NHL playoff predictions 2025: Which teams win first round series and advance in bracket?
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Paul Bissonnette on Ovechkin-Crosby rivalry over last 20 years
NHL on TNT's Paul Bissonnette breaks down the ongoing rivalry between Alex Ovechkin and Sidney Crosby
Sports Seriously
The NHL is rolling out its playoff schedule slowly with two Western Conference games on Saturday and the 2024 champion Florida Panthers not starting their Stanley Cup defense until Tuesday.
The Panthers will face the cross-state rival Tampa Bay Lightning in what could be one of the best series of the first round. The 2024 Western Conference champion Edmonton Oilers will try to make it four years in a row of beating the Los Angeles Kings in the first round.
Which eight teams will make it to the second round?
USA TODAY's Jason Anderson, Mike Brehm and Jace Evans give their predictions for the first round of the 2025 Stanley Cup playoffs:
Jason Anderson: Capitals in 6. The Caps have had some ugly losses in recent weeks to teams that missed the playoffs, including dropping a recent back-to-back pair of games to Columbus by a combined 11-1 score. I'm taking Washington, but with the Habs holding opponents to just 2.4 goals per game over their final 10 regular-season outings, this might be closer than a No. 1-vs.-No. 8 series ought to be.
Mike Brehm: Capitals in 6. The Canadiens are in the same position as the Capitals were last season: clinching on the last game of the season and facing one of the best teams in the league. Those Capitals were swept. These Canadiens won't be, but they are facing a Washington team that has improved in every aspect of the game, even with its late-season issues.
Jace Evans: Capitals in 6. Most of the focus on Washington lately has been on Alex Ovechkin's historic goal chase. While epic, it also obscured the fact that the Caps haven't been playing all that well. Still, the NHL's most surprising team this season should have enough to win this series, particularly if goalie Logan Thompson can return (and return to form).
Carolina Hurricanes vs. New Jersey Devils
Jason Anderson: Hurricanes in 5. Neither of these teams is coming into the playoffs on a hot streak, with ho-hum goaltending and more recent losses than wins. However, Carolina skates too well and is too deep for a Devils team that hasn't figured out how to replace Jack Hughes (shoulder).
Mike Brehm: Hurricanes in 5. The Devils are more than Jack Hughes, but New Jersey will miss his game-breaking ability against a Hurricanes team that doesn't give you much free space.
Jace Evans: Hurricanes in 4. The season-ending injury to Jack Hughes was so deflating for the Devils. It's just hard to imagine them mustering much of a fight without one of the game's top players.
Toronto Maple Leafs vs. Ottawa Senators
Jason Anderson: Maple Leafs in 6. Toronto is clearly the better team here, and is built for playoff hockey. However, no team enters the postseason with a more anxious fanbase thanks to how many times the Leafs have crashed out of the first round (it's eight times in nine postseason trips since the 2004-05 lockout, if you're counting). The Leafs will make it hard on themselves, but they have too much of an edge to pick against them in this series.
Mike Brehm: Maple Leafs in 6. This is when we'll find out how much the coaching change to Craig Berube will help. The Maple Leafs have been good in the regular season and not so good in the playoffs. But Berube has them playing the right way.
Jace Evans: Maple Leafs in 5. Not to be hyperbolic but if the Maple Leafs somehow manage to lose in the first round this year they should fold the franchise. Jokes aside, Toronto is the superior team and has its best opportunity to make a deep run since 2021 ... when it collapsed in the first round against another Canadian team.
Tampa Bay Lightning vs. Florida Panthers
Jason Anderson: Lightning in 7. This one feels like it could be a classic. It's hard to pick against the defending champions, but Florida has been too inconsistent down the stretch to make another long playoff run. Tampa Bay has the edge in goal with Andrei Vasilevskiy, Nikita Kucherov has been spectacular, and that's enough to make the home-ice edge in this series count.
Mike Brehm: Lightning in 6. The Panthers will have to play two games on the road without suspended Aaron Ekblad. And they're facing a Lightning team that made some smart pickups at the trade deadline. The Panthers were busy, too, adding Seth Jones and Brad Marchand, but they also have had injury issues.
