logo
What America doesn't get about South Asia: India and Pakistan can't be equated

What America doesn't get about South Asia: India and Pakistan can't be equated

Indian Express23-06-2025
Written by Milinda Moragoda
For decades, US foreign policy has framed India and Pakistan as parallel actors in a regional rivalry — an outdated assumption rooted in Cold War thinking. This legacy framework has become a liability. It fails to account for how dramatically the two countries have diverged — economically, politically, and strategically — and risks misaligning US interests in a multipolar world.
India, the world's most populous democracy, is poised to become the third-largest economy. It is a global leader in technology and space exploration, and home to a vast and influential diaspora. Its institutions remain rooted in a democratic tradition that supports long-term growth and international engagement. India is increasingly viewed as a stabilising force in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond. It plays a leading role in the Quad, recently concluded its G20 presidency, and is deepening partnerships across Asia, Africa, and the West.
Pakistan presents a sharply different picture. Born out of a hasty Partition in 1947 and fractured by civil war in 1971, Pakistan has never fully emerged from the shadow of military control. Civilian governments remain weak and often short-lived. The economy is in recurrent crisis, sustained by external bailouts. Radicalisation continues to permeate parts of the political and military establishment. Journalists, judges, and civil society actors often operate under intense pressure, while political dissent is routinely suppressed.
Washington has contributed to this imbalance. During the Cold War, the US propped up Pakistan as a counterweight to India, and later relied on it as a staging ground during the Soviet-Afghan war and the War on Terror. Even as Pakistan covertly developed nuclear weapons throughout the 1980s, Washington turned a blind eye in the early stages — responding later, by which time the programme was already well advanced. These tactical decisions sidelined Pakistan's democratic institutions, empowered its military intelligence complex, and entrenched a culture of impunity that persists to this day.
The fallout is stark. While India has established its credentials as an important player in a multipolar world and has staked a rightful claim to a permanent seat in the Security Council, Pakistan remains geopolitically transactional and internally unstable. Pakistan's capable citizens — entrepreneurs, academics, reformers — are constrained by a system that discourages institutional reform and relies instead on geopolitical leverage.
The US withdrawal from Afghanistan has only intensified regional challenges. India is left to absorb the consequences: A collapsed Afghan state, rising extremism, and a neighbour with an increasingly fragile grip on security and economic stability. Instability in Pakistan and Afghanistan now reverberates across South Asia, threatening hard-won regional gains.
Despite these realities, parts of the Washington policy establishment continue to default to 'balanced' diplomacy — treating both countries as parallel entities with equal claims on US strategic bandwidth. This misrepresents the regional equation and undermines the US's geopolitical interests and credibility as a democratic ally in Asia.
Some observers argue that this policy of parity is not simply a holdover from the past, but an intentional strategy to keep a rising India in check, viewing it as a potential competitor rather than a partner. If that is true, it would be a grave miscalculation. Such thinking is counterproductive and would suggest that the US has yet to absorb the lessons of its own Cold War-era missteps in South Asia. It also risks alienating one of the world's most consequential democracies. Even though India's foreign policy may not always align with US preferences, it is fundamentally a constitutional democracy with enduring institutions and a vibrant civil society. Pakistan, by contrast, is a military-dominated state whose political cycles and economic direction are shaped more by external influences than domestic consensus.
To remain effective in South Asia, US policy must reflect this asymmetry. Treating India and Pakistan as interchangeable partners sends the wrong signal to allies, undermines US credibility, and weakens regional stability. It perpetuates a flawed narrative that has outlived its strategic purpose.
The time has come for Washington to adopt a more strategic approach that is based on institutional strength, democratic resilience, and long-term alignment, rather than on historical convenience. This shift is not about abandoning Pakistan, but about acknowledging the costs of maintaining a policy of false parity.
In an era of multipolar complexity, where strategic clarity is essential, the US must recalibrate its approach. The stakes — for South Asia and for US influence in the Indo-Pacific — demand nothing less.
The writer is a former Sri Lankan cabinet minister, High Commissioner to India, and founder of the Sri Lankan strategic affairs think tank, Pathfinder Foundation
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jain & the art of diplomatic immunity
Jain & the art of diplomatic immunity

