Tech trial for Australia's social media ban ‘broadly on track' amid concerns under 16s could circumvent systems
It comes as the company behind the age assurance trial has revealed only one type of technology has been tested on children so far and some internal stakeholder concerns about how young people may circumvent the age ban systems.
The federal government has also been sitting on a separate report, costing more than $275,000, that it commissioned last year on Australians' attitudes to age assurance technology. It was delivered to the government on 2 January but has not yet been released.
The UK-based company recruited to run the trial, Age Check Certification Scheme (ACCS), was due to publish its age assurance report in June.
The report will focus on what technology could be used to prevent under 16s gaining access to social media and under 18s accessing adult websites.
The federal communications department has confirmed the ACCS report would now be delivered in July, and the minister would decide when to publish it, a spokesperson said.
'The independent trial of age assurance technologies remains broadly on track, in line with project delivery timeframes,' the spokesperson said.
Briefing documents from Senate estimates in February, released under freedom of information laws, stated the final report 'is due in June 2025'. ACCS had previously stated the report was due 'at the end of June', and it would independently publish it.
One of the first tasks for the new communications minister, Labor's Anika Wells, will be to assess the outcome of the trial, to decide which technologies are applicable and to which platforms they will apply.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Affected platforms must have age assurance systems in place by December. Wells must be satisfied that the platforms – expected to include Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and Snapchat – are taking reasonable steps to stop under 16s accessing their services.
In an update on the age assurance trial from ACCS last week, it said the only type of technology trialed so far is facial age estimation tech, which examines a photo or video of a user to try to estimate the age based on their facial features.
A total of 1,580 tests have been conducted on 485 students, in years 7 to 12.
Aside from this testing, further work has been limited to interviews with dozens of potential vendors, and statements outlining how their age ban enforcement technology could work.
The trial will try to confirm those claims through 'a combination of practical testing and a vendor interview'. About half of the interviews have been completed.
Technologies deemed sufficiently mature to include in the final report will be tested by another company – the Australian-owned KJR – or through schools testing or mystery-shopper type testing.
Mystery-shopper testing is a 'real-world environment, where users will have a variety of equipment, light conditions and access to required resources, be that an ID document or a bank account'.
ACCS said there will only be 'enough testing' to confirm claims made by vendors 'and that may be achieved with a relatively modest level of practical experimentation'.
The March meeting minutes for the stakeholder advisory board overseeing the trial reported stakeholders had raised concerns about gaps in the testing, particularly around how children may circumvent the age ban systems.
A spokesperson for the department said a preliminary report, provided in April but not released publicly, gave the government 'anticipated findings in relation to age verification, age estimation, age inference, successive validation, parental control and parental consent methods'.
Sources close to the trial told Guardian Australia they believed it was unlikely the report on the trial would be finalised by the due date – or that if it was, it would have not been adequate to inform government decisionmaking on the best technology to use.
One concern raised was that other countries, including New Zealand and the United States, are looking to Australia's trial to guide their own plans. Those who supported the policy wanted it implemented correctly, rather than rushed through with technology that could later present privacy or other issues.
The Social Research Centre was commissioned in August, and paid $278,000, to research attitudes to age assurance. This included an online survey of 3,140 adults, and 870 people aged 8 to 17 years.
A spokesperson for the department said it was a matter for the minister on when that report, delivered to government in January, would be released.
A spokesperson for the Albanese government did not directly respond to questions on the timing of the tech trial report or the Social Research Centre report release.