Jace Evans: Lightning in 6. Beyond questions about Matthew Tkachuk's health (and effectiveness after so much time away), Florida has just played an awful lot of hockey the last two years. It's very hard to make three consecutive runs to the Stanley Cup Final and it's an even bigger ask to begin that journey on the road against a team as good as Tampa.
Winnipeg Jets vs. St. Louis Blues
Jason Anderson: Jets in 6. The Presidents' Trophy has been a bit of a curse, but it's hard to pick against Winnipeg in this series. The Blues have played the Jets close this season, but St. Louis gives away too many chances in front and has too much trouble killing penalties to convert that into a major upset.
Mike Brehm: Jets in 5. The Jets play a strong defensive game and Connor Hellebuyck is heading toward a second consecutive Vezina Trophy. That didn't help him in last season's playoffs, when he was blown out by Colorado, but the Blues aren't the Avalanche and don't have their firepower.
Jace Evans: Blues in 6. Connor Hellebuyck is the best goalie in the world. But he's been a disaster the prior two postseasons. The Jets were the best team in the league this year. But no Presidents' Trophy winner has made the Stanley Cup Final since 2013 and only two since then have even made the conference finals (2015 and 2024 Rangers). I'm picking the upset.
Dallas Stars vs. Colorado Avalanche
Jason Anderson: Avalanche in 6. Plenty of data points suggest the Avs' record isn't quite as good as it should be, and that Dallas has had a bit of luck on its side. It's also impossible to ignore that the Stars enter the playoffs on a shocking seven-game losing streak. Despite Dallas having home ice, Colorado's scoring depth should be able to wear the Stars down.
Mike Brehm: Avalanche in 5. I had toyed with picking the Stars to reach the Stanley Cup Final. But that was before they cratered down the stretch. If Miro Heiskanen remains out and Jason Robertson misses time, Dallas will have a tough time.
Jace Evans: Avalanche in 7. The Stars are deep and seem like a title contender once again ... but they don't have the same level of star-power Colorado has. Nathan MacKinnon and Cale Makar will help the Avs find a way.
Vegas Golden Knights vs. Minnesota Wild
Jason Anderson: Golden Knights in 5. Vegas won all three regular-season meetings, and while the Wild have the best goalie in the series in Filip Gustavsson, Minnesota is also one of two teams to get into the playoffs despite a negative goal difference (-11) on the season. The Golden Knights are the stronger team top to bottom.
Mike Brehm: Golden Knights in 6. The Golden Knights lost key players to free agency but are a deeper team because of the emergence of players such as Pavel Dorofeyev. They didn't even make a stunning move at the deadline, just bringing back Reilly Smith. The Golden Knights have plenty of leftovers from the 2023 Stanley Cup champions and could go far.
Jace Evans: Golden Knights in 6. Minnesota has gotten healthy at the right time, but Vegas is a deep, balanced group that is loaded with championship experience. The Wild haven't won a playoff series since 2015.
Los Angeles Kings vs. Edmonton Oilers
Jason Anderson: Kings in 6. It's NHL tradition at this point for the Kings and Oilers to play in the first round, but this year Los Angeles finally gets one over on Edmonton. Darcy Kuemper gives the Kings an edge between the pipes, and it's impossible to assume the Oilers' long list of dinged-up players can be at their best.
Mike Brehm: Kings in 7. The Kings are dominant at home and they have home-ice advantage in this series. The Oilers will miss injured Mattias Ekholm.
