Top Democrat questions ‘special treatment' for Alaska, Hawaii in GOP SNAP proposal
As part of a major package being considered in the Senate to advance President Trump's tax priorities, Republicans also include a major change that would require some states to cover a share of SNAP benefit costs, which are currently funded by the federal government, for the first time.
Republicans are floating changes to that plan that would create special carveouts for Alaska and Hawaii amid internal GOP pushback. But senators signal the exemption could be at risk as Democrats question 'special treatment' for the states.
'On the SNAP side, as you know, they've shifted $64 billion to the states, of which 44 have balanced budget amendments,' Klobuchar argued on Monday. 'And we tried to stop that, because the states aren't going to be able to do this.'
'Two states, they threw in Hawaii, two states get this special treatment, and no one else, and so I just figure, if they get that treatment, maybe every other state should, you know, maybe we should be doing that for Wisconsin,' she told The Hill. 'Maybe we should be doing that for Iowa.'
'This cost shift to the states is the biggest cost shift in the bill,' she also said.
Republicans are still waiting on a ruling from the Senate parliamentarian to see if the reworked proposal passes muster with the chamber's Byrd Rule. That decision, in turn, could be instrumental in whether Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) will support the bill.
Her comments come as Alaska's other senator, Sen. Dan Sullivan (R), is pointing fingers at Democrats as he says the exemption – which is aimed at helping shield Alaska from steep cuts to federal dollars for food assistance – hangs in the balance because of pushback from the other side of the aisle.
Politico was first to report the news.
'[Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and the Democrats are trying, once again, to strip a provision that helps Hawaii and Alaska's most vulnerable,' Sullivan told The Hill on Monday.
'Everything that we're trying to do for Alaska and Hawaii, Schumer and the Democrats strip it,' Sullivan said, while urging his Democratic colleagues to call to tell their leadership, 'Don't screw our provision that's just trying to make it a little less difficult on challenging communities to implement their SNAP requirements.'
As part of the SNAP proposal, some states will cover a share of the cost of SNAP benefits if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent beginning in fiscal 2028.
But in a change from a previous version of the SNAP proposal assembled by the Senate Agriculture Committee, the bill also includes a 'waiver authority' section that could allow for noncontiguous states, or Alaska and Hawaii, to see the requirements waived if they're found to be 'actively implementing a corrective action plan' and carrying out other activities to reduce their error rate.
The update came after Alaska Republicans raised concerns over the GOP-crafted proposal.
Republicans say the proposal is aimed at incentivizing states to get their payment error rates down, while Democrats have argued the measure could lead to states having to cut benefits.
Figures recently unveiled by the U.S. Department of Agriculture found the state's payment error rate — which factors in overpayment and underpayment error rates — hit 24.66 percent in fiscal 2024. The rate is the highest in any state.
The national average in the new reporting was 10.93 percent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump wins again as ‘big beautiful bill' passes the Senate. What are the lessons for the Democrats?
