logo
Weakening agri policy would be ‘deal-breaker' for next EU budget

Weakening agri policy would be ‘deal-breaker' for next EU budget

Agrilanda day ago
Any attempt to weaken agricultural policy within the EU would be a 'deal-breaker' in terms of the negotiation of the long term budget, known as the multi-annual financial framework (MFF).
The comments came from Spanish MEP Carmen Crespo Díaz, the European Parliament's lead negotiator on the future of agriculture, regarding the plenary debate on the post-27 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).
'We firmly reject any attempt to nationalise this policy or merge its funding with other EU instruments,' Diaz, who is a member of the European People's Party (EPP) grouping in the EU, told Agriland.
'The CAP must remain a truly common policy, with dedicated funds and independent pillars, ensuring fair and equal support for all European farmers.
'Weakening agricultural policy would be a deal-breaker for the next EU long-term budget (MFF).
'We need to put farmers back at the centre of decision-making. Innovation, competitiveness, and sustainability must drive the transformation of Europe's food system without adding to the bureaucratic burden farmers already face,' she added.
MEP Carmen Crespo Diaz. Image source: EPP Group
EU Budget
Crespo Diaz said that a stronger budget is essential to shield farmers from rising costs, climate risks, and market instability.
'In addition to strengthening agricultural aid, the EPP Group is committed to simplification and smart incentives to increase the profitability and resilience of farming across Europe,' she added.
'We support smart incentives over obligations, fair prices for producers, and better support for vulnerable rural regions.'
In her draft report as rapporteur on the future of agriculture and the post-2027 Common Agricultural Policy, Crespo Diaz stated:
'It is necessary to consolidate a model based on incentives rather than obligations, promoting the adoption of sustainable practices without affecting farmers' profitability.
'Existing regulations need to be reviewed so that they do not impose disproportionate burdens, and administrative simplification needs to be encouraged, reducing bureaucracy and ensuring that support reaches those who need it in a timely manner.
'To this end, the following should be noted: CAP cross-compliance requirements should be reassessed to reduce excessive implementation requirements, administrative burdens and unnecessary costs.
'Direct payments under Pillar I of the CAP should be made available to all professional
farmers, irrespective of their size and type of production,' she also stated.
She also suggested the possibility of supporting sectors in difficulty or subject to specific constraints, such as arid, mountainous or outermost areas and sectors such as fruit and vegetables, wine, beekeeping.
A further point made is that the Mediterranean forests and livestock, should be maintained.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Harris to meet pharmaceutical sector representatives based in the US
Harris to meet pharmaceutical sector representatives based in the US

RTÉ News​

time37 minutes ago

  • RTÉ News​

Harris to meet pharmaceutical sector representatives based in the US

The Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Simon Harris, will meet senior representatives from the pharmaceutical sector based in the United States today. The online meeting comes at a critical juncture in EU-US trade talks and amid the ongoing US Section 232 investigation into the pharmaceutical sector. An important component of Ireland's economic relationship with the United States includes significant, mutually beneficial trade and investment partnerships in the pharmaceutical sector. Speaking before the meeting, the Tánaiste said: "The economic partnership between Ireland and the US, and the EU and the US in the pharmaceutical sector, is critically important. Trade and investment in this sector is mutually beneficial." Section 232 investigations are focused on national security issues; the integrated supply chain in pharma products between the EU, including Ireland and the US, supports rather than threatens our collective transatlantic economic security," Mr Harris said. "Fundamentally, governments and businesses alike have an interest in mutually beneficial transatlantic trade and investment, in supporting jobs on both sides of the Atlantic, and in pursuing negotiated solutions to trade and economic disputes. This is at the core of my ongoing outreach, both to the US government and to representatives of key economic sectors both domestically and in the US," the Tánaiste added. Background The Tánaiste has engaged directly with the US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on the pharma issue. Ireland's position is that the treatment of pharma should be within negotiations with the EU on an agreement in principle. Ireland makes payments in royalties and licences to US pharmaceutical companies of an estimated €20bn, which in turn supports manufacturing of finished products within the US, the EU and across the world. There is no doubt this is a crucial sector to our economy; In fact, there are about 49,000 people employed in pharma in Ireland. They are here for many reasons; They have access to a highly talented, skilled labour market. They have access too to an EU market of over 450 million people in terms of the European Union. About 80% of what US pharma companies export back to the United States is not the finished product. It goes into US factories, it creates jobs for American workers. The Government is continuing to engage intensively with the pharma sector as well as with EU partners and the European Commission.