Jace Evans: Oilers in 7. The Oilers were hit by the injury bug about as hard as any team in the playoffs, and there remains eternal questions about their goaltending. And yet, if the big guns are in the lineup, I just trust they'll find a way to score goals and beat the Kings — as they have the prior three years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
16 minutes ago
- New York Times
Getting a new CBA without a lockout is bad, actually: The Contrarian returns
It's late July, we're two months away from games that matter, and NHL GMs have apparently taken the rest of the summer off. Let's get Contrarian. This is the feature where you send in your most obvious takes, and I tell you that you're wrong, whether I believe it or not. In the past, we've made the case that Mark Messier was a great Canuck, Ray Bourque's Cup win was bad, but Brett Hull's crease goal was good and Bobby Orr's flying goal photo is overrated. Last time, we made the case for Alex Ovechkin being an overrated bum, and also for Alex Ovechkin being an underrated legend, because we're flexible like that. Advertisement This time, we've got a new CBA, an old legend and everything in between. Let's dive in. Note: Submissions have been edited for clarity and style. The NHL and NHLPA agreeing on a new CBA quickly and without any work-stoppage drama is a good thing. — Kevin S. On the contrary, Kevin S., you twit. Unless, of course, you're an owner. Are you an owner, Kevin? Are you? Because if not, you should be concerned about what we just saw play out. We had the two sides of this multibillion-dollar industry come together, and the result was a one-sided victory for the owners, one that appeared to come with next to no resistance from the players. Sure, they got a few minor concessions in the form of payroll taxes and an increased playoff fund. But in today's NHL, those 'wins' represent pennies on the dollar. Meanwhile, the owners got more games, shorter contracts and smaller bonuses. And they'll keep all the coming expansion money, a multibillion-dollar windfall that the players didn't even seem to try to get a piece of. And sure, you can see why it played out that way. After all, this is Gary Bettman's NHL, where history shows us how these things usually go. If the players try to stand up for themselves, even a little, Bettman shuts everything down. Sometimes the players win, sometimes they lose, and sometimes nobody's even sure, but it always comes with a cost in a league where careers are short. When it comes to work stoppages, Bettman isn't bluffing. He's proven that over the years. So why even try? The position was summed up perfectly by a player quoted in this excellent piece. 'What can we do? There can't be another lockout,' the player said. 'Those don't go our way. It's better to get it done.' 'What can we do?' indeed. That's rational, on some level. But it's not healthy. And it's not fair to the players, who are the reason we watch this league. Nobody thinks that Marty Walsh should have come in with guns blazing, trying to recreate the animosity of the Bob Goodenow era. But if this were a hockey fight, it sure looks like the owners wiggled their gloves and the players immediately turtled. Advertisement After three decades of Bettman's 'shut it down' approach, we now have labor peace. But that peace apparently just means the players roll over without any sign of a fight, while the owners tilt the ice even further at every opportunity. That's good news for fans who just wanted to watch hockey without hearing from the accountants and mediators. But it's not a good thing for the game. The 4 Nations Face-Off was an overwhelming success for the NHL. — James On the contrary, James, you clodpoll. Was it fun? Of course. Did it blow away expectations? I'd say so. Did the best team win? Indisputably. But that last bit is the problem. You're talking about what's best for the NHL. And when it comes to best-on-best tournaments, here's what's best for the NHL: Team USA finally winning one of these things. That's it. That's what needs to happen. If you could hook Bettman and friends and up to lie detectors, they'd tell you that's the whole point. From the league's perspective, shutting down a season for a best-on-best showdown is ultimately a marketing exercise. And when it comes to marketing this sport in the USA, only one result moves the needle. And Team Canada winning — again, like they always do — isn't it. Short of a Team USA win, this year's tournament delivered everything you could ask for, including a signature moment: The infamous Nine Seconds from the round robin, the rare hockey game that seemed to take over the sports discourse for days. Fans of other sports were hooked because what they were watching didn't look anything like the leagues they were used to. Unfortunately, it didn't look much like the modern NHL either, meaning that wild night in Montreal couldn't draw in new fans on its own. The tournament needed the right outcome, and it didn't get it. American sports fans will dip in to sample best-on-best hockey, as the record ratings for the 4 Nations final show. But they want to see a happy ending. They didn't get it this year, just like they didn't in 2002 or 2010 or any other year beyond 1996, which is too long ago to matter. And that's why they don't stick around. Less than four months later, we got a Stanley Cup Final featuring a rematch between Connor McDavid, who scored