Portal is sued over allegation
Published on: Sat, Jul 26, 2025 Text Size: SMM accused MalaysiaNow of publishing 'numerous allegations which are false, misleading, and defamatory' regarding the purported awarding of a Prospecting Licence (PL) to Bumi Suria, a company linked to prominent businessman and former political aide Datuk Farhash Wafa Salvador Rizal Mubarak. Kota Kinabalu: Sabah Mineral Management Sdn Bhd (SMM) has initiated legal proceedings against news portal MalaysiaNow over allegedly false and defamatory reports concerning the politically-linked company Bumi Suria Sdn Bhd. In a statement, SMM accused MalaysiaNow of publishing 'numerous allegations which are false, misleading, and defamatory' regarding the purported awarding of a Prospecting Licence (PL) to Bumi Suria, a company linked to prominent businessman and former political aide Datuk Farhash Wafa Salvador Rizal Mubarak. 'At no point in time did MalaysiaNow seek SMM's clarification prior to the publication. 'The publications were biased, one-sided, and represent a calculated attempt by MalaysiaNow to defame SMM, its directors, and officers,' SMM stated, adding that it would pursue legal action against any other media outlet that republishes the claims. The lawsuit comes after a series of articles and videos by MalaysiaNow suggesting that SMM had improperly awarded a prospecting licence to Bumi Suria for a 70,000-hectare forest reserve area in Kalabakan and Gunung Rara. SMM rebutted this, reiterating that it has no legal power to issue prospecting or mining licences. It stressed that this authority lies solely with the Sabah Department of Lands and Surveys (JTU) under the Sabah Mining Ordinance 1960. JTU Director Datuk Bernard Liew later confirmed that no mineral-related licence had ever been issued to Bumi Suria. Instead, SMM clarified that it had only issued a 'Conditional Letter of Permission to Apply for a Prospecting Licence' to Bumi Suria following internal board deliberations, stressing that this document did not amount to an approval or issuance of any licence. 'SMM's role is strictly limited to issuing conditional letters of permission to apply for a licence,' it said, adding that such a letter would only be issued after the agency's board of directors had convened to review the application. 'This letter does not confer or award any licence. Interested applicants must submit complete documentation and undergo due diligence by SMM before other related government agencies conduct further checks,' it said. The agency said it had, in the exercise of its functions, considered Bumi Suria's application and issued conditional approval for its application. 'Bumi Suria did not proceed to formally submit any of the required documents for an application,' it added. Consequently, on March 24, 2025, SMM issued an official letter revoking the permission to apply. 'These facts were maliciously omitted by MalaysiaNow,' the agency said. SMM also took issue with the use of a photo of its chief executive officer, Natasha Sim, and her name in connection with an audio recording that they claim does not feature her voice and is not associated with her. 'This deliberate act of misrepresentation is unacceptable and unethical,' it said. The issue has drawn public scrutiny, particularly as SMM has been embroiled in controversy since a series of leaked videos and audio recordings emerged, alleging corrupt practices in the awarding of licences and implicating several Sabah politicians. Two state assemblymen, Datuk Yusof Yaacob (Sindumin) and Datuk Andy Suryady Bandy (Tanjung Batu), are currently facing corruption charges over the scandal. Farhash, a former aide to PKR President Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, has denied allegations that he owned Bumi Suria and that the company had been awarded a mineral prospecting or exploration licence. While confirming he is a director and shareholder, his lawyers have demanded the articles be removed. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
2 days ago
- Daily Express
Sabah needs new Department of Mineral Mining: Any decision on developing Sabah's mineral wealth must be in the interest of Sabahans and the State
Published on: Sunday, August 03, 2025 Published on: Sun, Aug 03, 2025 By: Tengku Datuk Fuad Tengku Ahmad Text Size: FOLLOWING on last week's article ( 'Bumi Suria is hoo-ha over nothing'; Daily Express 27.7.2025 ), it is timely to analyse and discuss some of the reforms necessary to advance Sabah's mineral mining administration and policies. This article will explore some administrative reforms which should be implemented to both modernise and clarify the decision-making process in respect of mining rights in Sabah. To start, no discussion concerning Sabah mining can proceed without first considering the role and functions of Sabah Mineral Management Sdn Bhd ('SMM'). SMM was incorporated in 2006 under the name Sabah Capital Sdn Bhd , as a sendirian berhad (a private company limited by shares) with a total paid-up capital of RM12 million. As of 24.7.2025, SMM's nature of business is listed as 'Investment Holding' . In 2021, the company changed its name officially from Sabah Capital Sdn Bhd to Sabah Mineral Management Sdn Bhd . From this, a few things stand out. Why is SMM's nature of business listed as 'Investment Holding' when the company holds itself out a government-linked company whose purpose is to facilitate and manage all mining and