Shawn Michaels reveals his wrestling mount rushmore, leaves out familiar faces
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
In a recent interview with Going Ringside, the two-time Hall of Famer revealed the names that shaped his love for professional wrestling. 'To me, I've always felt like they're just your personal favourites,' Michaels said. 'Mine usually date back to the mid-80s or late-70s.'
Shawn Michaels chooses icons from wrestling's golden era
Michaels listed four names, with a fifth as an honorable mention - all of whom made their mark well before WWE became a global juggernaut. His Mount Rushmore includes Terry Funk, Harley Race, and Ric Flair, all known for their toughness, longevity, and influence in the territorial era of wrestling.
The fourth spot, according to HBK, is a toss-up between Tully Blanchard, a key member of the Four Horsemen, and Wahoo McDaniel, a respected name in regional promotions. 'That fourth one's always a little tough for me,' Michaels admitted. 'It sort of goes to Tully Blanchard because that's who I grew up with, or Wahoo McDaniel.'
Going Ringside Ep. 125: Shawn Michaels returns
What caught the attention of many fans was who Michaels didn't name. Despite being best friends with Triple H, and working alongside him both on-screen in D-Generation X and off-screen in WWE creative, Michaels did not include him on the list.
Both men have played key roles in shaping WWE's present and future. Triple H is now the head of creative for the main roster, while Michaels oversees the NXT brand as Senior Vice President of Talent Development. The omission seems to underline Michaels' point, this list is about personal inspiration, not accolades or friendships.
Since retiring from in-ring competition, Michaels has taken on a vital backstage role in WWE, nurturing the next generation of superstars through NXT.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
His creative input and eye for talent continue to shape the company's long-term vision. Under his guidance, NXT has produced breakout stars who have gone on to thrive on the main roster and even internationally. Michaels is widely credited with instilling old-school fundamentals while adapting to the demands of modern wrestling, a balance few can manage as effectively.
Despite leaving himself off the list, there's little doubt that Michaels has earned his place on countless Mount Rushmores compiled by fans, peers, and historians alike. His impact as a performer, mentor, and architect of WWE's future cements his legacy as one of the most influential figures the wrestling world has ever seen.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Why is Brock Lesnar's WWE return stirring controversy? Janel Grant's rep reacts to the Beast's glorified comeback
Brock Lesnar's return sparks reaction from Janel Grant's rep. Image via: Elsa/ Getty Images Brock Lesnar's shocking return at WWE SummerSlam 2025 set off fireworks in the arena and a firestorm outside it. As "The Beast Incarnate" dropped John Cena with his signature F5, the MetLife Stadium crowd roared. But the backlash was just as loud. Lesnar's comeback is far from an ordinary WWE surprise moment. It comes with serious controversy, legal implications, and fan outrage linked to ongoing allegations involving Vince McMahon and former WWE employee Janel Grant. Janel Grant's rep reacts to Brock Lesnar's surprise return Brock Lesnar was publicly named earlier this year in an amended federal lawsuit filed by Janel Grant against former WWE chairman Vince McMahon. Though Lesnar is not a defendant, the lawsuit alleges McMahon used Grant as a "s*xual pawn" in contract negotiations with Lesnar in 2021. The allegations are disturbing. Grant was allegedly asked to create "personalized s*xual content" for Lesnar, and a meeting was supposedly set up for a s*xual encounter that never materialized due to Lesnar's flight changes. Following his SummerSlam return, a spokesperson for Grant issued a strongly worded statement. "For far too long, abuse was allowed to thrive under WWE's leadership. Instead of righting this wrong, WWE has done nothing to ensure those responsible are held accountable. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Signs Of Heart Attack That Shouldn't Be Ignored (Take A Look) TheDaddest Undo This attempt to sweep misconduct under the rug will backfire. We look forward to the full set of facts, including those about Mr. Lesnar, coming out in a court of law where they belong but, in the meantime, we refer you back to Janel Grant's updated complaint, which outlines, in detail, the abuse she endured by McMahon and others while employed at WWE. " Lesnar's return was epic and it gave hardcore WWE fans something to cheer for but behind the spotlight, the comeback was always at the risk of controversy. Triple H opens up on keeping Brock Lesnar's return secret Brock Lesnar F5ed John Cena. Image via: Elsa/ Getty Images WWE Chief Content Officer Paul "Triple H" Levesque offered insight into how Lesnar's return was orchestrated. According to Triple H, this wasn't just a creative decision as it was personal, which was rooted in John Cena's retirement run. "This is John Cena's wish list. It's him writing the last chapter of his book," said Triple H during the SummerSlam post-show panel. "One of the very first things I said to [Cena] is, 'Who do you want? And how?' and we're working through that." To preserve the shock factor, WWE went to extreme lengths to keep the comeback secret. Lesnar was flown into a private airport a day before the event and hidden at the venue. Even WWE writers and producers were kept in the dark. The company canceled its usual post-event press conference to avoid tough questions. Reports suggest WWE's legal team cleared Lesnar four weeks before the event. Could Vince McMahon find his way back after Brock Lesnar? Brock Lesnar's return is also raising a more uncomfortable question. Is this a prelude to Vince McMahon testing the waters for his own comeback? McMahon resigned from all WWE and TKO roles in early 2024, following the original filing of Grant's lawsuit. Public trust is fragile. WWE risks undermining its credibility if it treats such serious allegations as minor PR hurdles. While Lesnar himself has not addressed the lawsuit, and no s*xual contact is alleged to have occurred, his involvement in the narrative has already fractured the fanbase. If WWE were to extend the same treatment to McMahon, the blowback could be far more severe. Also Read: Brock Lesnar ends speculation, returns to SummerSlam 2025 to F5 John Cena McMahon's WWE return chances are slim to none at this stage as his case in the lawsuit is far more intense and complicated than Lesnar's. So, it is fair to assume that WWE or TKO would not risk a PR nightmare by putting McMahon back on the throne, especially when WWE is thriving. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Why WWE Replaced Stone Cold Steve Austin with The Rock to fight Hulk Hogan at WrestleMania X8
Stone Cold Steve Austin and Hulk Hogan (Image via WWE) The biggest fight of WrestleMania X8 was the one between The Rock and Hulk Hogan . Even though it was not the main event, this fight got way more love than the one that did main event the Show of Shows that year. But what many people might not know is that initially, it was not The Rock who was supposed to face Hogan, but the Rattlesnake himself - Mr. Stone Cold Steve Austin . Then why didn't things go according to plan? Let's find out. Stone Cold Steve Austin refused to fight Hulk Hogan One of the best fights in the history of WrestleMania is the one between The Rock and Hulk Hogan during WrestleMania X8. The show was headlined by Chris Jericho vs Triple H, but it was the Rock-Hogan fight that ended up being the cherry on that pie. Recently, WWE Hall of Famer Jim Ross made some surprising revelations about that particular event and that particular fight. He said that Stone Cold Steve Austin refused to fight Hogan during that event leading the company to make a change of plans. On his 'Grilling JR' podcast, Ross said: 'He [Stone Cold] didn't think they had chemistry. He thought the match would suck. And he wasn't going to stand for having a sucky main event, especially at a WrestleMania. So that's the story there. It wasn't anything — it had nothing to do about the finish, or what could the finish be, or what would the finish be, whatsoever." The Rattlesnake, who shared a tribute to The Hulkster after his recent passing, refused to fight against Hogan because he didn't think they could produce something good. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo And this is what could have been, but never did. Even though fans kept waiting for it to happen someday, this one particular bout left them disappointed. Jim Ross says Stone Cold was a perfectionist Well, fans already know Stone Cold Steve Austin has been a perfectionist from Day 1. But that became the main reason behind his refusal to fight The Hulkster during WrestleMania X8. Ross, during the podcast, further said: "It had to do with what Steve wanted — he was a perfectionist. He wanted to have a great match, not a good match, but a great match. And he simply thought he could not get that done, Stone Cold versus Hogan.' Though the event wasn't affected by Stone Cold's decision, and the fight between The Rock and Hulk Hogan ended up being one of the best fights in WWE history, fans of wrestling never got to see these two heavyweights come together for a big match. Hogan recently passed away at the age of 71, leaving fans of the wrestler devastated all over the world. Also Read: Hulk Hogan's legacy - Top 5 matches that showed his greatness in the world of wrestling Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Ex-UFC Star Criticises WWE For Relying On Old Guard, 'A Relic In Brock...'
The seismic entrance of Brock Lesnar at SummerSlam reignited a fierce debate among wrestling insiders. While the crowd's roar confirmed his enduring appeal, MMA icon Chael Sonnen slammed WWE's strategy, accusing the company of hoarding 'legend juice" at the expense of burgeoning stars. On his YouTube channel, Sonnen didn't mince words: 'We had a relic in Brock run in and squash a relic in Cena." By pairing two veteran attractions instead of elevating fresh talent, WWE risks relying on nostalgia rather than nurturing the next generation. Sonnen argued that this approach may fill seats, but fails to build genuine excitement or long-term investment in new names. He singled out Dominik Mysterio and Gunther as prime examples of overlooked athletes. According to Sonnen, WrestleMania's current roster boasts technicians worthy of the spotlight. Gunther, in particular, 'is right there" with the likes of Kurt Hennig and nearly equals icons such as Bret Hart or Seth Rollins. Yet, despite his polished skill set, Gunther remains confined to mid-card status, awaiting a turn that may never arrive. Complicating matters is Brock Lesnar's ongoing legal entanglement. While no charges have been filed in the Janet Grant lawsuit, his name looms over WWE's decision to thrust him back into the main event. Critics argue that spotlighting Lesnar amid controversy sends the wrong message. A representative for Grant told USA Today the comeback felt like 'an attempt to sweep misconduct under the rug," echoing concerns that WWE values spectacle over sensitivity. WWE executives have largely stayed silent, focusing promotional efforts on Lesnar's upcoming clash with John Cena. Even the post–SummerSlam press conference was quietly cancelled, permitting the company to steer clear of awkward questions. Yet, as Sonnen's critique underscores, the debate transcends one night's booking. It strikes at the heart of WWE's philosophy: will the business continue to lean on established names, or will it finally commit to elevating its future headliners? In an era when fans crave authenticity and innovation, simply recycling retired icons may prove unsustainable. For the sake of its next crop of performers, WWE must balance nostalgia with genuine opportunity—lest those poised to carry the brand remain stuck on the sidelines.