Donald Trump is continuing his run of political wins after his keynote legislation, nicknamed the 'big beautiful bill', squeaked through the Senate. While the bill, which includes major cuts in tax and government spending, must now go back to the House of Representatives for another vote, passing the upper house is highly significant. Trump lost the support of just three Republican senators, and with the help of a tie-breaking vote from Vice-President J.D. Vance managed to push the bill forward. Democrats, the minority in both the House and Senate, have been unable to do anything but sit by and watch as Trump claims victory after victory. These include progress in his attempt to end birthright citizenship, the claimed destruction of significant Iranian nuclear sites (yet to be independently verified) and the convincing of Nato member states to increase defence spending to 5% of their GDP. Trump may even be getting closer to a peace deal between Israel and Hamas. And now the Democrats have failed in their desperate attempts to stop this bill. In the Senate, it was felt that there could be enough Republican senators concerned about cuts to Medicaid (the US system that provides essential healthcare to those on low incomes), the closure or reduction of services at rural hospitals, and the increase in national debt to potentially hinder the bill's progress. However, Democrats were unable to do anything apart from delaying the voting process, and the bill is progressing with some changes but not enough to be severely weakened. It had seemed likely that the Democrats could work with the Maga-focused Freedom Caucus group of representatives, whose members include Marjorie Taylor Greene, in the early stages in the House to stop its initial passage. But Speaker Mike Johnson managed to calm most of their fears about the rise in the deficit to get the bill through the House. The lack of effective opposition from the Democrats reflects their congressional standing. The Republicans control the Senate 53-47, and they also have a majority of 220-212 in the House, with three vacancies. While Democrat numbers in Congress is the primary issue in opposing this bill, their future congressional power will rely on strong leadership within the party and, more importantly, a clear set of policies with appeal that can attract more support at the ballot boxes. Failure to address this will probably allow Republicans to dominate Congress and shape American domestic and foreign policy any way they wish for longer. While Democrat Hakeem Jeffries has been a diligent minority leader in the House, he has attempted to operate as an obstacle to Republican policies with little success, rather than reaching across the political divide to create a consensus with dissenting Republicans. Outside of Congress, California governor Gavin Newsom, widely touted as a potential candidate for the next presidential election, has offered some resistance to the Trump administration, particularly over Trump's assumption of national command over the state-controlled National Guard to deal with protests in California against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. However, Newsom's reputation is still relatively regional, although it is on the rise. There will be jostling over the next couple of years for the Democratic presidential nomination, and this will have an impact on the platform that the party runs on. Party members and those voting for the next presidential nominee will need to decide whether to continue with the mainly centrist position that the party has adopted since the 1990s or adopt something more left-wing. A more radical candidate, such as New York representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, might offer a substantially different proposal that could seem attractive to Democratic voters and those Trump supporters who may feel dissatisfied with the current Republican administration. However, democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, recently selected as the Democratic nominee for the New York mayoral election, has already been vilified by some in the Republican party. Concerns about such a supposedly 'radical' candidate may concern many voters in red states in middle America. However, getting elected is one thing but implementing progressive, left-leaning policies is another thing entirely. They also need to deliver solutions to major issues, such as crime, at all levels, to show their abilities to solve problems. It is not just the policies that matter for the Democrats, but who they want to represent. Last year's election suggested that the Democrats had been ousted as the representatives of the working class. Some significant labour unions, a foundation of Democratic support for the majority of the 20th century, failed to endorse Kamala Harris. Mamdani's success in New York stemmed from the mobilisation of a grassroots campaign that used social media effectively. It targeted young working-class voters disenchanted with the Democratic party. He also resonated with voters in areas that had seen an increase in Republican voters in the 2024 election. All this may offer some lessons to the Democrats. They need to reassess their policies, their image and their tactics, and show Americans that they can solve the problems that the public sees as most important, including the high cost of living. While they can expect to gain seats in the House in next year's midterms, they need to look for a leader and policies that will capture the public's hearts. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Dafydd Townley does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
House Democrats demand closure of ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
House Democrats are calling for the closure of Florida's new migrant detention facility on a remote site nestled in the Everglades dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz,' citing it as an example of what they argue is the Trump administration's 'shameful, dehumanizing approach to immigration.' Democratic Reps. Janelle Bynum (Ore.) and Maxwell Frost (Fla.) led a group of 24 Democrats in sending a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Acting Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Todd Lyons on Wednesday. The letter includes signatures from Reps. Pramila Jayapal (Wash.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Rashida Tlaib (Mich.) and Eric Swalwell (Calif.), among others. The Democratic lawmakers panned the facility as a 'cruel and inhumane stunt.' The administration used money from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Shelter and Services Program to build the facility, which is projected to cost about $450 million a year. 'This kind of cruel rhetoric and deliberate endangerment further exemplifies the administration's shameful, dehumanizing approach to immigration – an approach rooted in anti-immigrant hostility that is morally indefensible and in clear violation of fundamental human rights,' the members wrote in the letter. They said migrants detained there while awaiting deportation will be kept in tents 'with inadequate sanitation facilities' facing conditions including 'exposure to deadly pathogens, constant threats from unpredictable flooding and extreme weather events, and daily temperatures averaging 90 degrees, with a heat index often over 100 degrees Fahrenheit.' 'Erecting tents in the blazing Everglades sun, during hurricane season no less, and call it immigration enforcement is nothing short of disgusting and cruel. Donald Trump and his Administration don't care if migrant men, women, and children live or die – they only care about cruelty and spectacle,' Frost said in a statement. The group is demanding clarity on the funding and conditions at the facility and 'a commitment to humane treatment for all detainees at all detention facilities.' Trump toured the site Tuesday to mark its opening, touting the facility alongside Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The facility was built through a partnership with state and federal resources to bolster Trump's immigration crackdown and features soft-sided units outfitted with chain-link cells that have been built to house hundreds of detainees. 'It's known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' which is very appropriate, because I looked outside and it's not a place I want to go hiking anytime soon,' Trump said while at the facility. 'We're surrounded by miles of treacherous swampland and the only way out is, really, deportation.'
