McDonald's is heating things up with 3 new Spicy McMuffins
Next week, McDonald's is launching three spicy breakfast menu items: the Spicy McMuffin, Spicy Sausage McMuffin and Spicy Sausage McMuffin with Egg. The McMuffins will feature their traditional ingredients – cheese, egg, Canadian bacon or sausage, and a buttered English muffin, topped with Spicy Pepper Sauce, a news release states.
McDonald's launched the Egg McMuffin in 1975. The breakfast item was the brainchild of Herb Peterson, a McDonald's franchisee in Santa Barbara, California. Herb, according to previous USA TODAY reporting, presented the sandwich as a to-go version of a diner classic: Eggs Benedict. Roy Kroc, the businessman who transformed McDonald's into what it is today, loved the idea.
When will the Spicy McMuffin be available?
The Spicy McMuffin (and its subsidiaries) will be available for a limited time, at participating locations, starting on Tuesday, July 8.
Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
9 hours ago
- The Hill
Head Start faces new worries about its future with Trump, GOP
Supporters of Head Start are worried about the program's future as it faces Trump administration calls for budgetary cuts ahead of the next school year. The free, federally funded program for low-income families provides education for infants through preschoolers and had enjoyed bipartisan support for most of its 60-year history. But worries are mounting for both Head Start staff and parents. The Project 2025 blueprint calling for deep federal cuts proposed Head Start's elimination, and while calls to cut its budget have diminished, advocates don't feel the program is safe. The administration also is looking at enrollment changes that could impact students lacking permanent legal status who are covered by Head Start. 'A lot of people have called this death by a thousand cuts, what we've seen in the past six months,' said Casey Peeks, senior director of Early Childhood Policy at the Center for American Progress. Head Start seemed to escape the worst possible fate after a report earlier this year by USA Today that said the White House was ready to adopt the Project 2025 blueprint and eliminate it. Despite the fears, President Trump's final proposal didn't include an increase or decrease in Head Start funding. It kept the program at the same funding level as last year. Other early preschool programs, Preschool Development Grants and the Child Care Access Means Parents in Schools, were cut in the budget. Still, the flat funding could hurt as more families seek to use Head Start in an era of rising costs. 'We do have concerns that flat funding … would equate as a cut to Head Start and Early Head Start programs, given cost of living, inflationary costs, as well as just higher costs of operating services, the needs to be able to provide a competitive wage in order to have staff,' said Tommy Sheridan, deputy director for the National Head Start Association. A report last week released by the Government Accountability Office found a temporary funding freeze to Head Start at the beginning of the administration was illegal. The move put programs into chaos, and some even briefly shut down during the pause. While funding was mostly spared, Head Start has watched the Trump administration target staff and enrollment changes. In April, around 50 percent of staff at the Office of Head Start were cut and all staff at regional offices of Head Start were fired. 'We're also seeing a lot of chaos and panic among Head Start staff. They don't know if their jobs are as secure as they once were, which is really causing a problem, because it's not just Head Start, but across the early childhood sector there is a workforce shortage and these types of concerns, lack of reliability, it really doesn't help with the retention issues that are already a problem in normal circumstance,' said Peeks. The latest curveball thrown at Head Start was a notice from the Department of Health and Human Services that said undocumented students can no longer participate in the programs. The directive did not come with any clear instructions, sending programs into confusion as immigration status was never considered in Head Start's history. Twenty Democratic-led states filed a lawsuit against the directive while the federal government argued it 'ensures that public resources are no longer used to incentivize illegal immigration.' 'There's still a lot of confusion about what exactly it means, and we're encouraging people not to take action until there's more guidance or clarity on who exactly it affects and what the Head Start programs are required to do,' said Melissa Boteach, chief policy adviser for Zero to Three. 'But I think an important point is that it has a chilling effect, regardless, and that if you're [an] immigrant family, regardless of what your status is in terms of legal permanent residence, or mixed status family or refugee or whatever it is, you're legitimately scared of sending your child to an Early Head Start or Head Start program,' she added. Some fear this is just the beginning of an effort to go after the program despite previous bipartisan support, including during the first Trump administration. In Trump's first four years in office, Head Start received funding increases and greater support, especially at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. There are signs the program could come under more pressure from Republicans who say Head Start has not been accountable enough in how it has spent money. Days after Trump came into office, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce highlighted a report by the Government Accountability Office regarding abuse and negligence in Head Start programs, including child safety concerns and lack of oversight over classroom materials. 'These programs continue to suck up millions in taxpayer funding without serious accountability or oversight. We have an obligation to protect these children and end this gross negligence immediately,' Committee Chair Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) said at the time. Proponents of Head Start argue there is data to show it helps lower crime rates, reduces health care costs and increase tax revenue. 'This is proof of the effectiveness of Head Start, and the effectiveness and the impact of the investment that Head Start has been making,' said Sheridan. 'And so, we believe that there's really no sound reason to interfere with that, and we believe that Congress and the administration should come together and really commit to building on the 60 year of bipartisan support that Head Start has had, and double down on that fundamental commitment that our country has made to children and to our collective future.'
