logo
Lawsuit: U-M fired 8 pro-Palestinian staffers and forever banned them from working there

Lawsuit: U-M fired 8 pro-Palestinian staffers and forever banned them from working there

Yahoo02-05-2025
A group of eight University of Michigan employees has filed a federal lawsuit against the university, alleging they were unlawfully fired and forever barred from working on campus because of their support of Palestinians, and calls on U-M to divest from Israel over the ongoing war in Gaza.
At issue for the plaintiffs is why were they disciplined over their protected free speech, when, they contend, such measures were never taken before — not during the civil rights movement, the Vietnam War era or when students pushed for the university to divest from apartheid-ruled South Africa, which U-M ultimately did in the late 1970s.
"During the previous half century, no such measures are known to have been taken at any time by the University against students or alumni who, while students, had engaged in speech and related activities on other important issues of public concern," the 64-page lawsuit states.
"In fact," the suit continues, "the University has encouraged its students and employees to speak out on a variety of issues of public concern," and promotes its "long history of activism by students — in brochures directed to prospective students, on murals on campus buildings, in classroom instruction, in social media posts and through emails to the entire University network."
The lawsuit also cites the University's Free Speech on Campus policy, which states:
"The university has long welcomed dissent, advocacy, and the expression of the broadest array of ideas, even those that could be unpopular, upsetting or critical of the university."
U-M Director of Public Affairs Kay Jarvis, citing university policy on pending litigation, on May 2 declined to comment on the lawsuit, which was filed the day before in U.S. District Court.
The plaintiffs include an academic program specialist at the university's Center for South Asian Studies, a nuclear energy researcher, a manager within U-M's Sustainable Food Program, a teacher's assistant at the North Campus Children's Center and undergraduate students who worked various jobs at the university, including research assistant and customer service rep for the Campus Information Center.
According to the lawsuit, three plaintiffs were fired over their participation in a Nov. 7, 2023, peaceful protest at the Ruthven Building, where 42 students were arrested by day's end on minor charges of not obeying police instructions to leave. Five plaintiffs were fired over their attendance at a May 3, 2024, peaceful demonstration outside the U-M Museum of Art. In both events, the demonstrators were protesting violence in Gaza and calling on the university to divest from Israel.
The lawsuit is the latest such case filed against the university, which has been the site of numerous protests over the Israel-Gaza war. In February, five people, including two students, sued the university alleging it violated their constitutional rights by effectively banning them from campus after they attended pro-Palestine demonstrations. In December, another group of students sued, claiming the college selectively targeted peaceful pro-Palestinian demonstrators for their beliefs, subjecting them to disciplinary proceedings and suspensions.
Meanwhile, pro-Palestinian activities have also triggered criminal charges and multiple raids by the FBI and other law enforcement groups. Last month, police and FBI raided three homes as part of an investigation into a string of vandalism cases involving pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel and antisemitic graffiti. Among the vandalism cases under investigation involve U-M Regent Jordan Acker, who is Jewish. Vandals spray-painted his car and smashed a window at his home while he and his family slept.
In September, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel filed criminal charges against 11 pro-Palestinian protesters at U-M, alleging that several of them used "physical force to counter" police officers clearing a tent encampment in Ann Arbor. One of the protesters was charged with ethnic intimidation after he allegedly attacked a pro-Israel rally.
"The right to free speech and assembly is fundamental, and my office fully supports every citizen's right to free speech under the First Amendment," Nessel has previously said. "However, violent and criminal behavior, or acts that trample on another's rights cannot be tolerated. I hope (these) charges are a reminder to everyone who chooses to assemble, regardless of the cause, that the First Amendment does not provide a cover for illegal activity."
In the latest lawsuit, the plaintiffs maintain that they engaged in no acts of violence, only peaceful demonstrations. They allege that U-M wrongfully accused them of violating a university policy prohibiting violent behavior, put an "indelible stain on their employment record," and failed to give them proper notice or a fair opportunity to be heard before firing them.
"Each of these actions were taken and based, in whole or part, on speech and activities — occurring outside Plaintiffs' work hours and unrelated to their work responsibilities — to advocate for the human rights of Palestinians, to call for an end to the genocide against the Palestinian people, and to petition their public University to divest from Israel and from companies complicit in violating the human rights of Palestinians," the lawsuit states.
As the suit notes, activities on the U-M campus — both in support of and against Israel's actions in Gaza — have dramatically increased since Oct. 7, 2023. That's the day the terrorist group Hamas launched a surprise attack in Isreal, killing nearly 1,200 people and kidnapping at least 240. Israel retaliated in a series of attacks that has devastated the Gaza region, killing 42,000 Palestinians, including 13,000 children in what Amnesty International has described as "genocide" in a December 2024 report.
The plaintiffs allege that the university has "solely targeted, discriminated against and punished" pro-Gaza demonstrators in an effort to deter others from expressing pro-Palestinian viewpoints." Moreover, their lawsuit states, demonstrators calling for divesture by the university isn't a new concept.
