'Putin shouldn't have a veto': TD says triple lock debated must avoid misinformation
Ms Callaghan is a member of the Oireachtas Committee on Defence and National Security.
Advertisement
Ms Callaghan, a TD for Carlow-Kilkenny and a former member of the Defence Forces who served in Lebanon, has said that under the current triple lock system, countries like Russia and leaders like Vladamir Putin have the power to veto Ireland's participation in peacekeeping.
'We don't believe that Putin or others should have a veto on whether our troops can be deployed on peacekeeping missions.
'Currently members of the UN Security Council bind Ireland's hands on peacekeeping missions, when these are decisions that should be made by our Government and the Dáil."
Ms Callaghan pointed to the fact that no new peacekeeping missions have been approved by the UN Security Council since 2014.
Advertisement
"This has meant that Irish peacekeepers have in some instances been delayed from engaging in missions to disrupt human smuggling and trafficking and maritime drug seizure operations," she added.
'This shows the absolute need to reform the UN Security Council which Ireland will continue to push for, but with that unlikely in the immediate future, we need to act in our own interests as an independent country in accordance with International Law and the UN Charter.
'In recent days, I have heard opponents of the proposals currently being examined by the Oireachtas Committee on Defence and National Security claim the UN General Assembly can approve peacekeeping missions and there is no need for a green light from the UN Security Council.
'But this is simply not the reality of how the system has worked over the last seven decades. While the General Assembly can make recommendations about deployments, it cannot compel countries to act.
Advertisement
'Only once in history has the General Assembly invoked a Resolution to recommend a peacekeeping operation - and that was nearly 70 years ago when it established the first UN Emergency Force in the Middle East in 1956."
Ms Callaghan is a member of the Oireachtas Committee on Defence and National Security.
Ms Callaghan added: 'The context back then was absolutely unique where it had the consent of the parties involved - Egypt, France, Israel, and the UK - and the recommendation was in line with the priorities of four of the permanent members of the Security Council.
'The reality for the last nearly 70 years has been that every Defence Forces peacekeeping deployment has only ever taken place on the basis of a Security Council mandate. This underscores the rationale for removing the Putin veto."
Ireland
Neutrality 'completely unaffected' by triple lock...
Read More
She said removing the triple lock has "nothing whatsoever to do with military neutrality".
Advertisement
'We value our neutrality and we are remaining militarily neutral. Ireland was militarily neutral for decades before the advent of the term 'triple lock' around the time of the Nice and Lisbon Treaty debates and it will continue to be neutral if these changes are passed through the Oireachtas and become law.'
In an interview with
BreakingNews.ie
in April, Minister of State Neale Richmond said: "Ireland's triple lock mechanism for deploying troops abroad is an archaic tool that is hindering our ability to be a global force for good whilst surrendering our sovereign decision making to the veto powers of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council.
"Given a UN mandate can be vetoed by any of the five permanent Security Council members, we are effectively giving the likes of Russia and China a veto of where and when we send our own troops."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
28 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Gardaí criticised for alleged strip searches of protestors following vigil for Gaza
Members of the public criticised gardaí over how they treated a group of women at a protest for Gaza in Dublin earlier this year. Fourteen people who attended the Mothers Against Genocide group protest against the Israeli war in Gaza were arrested after an entrance to Leinster House in Dublin was blocked. Advertisement The group said some of the women who were arrested at a group protest were strip-searched, and one was subjected to a cavity search. In documents seen by , there were 132 correspondences to the Department of Justice on how protestors were treated by gardaí that day, and the alleged cavity and strip searches. The gardaí's actions compared to how they handled other protests were brought up to the Department of Justice, as one person said: "I have not seen this level of aggressiveness directed towards people who were literally running riot on our streets or those burning down buildings dedicated to housing immigrants, or camping out and stoking racism in sites such as Coolock. " In another email to the Minister for Justice, a member of the public said: "Given the nature of the protest, there are legitimate questions to be asked about why this level of force was deemed necessary. Advertisement "In particular, there is concern about the apparent disparity in Garda responses to this protest when compared with other demonstrations, for example by far-right groups, which at times have involved threatening or intimidating behaviour with a visibly lighter." The number of gardaí involved in the protest was also brought into question, with people saying the number of gardaí heavily outnumbered the protestors. "The high level of Garda presence is very difficult to comprehend. These women were mothers, and were present at the Dáil as part of a Mother's Day Vigil to honour the murdered mothers and children of Palestine. They hoped to deliver a letter to incoming TDs this morning regarding Ireland's part in all of this." Another person compared their experience in needing the gardaí in a different situation and questioned why such a large force was necessary. Advertisement "I recently called the Gardaí in a serious situation, and it took 20 minutes for officers to arrive. How was such a large force available so quickly for a non-violent gathering?" An email to the Taoiseach's Office was also forwarded to the Department of Justice, where concerns were raised over alleged strip searches. "This practice raises significant human rights concerns and has