Miami Herald
a day ago
- Miami Herald
Cracker Barrel faces new 'woke' backlash over DEI policies
Backlash to corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion policies has led to several major companies downplaying their DEI programs in got the ball rolling in January 2025 as it ended some of its DEI practices and renamed its diversity team as "Global Inclusion team."The company also faced a lawsuit filed by the American Alliance for Equal Rights, objecting to McDonald's and International Scholarship & Tuition Services' HACER National Scholarship Program and asking that its scholarship recipients be chosen on their "own merits and essential qualities," since it believes the scholarship unlawfully discriminates against students from other races and ethnicities. Related: Popular pizza and beer chain files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Several companies have followed McDonald's lead and renamed or eliminated DEI programs and removed references to DEI in their annual reports, including Amazon, PBS, Pepsi, Citigroup, BlackRock, Paramount, UnitedHealth Group, Constellation Brands, and Gannett, Forbes reported. And now, popular dining chain Cracker Barrel is facing an attack on its diversity, equity, and inclusion policies from legal advocacy group America First Legal, a conservative nonprofit co-founded by White House aide Stephen Miller. America First Legal requested that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmenti investigate Cracker Barrel for alleged potential violations of federal and state civil rights laws stemming from its diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, according to a July 21 AFL statement. Related: Popular pizza dining chain franchisee files Chapter 11 bankruptcy The restaurant chain has faced a customer backlash in the past, as in August 2022, when it added a plant-based-sausage option to its menu. It did not take traditional sausages off its menu; it only added a meat-free choice, and that angered some of its customer base, which called for boycotts. Cracker Barrel launched its Diversity and Inclusion Strategy in June 2021, which included an effort to "better identify, recruit and advance strong, racially and ethnically diverse talent," WMAL Radio reported. The restaurant chain also asserted its support for the NAACP and Urban League, as well as doing more to recognize the LGBTQ+ community, in its Diversity and Inclusion Strategy. The company in 2024 shifted its Diversity and Inclusion Strategy to Culture and Inclusion, focusing on "Culture," "Workforce," and "Business." Culture: to educate, advocate, and communicate to create an inclusive, engaging, culture, and work Force: to attract, select, develop, and retain high-performing talent with diverse backgrounds, experiences, and Build and nurture diverse partnerships in the communities where we live and work, and ensure we have diverse representation in our advertising. Cracker Barrel's Culture and Inclusion Strategy is a 180-degree turn from the company's policies in early 1991, when the company adopted a policy to stop hiring LGBTQ people and terminate those who were already employed by the restaurant chain, according to Forbes. The company's Board of Directors voted to end discrimination against gay employees in 2002. More food and restaurants: Major iconic food brand files for Chapter 11 bankruptcyPopular Dairy Queen rival franchisee files Chapter 11 bankruptcyIconic pizza chain's franchisees close multiple restaurants American First Legal objected to Cracker Barrel's Business Resource Group benefits that "appear to be restricted to specific identity groups," according to its statement. It also objected to the company's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considering "diversity of age, gender, race, and ethnic background" when evaluating potential nominees for the company's Board of Directors. "Treating employees differently because of their race or sex is not only wrong, it is illegal and violates numerous federal and state civil rights laws. AFL will continue to fight back against unlawful discrimination in all its forms," American First Legal said in its statement. The organization submitted a complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, to investigate Cracker Barrel's employment practices, which they allege "appear to discriminate against employees or prospective employees, solely because of their skin color