logo
‘No effective treatment': Man dies in NSW's first case of rare bat disease

‘No effective treatment': Man dies in NSW's first case of rare bat disease

The Age03-07-2025
A man from northern NSW has died in the state's first case of Australian bat lyssavirus, a rare disease closely related to rabies.
Lyssavirus is transmitted from infected bats to humans when bat saliva containing the virus enters the body through a bite or scratch.
The man aged in his 50s died in hospital, NSW Health confirmed on Thursday. 'We express our sincere condolences to the man's family and friends for their tragic loss,' a spokesperson said.
More than 100 people required medical assessment after being bitten or scratched by bats last year, but this is the first confirmed case of the virus in NSW.
Loading
'It is incredibly rare for the virus to transmit to humans, but once symptoms of lyssavirus start in people who are scratched or bitten by an infected bat, sadly there is no effective treatment,' Keira Glasgow, a director in health protection at NSW Health, said on Wednesday.
Glasgow said people should assume any bat in Australia could be carrying lyssavirus, and only trained and vaccinated wildlife workers should handle them.
Lyssavirus is closely related to rabies – one of the most notorious and difficult to treat diseases humans can catch from animals.
Anyone bitten or scratched by a bat must seek urgent medical care. The wound must be washed immediately and thoroughly for 15 minutes with soap and water, then applied with antiseptic containing antivirus properties, such as betadine, and allowed to dry.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Melbourne obstetrician Dr Miranda Robinson pulls out of court battle against Sydney midwife she accused of 'stalking' and 'harassment'
Melbourne obstetrician Dr Miranda Robinson pulls out of court battle against Sydney midwife she accused of 'stalking' and 'harassment'

Sky News AU

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Melbourne obstetrician Dr Miranda Robinson pulls out of court battle against Sydney midwife she accused of 'stalking' and 'harassment'