the OT winner, and Matthew Tkachuk, who worked hard to make himself the face of Team USA. Nobody watched. Advertisement (Well, they watched in Canada, as they always do. But the NHL has been clear over the years: When it comes to Canada, the only priority is to cash as big a check as possible from Sportsnet every decade or so. Beyond that, they couldn't care less.) The bottom line: There's a reason that the typical American sports fan still thinks a round-robin upset from 1980 is the most important hockey game ever played. Until a Team USA can deliver that sort of moment again, nothing is going to be a 'success' for the NHL, in any way that matters to league leadership. American players can keep kicking the can down the road, always telling us that the next tournament is the one that matters. But eventually, they're going to need to do more than talk a good game. The decentralized draft was awful, and the GMs of this league proved their incompetence by voting for its return. — Jackson S. On the contrary, Jackson, you dumbbell. I mean, you're right about the first part — the decentralized draft that we all watched a few weeks ago was, indeed, awful. I wrote that at the time, and not many of you disagreed. But was it awful because it was a decentralized draft? Or was it awful because it was the first decentralized draft (of the modern era, that wasn't forced on us by a pandemic)? Or did the NHL just try a few things that didn't work, in a way they can learn from and fix for next year's edition? The answer is we don't know. But we'll find out, because they're doing it again next year. That's upset some fans, especially the kind of whiny babies who never like anything. But the reality is that we had decades of centralized drafts and one year of the alternative. We can't know if the new way can work. All we know is that it didn't, once. The league deserves a chance to ditch the cringey Zoom interviews, figure out a way to speed things along and try again. If that one stinks, then fine, attack the GMs if they insist on sticking with it. Just not yet. Comment sections are trash. — Paul W. On the contrary, Paul, you (tries to think of the most insulting label possible), commenter. Comment sections can be great … sometimes. If I had to guess, I'd bet that 90 percent of the commenters on a typical post of mine are pretty cool, even if they don't agree with what they've just read. Of course, that number can get a lot higher depending on whose post it is and what the subject matter might be. I generally get to play on easy mode, because how fired up can you really get over stuff like this? I've seen some really interesting discussions break out in my comment sections, not to mention having some really neat suggestions for future posts. Advertisement But it doesn't take much to ruin the vibe, even if 90 percent of people are cool — nobody's fine with 10 percent turd content in their punchbowl. And yeah, some of you are just weird. That includes the garden variety trolls and those who've made a permanent state of grievance into their whole personality. It also includes some sports- and hockey-specific types, like the super-homers, or the 'slow news day?' slugs, or the Leaf-pilled anti-fans who make everything about one team and then complain about it, or the single-issue obsessives, or the stick-to-sports losers, or Bruins fans. It is what it is. So what can you do? Not much, unfortunately. You can ignore the troll, upvote the first guy telling them they're an idiot, and then move on. (Piling on in the same thread just makes it look like that comment is the most important one on the piece.) Other than that, just be cool, remind yourself that we're talking about a game here, and remember that sometimes it's OK to just not post anything. That story about the Oilers learning how to win from the Islanders in 1983 is one of hockey's best. — Sean M. On the contrary, Sean, you … wait, this is me. I'm submitting my own questions. That's kind of pathetic, but in my defense, I basically asked you guys to send this one in a few weeks ago and nobody took the bait. So yeah, on the contrary, Sean, you absolute beauty. The Oilers/Islanders story is bad, and we need to stop bringing it up every year at playoff time. If you've somehow missed it, the story goes like this: It's 1983 and the upstart young Oilers are facing the Islanders in the Stanley Cup Final. They're the better team, in terms of regular-season record, and have all the pieces in place. But the Islanders are a dynasty, having won three straight Cups. Sure enough, the Isles sweep the series. After the deciding game, various Oilers players (including Wayne Gretzky and Mark Messier in most tellings) walk by New York's dressing room, expecting to see a raucous celebration. Instead, they see a bunch of beaten-up players with ice packs, barely celebrating at all because of how much they've left on the ice. At that moment, the Oilers finally understand what it takes to be a winner, and they go on to beat those same Islanders one year later for the first of five Cups in seven years. Here's Gretzky himself spinning the tale: It's an awesome story. You can see why fans love it. It's also completely fake. I mean, come on. Let's use some common sense. We're supposed to believe that the Islanders have just won the Stanley Cup, and they're all sitting in their locker room with the door open for some reason. Nobody's celebrating. Nobody's