
Former Conservative MP who harassed ex-wife handed community order
Appearing before Cardiff Magistrates' Court on Monday, Wallis, who was previously known as Jamie, was sentenced for harassing her ex-wife, Rebecca Wallis, now known as Rebecca Lovell.
The court heard the former MP sent messages accusing Ms Lovell of being 'mean' to them, demanding to know about her new partner, saying she was 'cock hunting,' and calling her a 'c***' and a 'f****** bitch'.
On February 25, using an unknown number, the former MP demanded £350,000 be put into their bank account within 15 minutes.
In a separate message, Wallis referred to her ex-wife and father as 'prejudiced f******' adding they hope they 'never have a happy moment again'.
In total, the former MP sent four messages and left one voice note.
The couple split in 2020, with the divorce finalised in 2024.
In a victim impact statement, which was read to the court, Ms Lovell said: 'This is the hardest thing I have written, for so long I have had to fight against the tide of Jamie's behaviour, publicly and privately.'
She added: 'The woman I used to be is destroyed. I will never understand what I have done to deserve the hurt I have endured.'
Ms Lovell described the last six months as 'utterly devastating' and said she was living her life as an 'overstimulated adult constantly in fight or flight'.
She said she feared Wallis turning up at her home, leading her to have CCTV installed.
Wallis, who was wearing a black dress, looked down as the statement was read to the court.
Narita Bahra KC, appearing for the defence, said Wallis uses female pronouns, referring to Jamie as her 'deadname'.
She argued it was 'disappointing' the case had come to court, criticising South Wales Police and the Crown Prosecution Service for not dealing with the issue outside the court.
Ms Bahra argued it was 'unequivocal' that Wallis had been suffering from mental health difficulties at the time of the offending, partly brought on by their transitioning.
She also said Wallis was suffering from PTSD, a depressive disorder and an adjustment disorder.
Ms Bahra said Wallis was remorseful and did not seek to excuse her actions.
In Wallis's final message to Ms Lovell she asked for help, claimed she was experiencing pain in her temples and said she wanted her father to pay for someone to hold her hand.
Wallis was then found by police and sectioned under the Mental Health Act before being arrested and later charged.
District Judge Rhys Williams handed Wallis a 12-month community order to be carried out over 12 days and a fine worth £1,264.
He also imposed a restraining order for 12 months to prevent Wallis from contacting Ms Lovell.
Wallis, who pleaded guilty to leaving the messages at a hearing in June, initially denied the charges, but changed her plea when allegations of having driven by her ex-wife's home were removed from the charge.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Afghan scandal is the latest evidence public are lied to and ignored by governments… It's time for an election NOW
IT came out of a clear blue sky. When John Healey, the Secretary of State for Defence, got up in the House of Commons on Monday afternoon you could have heard a pin drop. When he sat down the country's collective jaw had hit the floor. 4 4 A Royal Marine had circulated an email in 2022 containing the personal details of 25,000 Afghans by mistake. The email revealed which of them had helped British troops during the war — and would be an immediate gift to the Taliban if they got their hands on it. They would surely hunt these collaborators down and kill them. But, believe it or not, the story gets worse from there. Because the last Conservative government decided to cover it up and, using a draconian legal manoeuvre, attempted to keep it secret forever. Thankfully, because of dogged determination from newspapers and other media outlets, the truth has come out. And it's as shocking as it is shameful. Thousands upon thousands of Afghan families have been coming into this country secretly on unmarked planes, flying into military and commercial airports. At the moment, we don't know exactly how many of them there are, how many of them are going to stay here for life. And we don't even know really how much it's all going to cost in the long run. Defence chiefs braced for £1BILLION compensation bill over Afghan data leak scandal What we do know is that it's likely to be in excess of 24,000 people and £7billion. The Tory government went to extreme lengths to obtain a super-injunction in 2023 — usually reserved for millionaire footballers and celebrities to protect their private lives from scrutiny — so that we would never find out what they were doing. Lies and subterfuge Rishi Sunak, Michael Gove, Suella Braverman, Grant Shapps and Robert Jenrick all knew what was happening. And none of them thought it was a good idea for the British public to be given a clue about it. People were rightly angry on Talk on Tuesday and more frustrated with their politicians than ever. Many said they believed this was the final straw after years of being ignored, ridiculed and abused over their views on immigration. We were inundated with calls from all over the country. Listeners and viewers told me they'd had enough of lies, of subterfuge, of misleading reports and of betrayal by this government and the last. What they want now is an election. To clear the air once and for all and to take power back for the people of his country. When he was Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak vowed to stop the boats and thereby put an end to illegal migration. But it now turns out that not only did that not happen, he actively conspired to conceal from the public his own government's policy to import thousands of Afghans and their families secretly, offering them free housing and settled asylum status. When Keir Starmer took over at No10 last July, he decided to continue keeping secret the enormous scandal while pretending he was getting to grips with immigration. At Prime Minister's Questions yesterday he attempted to portray the horrific abuse of freedom of the Press as simply the failings of the previous government. 