the potential to cause undue distress and humiliation, particularly when conducted without sufficient justification or oversight. "Numerous reports have highlighted instances where strip searches were carried out in circumstances that may not have warranted such invasive procedures. Advertisement "The lack of clear safeguards, transparency, and independent oversight leaves room for potential abuse and a violation of individuals' dignity and rights. Furthermore, strict guidelines, accountability measures, and independent oversight must be implemented to prevent the misuse of strip searches. " A joint letter from Senators Lynn Ruane, Alice-Mary Higgins, Frances Black and Eileen Flynn was sent to the Department questioning how protestors were treated when arrested. "From our knowledge, some of those arrested were strip searched and visually cavity-searched. Can you outline for us the reasons for such an escalation on behalf of the Gardaí for what was a peaceful protest? "We are very worried about the lack of standardised policing practice that was applied to different individuals who were arrested. It is our understanding arrested protestors received different levels of treatment at different Garda stations, with significantly different levels of invasiveness. Advertisement "We request that you seek a full report from each Garda station as to the steps and decisions they took. "Specifically, we also want to ask you what are the internal policies are in the Gardaí when it comes to respecting cultural and religious norms in the event of a strip search, with particular regard to hijabs?" Both the Department of Justice and gardaí were contacted, and both said they had nothing further to comment on the story. Back in May, Garda Commissioner Drew Harris said: 'I can confirm the Garda members involved in conducting the searches acted at all times professionally, lawfully, and in accordance with established procedures and legislative provision." Mr Harris said statements made by People Before Profit TDs Richard Boyd-Barrett, Paul Murphy, and Ruth Coppinger on the arrests and alleged strip-searches were "wholly inaccurate". 'As a direct consequence of these wholly inaccurate statements and the widespread coverage of them in the media, I am deeply concerned about the damage that may be caused to public confidence and trust in policing."
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
West will have to defeat ENTIRE Axis of Evil if they want to end Putin's reign of terror, warns top US ex-general
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) WESTERN nations must change their attitude to Russia and crush the war machine fuelling Vladimir Putin's aggression, an ex-army commander warns. Rogue states such as Iran supply the tyrant with missiles and drones to unleash hell on Ukraine - propping up Russia's "not so great" army, US General Ben Hodges told The Sun. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 7 Vladimir Putin is propped up by his allies Credit: Reuters 7 Russia continues to threaten the West Credit: AFP 7 Putin shaking hands with North Korean tyrant Kim Jong-un Credit: AP Now retired, he told The Sun: "If you want to defeat somebody, you have to knock out whatever it is that keeps the other side in the fight." He warned that if the West fails to take the threat from bloodthirsty Vlad more seriously, Europe will be dealing with war "forever". Russia has continued to rain down misery on Ukraine for more than three years - raising questions over how Moscow hasn't depleted its ammunition stocks. It comes as Putin is hammering Ukraine with almost 1,000 kamikaze drones a missiles each day - overwhelming defence systems. READ MORE ON RUSSIA WAR FEARS UK faces war with Russia within next five years, warns ex head of British Army Dozens of innocents are being injured or killed as apartment buildings are mercilessly bombed and civilians terrorised. Putin ordered his troops over the border in February 2022 and the US military estimated that, without help, Moscow would have run out of firepower by that December. North Korea is widely believed to have supplied Russia with missiles and shells, while Iran has bolstered Putin's stockpile with drones and rockets. China - Moscow's biggest and richest ally - is suspected of equipping Vlad with "dual-use" components, which are used to make weapons. Hodges, who was in charge of American forces in Europe, has urged the West to go after ??????????? He also believes Putin focuses on civilian areas instead of military targets because "the great Russian army and the great Russian air force and the great Russian navy are not so great". Bloodthirsty Putin hits Ukraine with almost 1,000 missiles a DAY as he faces his biggest dilemma yet "I mean they have demonstrated after 11 years they cannot defeat Ukraine," Hodges added. "The only thing they can do is murder innocent people. So that's what they're doing. "Hundreds of drones and missiles and rockets every week, which they get from Iran, North Korea and China, because they can't even produce all that they need anymore. "So I think we know from history that going after the population almost never works. "It didn't work in the Second World War, it didn't work for us against the Vietnamese, it didn't work for us against the Taliban." Putin arrogantly assumed he could sweep in and seize Kyiv in a matter of days after ordering his troops over the border into Ukraine. But more than three years on, the red-faced despot has suffered huge losses on the battlefield. 