Grocery startup KiranaPro CEO gives an update on how company's servers were deleted: It was not hacking but ...
Deepak Ravindran
has confirmed that recent data wipeout was not the result of any external cyberattack, but rather an internal breach caused by a former employee. Ravindran posted on social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter) about the indecent. In post, he wrote that the company initially suspected hacking but later discovered that a trusted internal employee was responsible for deleting critical server logs. Despite the setback,
KiranaPro
assured that customer data remains intact, and the company is working to restore its services. The startup has also strengthened security measures, including revamping access controls and improving audit logging, to prevent similar incidents in the future.
KiranaPro's complete data deleted: Here's what happened
KiranaPro lost access to its backend servers and app source code, leading to disruptions in its operations. Initially, the company feared a targeted cyberattack, but an internal investigation revealed that the data deletion was intentional and carried out by an ex-employee with legitimate system access.
The startup, which operates on the Indian government's Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC), had been serving 55,000 customers across 50 cities, facilitating 2,000 orders daily.
KiranaPro CEO Deepak Ravindran on how company's servers were deleted
Ravindran explained that the individual behind the breach had worked with him previously and was part of the company's product team. The employee's role was terminated due to internal restructuring, and shortly after, the server logs were wiped.
"This was not a hack. No external party exploited vulnerabilities or bypassed security protocols. Instead, it was an
internal data breach
by someone who had legitimate access to our systems," Ravindran stated
Read KiranaPro CEO Deepak Ravindran complete post here
Clarifying the Recent Incident at
@kirana_pro
In light of recent events affecting our infrastructure, I want to take a moment to provide clarity and transparency regarding what occurred, the last few days have been hectic and stressful and firstly I would thank you for your support during such trying times.
Here is a snapshot of what happened and what did not.
After careful investigation, we conclude that this was not a hack. No external party penetrated our ordering or payment systems, exploited vulnerabilities, or bypassed security protocols. Our external security posture remains intact, and there is no evidence of any unauthorized access from outside the organization. All customer data stays intact.
Instead, this was an internal data breach. Specifically, it was the result of actions taken by a trusted internal employee who had legitimate access to our systems. This individual intentionally deleted critical server logs while they were being tested and/or edited, an action that goes directly against our policies, our principles, and the trust we place in our team.
Why the Distinction Matters
Understanding the nature of this incident is important:
A hack implies that a system was compromised from the outside. Typically due to security flaws or insufficient safeguards, which could place customers and stakeholders at broader risk.
An internal breach, however, involves someone with authorized access misusing their privileges. This represents a very different type of threat: one rooted in internal trust and the perpetrators need for vengeance, rather than technical system vulnerability.
What We're Doing
We are taking this breach extremely seriously and have already taken the following steps:
•Internal teams are working hard to bring the KiranaPro app back up live.
•Initiated a full forensic review to determine the complete scope and impact of the data deletion.
•Strengthened access controls and improved audit logging to prevent similar incidents in the future.
•Reinforced internal policies and implemented additional training around data governance and privileged access, restructed MFA for all parties working on the server and implemented a One-to-One Entry Log to the databases as we rebuild what we lost during this attack.
•Pursuing appropriate disciplinary and legal action against the individual responsible, in line with the severity of the breach.
I fully understand the concern this incident may cause. As the founder, I want to reiterate our commitment to protecting our systems and data not only from external threats but from internal misuse as well.
An attack of this kind is not an attack on outcomes, It is an attack on trust and the covenant we share with our employees, The next few months will see us come back, with learnings from this experience with stronger controls and systems in place.
