Colorado wildlife officials show patience with depredating Copper Creek wolfpack
Colorado Parks and Wildlife lethally removed a yearling member of the pack May 29. Since the removal, there have been no confirmed wolf depredations but several unconfirmed depredations and continued conflict on the same ranches for which the pack member was removed, agency staff reported at a special meeting July 7 focused on management options regarding the Copper Creek pack.
The state wildlife agency desired to take a wait-and-see posture before removing any other pack members, Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director Jeff Davis told the agency's commission at the meeting.
Davis said the agency promised the ranchers it will continue to spend resources — namely range riders around the clock — to keep the wolves from cattle on the McCabe and Lost Marbles ranches near Basalt, where a series of confirmed wolf depredations have taken place this spring.
"There might be a need for additional actions taken, both nonlethal and potentially lethal," Davis told the commission. "My experience is that's rarely full pack removal, that's usually incremental. Those removals are intended to modify pack behavior. There is data out there that suggest we may not have modified that pack behavior enough."
The data Davis presumably referenced is a thermal imaging video taken on one of the impacted ranches showing wolves chasing cattle and trying to separate a calf from its mother.
You can watch that video below.
Tai Jacober, a Pitkin County rancher and commission member, told commissioners and state wildlife staff that after range riders took a break from riding on the McCabe Ranch the night of July 3, the rancher, Brad Day, found his cattle scattered over other ranches in the area the next morning and had to retrieve them.
'This is a situation where we put these on the landscape, we recaptured them, knowing they were depredating, we let them out and they are behaving the same way they werel as before," Jacober said. "There's a limited amount of resources out there. At what point are we going to realize certain individuals are not worth all of the resources compared to the population we have to take care of?"
Jacober made a motion at the commission's regular meeting in June to remove the Copper Creek pack. The motion was ruled out of order but prompted the special July 7 meeting.
The Copper Creek pack has had seven confirmed depredations in Pitkin County this year after being implicated in the vast majority of the 18 confirmed depredations in Grand County last year. That prompted the state wildlife agency to capture pack members last fall and hold the breeding female and four pups at a facility until rereleasing them in January near the Lost Marbles and McCabe ranches, which went against the state's recovery plan of not rereleasing known depredating wolves.
The pack's breeding male was also captured but was in poor condition when it was trapped and died days later. The state wildlife agency was unable to capture a fifth pup belonging to the pack.
The agency confirmed at the July 7 meeting that the Copper Creek female, collar number 2312, and a wolf captured in British Columbia, 2305, had a litter of pups this spring. Lost Marbles and McCabe ranchers have said the den is near their cattle herds.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife has poured resources into keeping the Copper Creek pack from more depredations in recent weeks, telling commissioners three to five range riders are riding the ranches and five of its nine wildlife damage specialists have worked with the ranches.
Several commissioners who spoke at the meeting agreed with Colorado Parks and Wildlife's plan to give the conflict time to work itself out.
Commissioner Jay Tutchton said removing the entire pack could jeopardize the state's federal 10(j) rule that allows lethal removal of depredating wolves in certain situations.
"If we were start killing wolves for which we had no evidence or insufficient evidence that they had been involved in depredations, I think we would violate the 10(j) rule," Tutchton said. "That rule gives us flexibility to kill wolves involved in depredations but a bunch of puppies in a den, I do not think that's in line with the 10(j) rule."
Commissioner Jack Murphy applauded the agency's handling of a difficult situation while learning as it goes along with implementing the state's wolf recovery plan that calls for releasing 10 to 15 wolves for three to five years in an effort to establish a self-sustaining wolf population.
'We don't have to kill everything, there are ways of dealing with things in a nonlethal way," Murphy said. "A lot on all sides need to relax a little bit and allow this to kind of play out. I feel for the ranchers that are having problems. Yes, it's a tough situation. Change is always difficult. I live in the city and I'm having to put up with traffic and that gets on my nerves, too."