In fact, students have led other campaigns calling on the university to divest on other issues of public concern, including:
After years of protest, the University's Board of Regents passed its first resolution to divest from South Africa in the late 1970s.
In 2000, the University divested from tobacco companies.
In 2002, the University began the process of divesting from fossil fuels.
In 2022, the University divested from Russia.
The plaintiffs maintain that the methods of divestment advocacy haven't changed at U-M, but that the university's response "has changed dramatically when students advocate for divestment from Israel."
According to the lawsuit, this is how one of the plaintiffs learned she could never work at U-M again:
Nine months after the sit-in at the Ruthven Building, Arwa Hassaballa, a 2023 U-M graduate from Lake Orion who held several part-time jobs at U-M, including research assistant, student life facilitator and teaching assistant, received a letter from the university human resources department. The letter stated that she was 'ineligible for rehire' at the university and that her 'record will reflect that she violated the Violence in the University Community (police).'
At the time the letter was sent, Hassaballa was no longer a student or employed by the university, though she had planned to apply for post-graduate work.
On Oct. 22, 2024, she received evidence that the university allegedly used to fire her: a heavily redacted police report, and an incident report about her conduct. A November grievance hearing followed, with a university official claiming there was video showing Hassaballa had violated university policy.
No video was shown at the hearing, nor was it provided to Hassaballa, and no witnesses spoke. Still, the university upheld the decision to fire her and rendered her permanently ineligible for rehire.
On Nov. 22, 2024, Hasssaballa finally saw the video in question. It showed a crowd of protesters outside the Ruthven Building, and other protesters walking through the doors. Hassaballa was seen walking into the building without issue. She does not appear in the second video at all.
Another plaintiff, Rhea Chappel, a building manager at the university's Michigan League, has a similar story: Her conduct at the sit-in was deemed as being in violation of university policy and she was let go. She denied engaging in any violence, but to no avail. Her termination would stick and she was deemed permanently ineligible for rehire.
The plaintiffs who attended the subsequent demonstration outside the museum saw a similar fate. During that protest, several regents were attending a private event inside the museum as protesters stood in front of the building, linked arms and chanted. University of Michigan police arrived and set up a barricade surrounding the museum entrance.
The plaintiffs complied with orders from police, stood on the public sidewalk behind the barricade, and chanted for a free Palestine while calling on the university to divest from Israel.
According to the lawsuit, police sought to disburse the protesters by using pepper spray, pushing protesters with bikes, and physically assaulting individuals.
The plaintiffs maintain that they engaged in no sort of violence, but the university concluded otherwise.
Zainab Hakim, of Canton, a 2024 U-M graduate and full-time academic program specialist at the university's Center for South Asian Studies. His job duties included planning events, lectures, programs and conferences, and coordinating academic programs for students.
Henry Mackeen-Shapiro, of Ann Arbor, an undergraduate student at U-M who also worked as a student program assistant at the English Language Institute, where he provided feedback and advice to international graduate students on their coursework and other academic materials to improve their English writing and verbal skills.
Eaman Ali, of Ann Arbor, an undergraduate student at U-M and campus information assistant at the university's Campus Information Center. Her job included providing in-person customer service at the university unions.
Assmaa Eidy, of Ann Arbor, an undergraduate student at U-M and research assistant in the American Culture Department whose job included conducting research on Arab American social issues, archiving sources and assisting on a documentary film project. As a community leadership fellow, Eidy also conducted a public service project on behalf of the university with a local nonprofit organization.
Harrison Rhoades, of Ann Arbor, 2024 U-M graduate and part-time manager within the University of Michigan's Sustainable Food Program, which is part of the Student Life Sustainability Office. This job included event planning, collaborating with partnering organizations and and supporting a grant program.
Hassaballa, of Lake Orion, a 2023 U-M graduate who held several part-time roles at U-M, including research assistant, student life facilitator for M-STEM Academics, Arab Heritage Month Student Coordinator and teacher's assistant at the North Campus Children's Center. A severe foot injury forced her to leave her teaching assistant job in 2023.
Chappel, of Ann Arbor, an undergraduate student at U-M and part-time student building manager at the Michigan League, which involved managing and preparing rooms for events, including student meetings, conferences and weddings.
Zaynab Omar Ibn Al-Khattab Elkolaly, of Ypsilanti, a 2024 U-M graduate who conducted research on nuclear energy at U-M and held several part-time positions at the university, including administrative assistant at Michigan Medicine, and research assistant and diversity, equity and inclusion officer in the Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences Department.
Tresa Baldas: tbaldas@freepress.com
This is a developing story.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: University of Michigan sued for firing staffers who support Palestine
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Netanyahu aide faces indictment, accused of leaking top Israel military secrets on Gaza war
Netanyahu aide faces indictment, accused of leaking top Israel military secrets on Gaza war