Looking forward to your continued support.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
US, China and Russia: Navigating the superpower trilemma
Today, Indian foreign policy discourse is mired in an important debate. Two key assumptions govern this debate: that New Delhi's ties with the US arguably constitute its most important relationship in the 21st century, and that any negotiations with Beijing are a signal of weakness. India-US relations are undergoing a tense phase. The tensions have primarily been instigated by US President Donald Trump's decision to impose a 25% tariff on India, and an additional, 'unspecified penalty' for continuing to buy energy resources from Russia. His social media comments have gone so far as to refer to both India and Russia as 'dead economies.' Naturally, this has called into question the time-tested nature of the partnership in the face of the 'China challenge'. With the US-China equation changing, India has to balance ties with both as well as work towards its own national interests Speaking of China, after a long period of severed dialogue, postures on both sides have slightly relaxed, though the road to stability vis-à-vis the border issue, or even China's backing of Pakistan, is long and winding. Nonetheless, communication and negotiation between the two neighbours is underway, and is perhaps a welcome break from the silent-but-violent treatment. Besides the volatility in New Delhi's ties with the two superpowers, there exists a bilateral dynamic between the US and China, which vitally impacts India. An intense back-and-forth of escalating tariffs ensued between the two economic giants earlier this year. Yet, Trump's recent statements seem to suggest that a trade deal with Beijing is in the works. So how does that affect India? So far, India has believed that Trump's continued dissatisfaction with Beijing will be a core aspect of mutual convergence between itself and the US. This definitely was the case under the Joe Biden administration. But if anything is certain about Trump, it is that nothing, indeed, is certain. So, the US and China may not be entering a friendly phase, but they sure are inching toward some semblance of stability. The dynamics of this fateful triangle require that India think in its national interests— sustained economic growth and security of its territory from both external and internal threats. And as PM Modi himself remarked in an interview in 2023, '[The] foremost guiding principle in foreign affairs is our country's national interest.' This begs the question: How should New Delhi balance the nuances of its ties with the US and China and the repercussions of their own thaw, while working to achieve its national interests? One way is not to believe that negotiations with China signal weakness. This anxiety is likely to play up as New Delhi and Beijing negotiate. Most recently, India has eased tourism rules, while China has opened up access for Indians to undertake the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra. To a great degree, India's geographical, economic and military constraints require that communication with Beijing continue for sustainable security to be achieved. This is not to say that India should give up its confident posture, or discontinue investments in de-risking or border security. It is also not a call for it to shed its affinity for the US. But the steps toward a thaw with Beijing — high-level political conversations, ministerial-level dialogues, and working mechanism consultations on the border — are necessary. And at a time when Trump seems to be prepared to meet the 'China challenge' alone, India must figure its own way out to do the same. Second, is to evaluate costs when it comes to fulfilling its energy requirements through purchases from Russia. The affordability of such purchases, and the historic nature of ties with Moscow (especially in defence), make it a vital partner to New Delhi. However, Trump is prioritising reciprocal access to the Indian market over having a vital partner in the Indo-Pacific. And in a world where the US is vastly more powerful than India — or in most aspects, even China — much of what Trump says, goes. So the question is, where is the common ground between India not shedding its friendship with Russia, not risking insurmountable tariffs from the US, and not enabling China's unchecked regional power? The intertwined interests of economic growth and stable security seem orthogonal in this situation. But it is important to face facts. If it wasn't buying oil from Russia, India would still get the tariff slap. If there was great openness in the Indian dairy and agricultural markets, which Trump consistently demands, there would still be an 'unspecified penalty' for trading with Russia. So, the acknowledgement that there is no absolute win-win, is essential. It boils down to assessing what is more harmful — not making any adjustments to the trade numbers with Russia, or the US. It is also important to acknowledge the trade-offs — if there is a significant reduction in the imports of oil and/or defence equipment from Russia, and the US becomes the preferred alternative source of imports, Moscow may become unabashed in its support for China in its disputes with India. If trade with Russia continues as is, India shall face agonistic tariffs under Donald Trump and an overall lack of support in regional geopolitics. It is indeed true that India's tariffs continue to remain high, market openness is low, and domestic innovation and production capability face challenges. Hence, is the first step to addressing the above mentioned dilemma to take difficult steps towards phased openness? Most likely. It may assuage Trump's concerns about the US's trade deficit, without creating many troubles in India-Russia relations. Finally, the worrisome trend of self-reliance across the globe is leaving fewer alternatives for India to replace its dependencies on the US, China, or Russia. Where it gets affordable imports, it faces controversial dilemmas. Where it sees a strong partner, it faces chiding and deriding. So, moving forward, even as the willingness to negotiate diplomatically must continue, India must invest in its own trajectory toward economic and military modernisation. Illustration credit: Illustration by Chad Crowe (USA) Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Centre picks Medak for pharma energy scheme
