A West Virginia parent sues seeking a religious exemption from required school vaccinations
Miranda Guzman alleges that the state's vaccine mandate violates a 2023 West Virginia law that stipulates the government would not be able to 'substantially burden' someone's constitutional right to freedom of religion unless doing so 'is essential to further a compelling governmental interest.' Guzman sued the state and local boards of education and the county schools superintendent in Raleigh County Circuit Court.
West Virginia was among just a handful of states that granted only medical exemptions from school vaccinations when Republican Gov. Patrick Morrisey issued an executive order in January allowing religious exemptions. However, the state Board of Education voted this month to direct public schools to ignore the executive order and instead follow long-standing school vaccine requirements that are laid out in state law.
Also, two groups have sued over the governor's order, saying the Legislature, not the governor, has the authority to make such decisions.
Guzman obtained a religious exemption to the vaccine mandate from the state health department and enrolled her child in elementary school for the 2025-26 school year. But on June 17, Guzman received an email from the Raleigh County school superintendent rescinding the certificate, according to the lawsuit.
Guzman's attorneys said 'the straightforward legal issue" in the lawsuit is whether enforcement of the state vaccine mandate violates the 2023 Equal Protection for Religion Act.
West Virginia Board of Education spokesperson Christy Day referred to a June 12 statement from the board that its intent is to 'do what is best' for public school students, educators and school service personnel. 'This includes taking the important steps of protecting the school community from the real risk of exposure to litigation that could result from not following vaccination laws,' the earlier statement said.
A telephone message left with Raleigh County Schools Superintendent Serena Starcher wasn't immediately returned.
West Virginia's school vaccination policy long has been heralded by medical experts as one of the most protective in the country for children. State law requires children to receive vaccines for chickenpox, hepatitis B, measles, meningitis, mumps, diphtheria, polio, rubella, tetanus and whooping cough before starting school.
Morrisey, who is not a party to the lawsuit, held a news conference Tuesday in Beckley in support of Guzman.
'This is not about whether or not about parents should vaccinate their children,' Morrisey said. 'This is about standing up for religious liberty.'
At least 30 states have religious freedom laws, including one signed by Georgia's governor in April. The laws are modeled after the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, signed in 1993 by then-President Bill Clinton, which allows federal regulations that interfere with religious beliefs to be challenged.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mass. AG Campbell sues Trump admin for sharing private health info with ICE
Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea J. Campbell has opened another front in her ongoing legal battle with the Trump administration, charging that the Republican White House exposed private health information as it prosecutes its mass deportation campaign. The lawsuit, filed by Democrat Campbell and 19 of her colleagues nationwide, in U.S. District Court in California's Northern District on Tuesday, names U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert K. Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem as defendants. "Disclosing individuals' private health data for the purpose of immigration enforcement puts lives at risk. These actions are yet another example of the Administration creating unnecessary fear and confusion among our residents,' Campbell said in a statement. Read More: Renowned Boston restaurant considers closing after manager is detained by ICE 'Congress has made it clear that emergency Medicaid coverage extends to all individuals, regardless of immigration status. I will continue to fight against cruel and unlawful policies that harm our residents,' she said. Kennedy's advisers ordered the release of a dataset that includes the private health information of people living in California, Illinois, Washington state, and Washington, D.C., to the Department of Homeland Security, The Associated Press first reported last month. All of those states allow non-U.S. citizens to enroll in Medicaid programs that pay for their expenses using only state taxpayer dollars. Read More: Mass. AG Campbell sues Trump over obscure rule used to withhold federal funding to states The unusual data sharing of private health information, including addresses, names, social security numbers, immigration status, and claims data for enrollees in those states, was released to deportation officials as they accelerated enforcement efforts nationwide. The data could be used to help the Department of Homeland Security locate migrants in its mass deportation campaign, experts said. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who led the legal action, said the Trump administration's data release violates federal health privacy protection laws, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the AP reported. 