A Melbourne obstetrician accused of racism and anti-Semitism has withdrawn an application for a personal safety intervention order against a Sydney midwife following a report from Sky News. Dr Miranda Robinson had applied for the order in the Melbourne Magistrates Court, which was scheduled to go to a contested hearing on Monday morning. Instead, the doctor's lawyer told the court her client was withdrawing the application. The development took place after Sky News published an on-air story as well as online report for about the court case on Thursday. Dr Robinson brought the case against Sharon Stoliar after a series of professional and legal complaints lodged by the former midwife-turned-maternity advocate about the obstetrician's social media activity. In earlier submissions to the court, the doctor accused Ms Stoliar of 'stalking' and 'harassment'. Ms Stoliar told Sky News on Monday she could not comment further. 'The matter has been withdrawn and I have no further comments,' Ms Stoliar said. Dr Robinson's lawyer Bernadette Zaydan told Sky News "the withdrawal of the application was conditional upon an agreement reached between the parties". The pair's long-running stoush began in January last year, when Dr Robinson posted to Facebook group Australian and New Zealand Doctors for Palestine, which then boasted 1200 members, calling Ms Stoliar a 'POC [person of colour] and married to a Jewish man' who'd 'been brainwashed' due to her support for Israel, adding: 'I'd be very worried if I were one of her patients.' Ms Stoliar was sent a screenshot of the comment and posted it to her own Instagram account, with the caption 'Post 1 of many where healthcare professionals have participated in making libellous statements against me', making other references to the doctor online as 'anti-Semitic'. She also obtained a private message Dr Robinson had sent another Instagram user in which she describes Ms Stoliar as being linked to the 'Jewish mafia' and whose Jewish family comes from 'dirty, dirty money'. Ms Stoliar filed complaints about Dr Robinson's posts to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) and the Royal Australian New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and also contacted the doctor's employers at St Vincent's and Epworth private hospitals, and Sage Women's Healthcare. The Australian reported in August last year AHPRA had backflipped on a decision to impose conditions on Dr Robinson, instead finding she had 'indicated that she never intentionally meant to cause harm to [Ms Stoliar] and appreciates that [she] may have found the comments to have been hurtful.' It confirmed the doctor had completed 'formal education' on social media use and 'demonstrated her commitment to uphold the professional standards with respect to appropriate conduct on social media.' But Dr Robinson continued to publish offensive posts to social media, in November sharing another post titled 'Z!onism is a mental illness' and commenting she 'loves the Netherlands' after the attacks on Jewish football fans in Amsterdam that month. Bizarrely, Dr Robinson also posted a comment in support of convicted mushroom murderer Erin Patterson to LinkedIn, writing, 'I see someone yet again traumatised by a system that doesn't understand her.' Ms Stoliar then made a second complaint with AHPRA in March this year about the fresh posts, followed by a complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission about the original 'person of colour' post on the basis of racial discrimination, both sighted by Sky News. Spokespeople for both the regulatory body and the commission said they could not comment. In Dr Robinson's earlier submissions filed with the court, she alleges Ms Stoliar's conduct represented a 'pattern of targeted harassment and cyberstalking… [including] doxxing, catfishing, intimidation, threats and online harassment' and a 'campaign to vilify and target [Dr Robinson] for her political views.' She claimed the initial post about Ms Stoliar was made on a 'private' Facebook group that had been created 'to share concerns about the humanitarian impact of the Gaza genocide'. Dr Robinson claimed her contracts with two of the healthcare providers had been terminated as a result of the 'targeted campaign', and that she has experienced 'ongoing fear for her safety and that of her children', 'professional isolation', and had been 'forced out of private practice and lost her admitting rights at the Epworth Hospital, resulting in the estimated loss of $80,000 per month in professional income.' An Epworth spokeswoman said the hospital 'does not comment on individual matters or proceedings before the court.' In last week's interview with Sky News, Ms Stoliar denied she had been harassing Dr Robinson. 'That's not harassment – that's me as a legal citizen of this country accessing my legal right to escalate concerns that I feel are justified,' she said. 'Maybe she's angry that I have chosen not to be silent about it, that I am actually someone who is speaking out about an injustice that I see needs to be dealt with. There needs to be accountability and I don't think she likes that.' Ms Stoliar said she, too, had received threats as a result of Dr Robinson's and other pro-Palestine activists' posts about her, some serious enough to force her to move home. In her second complaint to AHPRA, Ms Stoliar raised concerns for the safety of Dr Robinson's patients, writing: 'Dr Robinson's continued expression of hatred online is alarming, particularly in the context of her role in patient care.' 'I do have concerns for patients who are people of colour or patients who are Jewish, that if these are the views that she holds that where is the line between holding those views and acting on them, even subconsciously?' Ms Stoliar told Sky News last week.

‘Devastating': What these Aussies can't afford
‘Devastating': What these Aussies can't afford

