One of Whoop's new wearables has a bug so bad the company is issuing replacements
According to complaints on Whoop's community forums and X, after setting up a Whoop MG, the wearable can mysteriously became unresponsive hours later, refusing to connect to a smartphone even when it should be charged. "I wore it for about 20 hours or so, but then it suddenly disappeared from the app, no sensor lights on, nothing appearing in the app," one new Whoop MG owner shared on Reddit. On the company's forums, Whoop suggests trying things like charging the MG, reconnecting it to your phone or resetting the wearable to see if that fixes things. Whoop owners have also been directed to contact Whoop's Support team, and multiple faulty Whoop MG owners report that they're being sent replacement wearables.
Engadget has contacted Whoop to get a sense for how widespread this issue is and what the company is doing to address it. We'll update this article if we hear back.
Unlike other companies, Whoop doesn't expect customers to buy a fitness tracker and then pay a subscription; Whoop's subscription fee is inclusive of its hardware. With the Whoop 5.0 and Whoop MG, the company is also hoping to expand the number of metrics it tracks beyond just activity and sleep tracking to things like real-time stress monitoring and, in the case of the MG, blood pressure and ECG readings. What features you're able to access ultimately depends on both the wearable you have and the subscription you're paying for, though.
To access the Whoop MG in particular, you have to pay $359 annually, which starts to feel pretty egregious when the wearable might not work. Prior to this issue, Whoop was also caught denying free hardware upgrades to existing customers after previously suggesting it would send out new wearables to anyone who'd been a member for six months or more. Whoop reversed that decision a few days later.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
12 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Galaxy Z Fold 7 — we just got bad news about the design right before Unpacked
A fair amount looks likely to change with the design of the Galaxy Z Fold 7, Samsung's upcoming foldable phone that's on track for a launch next week. But improved dust resistance may not be among those changes. That's the word from leaker PandaFlashX (via Android Police) who posted on X that the Galaxy Z Fold 7 would have an IP48 rating for dust and water resistance. That spec is unchanged from what the current Galaxy Z Fold 6 offers. Galaxy Z Fold 7 Still Supports iP48 Only 30, 2025 An IP48 rating means that the Galaxy Z Fold can withstand a dunk in water — up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes to be specific — but that dust resistance is limited to larger particles and not finer grains like you get from a device with an IP68 rating. The phones in Samsung's Galaxy S25 flagship lineup — especially the Galaxy S25 Ultra — offer the superior IP68 rating. You can approach this news from either a glass-half-empty or glass-half-full perspective. On the bright side, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is maintaining the dust resistance level offered by its predecessor. So even with Samsung reportedly making the phone thinner and increasing its screen size, it's not taking a step back on the durability rating. But on the other hand, Samsung may be the victim of its own expectation setting here. In a series of teasers for the upcoming phone, Samsung has touted the new model as delivering an "Ultra" experience, evoking comparisons to the top-of-the-line Galaxy S25 Ultra. In a subsequent teaser, Samsung talked about how "Samsung engineers and designers are refining each generation of the Galaxy Z series to be thinner, lighter and more durable than the last." (Emphasis added.) Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Durability can be measured in different ways, not just dust resistance. But in that area, at least, it doesn't sound like Samsung is moving things forward. That said, it doesn't sound as if the Galaxy Z Fold 7 will be wanting for changes when it makes its debut at the Galaxy Unpacked July 2025 event on July 9 in New York. Rumors tip the new phone to increase the main display to 8 inches, up from 7.6 inches on the Galaxy Z Fold 6, while the cover screen is set to expand to 6.5 inches from 6.3 inches. Galaxy Unpacked 2025 preorder: Samsung's expected to show off its latest Galaxy devices at the next Galaxy Unpacked event on July 9. Before that gets here, you can place a reservation now and earn a $50 credit to Samsung reportedly plans to make a thinner device, too, in the vein of the recently released Galaxy S25 Edge. The open foldable could be anywhere from 3.9mm to 4.5mm thin depending on which rumor you pay attention to, which would be a considerably slimmer profile than the Galaxy Z Fold 6 and its 5.6mm thinness. Last year, Samsung hiked the price on the Galaxy Z Fold 6 to $1,899, an increase of $100 over the previous model. Pricing rumors predict that Samsung will hold the line on price for the Galaxy Z Fold 7. Whatever the price of the new phone winds up being, you can make sure to save on that phone — or any device Samsung shows off at Unpacked — by taking advantage of a pre-event offer. Register your name and email address with Samsung ahead of the July 9 event, and you'll get a $50 credit toward the purchase of any product debuting at the show. In addition to the Galaxy Z Fold 7, we're expecting Samsung to show off the Galaxy Z Flip 7, a new version of its foldable flip phone, plus the latest Galaxy Watch 8 models. We could also get previews of a variety of products, from a triple folding Galaxy G Fold device to the Project Moohan mixed reality headset.