'This is about flouting seven decades of federal law policy and practice that have made it clear that personal healthcare data is confidential and can only be shared in certain narrow circumstances that benefit the public's health or the Medicaid program,' Bonta said during a news conference on Tuesday. The Trump administration has sought to arm deportation officials with more data on immigrants. In May, for example, a federal judge refused to block the Internal Revenue Service from sharing immigrants' tax data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement to help agents locate and detain people living without legal status in the U.S. The lawsuit filed by Campbell and her colleagues asks a federal judge to block any new transfer or use of this data for immigration enforcement purposes. It argues that the administration violated a brace of federal laws, including the Administrative Procedure Act, Social Security Act, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Federal Information Security Modernization Act, Privacy Act, and Spending Clause. The lawsuit also 'highlights that the Trump Administration's illegal actions are creating fear and confusion that will lead noncitizens and their family members to disenroll, or refuse to enroll, in emergency Medicaid for which they are otherwise eligible, leaving states and their safety net hospitals to foot the bill for federally mandated emergency healthcare services,' Cambell's office said in its statement. Other states joining the legal action included Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. Trump threatens arrest of NYC mayoral candidate during visit to 'Alligator Alcatraz' Mass. has an on-time(ish) state budget: 3 big things to know about the $61B plan Here's how Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene described support for Trump's 'big beautiful bill' Group behind MCAS ballot question broke campaign finance law, state says Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down 1849 total abortion ban Read the original article on MassLive.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Republicans Vulnerable to Losing Their Seats After Voting Yes on Trump Bill
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Republicans representing districts with high Medicaid enrollment rates could face losing their seats in the 2026 midterms if they vote for Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill." Recent changes to the bill would cut roughly $1.1 trillion in health-care spending and result in 11.8 million people losing Medicaid health insurance over the next decade, according to new estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The bill also mandates that able-bodied adults ages 19 to 64—including some parents of older children—complete and report at least 80 hours per month of work, job training, volunteering, or education to keep their coverage. Nearly 80 million children, senior citizens, people with disabilities, parents and adults without dependents rely on Medicaid and the related Children's Health Insurance Program. Rep. Juan Ciscomani, R-Ariz (L) and Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Calif are two of the Republicans who could lose their seats over Trump's Medicaid bill. Rep. Juan Ciscomani, R-Ariz (L) and Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Calif are two of the Republicans who could lose their seats over Trump's Medicaid bill. AP Why It Matters If Republican lawmakers lose their seats in the midterms, it could tip the balance of power in Congress, which is currently controlled by the GOP in both chambers. The party has particularly low margins in the House, where Trump's bill now faces a major test after it narrowly cleared the Senate on Tuesday, thanks to Vice President JD Vance's tiebreaking vote. What To Know More than 60 House Republicans represent districts where Medicaid enrollment is higher than the national average, according to a CNN analysis of enrollment data and 2024 election results. Among these 64 GOP lawmakers, five—Representatives Nick Begich, Juan Ciscomani, Ken Calvert, Jeff Hurd, and Rob Bresnahan—won their seats last November by slim margins of five points or less. So if they back Trump's bill, they could face a serious risk of losing their seats in next year's election. All five lawmakers are up for re-election in 2026. Rob Bresnahan Bresnahan won by 1.6 percent in 2024, and 26.2 percent of his district is enrolled in Medicaid. He previously joined four other Republican members of the Congressional Hispanic Conference in signing a letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson warning against cuts to Medicaid. In response to budget reconciliation negotiations, Bresnahan said, "If a bill is put in front of me that guts the benefits my neighbors rely on, I will not vote for it." He emphasized in a February 13 news release, "These benefits are promises that were made to the people of NEPA, and where I come from, people keep their word." The release noted that more than 200,000 Medicaid recipients live in the 8th Congressional District, more than a quarter of its population. Bresnahan also said in a February 26 Facebook post, "I will fight to protect working-class families in Northeastern Pennsylvania and stand with President Trump in opposing gutting Medicaid. My position on this has not and will not change." However, in an April 17 letter to House Republican leaders, Bresnahan and 11 fellow Republicans said they favor reforming Medicaid so "it is a strong and long-lasting program for years to come." They added, "However, we cannot and will not support a final reconciliation bill that includes any reduction in Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations." On May 22, Bresnahan and all of Pennsylvania's Republican House members voted for President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Bresnahan said, "Medicaid will be protected while ensuring taxpayer dollars are spent prudently. During