Perth Now

time7 hours ago

  • Perth Now

‘Devastating': What these Aussies can't afford

Four million Australians cannot afford basic personal hygiene and cleaning products, new research suggests. Up to one-in-five people are going without soap, toothpaste, pads and tampons or deodorant, results of a new survey from Good360 suggests. The researchers deem being unable to afford these essentials as 'hygiene poverty'. 'The impacts of hygiene poverty are wide ranging, with our research showing it takes a devastating toll on people's mental and physical wellbeing,' Good360 managing director Alison Covington said. 'Hygiene poverty can cause feelings of low self-esteem, embarrassment and shame, and make it difficult for people to maintain their health.' Women are more likely to be deciding which health essentials they can and cannot afford, the survey shows. Credit: Supplied Good360 donates new and unsold clothes, homewares, toiletries and toys from hundreds of retailers to thousands of Australian charities and schools. The charity has surveyed 1000 Australians to see how many people cannot afford hygiene and cleaning products, and the results were released on Tuesday. One-in-seven survey respondents are unable to afford cleaning products, the survey finds. Women and young people are more likely to experience hygiene poverty. About 30 per cent of people aged 18 to 24 are concerned about affording hygiene and cleaning products, as are 21 per cent of women. 'Our research also highlights the significant consequences on daily life, such as people avoiding social events or other critical commitments such as work and school,' Ms Covington said. As well as personal items, the survey finds large numbers of Australians cannot afford cleaning products. Credit: Supplied 'Eliminating hygiene poverty isn't just about ensuring people have access to toothpaste and deodorant, it's about helping people to live a dignified and healthy life. 'There should not be millions of Australians, including children, going without the basics they need to thrive,' she said. Australian-founded company QV Skincare works with Good360 to help people get basic necessities. QV head of global marketing Simone Thomassen said the findings of hygiene poverty across Australia were alarming. 'We were shocked at Good360 Australia's recent report on hygiene poverty,' she said. 'Nobody should have to experience hygiene poverty in a country like Australia. That's why we are proud to be partnering with leading charity Good360 to donate essential hygiene products to people in need.' Nearly a third of 18-24 year olds and 1-in-5 Australian women are concerned about affording essential hygiene and cleaning products. Credit: Supplied Separate from the Good360 research, the Victorian government announced on Monday an expansion of its free pads and tampons scheme, which has put vending machines in major public markets, libraries, sporting venues and recreation centres. The $23m scheme has dispensed 90,000 hygiene packs since November 2024. 'Whether you're at a footy final or on a school excursion, you shouldn't have to worry about access to pads and tampons,' Victorian Women's Minister Natalie Hutchins said. 'We're delivering free pads and tampons in public places right across Victoria, and now we're making it a reality at some of our most iconic venues – saving Victorian families thousands of dollars every year.' The latest consumer price index data shows health costs having risen 4.1 per cent in the past year, while furnishings, household equipment and services costs have risen 1.1 per cent in the capital cities during the past three months. Food inflation is running at 3 per cent for the past 12 months. Overall, the household inflation rate has ticked up 2.1 per cent during the past year. Wages are outpacing inflation again, with the latest quarterly wage price index data showing a 3.4 per cent rise in annual terms.

Best sunscreen for kids: Reef-friendly sunscreen winning praise from parents: ‘Absolute must-have'
Best sunscreen for kids: Reef-friendly sunscreen winning praise from parents: ‘Absolute must-have'

7NEWS

time20 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

Best sunscreen for kids: Reef-friendly sunscreen winning praise from parents: ‘Absolute must-have'

Shoppers can't get enough of a reef-friendly sunscreen brand that kids actually like wearing. Little Urchin was launched by Aussie dad Christopher Matthews, who wanted an alternative to the chemical-laden SPF brands often used on young children. The result is a dedicated range of natural skin care products, including reef-safe sunscreen, natural moisturisers and a natural tinted sunscreen that parents have described as 'must haves' for their babies and young children. According to Christopher, the name Little Urchin was inspired by the sea urchin, a remarkable creature that produces its own natural sunscreen to protect its young. One of the best-sellers in the range is the Kids Natural Clear Zinc Sunscreen SPF50 ($29.95). This currently has a five-star rating from happy customers, who have written comments like 'amazing' and 'fantastic'. 'My kids like to put it on, not like most zincs, where it's thick and heavy. It applies like normal suncream, but it's still waterproof and provides long protection,' one shopper wrote. ' This is my favourite product ever. It's perfect for all my children, even my daughter who has severe eczema,' another added. Others highlighted that they love the Little Urchin sunscreens because they are easy to apply to their children, as opposed to other brands which kids hate due to stickiness. The Natural Face Sunscreen SPF 50 Clear Zinc ($24.95) is another bestseller. This has been designed specifically as a sunscreen for your face and also boasts five-star reviews. The brand also has zinc sticks and SPF lip balms — which prove invaluable for SPF top-ups on the go. ' Little Urchin is proudly Australian‑made and owned, crafting natural sunscreens, skincare, and lip care that are as kind to your skin as they are to the planet,' founder Christopher tells Best Picks. ' Every product is created with the same care and intention as that very first formula; because I still believe that what we put on our skin should be safe, effective, and inspired by nature.' According to the Cancer Council, when applying sunscreen, you need at least one teaspoon per limb, one for the front of the body, one for the back and one for the head. A full body application for an adult should be at least 35mL or seven teaspoons. It's important to remember that the sun and UV levels are harsh, whether it's sunny, cloudy or raining. With this in mind, wearing a hat, sunglasses and applying sunscreen every couple of hours is an essential way to avoid skin cancer and prevent the signs of ageing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store