The Verge
3 days ago
- The Verge
The unbearable obviousness of AI fitness summaries
After nearly a decade of wearables testing, I've amassed a truly terrifying amount of health and fitness data. And while I enjoy poring over my daily data, there's one part I've come to loathe: AI summaries. Over the last two years, a deluge of AI-generated summaries has been sprinkled into every fitness, wellness, and wearable app. Strava introduced a feature called Athlete Intelligence, pitched as AI taking your raw workout data and relaying it to you in 'plain English.' Whoop has Whoop Coach, an AI chatbot that gives you a 'Daily Outlook' report summarizing the weather, your recent activity and recovery metrics, and workout suggestions. Oura added Oura Advisor, another chatbot that summarizes data and pulls out long-term trends. Even my bed greets me with summaries every morning of how its AI helped keep me asleep every night. Each platform's AI has its nuances, but the typical morning summary goes a bit like this: Good morning! You slept 7 hours last night with a resting heart rate of 60 bpm. That's in line with your weekly average, but your slightly elevated heart rate suggests you may not be fully recovered. If you feel tired, try going to bed earlier tonight. Health is all about balance! That might seem helpful, but those summaries are usually placed next to a chart with the same data. It's worse for workouts. Here's one that Strava's Athlete Intelligence generated for a recent run: Intense run with high heart rate zones, pushing into anaerobic territory and logging a relative effort well above your typical range. Thanks? I can ask Athlete Intelligence to 'say more,' but it regurgitates my effort, heart rate zone, and pace metrics I can see in graphs in the workout summary. If you didn't know anything about my athletic history or the circumstances surrounding this run, this summary might read as insightful. Here's what the summary left out: A more helpful insight might've been: 'You ran during record-breaking heat for your region. While you maintained a consistent and steady pace, you have a bad habit of ramping up mileage too quickly after prolonged breaks, leading to several self-reported injuries in the past five years. A safer alternative would be lower mileage runs over two weeks to acclimate to rising temperatures. Since you're injured, stick to low-intensity walks until your wounds have healed.' Runna, a popular running app that also features AI insights, generated a slightly more useful summary. It said my next run should be 'easy,' one that's perfectly timed for me to recharge. I'm sorry, but 48 hours isn't enough time for my knees to safely heal without risk of re-opening my wounds. The in-app chatbots aren't much better. Yesterday morning, I asked Whoop Coach if I should run today because I injured myself on my last run. It told me: 'Whoop is unable to reply to the message you sent. Please try sending a different message.' I tried reframing my prompt, saying, 'I'm injured and have a limp. Generate a low-intensity workout alternative while I recover.' I was prompted to contact Whoop Membership Services to continue the conversation. Oura Advisor was more helpful, noting in my daily summary: 'With your Readiness dipping and recent stressors like heat, an injury, and higher glucose, your body may feel more fatigued than usual today.' It suggested I prioritize rest. When asked, 'What types of movement are okay when you have an injured knee and a slight limp?' it responded with common-sense answers like a short and easy walk if there's no pain, light stretching, and a reminder to completely rest if I feel any sharp discomfort. This is closer to an ideal response, but I had to guide it to the type of answer I wanted. The insights are so general-purpose that they benefit self-quantification newbies — and even then, only if they're allergic to googling. My botched run is exactly the type of scenario where tech CEOs say AI insights could be most useful. In theory, I agree! It would be nice to have a competent, built-in chatbot that I could ask more nuanced questions. For example, I've had an irregular sleep schedule this month. I asked Oura Advisor if my sleep and readiness trends showed signs of an elevated risk of injury. I also asked if I had abnormally high levels of sleep debt this month. In both cases, it said no — it said I was improving. What resulted was an hour-long debate with a chatbot that left me questioning my own lived experience. When I tried asking it to delve into a particularly stressful week earlier this month, it told me its insights were 'limited to [my] most recent week and current trends.' That sort of defeats the point of having six years' worth of Oura data. After months of perusing Reddit and other community forums, I know I'm not the only person who finds these AI features to be laughable. And yet, Holly Shelton, Oura's chief product officer, tells me that the response to Oura Advisor has been 'overwhelmingly positive,' with 60 percent of users using it multiple times a week and 20 percent using it daily. 