Irish Examiner view: People in poverty are left behind
Irish Examiner view: People in poverty are left behind

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

Irish Examiner view: People in poverty are left behind

For a country that dragged itself out of poverty to wealth, we have certainly left a lot of people behind. St Vincent de Paul, at the coalface of citizens' attempts to keep up, not with the neighbours, but with the bare essentials, has called for a €16-a-week welfare increase to keep pace with the cost of living. And that's just the core rate, and not including other allowances that are vital to many people's survival. The core rate increase amounts to just over €830 a year — and frankly, one wonders if that's even enough, given the rates of inflation in recent years and the global uncertainty that a US-EU trade war might bring, not to mention the ever-present threat or reality of homelessness for far too many of our fellow citizens. The charity expects to get 250,000 calls this year. Let us recall that the population of the island is about 5.2m. SvP's head of social policy, Louise Bayliss, described it as 'policy failure', given this country's wealth. With the Government ruling out one-off measures to deal with the cost of living, urgency turns to how we can protect our most vulnerable people. One wonders how countries with similar populations that follow the Nordic model, such as Denmark and Finland, can seemingly deliver better outcomes for the people there than Ireland, which has a bigger GDP? The sad reality is that our problems are generally within our capability to solve, yet show no signs of abating even in the medium term. And that's a reality we should all sit with and contemplate — after all, how many of us are one lost job or one missed payment away from serious trouble? Times change, and relevance fades Cork city councillor Terry Shannon has objected to a process to rename Cork's Bishop Lucey Park, saying that Ireland is now 'a cold place' for Catholics. But is it? There is merit, certainly, in retaining elements of history, given how they inform our overall identity, as explored by Sarah Harte on these pages and in Monday's editorial. However, times do change, whether people like it or not, and what may be a touchstone for a previous generation may not have the same resonance for the current. The idea of wanting to rename areas associated with religious figures, given the numerous sexual abuse scandals involving the Church, as well as its historic role in oppressing women and children via mother and baby homes or industrial schools, seems quite reasonable. Let us remember that this is a vote simply to begin a process: The destination has yet to be reached. The suggestion of renaming the park isn't new, and can be found at least as far back as the aftermath of the commission into mother and baby homes in 2020. Although Cornelius Lucey — an opponent of contraception and a believer that the Church was right in everything including politics — may not be personally involved in any of the controversies affecting the institution, the stains on the Church affect him by association. For instance, he was responsible for founding the St Anne's Adoption Society in 1954 to arrange the adoption of babies born to unmarried Irish mothers in Britain. An Irish Examiner investigation in 2018 found that an unmarked plot in St Finbarr's Cemetery was bought by the society, which closed in 2003. Four children are buried in it, with the deaths occurring between 1979 and 1990. A neighbouring plot is owned by a different organisation that ran nursery services for the St Anne's Society. The Irish Examiner has reported extensively on the issues relating to adoption in this country. It is enough to warrant wariness in a republic that, for all its faults, endeavours to look forward rather than dogmatically back. Of the at least 5.2m people in the country, almost 70% identify as Catholics, which suggests that even as Mass attendance continues to shrink, that there is still plenty of warmth in that as a broad identity. How relevant people see religion as being part of their everyday life is another debate entirely, and one that predominantly remains between an individual and their own heart. Ultimately, what councillors voted in favour of is a renaming process — a decision on the name is still some way off, and what's to say the original name won't stay? The park, which councillors have noted will bear no resemblance to the one that closed for a revamp in 2023, will belong to the people of Cork. Shouldn't it be up to them to decide if they want to stick with the old or give it a brand new identity? Healy is an inspiration For a relatively small island, we have always tended to punch above our weight in culture and sport, with cyclist Ben Healy now taking his place on our list of elite names by being the first Irishman in 38 years to take a yellow jersey at the Tour de France. The last were Stephen Roche (1987) and Sean Kelly (1983), more than a whole generation ago, with Shay Elliot being the first in 1963. At 24, Healy, born in England and of Waterford ancestry, has plenty of life left in his legs, and even if he doesn't win the overall competition, it is exciting to see how well he's done at this nascent stage of his career, having only turned pro in 2022. Alongside our cluster of Olympic gold medallists, one hopes he can help inspire the next generation of Irish youth, at home and in the diaspora. No pressure, Ben.