happy. They're just all strapping ice packs to their broken limbs or whatever, not even so much as cracking a beer, even though just a few minutes earlier they looked like this. Advertisement You're buying that? Really? Because if so, I'm inviting you over to play the new Super Mario that I got from my uncle, who works at Nintendo. Now, does this mean I'm calling Gretzky a liar? Not necessarily. He's not a historian, he's a storyteller, and he's going back 40-plus years for this one. He's not making things up out of nothing. I don't doubt that he may have walked past that room, and maybe things weren't as boisterous as he expected. He's just exaggerating, being dramatic and shaping a story over the decades in a way that plays best. But what he's describing didn't happen that way. And if you don't believe me, why not ask somebody who was there: Islanders' legend Bryan Trottier. He was on a podcast a few months ago and mentioned the legend of the quiet dressing room. He says it's not true, or at least not accurate, the way Gretzky tells it. 'That's not the way we remember it,' he says. Instead, he says that somebody told the Islanders players when the Oilers were on their way past the room, so they quieted down the ongoing celebration out of respect for their opponent, not wanting to seem like they were rubbing it in. But they were celebrating. Of course they were. They'd just won the Stanley Cup! That version makes sense, and squares with where Gretzky (and others) got this idea in the first place. But over the years, it's morphed into the Islanders' post-Cup room being a morgue. That's not true, it was never true, and it's not a good lesson about how to win. When you achieve a lifelong dream, you absolutely should celebrate. And the Islanders did. You know who else did? The Oilers! If the story had really played out the way the modern version does, and was so instrumental to Edmonton learning how to win, shouldn't their celebrations have been muted? Instead, this is the team that invented the Cup handoffs and team photos and maybe did some other things. Does that sound like a team that had learned that the key to winning was being too beat up to be happy about it? No, because that never happened. Let's stop pretending it did. If you'd like to submit a take for future editions of The Contrarian, you can do that here. (Photo of Islanders' Bryan Trottier hoisting the Stanley Cup in 1983: Bruce Bennett Studios via Getty Images Studios / Getty Images)
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Evaluating Warriors' Jonathan Kuminga options as free agency stalemate drags on
The post Evaluating Warriors' Jonathan Kuminga options as free agency stalemate drags on appeared first on ClutchPoints. Over three weeks have passed since the NBA free agency window opened, and there is still no word on when a resolution will come for the Golden State Warriors and restricted free agent Jonathan Kuminga. When the Dubs first drafted Kuminga, they did so because the young wing had the potential to be the next guy in Golden State to help usher in a new era. Maybe Kuminga can still be this type of player given all of his untapped potential, but it continues to look unlikely that his long-term future will be with the Warriors. James Wiseman is no longer with the Dubs, and neither is Jordan Poole. All that remains from the 'two-timeline approach' Bob Myers attempted to put together is Kuminga and Moses Moody. Whether or not Kuminga remains with the Warriors is the biggest question remaining this offseason, and it is not far-fetched to believe he is the next young talent to depart Golden State. After all, he has been at odds with head coach Steve Kerr over the last year, and Kerr has stated multiple times that he doesn't view the 22-year-old as an ideal fit with Stephen Curry, Draymond Green, and Jimmy Butler. At this point, Kuminga and the Warriors are stuck in a holding pattern. This is especially true after the two sides met in Las Vegas during NBA Summer League. Is there still potential for a Jonathan Kuminga sign-and-trade? The Warriors and Kuminga's side have talked at length multiple times since their season ended in the Western Conference semifinals. While these conversations have been described as very 'fluid and open-ended,' no progress has truly been made between the two parties, sources told ClutchPoints. Overall, it has become clear that Kuminga would rather continue his career with another team than with the Warriors. At NBA Summer League, the Warriors again met with Kuminga's representation to talk about all of the different options available at this point in the offseason. With no sign-and-trade materializing, the common belief around the league is that Kuminga would return to the Warriors on a smaller contract than he is asking for, with the understanding he will be moved before the trade deadline in February. Well, Kuminga and his camp haven't come down on their asking price, and the Warriors have not increased their offer, which sits between $20 million and $23 million per season on a smaller contract than what is desired by the player. As a result, Kuminga and his representation have been in contact with several other teams around the league in attempts to kick-start a market. Near the start of free agency, it was the Sacramento Kings who made an aggressive push for Kuminga. The Kings have signaled that they are willing to part ways with talents