Sukhbir Badal declared 'Tankhaiya' by Takht Patna Sahib for failing to appear before it
Sources said the decision is an outcome of Sukhbir's failure to appear before the Takht despite being summoned twice.
It is understood that this development would further escalate clashes between Sikh religious authorities and political figures.
Badal was called to present himself before the panj pyaras (five beloved ones) following allegations related to his role in supporting individuals found guilty of violating a 'hukamnama' (religious edict).
While making this announcement, Takht Patna Sahib Jathedar Giani Baldev Singh said, "This action has been taken in view of the events that began on May 21 when unauthorized and unconstitutional interference was carried out by the Jathedars of Akal Takht and Takht Sri Damdama Sahib, challenging the established norms, constitution and authority of Takht Patna Sahib. Sukhbir Badal was involved in influencing and interfering with the affairs of Takht Patna Sahib, particularly during a series of controversial decisions and actions surrounding the status of fromer Patna Sahib Jathedar Giani Ranjit Singh Gohar.''
Despite repeated summons, Badal did not appear before the Panj Pyaras (five beloved ones) at the Takht Patna Sahib. However, citing ill health Badal had sought more time thus thereafter the takht in mid-June issued a fresh edict granting him twenty days more to appear before the Takht.
"Badal was given two opportunities to appear and present his position, but he failed to do so. Even after an extension of twenty days reportedly granted at the request of Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) president Harjinder Singh Dhami, Badal did not comply. By repeatedly ignoring the summons and undermining the authority of Takht Patna Sahib, Badal has violated the religious code. As a result, he is hereby declared Tankhayia,'' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
Sikh Regiment In British Army Soon? Here's What We Know
Curated By : Last Updated: July 28, 2025, 20:10 IST News18 Is the United Kingdom considering having a Sikh regiment in its forces? Several media reports have emerged recently hinting that the British Army is considering a proposal to induct a Sikh regiment. However, the UK's Ministry of Defence has denied, saying there are no such proposals in this regard. 'We want to do something to recognise Sikh contributions in some way, but not through a Sikh regiment," sources in the defence ministry told Times of India . The issue came into the limelight after Lord Sahota, a member of the House of Lords, asked UK defence minister Lord Coaker in the House of Lords on July 7 regarding the progress on having a Sikh regiment in the British Army. Coaker said, 'Let me consider that request from my noble friend. I am quite happy to meet him and see what more we can do to recognise the contribution of soldiers such as Sikhs." Coaker's remark led to media headlines like 'UK considering to have Sikh Regiment." Lord Sahota's grandfathers have served in the British Indian army, including the 15th Punjab Regiment. Speaking to TOI , he said he does not think this proposal will not against the UK Equality Act, highlighting the Staffordshire Regiment, Brigade of Gurkhas, the Royal Yorkshire Regiment, Royal Welsh and Royal Regiment of Scotland. As per the TOI report, there are around 200 Sikhs in the British Armed Forces at present. Swipe Left For Next Video View all The Sikh Regiment's origins are found within the British East India Company Army. Sikh soldiers were notably recruited following the First Anglo-Sikh War (1845–46) and even more extensively after the Second Anglo-Sikh War (1848–49). Serving with distinction as part of the British Indian Army, the Sikh Regiment played a significant role in both World War I and World War II. During the First World War, over 100,000 Sikhs were part of the British Indian Army, with a number of Sikh soldiers receiving the Victoria Cross, the highest British military honour. For the Second World War, more than 300,000 Sikhs served in the Indian Army. Saurabh Verma Saurabh Verma covers general, national and international day-to-day news for as a Senior Sub-editor. He keenly observes politics. You can follow him on Twitter -- Saurabh Verma covers general, national and international day-to-day news for as a Senior Sub-editor. He keenly observes politics. You can follow him on Twitter -- view comments News world Sikh Regiment In British Army Soon? Here's What We Know Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India Today
9 hours ago
- India Today
Demand for Sikh regiment in British Army peaks, minister says open to idea