This article originally appeared on Fort Collins Coloradoan: Colorado officials are hesitant to kill another Copper Creek wolf
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Let nature take its course: Avian Center reminds public to leave found wildlife alone
Jul. 7—MORGANTOWN — As summer spreads across West Virginia, the Avian Conservation Center of Appalachia is reminding people that sometimes the best way to help wildlife thrive is to simply leave it alone—especially when it comes to baby birds. "This is our busiest season because well-meaning people keep bringing us baby birds that are not actually hurt, " ACCA Executive Director Katie Fallon said. "They are fledglings—they are supposed to be hopping around on the ground. Their parents are still feeding them and teaching them how to be wild birds." The nonprofit, based near Cheat Lake, rehabilitates hundreds of sick, injured or displaced wild birds each year. But during the summer, many of the little patients do not need rescuing at all. "A lot of people do not realize that if a baby bird has feathers and is hopping around, it is just learning to fly, " Fallon explained. "It is the natural process. The best parents for baby birds are their own parents—not humans." If you find an uninjured baby bird in your yard, experts say to leave it be and keep pets indoors or on leashes if possible. "Cats especially pose a big threat, " Fallon said. "Even if they do not kill the bird outright, bacteria in a cat's mouth can be fatal." If you spot a featherless chick on the ground after a storm, it is fine to gently place it back in its nest. "That old myth that touching a baby bird will make its parents reject it is just that—a myth, " Fallon said. "They will take it right back." In addition to wildlife rehabilitation, the ACCA is dedicated to teaching the public how to protect native birds. The center's outdoor classroom houses non-releasable birds of prey, which includes hawks, owls, and even eagles—serving awareness for education and conservation. "Every Friday afternoon this summer, people can visit our outdoor classroom from 1-6 p.m., " Fallon said. "It's a wonderful chance to see these incredible birds up close, learn about their stories, and find out how to make backyards more bird-friendly." Fallon recommends planting native flowers and shrubs like serviceberry, viburnum, dogwoods, and milkweed to attract insects that many songbirds rely on to feed their babies. Shallow bird baths with gently moving water are another good way to draw in little visitors. "A lot of people think bird feeders are enough, but native plants and water make an even bigger difference in summer when birds are raising families, " Fallon said. For those hoping to spot less-common local species—like the cerulean warbler or the scarlet tanager—Fallon suggests planning birdwatching trips during spring or fall migration. But in summer, baby birds coming into the world is just as rewarding. "If you do find a truly injured bird, give us a call, " Fallon said. "But for healthy babies, the best thing you can do is to let nature do its job."
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Colorado wildlife officials show patience with depredating Copper Creek wolfpack
The Copper Creek wolfpack has continued to chase and harass cattle in Pitkin County despite amped-up state resources, but wildlife officials are opting to give pack members a longer leash. Colorado Parks and Wildlife lethally removed a yearling member of the pack May 29. Since the removal, there have been no confirmed wolf depredations but several unconfirmed depredations and continued conflict on the same ranches for which the pack member was removed, agency staff reported at a special meeting July 7 focused on management options regarding the Copper Creek pack. The state wildlife agency desired to take a wait-and-see posture before removing any other pack members, Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director Jeff Davis told the agency's commission at the meeting. Davis said the agency promised the ranchers it will continue to spend resources — namely range riders around the clock — to keep the wolves from cattle on the McCabe and Lost Marbles ranches near Basalt, where a series of confirmed wolf depredations have taken place this spring. "There might be a need for additional actions taken, both nonlethal and potentially lethal," Davis told the commission. "My experience is that's rarely full pack removal, that's usually incremental. Those removals are intended to modify pack behavior. There is data out there that suggest we may not have modified that pack behavior enough." The data Davis presumably referenced is a thermal imaging video taken on one of the impacted ranches showing wolves chasing cattle and trying to separate a calf from its mother. You can watch that video below. Tai Jacober, a Pitkin County rancher and commission member, told commissioners and state wildlife staff that after range riders took a break from riding on the McCabe Ranch the night of July 3, the rancher, Brad Day, found his cattle scattered over other ranches in the area the next morning and had to retrieve them. 