logo
Protesters arrested hours after specific group banned as terrorist organisation

Protesters arrested hours after specific group banned as terrorist organisation

Daily Mirror2 days ago
Protesters from Palestine Action with banners have been arrested in central London with the group now banned as a terrorist group.
Palestine Action was banned as a terrorist group after a late-night legal bid to delay it failed. MPs overwhelmingly voted in favour of Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the protest group under the Terrorism Act 2000 on Wednesday and Lords have approved the move.
A group gathered in Parliament Square in London holding signs supporting the newly proscribed Palestine Action.
Leslie Tate, 76, a Green councillor from Hertfordshire, said: 'Palestine Action are not a violent organisation, and the proscription is wrong. You do know, of course, that they were prescribed by Parliament with two other groups involved – all three at once so that was a trick to make sure the Bill went through.
'The evidence from their actions that they've taken from the start of Palestine Action is that they all have been non-violent. This protest is necessary to defend our democracy, and this is the creeping edge of totalitarianism, frankly.
'We thought they (the police) would probably take pictures of people. It's the obvious thing to do, to photograph them, then they have their identity, rather than make arrests.'
, , , , or visit homepage.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kenyan police clash with demonstrators as major roads blocked
Kenyan police clash with demonstrators as major roads blocked

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Kenyan police clash with demonstrators as major roads blocked

Protesters lit bonfires and hurled stones at police at roadblocks while officers fired and hurled teargas canisters, injuring one demonstrator. Associated Press journalists witnessed an injured person being carried by protesters who were chanting against police. Kenyans had planned demonstrations on July 7 to protest against police brutality, poor governance, and to demand President William Ruto's resignation over alleged corruption and the high cost of living. Kenyan riot police barricaded roads leading to Parliament buildings (Brian Inganga/AP) July 7 , known as Saba Saba, is a significant date in Kenya's recent history, marking the first major protests 35 years ago that called for a transition from a one-party state to a multi-party democracy, which was realised in the 1992 elections. Saba Saba is Swahili for Seven Seven, representing July 7. Police officers were stopping private and public vehicles from accessing the city centre. They were also blocking most pedestrians from entering the capital, only allowing through those deemed to have essential duties. 'There is no reversing the Gen Z Saba Saba-like spirit,' said Macharia Munene, professor of history and international relations at United States International University Africa in Nairobi. 'Attempt to criminalise protests is reactive and will not work. It instead makes the government appear retrogressive and desperate enough to subvert the constitution.' Public service minister Geoffrey Ruku had urged all government employees to report to work on Monday, insisting that the demonstrations would not disrupt public services. Interior minister Kipchumba Murkomen said on Sunday that the government would not tolerate violent protests and that police would be deployed to ensure public safety. The roads leading to the country's parliament and the president's office were barricaded using razor wire. On the outskirts of the city in Kitengela town, police fired tear gas on Monday to disperse protesters who had lit bonfires on the road that connects to neighbouring Tanzania. 'They have blocked the roads, blocking us from our work. I am a roadside vendor and I am supposed to get to town and buy merchandise to sell along the road,' said protester Caleb Okoth. 'What do they want us to eat? People are being beaten like dogs for protesting for their rights.' The country has recently experienced a wave of violent demonstrations, initially sparked by calls for police accountability following the death of a blogger in police custody. During protests on June 17, a civilian was shot at close range by police officers, further angering the public and prompting plans for additional demonstrations. On June 25, at least 16 people were killed and more than 400 injured during protests against police brutality, which were timed to coincide with the one-year anniversary of anti-tax protests where over 60 people lost their lives.

Labour MP tried to claim bedding and shower cream on expenses
Labour MP tried to claim bedding and shower cream on expenses

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Labour MP tried to claim bedding and shower cream on expenses

A Labour MP tried to claim luxury bedding and shower cream on expenses, it has emerged. Sean Woodcock, the MP for Banbury, attempted to bill taxpayers more than £200 for duvets, pillows, bedsheets and other household items from Marks & Spencer last year. The Daily Mail reported that he bought four 'luxury Egyptian cotton' towels along with a tube of magnolia shower cream, which he claimed on parliamentary expenses. The expenses watchdog, the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) rejected the two receipts, worth £100.50 and £116, as 'not claimable'. Rules introduced after the MPs' expenses scandal more than a decade ago banned parliamentarians from claiming home decorations or furnishings. 'Mistakenly avised' over accommodation expenses Mr Woodcock told the Daily Mail: 'As a newly elected MP I was mistakenly advised by a colleague about what type of accommodation costs could be claimed for. I accepted IPSA's decision immediately and paid for these items myself in full.' He had submitted two receipts last October, one for £100.50 and the other for £116, seemingly for furnishing his second home. The items included duvets, two pillows and a set of brushed cotton bedsheets. The Daily Mail also revealed that Lee Dillon, a Liberal Democrat MP, tried without success to bill taxpayers for a 'festive team meal' for Christmas last year. The MP for Newbury submitted a receipt for £204.95 from one of the Parliament restaurants, having bought dishes including steaks and scallops. A spokesman for the MP said: 'Lee accepted IPSA's decision in this case. He did not resubmit the claim and paid for the meal himself. He plans to do the same in future years.' 'Mistake' claim for flowers Another unsuccessful claim saw a new Labour MP's office attempt to bill taxpayers for £46 of flowers. Staff working for Dr Simon Opher, the Labour MP for Stroud, submitted a receipt from Lily Pad Florist last October, but a spokesman said that Dr Opher was unaware of the claim. A spokesman said: 'Simon didn't know about the initial claim, and the office did not question the subsequent rejection by IPSA because we realised the mistake. We obviously did not re-submit the claim.' It comes after the Government became engulfed in a row last year over the acceptance of free hospitality and clothing. Ministers are allowed to take handouts as long as they are properly declared, although they are urged to take public perception into account. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, came under fire for accepting tickets to a Sabrina Carpenter concert, which she declared in accordance with the rules.

Leominster campaigner says miscarriage leave change is 'amazing'
Leominster campaigner says miscarriage leave change is 'amazing'

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Leominster campaigner says miscarriage leave change is 'amazing'

A woman who campaigned for changes to bereavement leave after having three miscarriages said it was "amazing" that a planned law would cover more government is set to amend the Employment Rights Bill, which is making its way through Parliament, to give parents a legal right to time off work if they experience pregnancy loss at any leave is currently only available to parents who lose an unborn child after 24 weeks of pregnancy."For anybody in the future who does have to go through [a miscarriage], all that stress and that campaigning has been worth it," said Tash Allin, from Leominster, who was nine weeks pregnant when she had her third miscarriage. "It's crucial - to be able to get over such an upsetting life experience, you need that time," she told BBC Radio Hereford & added that she was one of many women and men who had campaigned on the issue and it felt "amazing" to have helped bring about change. 'Bottled up emotions' The proposed extended right to leave would be unpaid and last for at least one week, though the exact length is still being consulted details, including who will be eligible and whether a doctor's note would be required, will also be decided following a Allin said she had a supportive employer when she had her most recent miscarriage, but she had harder experiences during some of her pregnancy losses."It was very much, 'I'm so sorry to hear it, but when are you coming back?' That was how the conversation went," she said."When your boss is saying that, you do feel pressure to go back and therefore you just kind of have to bottle up your emotions."Ms Allin, who has two children, added that she hoped the final bill would contain a right to leave that lasted more than one week. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store