mineral development in Sabah? Second, it is unclear how a private limited company can seemingly exercise governmental powers in assessing and approving mining permits and licences issued under the Mining Ordinance 1960 ('MO')? Third, it is curious why SMM is not located closer to the Lands and Survey Department or the Chief Minister's office since both exercise decision-making powers under the MO? Finally, what advantages are there in outsourcing to SMM the mining licence and permit approvals process? Sabah Mineral Management Sdn Bhd is a government-linked company ('GLC') A company search reveals that SMM is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Chief Minister, Incorporated ('CMI'). CMI is a special purpose corporation created under the Chief Minister (Incorporation) Ordinance which enables the Sabah Government to hold assets through the office of the Chief Minister as if the same were a company. This alone shows that SMM is indeed a GLC. Moreover, the Board of SMM includes the Chief Minister, the Chief Conservator or Forests, The Secretary of Natural Resources, the State Attorney-General, State Secretary and other senior government officials. On its surface, it appears that SMM seems to function as a quasi-government department with one important difference: SMM is still a sendirian berhad and is subject to the provisions of the Companies Act 2016. It is not a government department and is not subject to the protections provided under the Government Proceedings Act 1956 or the Public Authorities Protection Act 1948, among others. More importantly, the purpose and functions of a private limited company are very different from those of a government department. Can / should SMM assess and approve permits and licences under the Mining Ordinance ('MO')? It is easy to assume that it is lawful for SMM to exercise governmental decision-making powers simply because it is owned by the Sabah government and where the Chief Minister and other senior officials sit on SMM's board. A layman would be forgiven for asking what is the difference between a decision made by SMM and one made by the Sabah government when both are comprised of the Chief Minister and other relevant government officials? The difference is this: The Companies Act requires the board of private limited companies to make decisions in the interest of the company whereas a government authority or department is constitutionally required to make decisions in the interests of the State of Sabah and its people. So, every time SMM's board holds a meeting, Malaysian company law requires that the board makes decisions in the financial interests of SMM and not the people of Sabah. Failure to observe this can attract legal consequences. This is an important point to observe. The Sabah Government holds the state's mineral resources on trust for the benefit of the people of Sabah. Therefore, any decision concerning the development of Sabah's mineral wealth must be made in the interest of Sabahans and the state – the Chief Minister and his officials must not be constrained from doing so by the restrictive requirements of SMM's board as required by the provisions of the Companies Act. Apart from this apparent inconsistency between corporate and governmental duties and objectives, another issue arises: under what authority does SMM function? From press reporting and other inquires, it appears that SMM's function is to facilitate and manage the mining permit and licence application process in Sabah. Put simply, if you want a mining permit or licence in Sabah, you must apply through SMM. But the question remains, from where and how does SMM derive its powers? SMM does not have statutory recognition The MO does not mention – at all – SMM or any other private corporate body as having a role in the application for or issuance of mining permits or licences. Section 6 of the MO empowers the Director of Lands and Survey to issue mining licences to any person with the approval of the Chief Minister (being the Minister in charge of natural resources). Section 4 MO operates identically in respect of the issuance of mining permits. The MO does not, however, provide for any delegation of the Chief Minister's duties or functions in respect of approving mining permits or licences. Unless specifically permitted by legislation, a Minister or other official cannot delegate their duties, the exercise of their discretion or powers to another person or entity. This would include SMM. The only exception is where the Minister authorises a governmental official to perform some of his functions or duties where the Minister is ultimately accountable to the State Legislative Assembly for the actions of said government official. Additionally, the Delegation of Powers Enactment , 1963 does not assist SMM. Section 3 permits the Chief Minister to delegate the performance of his duties to any person described by name or office. 