'Beyond frequency,' Shelton says, 'It's delivering real impact: 60 percent say Advisor has helped them better understand metrics or health concepts they previously found confusing.' Meanwhile, Strava spokesperson Brian Bell tells me Athlete Intelligence was intended to help beginner athletes and that 'the response to the feature remains strong' with about '80 percent of those opting in to give feedback finding the feature 'very helpful' to 'helpful.'' A Whoop spokesperson wasn't able to respond by publication. These milquetoast summaries? They're probably the best compromise between speed, cost, usefulness, data privacy, and legal liability I understand my frustrations stem from the inherent limitations of LLMs and the messiness of private health data. Strava might be a de facto fitness data hub, but it lacks all the health data points necessary to create holistic, useful, and personalized insights. It'd take Oura Advisor a long time to crunch a year's worth of sleep data for trends. That latency is guaranteed to offer a bad user experience. Not to mention, they'd likely have to up their subscription from $5.99 a month to add that type of computing power. I'm not sure, but Whoop Coach may have declined my injury-related queries to protect itself from liability if something bad happened to me from following its suggestions. These milquetoast summaries are probably the best compromise between speed, cost, usefulness, data privacy, and legal liability. But if that's the case, then let's be honest. Current AI features are repackaged data, much like book reports written by a fourth-grader relying on a Wikipedia summary instead of reading the book. It's a feature tacked on with duct tape and a dream because AI is the zeitgeist. Perhaps one day, these AI insights will create a useful and personalized experience with actionable insights. That day is not today, and it's not worth paying extra for.
The Verge
5 days ago
- The Verge
Gemini is getting ready to replace Google Assistant on Android
Android users will soon be able to let Gemini control device features and apps with fewer privacy concerns. In an email seen by Android Police, Google recently notified Gemini users that it will start rolling out an update on July 7th that allows the AI bot to 'use Phone, Messages, WhatsApp, and Utilities on your phone, whether your Gemini Apps Activity is on or off.' Disabling the Gemini Apps Activity setting stops conversations with the chatbot from being used to 'provide, improve, develop, and personalize' Google products and AI models. It also currently prevents users from asking Gemini to perform tasks in connected apps, such as setting alarms, calling contacts, sending WhatsApp messages, and controlling media playback settings. The vague wording of Google's message initially raised some confusion around whether the change would give Gemini unrestricted access to private data or system functions. Google later clarified that Gemini's app connections can still be disabled at any time, and that the update 'is good for users.' 'They can now use Gemini to complete daily tasks on their mobile devices like send messages, initiate phone calls, and set timers while Gemini Apps Activity is turned off,' Google said in a statement to Android Authority. 'With Gemini Apps Activity turned off, their Gemini chats are not being reviewed or used to improve our AI models.' The incoming change means that people can use Gemini like a personal assistant for their device without contributing to Google's AI training datasets, just in time for Gemini to actually replace Google Assistant on Android devices later this year. Turning Apps Activity off will also stop Gemini interactions from appearing in the activity log, though Google notes it will still save conversations for up to 72 hours for security purposes, regardless of whether the setting is disabled or not.