New York Post
18 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dem Mikie Sherrill holds 20-point lead over Jack Ciattarelli as NJ gov general election race heats up: poll
Republican Jack Ciattarelli faces an uphill battle in his quest to become governor of New Jersey, with a new poll showing him trailing Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill by 20 percentage points. The Rutgers-Eagleton/SSRS survey shows Sherrill (D-NJ) getting 51% support among registered voters compared to 31% for Ciattarelli. Another 13% said they were unsure about whom they would vote for and 5% said they would support neither candidate. Ciattarelli, 63, stunned most political observers four years ago when he came within 2.8 percentage points of unseating incumbent Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. Advertisement 4 Rep. Mikie Sherrill has widely been seen as the frontrunner in the New Jersey gubernatorial race. REUTERS 4 Republican Jack Ciattarelli has dramatically outperformed polling and expectations in the past. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post President Trump similarly overperformed in New Jersey last November, losing the Garden State by only 5.9 percentage points — improving on his 2020 margin of defeat by 10 percentage points. Advertisement Republicans are hopeful that Zohran Mamdani's shock victory in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary could boost their prospects across the Hudson. 'As the next Governor of NJ, I will be proactive in protecting our state from the lawlessness and chaos that will ensue if [Zohran Mamdani] becomes NYC's next Mayor,' Cianttarelli vowed last week. 'While NJ Democrats roll over to their extreme far-left base, I will take action to protect New Jersey.' Advertisement Sherrill, 53, has focused her pitch on opposing the Trump administration, and the Rutgers-Eagleton survey indicated it is having an effect. The survey found more than half of respondents (52%) called the president a 'major factor' in their vote for governor, while 18% called Trump a 'minor' one. 'Trump's influence appears to be more of a benefit to Sherrill right now, given key groups more likely to support her are also more likely to claim the president is a factor in their vote choice, while those more supportive of Ciattarelli do not,' observed Ashley Koning, director of Rutgers' Eagleton Center for Public Interest Polling. 4 Republicans are hoping to seize on Zohran Mamdani's victory across the Hudson River and use it against Democrats in the tri-state area. Stephen Yang Advertisement 'While Trump's endorsement may have helped in the primaries, these numbers are an early sign that the endorsement may play differently when it comes to the general.' Sherrill, a former naval aviator and federal prosecutor, was elected to Congress as part of a Democratic wave in 2018, succeeding longtime Republican lawmaker Rodney Frelinghuysen. The poll found Sherrill outperforming Ciattarelli on all key voting issues, including taxes (39% to 34%), affordability (45% to 29%), the economy (42% to 33%) and budgeting (42% to 32%). 4 President Trump loomed large on the minds of prospective New Jersey voters, according to the poll. AFP via Getty Images 'Early polling on the governor's race should serve as a baseline or a barometer of how voters are feeling in the moment – not as some crystal ball predicting the future four months from now,' Koning cautioned. 'A lot can happen between now and November, and we know this gap will very likely narrow in the next several months. We only need to look back to 2021 to see how much a race can change throughout a cycle.' New Jersey and Virginia hold off-year elections, which are carefully watched as potential bellwethers for what's to come in the midterms. The Rutgers survey sampled 579 registered voters June 13-16 with a margin of error of plus-or-minus 5.2 percentage points.