European Commission to propose merging CAP funding with other funds
European Commission to propose merging CAP funding with other funds

RTÉ News​

time2 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

European Commission to propose merging CAP funding with other funds

The European Commission is set to propose merging Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) funding with other funds, in a radical overhaul of how farmers receive financial supports from the European Union budget. Draft documents of the proposals, seen by RTÉ News, indicate that from the start of the next EU budgetary cycle in 2028, the commission plans to pool dedicated agricultural and rural financial supports into a single National and Regional Partnerships fund. The proposal would mean CAP would no longer be a stand-alone fund within the EU budget but would instead be merged with EU cohesion, migration, and infrastructure funding. This could result in certain funding for agriculture within the EU budget no longer being ringfenced and see financial supports funnelled away from farming and into other areas. In the draft, the commission argues the change would allow for "stronger synergies between policies", and create a more flexible, crisis-responsive budget that better reflects the EU's shared priorities. The commission will outline its proposals to MEPs later today for the next EU budget - known as the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) - which comes into effect in 2028. Irish farmers receive around €2 billion annually in CAP payments to help support the rural economy and food production. This funding is divided into two pillars - the first comprising direct payments to farmers, with the second focusing on rural development. However, the draft commission document proposes to guarantee "coherence by integrating the CAP interventions from the current two-funds structure under one single umbrella". The proposal suggests member states would have more power to reallocate funding "based on their specific needs rather than uniform allocations". Some Irish MEPs who have seen the leaked commission proposals say they risk CAP funding to farmers being considerably reduced, with some estimates suggesting they could see a drop of up to 30%. Fine Gael MEP Maria Walsh, who is a member of the European Parliament's Agriculture Committee, said they "highlight a real risk of the already insufficient CAP budget being further decreased. "While the relevance of some pillar-two tools - from farm advisory services to LEADER programmes - is maintained in the proposal, the funding is uncertain. "Without guaranteed investment, our rural communities and farmers will suffer. For example, the ringfenced funding for LEADER programmes has been abolished - I will be fighting within the Agriculture Committee to reverse this decision," she added. The commission's plans also recommend CAP funding "should be focused on active farmers", meaning supports would be "targeted towards farmers who exercise agriculture as a principal activity". In addition, the proposals would increase supports for younger farmers significantly, with funding for the costs of establishing a new farm potentially rising from €100,000 to €300,000. Independent Ireland MEP Ciaran Mullooly said he is "alarmed and concerned" by the reported proposals "to scrap a fund with millions of euros of Pillar 2 rural development grants. "These grants provide a lifeline to many parts of the midlands, west, north west and north east," he said. He added that "the Commissioner is proceeding against the advice of all farmers and community groups with a single fund to be merged with cohesion funds paid to member states. "The scale of cuts in the budget being proposed are absolutely disastrous for Irish farmers." 'Big battle ahead' - IFA The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) has described the draft proposals as "very concerning". IFA President Francie Gorman said: "it is clear that the EU Commission is downgrading the importance of the CAP and food production to allow for greater spending elsewhere. "The CAP is being turned into an environmental and social policy. Support for farmers who are producing the most food is being consistently reduced. "At a time when Ireland is a net contributor to the overall EU budget, this level of investment in every parish takes on even more significance," he said. "CAP has been the cornerstone of the multi-billion export sector that underpins thousands of jobs in regions far from the urban centres. "There is a big battle ahead to retrieve a coherent policy from what the EU Commission is proposing," he added. 'Beginning of a protracted process' Minister for Agriculture Martin Heydon has said that the commission's budget proposals are "just the beginning of a protracted process". The minster said: "Member States will, through the Council of Ministers, begin the process of agreeing a general approach to the commission's proposals, before engaging in line-by-line negotiations with the EU Parliament and the EU Commission. "This will take some time, and I fully expect the progression of these proposals to be a significant feature of Ireland's Presidency of the EU Council in the second half of next year. "My priority throughout will be to ensure that the legislation finally agreed reflects Ireland's concerns, and provides certainty and stability for farmers," the minister added. Once the commission sets out its proposed EU budget, this will start a process of debate and negotiation that will ultimately lead to a final vote on the next budget for the bloc, that would begin in 2028. Ireland is expected to play an important role in this process, especially regarding CAP funding, given that we will hold the rolling six-month EU presidency for the second half of 2026.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store