1 2 Hyderabad: The Centre has selected Medak district in Telangana to promote global energy efficiency technologies in the pharma industryunder the Assistance in Deploying Energy Efficient Technologies in Industries and Establishments (ADEETIE). Through this scheme, MSMEs are expected to reduce energy consumption by 30 to 50%, enhance their power-to-product ratio, and support the creation of green energy corridors. The Centre has allocated Rs 1,000 crore for the scheme across the country. Being implemented by the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE), the scheme aims to accelerate the adoption of advanced energy-efficient technologies in MSMEs. BEE has called upon all state govts to act swiftly and ensure the successful implementation of ADEETIE, urging engagement with state-designated agencies (SDAs) to inform stakeholders, identify suitable clusters, and assist MSMEs in transitioning to new technologies. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad ADEETIE is being rolled out across 60 industrial clusters and 14 energy-intensive sectors, such as textiles, foundries, and food processing, through a phased and cluster-specific approach targeting precise interventions for tangible outcomes. BEE has selected five states for the ADEETIE scheme to promote global energy efficiency technologies in the pharma industry, including Telangana. Apart from Medak, the scheme will also be implemented in Baddi, Madgaon, Ahmedabad, and Bidar for pharma sector innovation. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indian NRIs Are Getting Eligible For INR 2 Lakh Monthly Pension On Retirement. Invest 18K/M Get Offer Undo by Taboola by Taboola "ADEETIE is a big boon to the MSME sector," said Akash Tripathi, additional secretary, ministry of power and director general, BEE, urging all states to leverage this opportunity from the outset to ensure the scheme's success and optimise benefits for their industries. From the ₹1,000-crore budget, ₹875 crore is designated as interest subvention to facilitate concessional finance for energy-efficient upgrades, with ₹50 crore earmarked for implementation and capacity-building. The initiative is projected to mobilise investments of over ₹9,000 crore, including substantial contributions from MSMEs themselves. The Union govt views the scheme as an essential tool for post-pandemic recovery and for fostering long-term sustainability, employment generation, and the pursuit of India's climate and net-zero objectives. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Liquor shops in Pune report ‘severe shortage' of IMFL brands, blame excise duty hike
1 2 3 Pune: The Maharashtra govt's recent decision to increase excise duty has triggered a shortage of Indian-made foreign liquor (IMFL) brands across liquor shops and distribution networks, industry stakeholders said. They said the price shock, production slowdown and logistical delays have resulted in around 30-40% shortage of mainstream IMFL brands. In a concerning trend, retailers said there has been a significant spike in demand for country liquor, as consumers shift down the price ladder. "There's a gradual and visible shift towards country liquor across the counter. Those who previously bought lower-end IMFL are now moving to cheaper options," said a member of Pune District Wine Merchants' Association. You Can Also Check: Pune AQI | Weather in Pune | Bank Holidays in Pune | Public Holidays in Pune Aditya Patil, owner of a liquor shop in Dhanori, said: "After the steep excise duty hikes, most regular and fast moving liquor brands — those typically bought by daily or price-conscious consumers — are either out of stock or missing several pack sizes. For nearly 25 days now, we've had very limited availability. At present, only 180 ml bottles are available in some brands. But the 750 ml, 90 ml, and 1-litre bottles are not coming in. The brands people regularly ask for, especially lower and mid-range whisky and rum, are just not on the shelves." He said: "In addition to the price hike, liquor companies have also slashed the usual trade schemes and cash discounts that retailers used to get per bill. The additional schemes that used to come with bulk orders have also been discontinued. That is hitting our margins hard. Companies have passed the cost pressures to distributors, who in turn have reduced the margins and benefits we used to get as retailers. We (retailers) are now refusing to purchase brands that no longer offer reasonable payment terms or schemes," Another member of Pune District Wine Merchants' Association said: "Most of the major IMFL brands are facing shortages in the last few days, following a rise in the state excise duty by over 50%. The liquor companies needed time to recalculate and revise their MRPs to ensure their products remained affordable to consumers. Some firms took 10-20 days to fix prices. To add to the crunch, two of the biggest IMFL manufacturers had scaled down production ahead of their financial year-end in June. " Multinational companies often limit stock movement in the last month of their financial year to avoid setting a high-sale benchmark for the following fiscal year. As a result, even before the excise hike, supply from these players was already sluggish, another member of the association said. After a 20-day gap in production and dispatch, markets began running dry. "Once pricing was finalised, companies started producing and shipping bottles. But the demand — say 100 bottles — is now being met with just 20 or 50, which is far from sufficient. Moreover, not all pack sizes are being produced," another top retailer said. "The shortage is severe. In addition, there is definitely a shift happening. About 20-25% of customers who previously bought lower-tier IMFL brands have started switching to country liquor or wine-based low-cost alternatives, simply because the latter is more affordable now," he said. Another member of the association said: "The annual licence fee for operating a wine shop is Rs 22 lakh, and govt increases it by 10% every year. On top of that, we bear expenses like rent, freight charges, staff salaries and electricity bills. Earlier, the retail margin on most liquor brands was around 12%. It has now dropped to just 7.2%. Multinational companies are still making profits, but they're squeezing retailer margins to maintain their own. Govt decides the excise duty and VAT structure and also sets the licence fees we pay. But it doesn't regulate or fix the retailers' margin. That leaves us completely at the manufacturers' mercy." A distributor, who did not wish to be named, said: "After the excise duty hike, liquor companies had to revisit and re-register their MRPs. Everyone in the industry was waiting to see how others priced their products. Companies delayed finalising their MRPs to stay competitive. Until that was sorted out, most companies held off production, which led to a complete halt for about 20-25 days. At the distributor level, we are witnessing a shortage of around 20–30%. The problem is, when one pack size comes in, it sells out quickly before the next one arrives. The most popular segments — the ones with highest daily movement— have been hit the hardest." Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