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Jain & the art of diplomatic immunity

The Uttar Pradesh Police's Special Task Force (STF) has just pulled the curtain on a plot so audacious it could make Sukesh Chandrashekhar man who invented multiple micro nations and appointed Shri Harsh Vardhan Jain as the ambassador or consul-general has been arrested from the Westarctica Embassy compound in Ghaziabad's ambassador of Ladonia and the Consul-General of Saborga had diplomatic number plates, passports, but, as it turned out, no diplomatic immunity. When the man identified himself as Harsh Vardhan Jain, it became clear that Gangadhar hi Shaktiman Meet Harsh Vardhan Jain, the man who turned a rented house into a diplomatic Disneyland for fictional nations like Westarctica, Saborga, Poulvia, and Ladonia, countries so obscure even Google Maps would shrug and say, "Bhai, yeh kahan hai?"It was a Tuesday, July 22, when the Noida unit of the UP STF, acting on a tip-off from central agencies, swooped in like a hawk on a particularly delusional pigeon. They found Jain, the mastermind of this micronation madness, strutting about as the "Ambassador" of these make-believe had four luxury cars decked out with fake diplomatic plates, because nothing screams "I'm legit" like a second-hand Merc with a dodgy licence plate. Add to that a haul of 12 "diplomatic passports" for his fantasy nations, forged documents stamped with the seal of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), two fake PAN cards, 34 rubber stamps of various countries and companies, and two counterfeit press also had Rs 44.7 lakh in cash just so minor inconveniences came knocking. A stash of foreign currency that could fund a small coup in Poulvia, if it were a real a Ghaziabad resident with a rap sheet that includes a 2011 case for possessing an illegal satellite phone, had a knack for playing dress-up. He allegedly morphed photos of himself with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, former President APJ Abdul Kalam, and other global bigwigs to convince gullible folks he was a diplomatic heavyweight."Look, here I am with Modi ji, shaking hands like we're planning a G20 summit in Mordor Midlands!" you can almost hear him say. He targeted dreamers desperate for jobs abroad and companies chasing overseas deals. Jain promised them visas to the countries he had invented. STF suspects he ran a suspected hawala racket through shell companies to keep the cash let's look at some of his "micronations". Westarctica? Sounds like a rejected Marvel villain hideout. Saborga, Poulvia, Ladonia? They're not even on the dark web's travel itinerary. A micronation, for the uninitiated, is a self-declared "country" that no government or international body recognises. They are like a WhatsApp group declaring itself a sovereign however, sold these as real destinations, complete with "diplomatic" credentials. He even styled himself as Westarctica's "Baron," which is less a title and more a cry for a country where bureaucracy is a blood sport, Jain's hustle is both laughable and oddly admirable. He forged MEA seals, instead of some low-level patwari's. He knew few cops dare to stop and extort from diplomats so he got the vehicular equivalent of sticking a "VIP" sticker on your scooter. Jain's plan worked, at least for a while, because India loves a good someone you're an ambassador with a selfie next to Modi ji, and they'll hand over their life savings faster than you can say "visa approved."So, what's next? An FIR's been lodged at Kavi Nagar police station, and the STF is digging deeper. Jain's embassy of nowhere is crumbling, but the question lingers: how did he pull this off for so long?Maybe it's because, in Delhi, we're so used to embassies and CD numberplates, a fake embassy feels like just another problem is Jain opened one in Kavi Nagar, Ghaziabad. Had this been in South Delhi, he would be having a nice lunch at Habitat with a fellow diplomat. Because diplomats and consuls are all over the markets, only god and Delhi Police know how many are of countries invented by Jain's fellow diplomats.- EndsTrending Reel

Who are Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, Freedom Convoy organizers, facing 7 and 8-year sentences for the 2022 Ottawa protest?
Who are Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, Freedom Convoy organizers, facing 7 and 8-year sentences for the 2022 Ottawa protest?

