BBMB granted Haryana ‘one-time relaxation' without Punjab's indent or consent
Bhakra Beas Management Board
(BBMB) is holding firm on its decision to release an additional 8,500 cusecs of water to Haryana.As per the resolution passed by the BBMB on April 30 by a "majority vote", it had resolved to release 8,500 cusecs of water for eight days (April 24 to May 1), "as a one-time exception/relaxation" without "placing of indent" by Punjab.
The BBMB chairperson Manoj Tripathi had, meanwhile, assured to look after the needs of Punjab during the filling period.Later, during a meeting with the Union home secretary in New Delhi on May 2, the BBMB chairperson claimed that the Board's decision of April 30 could not be implemented due to "deployment of police force" by Punjab.At the BBMB meeting, Tripathi informed that the BBMB had faced similar situations in the past as well and the last such situation was during the year 2021. It was observed by the Board that the decision of the technical committee meeting (TCM) held on April 23, was not complied with by Punjab due to non-placement of indent to the BBMB due to objection by the Punjab govt after the TCM meeting, read the resolution.The Punjab member did not agree to this decision of extra water to Haryana beyond 4,000 cusecs, which is already being released at Haryana Contact Points (HCPs). The BBMB chairperson asked Haryana to place the indent directly to the BBMB with a copy to Punjab and Rajasthan for revised releases."Haryana will ensure releases to Rajasthan and Delhi so as to resolve the drinking water crisis in Rajasthan and submit a daily report to the BBMB after compliance. The member from Punjab did not agree with the above decision and recorded his objections," added the resolution."Since 8,500 cusecs was not released for 8 days (April 24 to May 1), the Board by majority resolved to release 8,500 cusecs with effect from May 1 for 8 days, even without placing the indent by Punjab, as a one-time exception/relaxation, which includes 500 cusecs to Rajasthan and 496 cusecs to Delhi. The chairperson of the BBMB stated that he would try to look after the needs of Punjab during the filling period," it read.The BBMB had also claimed that with the present inflow pattern, the levels of Bhakra as on May 20 (at the end of the depletion period) would be between 1,540-1,545 feet, which would be higher than the long-term average levels of Bhakra on that date and would also be higher than the minimum level decided by the TCM (1,506 feet).The BBMB also informed that the minimum draw-down level (MDDL) for Bhakra was 1,462 ft. It was also intimated that releases decided during the TCM were based upon many factors such as balance share quota, needs of states, storage available in the reservoir and monsoon predictions by the India Meteorological Department (IMD).On May 1, however, the Punjab govt had swung into action to ensure "status quo" at the Nangal Dam. Led by minister Harjot Singh Bains, several AAP workers and locals had reached there and police deployment at the dam was also stepped up.'Water issue should not have escalated'According to the 'record of discussion' of the meeting convened by Union home secretary Govind Mohan on May 2, at the outset, he said the issue of releasing additional 4,500 cusecs of water to Haryana "should have been resolved within the BBMB and must not have escalated".Punjab's principal secretary, water resources, however, said Haryana had exhausted its allocated share and Punjab would not allow additional 4,500 cusecs of water for the next 8 days. Punjab cited cotton sowing in May and paddy cultivation from June. However, the Union home secretary "concluded with directions", which included "to release 4,500 cusecs of extra water from Bhakra Dam to Haryana for next 8 days to meet their urgent water requirements".It was also agreed that during the filling period of dams, the BBMB will provide this excess water to Punjab to fulfil their additional requirements. The Punjab govt has, meanwhile, pointed out that no minutes of the meeting with the Union home secretary had been provided and only record of discussion and a press release were issued.MSID:: 121110051 413 |
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
40 minutes ago
- Mint
ED raids multiple Mumbai properties linked to Anil Ambani, says ‘well-planned scheme to siphon off public money'