7 Xi Jinpping attended the Victory Day parade in Moscow Credit: EPA 7 Putin shakes hands with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi Credit: EPA 7 Smoke and fire rise during a Russian strike on Kyiv Credit: Reuters More than 10,000 tanks, 22,000 armoured vehicles, 26,000 artillery systems, and over 700 aircraft have been destroyed, officials estimate. And the casualty numbers are far grimmer. Western officials have revealed that the Russians have sustained more than 900,000 casualties, with 250,000 dead, since Putin unleashed his illegal war. Despite this, the megalomaniac has pushed forward - continuing to throw wave after wave of troops into the meatgrinder. Putin has found his stocks of weapons backfilled by his allies - such as receiving drones from Iran. And meanwhile, Kim has sent tens of thousands of troops to Russia to serve alongside Vlad's men. A small number of Chinese troops have also allegedly been found serving in Ukraine. But Beijing has strongly denied accusations from Ukraine that they supplying Putin with weapons. Russia now is planning to try and unleash 1,000 drones per day on Ukraine as the war marches on - much to the fury of the US. 7 Hodges warned Western nations must instead focus on eliminating the threat from Axis of Evil countries - ultimately diminishing Putin's capabilities. The former military chief said it could see Europe grappling with endless bloodshed if not. He said: "Europe should be more serious and try to crush them, crush that regime, use all of our economic tools and also help Ukraine be successful to defeat Russia. "The only way Russia ever changes is after defeat. And if they're not defeated, then after Putin will be another Putin. "So we're going to be dealing with this forever unless we get serious about defending everything that we say is important. "And we should quit being so scared of what the Russians might do. The Russians should be worrying what the hell we're going to do." Axis of Evil 'supplying Russia with weapons' Iran Iran last year transferred close-range ballistic missiles to Russia in a move condemned by the UK's government and allies. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: "Iran supplying Russia with ballistic missiles to fuel its illegal invasion of Ukraine is a significant and dangerous escalation." Initial claims of Iranian weapons being sent to Russia emerged in late 2022. US military intelligence at the time indicated Tehran was preparing to supply Fateh-110 and Zolfaghar rockets to Moscow. Russia's defence minister Sergei Shoigu visited Iran in September 2023 - and reviewed Tehran's missile arsenal during the trip. North Korea Kim Jong-un vowed to "support" Putin's "sacred fight" to defend Russia's security interests when the North Korean tyrant visited Moscow in 2023 He vowed the two countries would "be together in the fight against imperialism". North Korea has been accused of supplying missiles and shells to Moscow. In April, Volodymyr Zelensky said a missile that killed 12 people in Kyiv had been manufactured in North Korea. The US has imposed sanctions on several entities accused of being linked to arms deals between the two states. Pyongyang has previously denied having any "arms dealings" with Russia. China China has been accused of supplying crucial materials and equipment to at least 20 Russian military factories. Oleh Ivashchenko, head of Kyiv's foreign intelligence service, said in April: "There is information that China supplies tooling machines, special chemical products, gunpowder, and components specifically to defence manufacturing industries. "We have confirmed data on 20 Russian factories." Nato leaders jointly accused Beijing of being a "critical enabler" of Russia by providing "massive support to its defence industry". They claimed China sends "dual-use" components to Moscow such as computer chips that can be used to make weapons. Beijing has denied supplying Russia. Hodges predicts Putin, 72, will stay at the helm of the Kremlin for at least another decade - only taking into account his health. But at some point, the oligarchs around him - who lost enormous fortunes through war sanctions - could snap and force him out, Hodges said. He said: "From a health standpoint, Putin's around for another ten years. "Usually dictators don't have a retirement plan because there are so many people that want to kill them. So that's why they stay in power until the very end. "So I think we should assume he's going to be there, if it's just health, for at least another ten years. "But if enough people finally got mad about how he was ruining Russia's economic standing, that would be different."
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump ‘considering' taking away US citizenship from comedian Rosie O'Donnell
President Donald Trump says he is considering 'taking away' the US citizenship of a long-time rival: the actress and comedian, Rosie O'Donnell. The move comes despite a decades-old Supreme Court ruling that expressly prohibits such an action by the government. Advertisement 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship,' Mr Trump wrote in a social media post on Saturday. He added that Ms O'Donnell, who moved to Ireland in January, should stay in Ireland 'if they want her'. President Donald Trump has threatened to remove the actress's citizenship (Evan Vucci/AP) The two have criticised each other publicly for years, an often bitter back-and-forth that predates Mr Trump's involvement in politics. In recent days, O'Donnell on social media denounced Mr Trump and recent moves by his administration, including the signing of a massive tax breaks and spending cuts plan. Advertisement It is just the latest threat by Mr Trump to revoke the citizenship of people with whom he has publicly disagreed, most recently his former adviser and one-time ally, Elon Musk. But Ms O'Donnell's situation is notably different from Mr Musk, who was born in South Africa. Ms O'Donnell was born in the United States and has a constitutional right to US citizenship. The US State Department notes on its website that US citizens by birth or naturalisation may relinquish US nationality by taking certain steps – but only if the act is performed voluntary and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. citizenship. Advertisement Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, noted the Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case that the 14th Amendment of the constitution prevents the government from taking away citizenship. 'The president has no authority to take away the citizenship of a native-born US citizen,' Ms Frost said in an email on Saturday. 'In short, we are nation founded on the principle that the people choose the government; the government cannot choose the people.' Ms O'Donnell moved to Ireland after Mr Trump defeated vice president Kamala Harris to win his second term. She has said she is in the process of obtaining Irish citizenship based on family lineage. Advertisement Responding to Mr Trump on Saturday, Ms 'Donnell wrote on social media that she had upset the president and 'add me to the list of people who oppose him at every turn'.