like Devin Carter, Dario Saric, and a protected first-round pick for the Warriors' forward. This is a proposal that Golden State has not given any thought to and immediately turned down. Malik Monk is another name who has come up in trade talks from Sacramento this offseason, but his contract isn't one that the Dubs have expressed interest in. Keegan Murray and Keon Ellis are two players the Warriors would likely want in a potential sign-and-trade with their in-division rivals. However, the Kings have given zero indications that they will part ways with either player, especially given the notion that Kuminga wants out. The other issue surrounding the Kings and their Kuminga pursuit is that they are hard-capped at the first apron and only have about $7 million in wiggle room. So, if the Kings were to bring Kuminga in via a sign-and-trade on a contract worth at least $25 million per season, they would need to find a way to cut at least $18 million in salary, hence the talk of Monk being the player who would be moved. Right now, there aren't any indications suggesting that the Kings are on the verge of striking a deal here. Other teams with rumored interest in Kuminga are the Chicago Bulls, Phoenix Suns, and Brooklyn Nets. Then again, the Nets, who have plenty of cap space, have yet to express serious interest in Kuminga. If they wanted to, Brooklyn could sign Kuminga to an offer sheet right now and escalate this situation. This doesn't seem like a path the Nets will go down this summer, but things could change quickly based on what happens with Cam Thomas' situation. The Bulls are also in a holding pattern since Josh Giddey is a restricted free agent. While Giddey wants to be paid like Jalen Suggs and Immanuel Quickley, two guards who recently got five-year extensions that pay them over $30 million per season, Chicago has made it clear that they won't be giving the Australian guard this kind of money. If the Bulls are to pursue Kuminga, they won't be getting rid of guard Coby White to do so, sources said. It has been made clear the Bulls hold no interest in trading White, and it's also unlikely Golden State would pursue veteran center Nikola Vucevic in a sign-and-trade for Kuminga. As a result, players like Ayo Dosunmu and Jalen Smith loom large as potential assets Chicago can offer up for Kuminga. In terms of the Suns' interest in Kuminga, this has existed since the trade deadline when Golden State was on the verge of acquiring Kevin Durant, sources said. Kuminga was one of the main assets who would have gone to Phoenix in the deal that was basically agreed upon before Durant shut it down. Phoenix is not actively searching up and down their roster to find a way to add Kuminga, but that level of interest from the trade deadline has not gone away. If they can land the young forward at a reasonable price, both contract-wise and in terms of assets going out, the Suns would be open to doing so. So far, the Suns are basically in the same boat as the Kings. Their offer, as previously reported to include Grayson Allen, isn't of interest to the Warriors. Although Allen is a good player on the perimeter, he still has three more years left on his contract, including the 2025-26 season. Golden State does not want to run into a problem where its cap sheets are spread out across multiple years, and they are currently operating on a two-year window with its current core. Stephen Curry, Jimmy Butler, and Draymond Green are all under contract through the 2026-27 season. Steve Kerr's contract runs through then as well. The Dubs' main problem is that there simply isn't a market for Kuminga right now. Since they aren't getting offers that intrigue them and the two sides remain far apart in negotiations, the next question many are asking is whether Kuminga would consider taking a chance on himself for one year. A qualifying offer agreement is Warriors' worst nightmare If things go south between Kuminga and the Warriors in negotiations, and the team continues to essentially hold him hostage when it comes to sign-and-trade scenarios, then the 22-year-old may be forced to take a bet on himself. As a restricted free agent, Kuminga was extended a $7.9 million qualifying offer by Golden State. This is a standard one-year offer that must be given to a player entering restricted free agency, assuming the team wants to maintain its rights on said player. That is the case here with Kuminga and the Warriors, as they don't want to lose him for nothing. The longer this stalemate drags on, the more questions will be asked about whether Kuminga will take control of the situation and possibly accept his qualifying offer. In doing so, he would basically lock himself in with the Warriors on a one-year contract that contains a no-trade clause. Golden State would not be able to flip Kuminga before the trade deadline without his permission, and he would become an unrestricted free agent in 2026. Essentially, the Warriors would lose complete control of Kuminga and not be able to do anything about it. However, why would Kuminga and his camp do this other than to create a nightmare scenario for the Warriors? Not only would Kuminga run the risk of getting injured with Golden State before signing a long-term, high-paying contract, but he would also be stuck in a system that doesn't fit him. If he were to accept this qualifying offer, what is stopping the Warriors from continuing to bench him at times