this process, I fought to protect social safety net programs from the waste, fraud, and abuse that have threatened their long-term solvency. By ensuring states are not using Medicaid dollars on illegal aliens, conducting more frequent eligibility checks, and requiring work for able-bodied recipients, we are securing Medicaid for those who truly need it." Nick Begich Begich won by 2 percent in 2024, and 33.5 percent of his district is enrolled in Medicaid. He has been a vocal supporter of the bill. Shortly after the vote, Begich said in his Washington, D.C. office, "This is a great bill for Alaska. It preserves the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, so it keeps taxes low for working Americans, working Alaskans. It also drives some accountability in some of the government programs that are safety-net programs." In a post on X, he added, "The American people are counting on Congress to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and deliver on the America First promises that will make our nation prosperous, strong, and safe again." Juan Ciscomani Ciscomani won by 2.5 percent in 2024, with 22.9 percent of the district enrolled in Medicaid. In May, he voted to approve President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," which included cuts to Medicaid services. Ciscomani also joined the letter opposing reductions in Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations. Ken Calvert Calvert won by 3.4 percent in 2024, with 27.4 percent Medicaid enrollment in his district. He defended the bill, telling News Channel 3, "Medicaid is fine. We're not doing anything to Medicaid other than people that are able-bodied, men and women under the age of 65 that are in good health with no children, have 20 hour a week work requirement or 20 hours of volunteer work. That's not too much to ask to get Medicaid insurance on your behalf." He also said in a post on X, "I don't believe it's fair to ask a taxpayer who works 40 hours a week to support their family to send their tax dollars to provide Medicaid benefits for healthy working-age adults without children who refuse to work. Like most Americans, I support reasonable work requirements." Jeff Hurd Hurd won by 5 percent in 2024, and 26.3 percent of his district is enrolled in Medicaid. He joined the letter opposing Medicaid coverage reductions and voted for the bill in the House. His 3rd Congressional District has the highest rate of Medicaid recipients in Colorado. A spokesperson confirmed that Representative Hurd plans to vote "yes" on the bill, according to The Colorado Sun. What Happens Next The One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed a key procedural vote in the early hours of Thursday. It remains to be seen whether Johnson can rally the necessary votes to approve the package and move it to Trump's desk, where it would be signed into law.
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Study: Medicaid, Medicare don't adequately cover addiction treatment
July 1 (UPI) -- Opioid addicts covered by Medicare and Medicaid are less likely to receive the mental health and substance use treatment that they need, a new study says. Addicts with public insurance receive more than twice as many sessions if their therapy is also covered by other sources, such as court-mandated treatment, researchers report in the journal Addiction Science & Clinical Practice. "What's most striking is how insurance type fundamentally shapes patient treatment," said principal investigator Jamey Lister, an associate professor at the Rutgers University School of Social Work in New Jersey. "We discovered that patients with public insurance alone were less likely to utilize treatment services compared to those with multiple funding sources," Lister said. This news comes as Medicare and Medicaid face potential cuts from Republican-sponsored legislation making its way through Congress, researchers noted. About 10% of American adults suffer from both substance use and mental health disorders that require integrated treatment for both. For the new study, researchers analyzed records of 705 patients registered at a community health center in New Jersey between 2015 and 2021. During that period, the state's Medicaid coverage expanded under the Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare). The patients all had been diagnosed with opioid use disorder, and 72% had another substance use disorder such as cannabis, cocaine or alcohol. About 39% also had a co-occurring mental health condition such as anxiety, bipolar disorder, depression or schizophrenia. Results show that people were more likely to get all the help they needed if they had additional coverage on top of Medicaid or Medicare. "It's the exact opposite of how we should be helping people," Lister said. "We should aspire to provide health care services that are driven by patient need, not by financing. But as we found, if you're only using public insurance, you're likely falling through the cracks." Cutting Medicaid and Medicare would make these problems worse, and cost the health care system even more in the long run, Lister argues. Lister pointed to a 2021 study published by the American Medical Association, which found that improving access to opioid addiction treatment can save between $25,000 to $105,000 in lifetime costs per person. In addition, overdoses, addiction and deaths account for $35 billion in health care costs annually, as well as nearly $15 billion in criminal justice costs, according to a Pew report highlighted by Lister. More information The National Institute of Mental Health has more on co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