'The government looks forward to receiving the age assurance report and progressing our reforms to protect children from social media harms,' the spokesperson said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
38 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Ofcom boss: Tech firms not given much power over how to protect children online
The regulator announced last month that sites containing potentially harmful content, like porn sites, will have to perform age checks on users as part of reforms which apply to both dedicated adult sites and social media, search or gaming services as part of the Online Safety Act. Ian Russell, who has been campaigning for improved online safety since his 14-year-old daughter Molly took her own life after viewing harmful content on social media, said Ofcom needs to 'act within the bounds of the Act in the strongest possible way' and communicate weaknesses in the legislation to the Government. Ofcom's chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes told BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: 'We've set out about five or six things that we think can work, like facial checks and using things where you've already been checked for your age, like credit cards or open banking. 'We said (to tech companies) you decide what works for your platform but we will be checking whether it's effective and those that don't put in those checks will hear from us with enforcement action.' Responding to the suggestion that Ofcom is giving companies a lot of power over how they implement measures, Dame Melanie said: 'No, we're not giving them that much power actually. What I'm saying is that when they're putting in age checks they need to work out what's going to work on their service. 'But, let me be really clear, what we are demanding to protect children and what does come in force at the end of this month they're going to need to tame those algorithms so that not just porn and suicide and self-harm material must not be shown but also violent content, dangerous challenges, misogyny, all of that must not be fed actively to kids on their feeds.' Pressed on why those types of content are not being blocked altogether, the chief executive said: 'What Parliament decided was that there should be an absolute block on suicide and self-harm material and pornography for under-18s and, then, what we've done is also add to that other types of content that we think is really harmful for children.' She added: 'I'm not a politician and I think it's incredibly important that Ofcom respects the role that we have which is to implement the laws that we've been given. 'If Parliament decides to widen those towards mis- and disinformation, or wider issues around addiction for the kids, for example, then of course, Ofcom stands ready to implement that.' Mr Russell said on the programme that it 'sounds promising' but the proof will be in what happens in practice. He said: '(Ofcom) need to act within the bounds of the Act in the strongest possible way. 'They're sitting in the middle pushed on one side by families who've lost people like me and pushed on the other side by the power of the big tech platforms. 'I also think it's really important that Melanie starts to talk back to Government because Ofcom is clear about where the act is weak and she needs to push back and communicate those weaknesses to the Government so that we can make change where necessary.' He said the charity he set up in his daughter's name, the Molly Rose Foundation, will be monitoring how harmful content online is reduced. Any company that fails to comply with the checks by July 25 could be fined or could be made unavailable in the UK through a court order. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said those changes in the law are 'really important', adding it was now up to technology companies to put in 'robust safeguards' for children using their platforms. But she suggested it was not the end of ministers' plans, telling the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: 'We are very clear as a Government that this is the foundation for a safer online experience for children, but it is not the end of the conversation. 'Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, has been clear that he wants to look at things such as addictive habits and how we create healthier habits for children online in the same way as we talk about healthier physical habits for children.' Ministers 'will keep under review what is required', Ms Alexander added. Ofcom research found that 8% of eight to 14-year-olds in the UK had visited an online porn site or app on smartphones, tablets or computers in a month. Last month, the regulator said it had launched a string of investigations into 4chan, a porn site operator and several file-sharing platforms over suspected failures to protect children, after it received complaints about illegal activity and potential sharing of child abuse images. A report looking into the use and effectiveness of age assurance methods will be published by Ofcom next year.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Tessa bumped into a classmate during school sport at 16. But her 'sore shoulder' was a sign of something far more sinister going on in her body...
When 16-year-old Tessa McHugh brushed shoulders with a classmate during a casual game of school sport, she didn't think twice about it. 'It was just a little bump,' the now-25-year-old, from Adelaide, told FEMAIL. 'But the pain in my shoulder wouldn't go away.' What started as a dull ache soon became something far more serious. The initial bump had highlighted a sinister growth lurking in her body. 'I mentioned it to Mum in passing and she felt a large lump on my shoulder blade,' she recalled. A routine GP visit quickly turned into a series of scans and tests. Within two weeks, doctors delivered devastating news: Tessa had stage-two chondrosarcoma, a rare and aggressive form of bone cancer. 'I'd never even heard of sarcoma, let alone chondrosarcoma,' she said. 'It was confronting and distressing to hear that at 16.' Unlike other cancers, chondrosarcoma is notoriously resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The only treatment is surgical removal of the tumour, and in Tessa's case, it wouldn't just be one operation. Just six weeks after her diagnosis, she underwent her first surgery at Adelaide's Women's and Children's Hospital. Surgeons performed a subtotal scapulectomy, removing a large portion of her shoulder blade and surrounding muscle. 