Economic Times

time2 hours ago

  • Economic Times

Who are Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, Freedom Convoy organizers, facing 7 and 8-year sentences for the 2022 Ottawa protest?

Reuters Freedom Convoy organizer Tamara Lich walks to the courthouse for a sentencing hearing in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada July 23, 2025. REUTERS/Blair Gable Sentencing hearings began Wednesday, July 23 for Freedom Convoy organizers Chris Barber and Tamara Lich, as the Crown called for unusually stiff penalties, eight years in prison for Barber and seven for Lich, following their April convictions for mischief. Crown prosecutor Siobhain Wetscher told Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey that the proposed sentences reflect the 'extraordinary harm' caused by the 2022 trucker protest, which paralyzed downtown Ottawa for more than three weeks. She argued that Lich and Barber played 'pivotal leadership roles' in orchestrating the occupation and encouraging participants to remain in place despite court injunctions and mounting disruptions to residents and businesses. 'It's not a sentence that is being sought lightly,' said Wetscher, 'but one the Crown believes is proportional to the damage caused.' Defence Pushes Back: 'Cruel and Unusual Punishment' Barber's lawyer, Diane Magas, pushed back forcefully against the Crown's recommendations, calling them 'excessive, abusive, and unconstitutional.' She urged the court to consider an absolute discharge, which would spare Barber both jail time and a criminal record. At minimum, she said, he should serve a conditional sentence in the cited several precedents, including the 2010 G20 summit protesters, who caused extensive property damage but received less than two years in jail. Pat King, another convoy figure, received a three-month conditional sentence plus time served.'There are clearly more severe cases of mischief in Canadian legal history,' she said. 'The fear and intimidation in those incidents was far greater than in this case.' Mitigating Factors Acknowledged Magas pointed out Barber's cooperation with police during the protest, including efforts to relocate trucks away from residential streets. Justice Perkins-McVey acknowledged the action as a mitigating factor, though she noted that Barber's cooperation helped manage the disruption, but didn't end also read aloud character references that portrayed Barber as a 'pillar of the Swift Current community' and emphasized the impact a criminal record would have on his trucking business, particularly his ability to cross the US border. Who Are Tamara Lich and Chris Barber? Tamara Lich and Chris Barber were two of the most visible organizers of the so-called Freedom Convoy, a protest movement that began in late January 2022 in response to COVID-19 vaccine mandates for cross-border truckers. Tamara Lich was born in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, and has worked primarily in logistics within the energy sector, including as a base administrator at STEP Energy Services. She has also been a fitness instructor and performs as the lead vocalist and guitarist for the Alberta-based band Blind gained attention as an organizer of the far-right Yellow Vest protests in Medicine Hat during 2018–2019, distancing the group from violent rhetoric after threats against Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. She later became a leader of the Maverick Party, promoting Western Canadian interests and constitutional reform, with secession as a secondary goal. Lich stepped down from the party's board in early resides in Medicine Hat, Alberta. She is married to Dwayne Lich and is both a mother and a grandmother. One of her daughters was born prematurely, while another daughter works as a nurse. Lich has also claimed Métis John Barber (born 1975) is a truck driver and owner of C.B. Trucking Limited in Swift Current, Saskatchewan. He co-led the 2022 Canadian convoy protest and was arrested on February 17, 2022, then released on bail the following day. What Was the Freedom Convoy Protest? The case against Tamara Lich and Chris Barber stems from their roles as key organizers of the 2022 Freedom Convoy protest that occupied downtown Ottawa for over three weeks. Initially charged with multiple offences, including mischief, obstruction, and intimidation, the charges were later narrowed, and in April 2025, both were found guilty of mischief, while Barber was also convicted of counselling others to disobey a court order. They were acquitted of more serious charges like intimidation and obstructing police. Lich and Barber were arrested on February 17, 2022, shortly after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act, a first in Canadian history, to dismantle the protest. A federal court later deemed that move unconstitutional. Initially, the pair faced several charges, including counselling mischief, obstructing police, and intimidation. However, after Ottawa police filed a relaid information sheet, the most serious charges were narrowed April 2025, both were convicted of mischief, with the court finding that they encouraged demonstrators to stay despite knowing the disruption they were causing. Barber was also found guilty of counselling others to disobey a court order, after he told followers to ignore a judge's ruling banning horn honking. They were acquitted on other charges, including intimidation and obstructing police. Political Reaction: Poilievre Slams Crown's Request Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre has criticized the Crown's proposed sentences as disproportionate and politically motivated.'Let's get this straight,' he posted on X, 'while rampant violent offenders are released hours after their charges... the Crown wants 7 years prison time for the charge of mischief for Lich and Barber. How is this justice?'His remarks drew support from Barber and Lich. In a statement, Lich thanked Poilievre and wrote: 'The double standard and vindictive nature from the prosecution office has become too obvious to ignore.'The sentencing hearings are scheduled to continue Thursday, July 24, with more arguments from the defence and a final ruling from Justice Perkins-McVey expected later this summer. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Can victims of Jane Street scam be compensated by investor protection funds? Did the likes of TCS, Infosys, Wipro let India down in AI race? How India's oil arbitrage has hit the European sanctions wall Apple has a new Indian-American COO. What it needs might be a new CEO. Stock Radar: Tata Chemicals breaks out from 1-month consolidation; time to buy the dip? Power sector companies: Will they be able to outperform? 5 power stocks with an upside potential ranging from 6 to 29% For risk-takers with long-term perspective: 7 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential of over 26% Multibagger or IBC - Part 16: Regulatory tailwind turns compliance into cash. This auto ancillary could be a winner