'This is a situation where we put these on the landscape, we recaptured them, knowing they were depredating, we let them out and they are behaving the same way they werel as before," Jacober said. "There's a limited amount of resources out there. At what point are we going to realize certain individuals are not worth all of the resources compared to the population we have to take care of?" Jacober made a motion at the commission's regular meeting in June to remove the Copper Creek pack. The motion was ruled out of order but prompted the special July 7 meeting. The Copper Creek pack has had seven confirmed depredations in Pitkin County this year after being implicated in the vast majority of the 18 confirmed depredations in Grand County last year. That prompted the state wildlife agency to capture pack members last fall and hold the breeding female and four pups at a facility until rereleasing them in January near the Lost Marbles and McCabe ranches, which went against the state's recovery plan of not rereleasing known depredating wolves. The pack's breeding male was also captured but was in poor condition when it was trapped and died days later. The state wildlife agency was unable to capture a fifth pup belonging to the pack. The agency confirmed at the July 7 meeting that the Copper Creek female, collar number 2312, and a wolf captured in British Columbia, 2305, had a litter of pups this spring. Lost Marbles and McCabe ranchers have said the den is near their cattle herds. Colorado Parks and Wildlife has poured resources into keeping the Copper Creek pack from more depredations in recent weeks, telling commissioners three to five range riders are riding the ranches and five of its nine wildlife damage specialists have worked with the ranches. Several commissioners who spoke at the meeting agreed with Colorado Parks and Wildlife's plan to give the conflict time to work itself out. Commissioner Jay Tutchton said removing the entire pack could jeopardize the state's federal 10(j) rule that allows lethal removal of depredating wolves in certain situations. "If we were start killing wolves for which we had no evidence or insufficient evidence that they had been involved in depredations, I think we would violate the 10(j) rule," Tutchton said. "That rule gives us flexibility to kill wolves involved in depredations but a bunch of puppies in a den, I do not think that's in line with the 10(j) rule." Commissioner Jack Murphy applauded the agency's handling of a difficult situation while learning as it goes along with implementing the state's wolf recovery plan that calls for releasing 10 to 15 wolves for three to five years in an effort to establish a self-sustaining wolf population. 'We don't have to kill everything, there are ways of dealing with things in a nonlethal way," Murphy said. "A lot on all sides need to relax a little bit and allow this to kind of play out. I feel for the ranchers that are having problems. Yes, it's a tough situation. Change is always difficult. I live in the city and I'm having to put up with traffic and that gets on my nerves, too." This article originally appeared on Fort Collins Coloradoan: Colorado officials are hesitant to kill another Copper Creek wolf
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wildlife Rescuers Shares the Adorable Way Mama Elephants Keep Their Babies in Line
Wildlife Rescuers Shares the Adorable Way Mama Elephants Keep Their Babies in Line originally appeared on PetHelpful. Just like human moms, sometimes animal moms have trouble keeping their toddlers from running away and getting into trouble. Babies -both human and animal - are naturally curious, so it makes sense that they want to get away from mom and explore the world on their own, but it can be dangerous for them. Elephant moms have the cutest way of keeping track of their little ones, and it's adorable to see. Wildlife Rescuers shared a video of one mama elephant and her little one. Watch as these rambunctious toddler tries to get away from mom, and how mom keeps track of where the baby's going. The baby elephant didn't look so happy about not being able to run off and do his own thing! Wildlife Rescuers said in the video's caption, "Mama elephants often use their trunks to gently grab their baby's tail to keep them close and safe. This helps prevent the little ones from wandering into dangerous areas and allows the mother to guide and control them—especially when they get a bit too curious or playful! It's a sweet and practical way to protect their young while teaching them to stay with the herd."While mama elephants hold their baby's tail to keep them in line, A to Z Animals explains that it's a sign of affection as well. "Elephants hold their babies' tails for reasons similar to why humans hold hands: to help, support, or show affection." Reptile Knowledge also explains that calves hold on to their mother's tail to help keep up. Elephants will also hold on to each other's tails and surround their calves as a form of protection from predators. A to Z shares another instance when elephants will hold each other's tails, "Elephants also hold on to each other's tails when scared. Quite often, they cross through rivers with strong currents or those containing predators like crocodiles. To safeguard weak elephants, and ensure that every member of the herd comes out safely, tail holding could be done in a single-file arrangement. Usually, the matriarch (head female elephant) takes the lead, while every elephant props the tail of the elephant in its front." Really, all the same reasons us humans hold hands! Wildlife Rescuers Shares the Adorable Way Mama Elephants Keep Their Babies in Line first appeared on PetHelpful on Jul 7, 2025 This story was originally reported by PetHelpful on Jul 7, 2025, where it first appeared.