The Enforcement Directorate on Thursday, 24 July, raided several premises in Mumbai linked to Anil Ambani, days after SBI declared him a 'fraud' account holder. Around 35 premises, 50 companies, and over 25 individuals are being searched under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). ANI reported quoting ED sources, 'Subsequent to recording of FIRs by CBI, ED started investigating the alleged offence of Money Laundering by RAAGA Companies (Reliance Anil Ambani Group Companies). Other agencies & institutions also shared information with ED, such as - The National Housing Bank, SEBI, National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA), Bank of Baroda.' 'Preliminary investigation by ED has revealed a well-planned and thought-out scheme to divert/ siphon off public money by cheating banks, shareholders, investors and other public institutions. The offence of bribing bank officials, including Promoter of Yes Banks Limited, is also under scanner.' 'Probe also reveals alleged illegal loan diversion of around ₹ 3000 crore from Yes Bank (period 2017 to 2019). ED has found that just before the loan was granted, the Yes Bank promoters allegedly received money in their accounts. ED is investigating this nexus of bribe and loan. ED has found gross violations in Yes Bank loan approvals to RAAGA companies, such as Credit Approval Memorandums (CAMs) were back-dated, Investments were proposed without any due diligence/ credit analysis in violation of Bank's Credit Policy, inter alia.' 'In this regard, over 35 premises, 50 companies and over 25 persons are covered in a search operation launched today by the ED under section 17 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act,' sources further said. Meanwhile, the State Bank of India has classified Reliance Communications and promoter director Anil D Ambani as 'fraud' and is also in the process of lodging a complaint with CBI, Parliament was informed on Monday, as reported by PTI. Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary said in a written reply in the Lok Sabha that the entities were classified as fraud on 13 June 2025, in accordance with the RBI's Master Directions on Fraud Risk Management and the Bank's Board-approved Policy on Classification, Reporting & Management of Frauds. 'On 24 June 2025, the bank reported classification of fraud to RBI, and is also in the process of lodging a complaint with CBI,' he said. Further, on 1 July, 2025, as part of disclosure compliance, Resolution Professional of RCom informed the Bombay Stock Exchange regarding fraud classification by the bank. He said SBI's credit exposure in RCom includes fund-based principal outstanding of ₹ 2,227.64 crore, along with accrued interest and expenses with effect from 26 August 2016, and non-fund-based Bank Guarantee of ₹ 786.52 crore.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Mandaviya introduces Sports Governance Bill for greater transparency
Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya on Wednesday introduced the National Sports Governance Bill in Lok Sabha that proposes to institute a Board which will have sweeping powers to lay down rules and oversee the functioning of federations, including the cash-rich BCCI. Mandaviya introduced the bill that has provisions for a National Sports Board (NSB) to create a stringent system of accountability. All National Sports Federations (NSFs) will have to attain NSB's recognition for access to central government funding. Another striking feature is the proposal for a National Sports Tribunal, which will have the powers of a civil court and decide disputes ranging from selection to election involving federations and athletes. Once instituted, Tribunal's decisions can only be challenged in the Supreme Court. The bill makes some concessions on the issue of age cap for administrators by allowing those in the bracket of 70 to 75 to contest elections if the concerned international bodies' statutes and byelaws allow for it. It is a departure from the national sports code that capped the age limit at 70. '...as a part of the preparatory activities for the bidding of Summer Olympic Games 2036, it is imperative that the sports governance landscape undergoes a positive transformation to bring better outcomes, sporting excellence and aids in improved performance in major international competitions,' read the bill's statement of objectives. All recognised national sports bodies would also come under the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, something that the BCCI has vehemently opposed since it is not dependent on government funding. 'Now we have to study the bill and we will have to see if we need to place it before the Committee (Apex Council). We can only comment after that,' BCCI vice President and Rajya Sabha member Rajeev Shukla said outside the Parliament. 'Obviously BCCI members will study the bill and its clauses and if put forth to any committee, they will study and then we will see what needs to be done. We will also have discussions with the government,' he added. The ministry has insisted that the BCCI, which is now a part of the Olympic movement following cricket's inclusion in the 2028 Los Angles Games roster, will have to comply with the provisions of the bill once it becomes an act. The NSB will comprise a chairperson and its members will be appointed by the central government from 'amongst persons of ability, integrity and standing.' The Board's constituents will also be expected to possess 'special knowledge or practical experience in the field of public administration, sports governance, sports law and other related fields.'