or sex." American First Legal also filed a complaint with the Tennessee attorney general, as well as the Cracker Barrel Board of Trustees. Cracker Barrel was not immediately available for comment. McDonald's: Renamed diversity team as "Global Inclusion team." Amazon: Removed references to inclusion and diversity hiring from its annual Closed its diversity, equity, and inclusion Removed representation goals from Renamed its Diversity, Equity and Inclusion and Talent Management team as Talent Management and Removed references to DEI in its annual No longer uses diversity tied to race and gender in Group: Removed diversity, equity, and inclusion webpages and adopted terms like "culture of belonging."Constellation Brands: Renamed DEI team as Inclusive Removes diversity references from its website. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
Women's dating safety app Tea hit by data breach impacting thousands of photos
A dating app for women to do background checks on men – and share information about potential bad actors – said it has been hacked, exposing tens of thousands of photos and other personal information. Tea, the company behind the Tea Dating Advice app, said in a July 25 alert posted on its website that a security breach compromised "a legacy data storage system" storing about 72,000 images. Images taken in the breach, which Tea learned about at 6:44 a.m. PST on July 25, include about 13,000 selfies and users' photo identification, plus about 59,000 images from posts, comments and direct messages within the app. No email addresses or phone numbers were accessed, according to Tea. The breach only affected users who signed up for the app before February 2024, the company said. In the app's early days, Tea required selfies and IDs "as an added layer of safety to ensure that only women were signing up for the app," according to the company's statement. The ID requirement was removed in 2023, Tea said. Third-party cybersecurity experts and Tea's internal security teams "are working around the clock to secure our systems. At this time, we have implemented additional security measures and have fixed the data issue," the company said in a statement to USA TODAY. "There is no evidence to suggest that additional user data was affected. Protecting our users' privacy and data is our highest priority," Tea said in its statement. "We are taking every necessary step to ensure the security of our platform and prevent further exposure." Hackers were able to exploit Tea's data storage system to access where data was stored before Feb. 24, 2024, because "during our early stages of development some legacy content was not migrated into our new fortified system," according to the company's statement. "As we grew our community, we migrated to a more robust and secure solution which has rendered that any new users from February 2024 until now were not part of the cybersecurity incident," the company said. The Tea Dating Advice app – its name comes from the phrase "spilling tea," or to share secrets or gossip – recently went viral, becoming the top free app in the Apple App Store this past week, claiming nearly 1 million new users, NBC News reported. Available for free on Android and iOS, Tea provides women a way to check the personal history of men including a "Reverse Image Search" feature to catch men catfishing, pretending to be someone else online to attract potential romantic partners. Other features include "Phone Number Lookup to check for hidden marriages, and Background Checks to uncover criminal records," according to the company's website. Women can also anonymously discuss men and give them "green" or "red" flags. "Tea ensures that women have the information they need before meeting someone new," the company says on its website. More than 1.7 million women have used the app, the company says. Reports from 404 Media and CNET say photos of some users and images of their drivers licenses were posted on 4Chan and Reddit message boards Friday. USA TODAY has reached out to Tea for comment about any identity theft concerns for users. If you joined the app before February 2024 and are concerned about your drivers license information or other personal information being misused, you can find tips on the Federal Trade Commission's Identity Theft website. Mike Snider is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, X and email him at mikegsnider & @ & @mikesnider & msnider@