Following calls for a dedicated Sikh regiment in the British Army, comprising members of the community in the UK, the Keir Starmer-led government has said that it's open to the idea. Earlier this month, Labour peer Lord Kuldip Singh Sahota raised the issue in the House of Lords, citing the loyalty and courage of Sikh soldiers in both World Wars, The UK Defence Journal Defence Minister Vernon Rodney Coaker expressed his willingness to discuss the matter with the Sikh in July, Sahota, in the House of Lords, asked about progress on long-standing calls for such a unit in the British responded that he was open to discussions, saying, "I am quite happy to meet him (Sahota) to see what more we can do to recognise the contribution of soldiers such as Sikhs, and those of many other faiths as well".Notably, according to The Royal Logistic Corps Association, there were 130 Sikh soldiers in the British Army and another 70 serving across defence forces in 2019. However, media reports estimate that the number of Sikh soldiers in the British Army to have risen to around 160 in Minister Coaker, in the first week of July, pointed to the Victory over Japan Day commemorations on August 15, as a moment to reflect on the global wartime sacrifices of the British forces. "Not least among that were the Sikhs of the world, who played a valiant part," the UK Defence Journal quoted him as no firm commitment was made, the conversation signals fresh momentum to acknowledge Sikh military history in the British Armed A NEW IDEA TO HAVE SIKH REGIMENT IN THE BRITISH ARMYThis isn't a new 2015, Armed Forces Minister Mark Francois told the House of Commons that General Nicholas Carter, then-Chief of the General Staff, was reviewing the feasibility of a Sikh unit, possibly a reserve Defence Minister Sir Nicholas Soames urged the government to "do away with political correctness" and establish the regiment, praising the "extraordinary gallant and distinguished service by Sikhs to this country down the generations".Francois had in 2015 noted the proposal's merits, saying it was raised by several MPs and was under consideration. The discussions emphasised carrying forward the traditions of Sikh regiments from the British Indian Army, though no action ASSOCIATED WITH BRITISH ARMY SINCE MID-19TH CENTURYSikhs have served in the British military since the 1840s, after the annexation of the Sikh Empire in British colonisers, to bolster their grip, categorised military regiments in the British Indian Army by caste, religion, and region, designating Sikhs, Gurkhas, Jats, Rajputs, Nagas, and many others as "martial races" that were suited for recruited heavily from Punjab after the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny or the First War of Independence, as the community was deemed divisive strategy prioritised military utility over the cultural depth of the Sikhs transformed this imposed label into a legacy of the late 19th century, Sikhs were a cornerstone of the British Indian Army, serving in regiments like the Sikh Regiment and Punjab per the UK Defence Journal, in World War I, over 1,00,000 Sikhs fought in France, East Africa, Mesopotamia, and Gallipoli, earning Victoria Crosses in battles like Neuve were less than 2% of British India's population but 20% of its World War II, 3,00,000 Sikhs served in North Africa, Italy, and Southeast Asia, their impact huge in combat and support roles, the journal also India's Independence, the Sikhs became a part of the Indian Army, though some still serve in the UK LEGACY CAN LINK COLONIAL TIES TO MODERN BRITAINA Sikh regiment would be similar to the Brigade of Gurkhas, which recruits from Nepal and Indian Nepali-speaking communities, linking colonial ties with today's British Army.A Sikh regiment could do the same for Britain as the Gurkha Regiment has, boosting diversity in the British 2015 push did not yield results, but Coaker's openness a decade later could signal a shift in the British Army.- Ends advertisement
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
10 hours ago
- First Post
Why illegal migrants are a bigger crisis for UK than US
Migrants becoming a hot button issue in the US has so engrossed the media space that similar crises in other Western countries, especially the UK, have almost escaped notice read more Britain has to face up to the fact that it is no longer an Empire with millions of acres of land at its disposal; it is a tiny island which is trying desperately to keep its faltering economy above the water. Representational image: REUTERS A photograph of anti-migrant protesters at London's Canary Wharf last week in an inside page of a major British daily this week included a Sikh waving a placard saying 'Stop calling us Far Right. Protect our women & children' and there was at least one other south Asian in the frame. But the overwhelming impression in the British media is that only gangs of white, Far-Right thugs are on the rampage to stop the influx of poor, starving, non-white asylum seekers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD That is clearly not the correct picture, as a few candid photos show. It's not only the white nativists who are alarmed at the boatloads of 'asylum seekers' arriving on British shores to increase the burden on already inadequate public services—even as scores of more prosperous Britons flee to escape rising taxes. Britons with businesses struggling to survive or even those living in neighbourhoods where changing demographics have caused huge tensions are worried. Migrants becoming a hot button issue in the US—a country built by successive generations of emigration from Europe and elsewhere—has so engrossed the media space that similar crises in other Western countries, especially the UK, have almost