The Hindu
19 hours ago
- The Hindu
Mandaviya introduces sports governance bill for greater transparency in NSFs, including BCCI
Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya on Wednesday (July 23, 2025) introduced the National Sports Governance Bill in Lok Sabha that proposes to institute a Board which will have sweeping powers to lay down rules and oversee the functioning of federations, including the cash-rich BCCI. Mr. Mandaviya introduced the bill that has provisions for a National Sports Board (NSB) to create a stringent system of accountability. All National Sports Federations (NSFs) will have to attain NSB's recognition for access to central government funding. Another striking feature is the proposal for a National Sports Tribunal, which will have the powers of a civil court and decide disputes ranging from selection to election involving federations and athletes. Once instituted, Tribunal's decisions can only be challenged in the Supreme Court. The bill makes some concessions on the issue of age cap for administrators by allowing those in the bracket of 70 to 75 to contest elections if the concerned international bodies' statutes and byelaws allow for it. It is a departure from the national sports code that capped the age limit at 70. '...as a part of the preparatory activities for the bidding of Summer Olympic Games 2036, it is imperative that the sports governance landscape undergoes a positive transformation to bring better outcomes, sporting excellence and aids in improved performance in major international competitions,' read the bill's statement of objectives. All recognised national sports bodies would also come under the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, something that the BCCI has vehemently opposed since it is not dependent on government funding. 'Now we have to study the bill, and we will have to see if we need to place it before the Committee (Apex Council). We can only comment after that,' BCCI vice President and Rajya Sabha member Rajeev Shukla said outside the Parliament. 'Obviously BCCI members will study the bill and its clauses and if put forth to any committee, they will study and then we will see what needs to be done. We will also have discussions with the government,' he added. The ministry has insisted that the BCCI, which is now a part of the Olympic movement following cricket's inclusion in the 2028 Los Angles Games roster, will have to comply with the provisions of the bill once it becomes an act. The NSB will comprise a chairperson and its members will be appointed by the central government from 'amongst persons of ability, integrity and standing.' The Board's constituents will also be expected to possess 'special knowledge or practical experience in the field of public administration, sports governance, sports law and other related fields.' The appointments would be done based on the recommendations of a search-cum-selection committee, according to the draft bill that has been finalised after extensive consultations with stakeholders and public inputs. The selection committee would be made up of the Cabinet Secretary or Secretary Sports as chairperson, the Director General of the Sports Authority of India, two sports administrators who have each served as the President or Secretary General or Treasurer of a National Sports Body and one eminent sportsperson who is a Dronacharya, or Khel Ratna or Arjuna awardee. '...there is a felt need for a comprehensive legislation to improve the governance of the sports bodies and achieve better results in sports and reduce the disputes and litigation, inter alia, involving sports federations,' stated the objectives of the bill. 'There is an imperative need to curb factionalism, and administrative interventions which adversely affects the organised development of sports and related activities in India and also for its better presentation before the international sports community,' it added. The NSB will have the mandate to de-recognise a national body that fails to hold elections for its Executive Committee or has committed 'gross irregularities in the election procedures.' Failure to publish annual audited accounts or 'misused, misapplied or misappropriated public funds' would also be liable for action by the NSB but it would be required to consult the concerned global body before making its move. The bill also provides for a National Sports Election Panel consisting of former members of the Election Commission of India or the State Election Commission or former Chief Electoral Officers of the States or Deputy Election Commissioners. '(They) shall act as electoral officers to oversee the conduct of free and fair elections to the Executive Committees and the Athletes Committee of the National Sports Bodies,' the bill stated. Mr. Mandaviya also introduced The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill-2025 that seeks to incorporate the changes sought by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), which objected to 'government interference' in the functioning of the country's Anti-Doping Agency (NADA). The act was originally passed in 2022, but its implementation had to be put on hold due to objections raised by WADA. The world body objected to the institution of a National Board for Anti-Doping in Sports, which was empowered to make recommendations to the government on anti-doping regulations. The Board, which was to comprise a chairperson and two members appointed by the central government, was also authorised to oversee the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) and even issue directions to it. WADA rejected this provision as government interference in an autonomous body. In the amended bill, the Board has been retained but without the powers to oversee NADA or the advisory role it was previously assigned.