'The pain was a persistent ache,' she said, 'and it affected how much I could move my arm.' But that was just the beginning. Complications followed the initial surgery, and Tessa underwent two more operations to manage damage from the invasive procedure. And then came the unthinkable: the cancer returned. Not once, but three times. Each time, it was discovered during routine scans. This meant going back into hospital and preparing for yet another surgery. Between January 2016 and March 2018, Tessa endured six major surgeries, spaced just months apart. 'There were definitely lots of moments when I was really tired and frustrated,' she said. 'I'd just heal from one surgery, and then I'd have a scan that showed another tumour.' Despite the emotional toll, she never hesitated to continue treatment. 'Knowing that surgery was my only option, I just had to keep going,' she said. While many teenagers worry about exams and friendships, Tessa was navigating hospital corridors and post-op recoveries. But school became her anchor. 'School was something normal while all of these medical things were happening,' she explained. 'It gave me a sense of consistency. I actually enjoyed going when I was able.' Teachers and friends rallied around her, and her close-knit family were by her side every step of the way. 'My mum, dad, older brother and uncle - who is a medical professional - were my biggest supports,' she said. 'They were always there for appointments and helped out when my arm was in a sling.' It's now been nearly a decade since her diagnosis, and Tessa has learned to live with the long-term effects of her surgeries. 'I can't really lift my arm above my head,' she said. 'So a lot of over-the-shoulder movements are out. But I focus on what I can do, not what I can't.' She's careful not to overstrain herself, adjusting her daily routine to suit her physical limits. 'The human body is amazing,' she reflected. 'I've adapted.' Growing up, she was an avid horse rider - a passion that had to be put on hold. 'After surgery, there's always a long recovery period. I had to be really mindful about healing before doing anything too active.' But throughout her recovery, nature and animals became a source of comfort. Living on a large property, Tessa found peace in the outdoors. 'I've always been connected to nature. Spending time with my pets and being outside was really important for my mental health.' That deep connection to healing eventually shaped her future. Today, she works as a provisional psychologist, helping others navigate trauma and hardship. 'Cancer doesn't define who I am,' she said. 'But it has shaped my perspective and values. Going through it during adolescence - when you're still figuring out who you are - has had a huge impact.' Though she's in remission, Tessa continues to have yearly scans. She'll reach her 10-year milestone in 2028, after which regular checks will stop. Until then, the fear of recurrence still lingers. 'The anxiety that it's going to come back is very real,' she said. 'Because it already did - three times.' And while she's been told the tumour may have been growing for up to nine months before diagnosis, there were no warning signs until that fateful bump at school. 'I had no idea anything was wrong,' she said. 'It just felt like a sore shoulder.' Tessa hopes her story encourages others to listen to their bodies and seek help when something doesn't feel right. She also wants young people going through cancer to know they're not alone. For Tessa, that strength was forged through pain, persistence, and the love of family, nature, and community. She may not lift her arm above her head anymore, but she holds her head high. In line with Sarcoma Awareness Month (July) ANZSA is calling on people to register for The Great Sarcoma Plankathon, a national fundraising event to support sarcoma research by planking for 60 minutes across the month. Funds raised through the Plankathon will go directly towards sarcoma research and clinical trials co-ordinated by ANZSA, with the aim of improving survival rates and quality of life for those diagnosed.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP State Pension uplift could see people receive extra £657
The Triple Lock policy has been making headlines recently State pensioners born after 1951 could be in for a financial boost, with a potential £657 increase on the cards under the Triple Lock proposal. For the 2025/26 tax year, anyone eligible for the full new State Pension can expect to pocket £11,973 annually or £230.25 each week. Thanks to the Triple Lock being tied to an impressive 5.5% earnings growth, weekly state pension payments might see a spike to £242.90. That's nearly £972 over four weeks and leads to a favourable yearly sum of £12,630.80. The Triple Lock scheme is DWP' s promise to uprate pensions yearly based off the highest of three measures: average annual pay bump observed from May to July, CPI come September, or a fixed rate of 2.5%. This comes amid the UK's economy facing a slight 0.1% dip in growth this past May, despite the Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealing positive signs, with GDP hopping up by 0.5% in the March to May 2025 quarter, just above the expected 0.4%. Professor Joe Nellis, expert at MHA, said: "This is a far cry from the strong growth in the first quarter of the year when a surge in exports and a robust performance in the services sector placed the UK among the G7's top performers. Growth over the first half of the year is now expected to be modest. "Despite a more positive outlook for the remainder of the year, this presents a challenge to the Chancellor - her fiscal headroom remains limited by high levels of public borrowing and debt and her spending plans are heavily reliant on kickstarting the economy. "Just as last year, we now wait tentatively for the Autumn Budget to find out how the Chancellor aims to solve her fiscal problems." Mr Nellis added: "Something must change - she must either cut spending, increase borrowing, or raise taxes. We expect a squeeze on unprotected Government budgets to cut spending, but the recent rebellion in the Labour Party against the welfare reform bill shows that major spending cuts may be too politically dangerous for the Government. "The OBR's July report highlighted the intense burden that the triple lock on the state pension places on the UK economy - demographic and economic shifts have made this policy difficult to uphold, but any attempt to undo it would move the Government into treacherous waters."