4 4 But, in truth, Labour must also shoulder much of the blame for attempting to pull the wool over the eyes of every man, woman and child in Britain by preventing the publication of one of the biggest government blunders in our history. For the past three years, I have been telling the story of our immigration overload, of groups of young men gathering in town centres up and down the country, seemingly jobless and in ever increasing numbers. My knowledge of the problem was informed by ordinary people telling me what it was like where they lived every single day. Yesterday was no different. One caller from Sussex told us how he'd bought a new build, four-bedroom house for half a million pounds only to discover that an Afghan family had been moved into another one for free on the estate, along with three others in smaller homes. 'We weren't told,' he said. 'It leaves a very sour taste.' Another woman from Uxbridge said she was living in former Air Force housing when suddenly, in February last year, several Afghan families were moved into other homes in the same compound. All the children were sent off to the local schools, and none of them spoke English. People have told me for months that there seems to be more Afghan nationals around the place than usual. They're worried. They know from recent government statistics that Afghan and Eritrean men are 20 times more likely to commit sex crimes than British men. And they also see the unfairness of paying out £7billion for years and years to come, to provide free homes, schooling and support. Let us face facts. What we've got is a government that's in power but not in charge. It's a government that was elected last July somewhat on false pretences. Because we were not told about the Afghan kill list, nor the fact it was leaked, nor that the establishment was conspiring to keep it all secret from the public. It's clear that we have all been lied to, treated with contempt and ignored. The people have had enough. Let the public decide. And let the public choose who they want to run this country. It's time for an election NOW.

Leader Live
3 hours ago
- Leader Live
Keir Starmer suspends 3 Labour MPs over discipline breaches
It is understood that the Prime Minister has removed the whip from Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliffe. This means that they will sit in the House of Commons as independents, rather than being affiliated with the party. All three voted against the Government's planned welfare reforms as part of a wider rebellion earlier this month, and all were first elected at last year's election. 🚨 | The Labour Party has suspended the following 3 MPs for "persistent breaches of party discipline" - Brian Leishman (Alloa & Grangemouth) - Chris Hinchcliff (North East Hertfordshire) - Neil Duncan Jordan (Poole) In total, 47 Labour MPs rebelled against the government's proposed cuts to welfare. BBC News reports: "The rebellion undermined Sir Keir's authority, which was weakened after a series of policy reversals, such as restoring the winter fuel allowance to millions of pensioners." The office of Mr Leishman, who represents Alloa and Grangemouth, confirmed he had had the whip 'temporarily suspended," the PA News Agency reported. 🚨 BREAKING: Keir Starmer has suspended Brian Leishman, Chris Hinchliff and Neil Duncan Jordan for "organising on the welfare rebellion and other insurrection" In a statement, he said he is a 'proud Labour member' and remains 'committed to the party'. Recommended Reading Starmer immigration plans as he vows to 'take back control' Plans to 'put more money in people's pockets' in bid to boost homeownership Labour's Budget pension changes slammed by expert 'I wish to remain a Labour MP and deliver the positive change many voters are craving,' he added. 'I have voted against the Government on issues because I want to effectively represent and be the voice for communities across Alloa and Grangemouth. 'I firmly believe that it is not my duty as an MP to make people poorer, especially those that have suffered because of austerity and its dire consequences.'


North Wales Chronicle
5 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Keir Starmer suspends 3 Labour MPs over discipline breaches
It is understood that the Prime Minister has removed the whip from Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliffe. This means that they will sit in the House of Commons as independents, rather than being affiliated with the party. All three voted against the Government's planned welfare reforms as part of a wider rebellion earlier this month, and all were first elected at last year's election. 🚨 | The Labour Party has suspended the following 3 MPs for "persistent breaches of party discipline" - Brian Leishman (Alloa & Grangemouth) - Chris Hinchcliff (North East Hertfordshire) - Neil Duncan Jordan (Poole) In total, 47 Labour MPs rebelled against the government's proposed cuts to welfare. BBC News reports: "The rebellion undermined Sir Keir's authority, which was weakened after a series of policy reversals, such as restoring the winter fuel allowance to millions of pensioners." The office of Mr Leishman, who represents Alloa and Grangemouth, confirmed he had had the whip 'temporarily suspended," the PA News Agency reported. 🚨 BREAKING: Keir Starmer has suspended Brian Leishman, Chris Hinchliff and Neil Duncan Jordan for "organising on the welfare rebellion and other insurrection" In a statement, he said he is a 'proud Labour member' and remains 'committed to the party'. Recommended Reading Starmer immigration plans as he vows to 'take back control' Plans to 'put more money in people's pockets' in bid to boost homeownership Labour's Budget pension changes slammed by expert 'I wish to remain a Labour MP and deliver the positive change many voters are craving,' he added. 'I have voted against the Government on issues because I want to effectively represent and be the voice for communities across Alloa and Grangemouth. 'I firmly believe that it is not my duty as an MP to make people poorer, especially those that have suffered because of austerity and its dire consequences.'