employment, stating, 'AI is for sure going to change a lot of jobs, totally take some jobs away, and create a bunch of new ones. This is what happens with technology, and in fact, if you look at the history of the world of technology-driven job change, it's been happening for a long time. And the thing that is different this time is just the rate of which it looks like it will happen.' While Altman largely downplays the impact of AI on the job market, he did say humanity isn't prepared for something else he believes will have a much greater impact: 'The thing I think the world is not ready for is, I don't think the world has had the humanoid robots moment yet, and I don't think that's very far away from a visceral 'this is going to do a lot of things that people used to do.' It's coming. We have always tried to be super honest about what we think the impact may be, realizing that we may be wrong about a lot of the details.' When asked what will happen when humanoid robots arrive, Altman predicted that their presence will feel 'very sci-fi,' fundamentally altering daily life and the job market. More News from Barchart UnitedHealth Stock Spirals Lower Again. Don't Buy the Dip. This Self-Driving Car Stock Is Surging on a Major Nvidia Boost Auto Revenue Keeps Plunging at Tesla. Should You Buy the TSLA Stock Dip or Run Far Away? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! Altman's authority on this subject is rooted in a career defined by technological foresight and leadership. After dropping out of Stanford, he co-founded Loopt, a location-based social networking startup, and later became president of Y Combinator, where he helped launch and scale some of Silicon Valley's most successful startups. Since 2019, Altman has led OpenAI, guiding the organization through the development of advanced AI systems such as ChatGPT and DALL-E, which have set new standards in natural language processing and generative AI. Under his leadership, OpenAI has secured major investments, including a multi-billion-dollar partnership with Microsoft (MSFT), and has been at the center of global discussions about the ethical and societal implications of artificial intelligence. Altman's comments reflect a pragmatic understanding of technological change. He draws on historical precedent, noting that job displacement and creation have accompanied every major wave of innovation, from the Industrial Revolution to the rise of the internet. What distinguishes the current era, in Altman's view, is the speed and breadth of change that AI and robotics are likely to bring. His prediction that the world is unprepared for the 'humanoid robots moment' signals a belief that the next phase of automation will be more visible and rapid than previous shifts, with robots performing tasks previously reserved for humans. This perspective is particularly relevant as businesses and policymakers grapple with how to adapt to AI's accelerating capabilities. Altman's insistence on honesty about the uncertainties involved, and his acknowledgment that even experts may be wrong about the details, offers a measured approach to navigating the future of work. His leadership at OpenAI, marked by a focus on transparency and ethical considerations, lends credibility to both his warnings and reassurances alike. As AI continues to reshape industries, Altman's insights serve as both a caution and a call to prepare for profound changes that will challenge existing structures but also create new opportunities, as has been the case throughout technological history. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Customer sues Amazon after suffering serious injury while using popular product: 'Complete disregard for the safety of its subscribers'
Customer sues Amazon after suffering serious injury while using popular product: 'Complete disregard for the safety of its subscribers' The megacorporation Amazon has had its fair share of controversies, but a lawsuit over an e-bike incident is bringing attention to issues about the company's accountability. What's happening? According to Electrek, California man Robert Lewis purchased an e-bike on Amazon and suffered a disastrous injury, leaving him paraplegic. "The e-bikes distributed through and sold by are the latest example of Amazon seeking to profit off of a new consumer product space with complete disregard for the safety of its subscribers," the lawsuit reads, per Electrek. The lawsuit compares e-bike sales to the hoverboard craze. It suggests Amazon inundates its site with trending products, allegedly doing so without always making proper safety assessments. "Lewis's legal team … is seeking damages for medical costs, lost wages, and punitive damages, pointing to what they describe as a pattern of neglect by Amazon…" Electrek reported. Why is the lawsuit important? Lewis is suing both Amazon and the company that made the bike. He fell from the bike in December 2024 when the handlebars gave out due to the locking system failing. He officially filed the suit in June 2025. This incident of carelessness by a massive company is not unheard of. Amazon has faced backlash for countless other problems, including the company's major contribution to pollution — amounting to more than that of some countries. While it has taken a few visible steps to reroute its path towards sustainability, such as implementing electric delivery vans and getting rid of most of its plastic packaging pillows, it has still been accused of greenwashing — or using supposedly eco-friendly practices to boost business but not actually helping the environment at all. Not only is this incident a tragedy for Lewis, but it is also a stumbling block for the eco-friendly movement, as consumers are more likely to be wary of e-bikes because of safety concerns and fears about faulty products. This incident could deter people from purchasing from even reputable sellers, setting back the transition to electric vehicles. Do you worry about companies having too much of your personal data? Absolutely Sometimes Not really I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. What's being done about faulty products? The hope is that suits like Lewis's bring attention to a bigger issue and help hold the company accountable. While Amazon has previously avoided similar suits, claiming to be a sales platform separate from the sellers themselves, some individuals have had success in instances of defective items or injury, as Habig Injury Law reported. To avoid the fleeting trends associated with Amazon, you can try thrift shopping — buying used items at low prices without contributing to the massive production pollution of mega companies. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the the daily Crossword