'Any person described by name or office' in this context means any Sabah government official or governmental office. It does not mean any non-governmental official or entity since, as stated above, the conduct and actions of officials acting under Ministerial power must always remain answerable to the Legislative Assembly. Additionally, and for completeness, there is no Gazette announcing that the Chief Minister has delegated his functions and powers under the MO to SMM as would be required by Section 8 of the Delegation of Powers Enactment. This raises another inconsistency. SMM is purportedly concerned with the development of mineral and mining matters in Sabah. This would clearly designate SMM as being subject to the Minister in charge of natural resources which, is the Chief Minister. And yet, a search of the Warta Kerajaan Negri Sabah reveals that SMM is designated as coming under the Sabah Minister of Finance, who, does not have any direct duties or functions under the MO (See: Warta Kerajaan Negri Sabah, 18 July, 2024). SMM – Cannot make decisions on the Chief Minister's behalf To be fair to SMM, it can be argued that the company only plays an advisory role where it scrutinises mining permit and licence applications and makes a recommendation to the Chief Minister for approval. However, in practice, it is widely perceived that SMM acts as an approving authority and that mining permits and licences will not be issued unless approved by SMM's board of directors. This would imply that mining licence and permit applications are considered and assessed by SMM. The Chief Minister, therefore, must not treat the conclusions of SMM as being final or binding on him or on any exercise of his discretion under the MO. Instead, the Chief Minister should (and does) consider each mining permit or licence application and make a decision based on the merits – the Chief Minister should not appear to delegate the exercise of his discretion to SMM. Moving Forward – Proposed Reforms So, in short, SMM does not have any official statutory or ministerial authority to assess or recommend for approval, mining permit or licence applications in Sabah. SMM, however, has de facto authority because the Sabah Government appears to treat SMM as if it were a government department when in fact its status as a private limited company is – at times - legally inconsistent with that of a government department. Therefore, it is in the best long-term interests of Sabah for the GRS-lead government to create a new Department of Mineral Mining headed by a Commissioner or head of department (an official on par with the Chief Conservator of Forests). By subsuming SMM's de facto duties and functions, it is argued that a new Mineral and Mining Department would not only promote greater transparency in the mining permit and licence application process but moreover, result in more accountability and public consultation in respect of mineral mining policy in Sabah. This would bring the development of mineral mining in Sabah in line with the development and management of the state's forest and timber resources. The creation of a new mining and minerals department must also be accompanied by a modernisation of the Mining Ordinance 1960 where its provisions should be harmonised with the environmental and forestry protections contained in the Forest Enactment 1968. This whole-sale structural and legislative reform of Sabah's mining and mineral management sector should be made a priority under the GRS-lead government since – as recent news on the matter shows – the current state of affairs is no longer sustainable or in the best interests of Sabah. Tengku Datuk Fuad Tengku Ahmad Tengku Fuad is a senior lawyer specialising in commercial and public law and has, and continues to, act for the Sabah Government in complex cases. In 2021 Tengku Fuad was appointed as a member of the Federal Government's Special Task Force to review legal matters related to the sovereignty of Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge and, in 2022, was also appointed to the Federal Government's Special Task Force to resist the Sultan of Sulu's (heirs) claim against Malaysia. Prior to establishing his firm, Tengku Fuad served as a public company director and was involved in the corporate sector. The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]
Free Malaysia Today
28-07-2025
- Free Malaysia Today
E-hailing firms Maxim, InDrive risk losing licences, says Loke
Transport minister Loke Siew Fook said both inDrive and Maxim had started making improvements. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : Russian-founded e-hailing firms inDrive and Maxim risk having their licences revoked if they fail to ensure their drivers comply with key requirements, including obtaining e-hailing vehicle permits. Transport minister Loke Siew Fook said both companies were found to have allowed their drivers to operate without an EVP, a key condition under their operating licence, Bernama reported. Loke acknowledged that while the Land Public Transport Agency (Apad) had recommended revoking the companies' licences in April for allowing their drivers to operate without EVPs, doing so could burden drivers and passengers who relied on the platforms. Both operators had appealed and the ministry granted a three-month monitoring period starting July 24. 'We've outlined the steps they must take, and they've started making improvements,' Loke said after launching the Kota Setar service in Alor Setar today. 'As this is their first offence, we are giving them the opportunity to rectify the issues. 'However, if they continue to violate (e-hailing) conditions, their licences may be suspended or cancelled.' In September 2022, the road transport department had raided inDrive's Malaysian office and discovered that the firm was operating with an expired licence. In 2023, Maxim was also raided by Apad officers for allowing vehicles to operate without a valid permit.