UN ‘concerned' as Afghanistan women arrested over Taliban dress code
UN ‘concerned' as Afghanistan women arrested over Taliban dress code

Hindustan Times

time3 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

UN ‘concerned' as Afghanistan women arrested over Taliban dress code

The United Nations expressed its "concern" on Monday over a series of arrests of Afghan women in the capital Kabul who were accused of breaching the Taliban government's strict dress code, with officials denying such detentions. The women were wearing flowing abaya robes and wearing make-up. They resisted getting into the vehicle but were forced to do so by a PVPV official who was holding a gun, the witness said on condition of anonymity. (Pic used for representation)(AP file) Since their return to power in 2021, the Taliban authorities have imposed a severe interpretation of Islamic law and require all women to be covered from head to toe. The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) said it was "concerned by the arrest of numerous women & girls in Kabul between 16-19 July due to their alleged non-compliance with the de facto authorities' hijab instructions". "These incidents serve to further isolate women and girls, contribute to a climate of fear, and erode public trust," the agency wrote on X, adding that they had contacted the authorities about the matter. A witness told AFP last week that while driving in central Kabul, he saw a unit of the Ministry for Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice (PVPV) "telling two women to go with them in the car". The women were wearing flowing abaya robes and wearing make-up. They resisted getting into the vehicle but were forced to do so by a PVPV official who was holding a gun, the witness said on condition of anonymity. The Taliban authorities denied the arrests and said they have "only campaigned for (the) hijab" dress code. "But there's nothing like arresting someone or taking anyone to jail," PVPV spokesman Saiful Islam Khyber told AFP. Over the past four years, women have been progressively isolated by the Taliban authorities, which have banned them from universities, public parks, gyms and beauty salons, in what the UN has denounced as "gender apartheid". The Taliban government says that their interpretation of Islamic law "guarantees" everyone's rights and that allegations of discrimination are "unfounded". On Monday, UNAMA called on the Taliban authorities "to rescind policies and practices that restrict women and girls' human rights and fundamental freedoms".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store