escaped notice. And yet, given that the UK has such a large population of what is largely now third or fourth generation British-Indians, the warning signals should be heeded about rising public apprehensions about migrants. Many of those agitated on both sides of the migration issue are unable to understand that all migrants are not the same; nor are their intentions. Former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's parents, for instance, did not go to Britain from East Africa to live off welfare and create mini ethnic enclaves. They were hardworking professionals who contributed meaningfully to their adoptive country and assimilated even as they preserved their own cultural best practices. The waves of migrants who have arrived in Britain in the 21st century do not all fall into the Sunaks' category of new arrivals. Many of them have made little effort to support themselves financially and far too many of them have been unable to integrate with or even understand the society they are now part of. And the incomprehension is mutual because the newcomers are not very willing to let the locals into their close-knit social and even religious network. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The result is the latest phase of unrest and demonstrations at hotels in various English counties that have been mandated by the government to house migrants. And the catalyst—several recent violent incidents in the UK allegedly linked to migrants—make President Donald Trump's views on similar happenings in the US seem scarily prophetic. Except that Britain is far smaller and more densely populated than the US and therefore more vulnerable to rising tensions. It is germane to note that the people preemptively described as 'asylum seekers and refugees' arriving in the UK by boats across the English Channel from Europe are mostly Muslim and mostly from the Middle East, from Iran to Syria, though the two largest nationalities right now are Pakistani and Afghan. Ukrainians are another cohort. In 2024, a record 1.8 lakh asylum applications were made in the UK (the highest since 2002) and most of them were permitted to stay. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The trial and sentencing of an 18-year-old Somali-British national to 52 years in jail for killing three girls (aged 6 to 8, each was stabbed over 80 times) revealed that he had been flagged thrice in the five years before his murderous rampage, but investigators did not act on any of the complaints. The same reluctance to follow up cases of Pakistani-British men grooming and sexually exploiting white girls in northern England also showed institutional laxness. That has given rise to very justified fears among the public that their government is not willing to understand the ramifications of years of deference to multiculturalism, and that its institutions are chary of taking action for fear of being pulled up for racism. Protesters also believe if something is not done to regulate the flow of different kinds of migrants—winnowing out freeloaders and allowing in only those who can benefit the UK—there will be hell to pay. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Branding all anti-illegal-migrant protesters as 'Far Right' does not do any cause any favours. The key word is 'illegal' which is often deliberately omitted in reports to further the narrative that opposition to this ingress comes only from one quarter. There is also a big difference between migrants and asylum seekers. Migrants can be qualified professionals moving for career advancement, but the latter almost always implies that the state will have to look after them Lodging migrants, whether families or single men, in hotels situated in small communities pending processing is also an ill-thought measure, as integration there is even more difficult than in big cities. An Ethiopian asylum seeker arrested and charged this month with trying to forcibly kiss a local teenager in one such small community—to which he has registered a plea of not guilty—highlights the inherent danger of summarily accommodating migrants just anywhere. Opting to house asylum seekers in cities also draws flak as can be seen from the uproar over a four-star hotel in London's once glitzy Canary Wharf being kitted out with new mattresses, sanitaryware etc to house migrants. Instances of local police forces escorting 'pro-migrant' activists to places where the 'anti-migrant' camps are protesting—in the name of the democratic right to protest—only make matters worse as they increase the public's suspicion of official bias. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Britain has to face up to the fact that it is no longer an Empire with millions of acres of land at its disposal; it is a tiny island which is trying desperately to keep its faltering economy above the water. It may be flattering that so many refugees still consider the UK to be an attractive destination, but the fact is, there is no land to house them and no public willingness to accommodate them economically, socially or culturally. Seeing it as anything else is self-delusional. The author is a freelance writer. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
