Budapest Pride: Thousands of marchers defy police ban – DW – 06/28/2025
Tens of thousands of people marched in the streets of the Hungarian capital despite police banning the event. Attendees risk a fine and organizers could face a one-year prison sentence.
Tens of thousands LGBTQ+ rights supporters took part in the Budapest Pride march on Saturday, in defiance of a police ban and threats from Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.
"We believe there are 180,000 to 200,000 people attending," Pride president Viktoria Radvanyi told the AFP news agency. "It is hard to estimate because there have never been so many people at Budapest Pride."
Local media sites including 444.hu and Magyar Hang estimated the crowd to be closer to 100,000, still far more than the previous record turnout of 35,000 people.
Prime Minister Orban has restricted the rights of the LGBTQ+ community over the past few years, and his party's lawmakers passed a law in March allowing the ban of Pride marches, claiming it was motivated by the need to protect children.
However, Budapest Mayor Gergely Karacsony declared the Pride parade a municipal event, arguing that this designation exempts it from the assembly law and renders the police ban invalid.
The annual event has now come to symbolize resistance to a general repression of civil society in Hungary under the nationalist government of Orban, which is facing a growing challenge from center-right opposition leader Peter Magyar's Tisza party ahead of elections next year.
"This is about much more, not just about homosexuality,...This is the last moment to stand up for our rights," Eszter Rein Bodi, one of the marchers, told the Reuters news agency.
"This isn't just about LGBQT+ rights, it's also about the right to assemble and about standing up for each other and not allowing [the
government] to oppress us," another participant, Blanka Molnar, told the AP news agency.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
More than 30 embassies have also voiced support for the march, which was due to be attended by European Commissioner for Equality Hadja Lahbib and about 70 members of the European Parliament.
Ahead of the parade European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has called on Hungarian authorities not to block the march.
"Our Union is one of equality and non-discrimination," von der Leyen wrote in a statement. She called these "core values" that "must be respected at all times, in all Member States."
Anyone attending the march, however, risks being accused of a misdemeanor, while organizing such an event could carry the penalty of a one-year jail sentence, according to a letter sent to some foreign embassies in Budapest by Justice Minister Bence Tuzson.
The so-called child-protection legislation that allowed the ban to be imposed also allows police to hand out fines and to use facial recognition technology to identify attendees.
Over the past decade, Orban's government has frequently been at loggerheads with the EU over its increasing repression of civil liberties and press freedoms under the guise of protecting "Christian" values. Orban has also used nationalism and far-right rhetoric to reinforce his grip on power since reclaiming his position as prime minister in 2010.
The ban on the Pride march is being seen by opponents as part of a wider crackdown on democratic freedoms ahead of next year's elections, at which Orban's government is expected to face a stiff challenge from Magyar, whose party has been leading in opinion polls.
The Tisza party, while avoiding taking a strong position on gay rights issues, nonetheless called on the government to protect anyone attending the march.
"Peter Magyar has called on the Hungarian authorities and police to protect the Hungarian people this Saturday, and on other days as well, even if it means standing up against the arbitrariness of power," its press office said. Magyar himself has not planned to attend.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
32 minutes ago
- DW
Ukraine loses F-16 and pilot during massive Russian strike – DW – 06/29/2025
Russia launched a fresh wave of large-scale drone and missile strikes across Ukraine overnight. Kyiv lost a pilot and fighter jet during the effort to repel the attack. DW has more updates. Below, you can read a roundup of events regarding Russia's war in Ukraine from Sunday, June 29, 2025. A Ukrainian pilot has been killed and his F-16 fighter jet lost as Ukraine's military forces worked to repel a large-scale Russian drone and missile attack. Ukraine's military confirmed the loss on Sunday morning. This is the third such loss of an F-16 fighter jet since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, the military said. "The pilot used all of his onboard weapons and shot down seven air targets. While shooting down the last one, his aircraft was damaged and began to lose altitude," Ukraine's air force said on the Telegram messaging app. The pilot flew the jet away from civilian settlements and did not have time to eject to save himself, the message read. Russia launched a fresh wave attack on Ukraine overnight, targeting the country's central, southern and western region. Some 500 aerial weapons were deployed including drones, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, Ukraine's military said. At least three people were injured and there were reports of damaged houses and other infrastructure. Air raid sirens sounded across the coutnry, including the western region which is considerably far from the Russian front lines. "To repel the massive attack, all available means of the defence forces that can operate on enemy air assets were deployed," Ukraine's military said. Reports cited the operational command of the Polish Armed Forces saying they scrambled fighter jets and activated ground-based air defenses in response to the raids in Ukraine which were close to Poland's border. This comes after Ukraine's air force had warned of an attack involving Russian bombers and drones, on Saturday evening. RBK-Ukraine, a local news agency, reported explosions in Kyiv overnight. Ukraine's military said Russia had launched some 477 drones and 60 missiles but 211 of the drone and 38 of the missiles had been intercepted and destroyed. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video We are following the latest developments concerning Russia's war in Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin, once again, said that he was ready for a round of peace talks with Ukraine. This would be the third such round of talks , should they materialize. Meanwhile, Russia continued to strike parts of Ukraine with drones and missiles. US President Donald Trump said he believed something could soon happen that could bring Russia's war in Ukraine to an end, referencing a recent phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin but providing no further details.