and this becoming a toxic situation? This isn't a smart move for Kuminga early in his career, as it's not like the market would change all of a sudden for him after one year unless he were to have an All-Star-like season with the Warriors. So, if there isn't a sign-and-trade right now and the qualifying offer is just a threat at this point, when should we expect a resolution to Golden State's offseason? When will the Jonathan Kuminga situation be resolved? This is the biggest question Warriors fans want to know. There is no deadline for Kuminga to sign, and he has no reason to be in a rush. On the flip side of things, the Warriors obviously want to find a solution sooner rather than later, as it has held up their entire offseason to this point. The common belief among NBA personnel and rival teams who pursued both players is that Al Horford and De'Anthony Melton have agreements in place with the Warriors. However, neither player can sign and officially hit the Dubs' cap sheet until Kuminga's situation is figured out because Golden State needs every dollar below the first apron to maintain flexibility in discussions. If the Warriors were to sign players to minimum deals or utilize their mid-level exception in Horford's case, then any other team could swoop in and sign Kuminga to an offer sheet. As a result, Golden State would be in 'checkmate' since they wouldn't be able to match Kuminga's deal with another team. In recent days, it has also become clear that the Warriors' interest in Seth Curry, Steph's brother, is mutual. Seth was a player we reported on last week for Golden State, with league personnel beginning to link him to the Dubs during NBA Summer League. While anything is possible, the Kuminga situation isn't expected to have a clear resolution entering August. Until either side budges or a team swoops in with a valid sign-and-trade offer, the Warriors will continue to go around in circles with the young forward. A return to the Warriors is still in play. Should this occur, then all eyes will shift to January 15, the date when Kuminga would become available to be dealt before February's trade deadline. Related: Warriors rumors: Insider confirms Seth Curry 'mutual interest' Related: Warriors' Stephen Curry tells funny bowling story involving LeBron, 4-year-old Bronny
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Rangers' Brett Berard played with shoulder tear for most of season
Access the Rangers beat like never before Join Post Sports+ for exciting subscriber-only features, including real-time texting with Mollie Walker about the inside buzz on the Rangers. tRY IT NOW Brett Berard revealed that he tore his labrum in his shoulder during his fourth NHL game last season, which lingered throughout the remainder of the 2024-25 campaign before forcing him to withdraw from Team USA at the 2025 World Championship. 'That happened [on Nov. 30] against Montreal, right when I got called up,' the 22-year-old said Thursday before participating in the Shoulder Check Showcase at Terry Conners Rink in Stamford, Conn. 'Just kind of lingered all year, wore a brace all year. It was good to kind of get that situated. It feels good, it feels strong. So just trying to get it all better, but we feel a lot better now.' Advertisement No surgery was required, and Berard expects to be 100 percent ready to go for training camp. At the time of the injury, Berard had just been called up for the first time since the Rangers drafted him No. 134 overall in 2020. After the injury, the Rhode Island native missed just three games before returning to the lineup. Advertisement Brett Berard plays in the third annual Shoulder Check hockey showcase game at Terry Conners Rink on July 24, 2025, in Stamford, CT. Corey Sipkin for New York Post 'It was really just kind of a normal hit, I just went in weird. … It didn't feel great at all,' said Berard, who appeared in 35 games last season with the Rangers. 'I was out for a week or so. But it's one of those things where you're up in the NHL, you work your whole life for it. I felt like I was playing pretty good hockey, too, so you don't want to really lose that. So, just tried to play through it.' As first reported by The Post in May, Berard pulled out of the international tournament at the last minute due to what was described as 'physical limitations' at the time. Berard said he committed, skated once or twice and his shoulder didn't feel great. Advertisement Brett Berard plays in the third annual Shoulder Check hockey showcase game at Terry Conners Rink on July 24, 2025, in Stamford, CT. Corey Sipkin for New York Post When he realized he'd have no rehab time, Berard made the tough decision not to participate in the tournament. The injury hasn't affected his offseason training. Read the expert take on the Blueshirts Sign up for Larry Brooks' Inside the Rangers, a weekly Sports+ exclusive. Thank you Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Enjoy this Post Sports+ exclusive newsletter! Check out more newsletters Advertisement 'It stunk. I was rooting for everybody, it was awesome to see them win gold there,' Berard said of Team USA, which won its first standalone world championship title since 1933. 'It makes you a little bit jealous, but I know a ton of those guys, a lot of best friends with them. So it was awesome to watch them. … It was deserved. They had a great team. It was a ton of fun to watch them, but it did stink.'