Daily Express
26-07-2025
- Daily Express
Portal is sued over allegation
Published on: Saturday, July 26, 2025 Published on: Sat, Jul 26, 2025 Text Size: SMM accused MalaysiaNow of publishing 'numerous allegations which are false, misleading, and defamatory' regarding the purported awarding of a Prospecting Licence (PL) to Bumi Suria, a company linked to prominent businessman and former political aide Datuk Farhash Wafa Salvador Rizal Mubarak. Kota Kinabalu: Sabah Mineral Management Sdn Bhd (SMM) has initiated legal proceedings against news portal MalaysiaNow over allegedly false and defamatory reports concerning the politically-linked company Bumi Suria Sdn Bhd. In a statement, SMM accused MalaysiaNow of publishing 'numerous allegations which are false, misleading, and defamatory' regarding the purported awarding of a Prospecting Licence (PL) to Bumi Suria, a company linked to prominent businessman and former political aide Datuk Farhash Wafa Salvador Rizal Mubarak. 'At no point in time did MalaysiaNow seek SMM's clarification prior to the publication. 'The publications were biased, one-sided, and represent a calculated attempt by MalaysiaNow to defame SMM, its directors, and officers,' SMM stated, adding that it would pursue legal action against any other media outlet that republishes the claims. The lawsuit comes after a series of articles and videos by MalaysiaNow suggesting that SMM had improperly awarded a prospecting licence to Bumi Suria for a 70,000-hectare forest reserve area in Kalabakan and Gunung Rara. SMM rebutted this, reiterating that it has no legal power to issue prospecting or mining licences. It stressed that this authority lies solely with the Sabah Department of Lands and Surveys (JTU) under the Sabah Mining Ordinance 1960. JTU Director Datuk Bernard Liew later confirmed that no mineral-related licence had ever been issued to Bumi Suria. Instead, SMM clarified that it had only issued a 'Conditional Letter of Permission to Apply for a Prospecting Licence' to Bumi Suria following internal board deliberations, stressing that this document did not amount to an approval or issuance of any licence. 'SMM's role is strictly limited to issuing conditional letters of permission to apply for a licence,' it said, adding that such a letter would only be issued after the agency's board of directors had convened to review the application. 'This letter does not confer or award any licence. Interested applicants must submit complete documentation and undergo due diligence by SMM before other related government agencies conduct further checks,' it said. The agency said it had, in the exercise of its functions, considered Bumi Suria's application and issued conditional approval for its application. 'Bumi Suria did not proceed to formally submit any of the required documents for an application,' it added. Consequently, on March 24, 2025, SMM issued an official letter revoking the permission to apply. 'These facts were maliciously omitted by MalaysiaNow,' the agency said. SMM also took issue with the use of a photo of its chief executive officer, Natasha Sim, and her name in connection with an audio recording that they claim does not feature her voice and is not associated with her. 'This deliberate act of misrepresentation is unacceptable and unethical,' it said. The issue has drawn public scrutiny, particularly as SMM has been embroiled in controversy since a series of leaked videos and audio recordings emerged, alleging corrupt practices in the awarding of licences and implicating several Sabah politicians. Two state assemblymen, Datuk Yusof Yaacob (Sindumin) and Datuk Andy Suryady Bandy (Tanjung Batu), are currently facing corruption charges over the scandal. Farhash, a former aide to PKR President Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, has denied allegations that he owned Bumi Suria and that the company had been awarded a mineral prospecting or exploration licence. While confirming he is a director and shareholder, his lawyers have demanded the articles be removed. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