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Russian threat sees Eastern Europe bring back land mines – DW – 06/29/2025
Five out of six countries along the border with Russia and Belarus plan to secure their borders with land mines, aiming to protect NATO's eastern flank from a possible attack. But the plan is highly controversial. Since the start of the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine in February 2022, there has hardly been a more pressing issue for NATO than the defense of its eastern borders. Over the past three years, five of the six NATO countries that share a border with Russia or Belarus — Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland— have already made significant investments to better secure these borders, for example with fences and surveillance systems. But now, a new plan is in the works: land mines. Those five NATO countries recently announced their withdrawal from the Ottawa Convention, the 1997 treaty which bans anti-personnel mines worldwide and prohibits their use, production and transfer. Only Norway, which shares a nearly 200-kilometer (124-mile) border of almost 200 kilometers with Russia, wants to stick to the treaty. Such mines are highly controversial, as they can be a danger for both soldiers and civilians. Uncleared mines remain a long-term threat after the end of a conflict: In 2023, nearly 6,000 people worldwide were killed or injured by land mines. Some 80% of the victims were civilians, including many children. Clearing these explosive devices is dangerous, expensive and extremely time-consuming. According to the nongovernmental organization Handicap International, 58 countries around the world and other areas are still contaminated with land mines, even if some of the underlying conflicts ended decades ago. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video From the end of 2025, these five NATO countries could restart the production and storage of anti-personnel mines near the border. In case of an emergency, these mines would then be deployed quickly. While 164 countries worldwide have signed the Ottawa Convention, 33 have not. In addition to the major powers US and China, this includes Russia. In fact, the Kremlin has by far the world's largest stockpile of anti-personnel mines, with an estimated 26 million. Many of these are already being used in Ukraine. From Finnish Lapland in the north to the Polish province of Lublin in the south, the border between the five NATO states and Russia and Belarus is around 3,500 kilometers (2150 miles) long. Most of these areas are sparsely populated and densely forested, making them difficult to monitor the area. Nevertheless, there is great concern about a possible Russian attack on NATO territory. According to a report in the British newspaper , NATO experts are already analyzing which areas could be targeted. The aim of the NATO countries is to maximize deterrence: together with other border security measures, the mines are intended to inflict such heavy losses on the advancing enemy in the shortest possible time that Moscow would refrain from a prolonged war. Several million mines and other concealed explosives would likely be necessary to effectively protect the long border. Large areas would become uninhabitable for decades, and the potential damage to people and the environment is almost impossible to predict. David Blair, foreign correspondent for , described the plan as a new, explosive "Iron Curtain," alluding to the heavily guarded border between NATO and the Warsaw Pact states during the Cold War. In addition to mines, the eastern NATO states have already initiated many other measures, erecting or reinforcing border fences and walls, installing modern surveillance and early warning systems and strengthening troop contingents. Some of the countries are also planning to deploy drone defense systems along the border, and deepen irrigation systems so that they can be used as trenches in an emergency. They also aim to plant trees along important roads to provide camouflage for civilians and soldiers. Lithuania, squeezed between the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad on the Baltic coast and Belarus in the east, is particularly vulnerable. A narrow, 65-kilometer land connection — the Suwalki Gap — links the Baltic states and Poland, making the area a likely target for a initial Russian attack. Vilnius, therefore, is planning to invest around €800 million ($937 million) in the production of new land mines in the coming years. Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovile Sakaliene has defended the strategy, speaking of the "existential threat" to her country. Russia has increasingly manufactured mines in recent years, she explained, while Europe had destroyed its own stockpiles under the terms of the Ottawa Convention. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Eva Maria Fischer, head of advocacy at Handicap International Germany, believes the land mine plan is a dangerous and worrying development. "Of course, the security concerns of the Eastern European states may be justified in the current unstable international context," Fischer said in March, when Poland and the three Baltic states first announced their plans to withdraw from the treaty. "However, lasting security cannot be built on weapons that kill indiscriminately, remain in the ground long after the end of a conflict and continue to maim civilians and destroy livelihoods," she added. "There are alternatives to defending a country. These may seem more expensive, but they are not when you consider the enormous follow-up costs of using anti-personnel mines."
Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
UK Considers Envoy For Britons Held Abroad
Britain is preparing to emulate the United States by appointing an envoy tasked with freeing citizens arbitrarily detained abroad, as it faces calls to do more to bring them home. High-profile cases like jailed Egyptian-British activist Alaa Abdel Fattah and imprisoned Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai have spotlighted the plight of Britons held in jails overseas. The UK foreign ministry insists it continues to press such cases with governments, but relatives of detainees and human rights organisations complain of a lack of urgency and transparency. "The government is committed to strengthening support for British nationals, including through the appointment of a new envoy," a Foreign Office spokesperson told AFP. Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer has said an "Envoy for Complex Consular Detentions" is expected to be appointed "before the summer". The government has not specified the terms of the role but it could be similar to America's Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs, a position created in 2015. Unlike the United States though, Britain does not take part in prisoner exchanges. Professor Carla Ferstman, an expert on arbitrary detentions at the Human Rights Centre at Essex Law School, said appointing someone would be the "clearest thing that the UK can do that it hasn't done yet". "When you have someone at the highest level they command a certain level of respect," she told AFP. Abdel Fattah was arrested in September 2019 and sentenced to five years in prison on charges of "spreading false news" after sharing a Facebook post about police brutality. He is still imprisoned despite a hunger strike by his mother and Britain's foreign ministry saying it is pushing for his release "at the highest levels of the Egyptian government". His sister Sanaa Seif said an envoy would mean "a proper continued focus on" freeing detainees. "It's also important to have a focal point that can help coordinate between different government bodies so that they all work in synchronisation," she told AFP. Seif believes the government should consider revising travel advice to Egypt too, a call also made by lawmakers who have suggested the government should sanction Egyptian officials as well. "Is it not clear that words are no longer sufficient?" Conservative peer Guy Black asked in parliament's House of Lords recently. Ferstman said tightening travel guidance can be a powerful tool. "It's a big deal because all of a sudden tourists can't get insurance and it's harder for business travel to happen. There's all kinds of implications," she explained. Amnesty International recently called for the government to develop a "clear strategy" to support arbitrarily detained Britons, including by demanding that UK officials attend trials. The Labour government pledged in its general election-winning manifesto last year that it would introduce "a new right to consular assistance in cases of human rights violations". Amnesty also wants the government to call for a person's "immediate release", including publicly when it is requested by the family. It said London took three years to publicly call for Lai to be freed, something his son Sebastian said "sends the wrong message" to "autocratic states". "The quicker we have the government speak out post-arrest, that's the window of opportunity to have people released," Eilidh Macpherson, Amnesty's campaigns manager for individuals at risk told AFP. UK officials say the government can be wary of accusations it is interfering in another country's judicial system. "Sometimes it may need to be quiet about what it's doing, but this shouldn't come at the expense of transparency," said Ferstman. Jagtar Singh Johal, a Sikh blogger from Scotland, was arrested in India in November 2017 while there for his wedding on accusations of being part of a terror plot against right-wing Hindu leaders. He has not been convicted of a crime and in March was cleared in one of the nine charges against him. The foreign ministry spokesperson said Foreign Secretary David Lammy "continues to raise concerns" about the detention with India's government "at every appropriate opportunity". But his brother, Gurpreet Singh Johal complains of being kept in the dark. "We don't know what's actually being said," he told AFP. Gurpreet said an envoy would be a "good thing" but until the position is in place, "We won't know exactly what it means." Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy continues to raise the plight the cases of detaine Britons AFP Abdel Fattah's mother Laila Soueif has been on a lengthy hunger strike to protest her son's imprisonment AFP British Sikh man Jagtar Singh Johal (C) has been detained in India since 2017 AFP