News24

timean hour ago

  • News24

Netanyahu aide faces indictment, accused of leaking top Israel military secrets on Gaza war

Jonatan Urich, an aide to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, faces indictment on security charges. He is accused of leaking top secret military information during Israel's war in Gaza. The charges are baseless, Urich's attorneys said. An aide to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces indictment on security charges pending a hearing, Israel's attorney general has said, for allegedly leaking top secret military information during Israel's war in Gaza. Netanyahu's close adviser, Jonatan Urich, has denied any wrongdoing in the case, which legal authorities began investigating in late 2024. Netanyahu has described probes against Urich and other aides as politically motivated and on Monday said that Urich had not harmed state security. Urich's attorneys said the charges were baseless and that their client's innocence would be proven beyond doubt. Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara said in a statement late on Sunday that Urich and another aide had extracted secret information from the Israeli military and leaked it to German newspaper Bild. READ | 'Window of opportunity' in Gaza truce talks between Hamas and Israel closing amid sticking points Their intent, she said, was to shape public opinion of Netanyahu and influence the discourse about the slaying of six Israeli hostages by their Palestinian captors in Gaza in late August 2024. The hostages' deaths sparked mass protests in Israel and outraged hostages' families, who accused Netanyahu of torpedoing ceasefire talks that had faltered in the preceding weeks for political reasons. Netanyahu vehemently denies this. He has repeatedly said that Hamas was to blame for the talks collapsing, while the militant group has said it was Israel's fault no deal had been reached. Four of the six slain hostages had been on the list of more than 30 captives that Hamas was set to free if a ceasefire had been reached, according to a defence official at the time. The Bild article in question was published days after the hostages were found executed in a Hamas tunnel in southern Gaza. It outlined Hamas' negotiation strategy in the indirect ceasefire talks and largely corresponded with Netanyahu's allegations against the militant group over the deadlock. Bild said after the investigation was announced that it does not comment on its sources and that its article relied on authentic documents. The newspaper did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday. A two-month ceasefire was reached in January this year and included the release of 38 hostages before Israel resumed attacks in Gaza. The sides are presently engaged in indirect negotiations in Doha, aimed at reaching another truce. In his statement on Monday, Netanyahu said Baharav-Miara's announcement was 'appalling' and that its timing raised serious questions. Netanyahu's government has for months been seeking the dismissal of Baharav-Miara. The attorney general, appointed by the previous government, has sparred with Netanyahu's cabinet over the legality of some of its policies.

Blast in residential block blast near Iran's Qom, source says not Israeli attack
Blast in residential block blast near Iran's Qom, source says not Israeli attack

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Blast in residential block blast near Iran's Qom, source says not Israeli attack

DUBAI (Reuters) -An explosion at a residential building injured seven people in the Pardisan neighbourhood of Qom city, Iran's semi-official Fars news agency reported, going on to quote an unnamed source saying it was not the result of any Israeli attack. "Four residential units were damaged in the blast. Initial assessments show that the cause of the incident was a gas leak, and follow-ups are continuing in this regard," the director of Qom's fire department told Fars. The agency said the residents of the building were ordinary citizens. Iran's regional arch-rival Israel has a record of assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists, whom it considers part of a programme that directly threatens Israel. Tehran maintains its nuclear programme is solely for peaceful purposes. Since the end of a 12-day air war last month between Iran and Israel, in which Israel and the United States attacked Iran's nuclear facilities, several explosions have occurred in Iran, but authorities have not blamed Israel. "People should not worry about rumours (of Israeli attacks). If a hostile action occurs in the country, the news will immediately reach the people and alarm bells will simultaneously be activated in the Occupied Territories," Fars quoted an unnamed Iranian source as saying following the blast in Qom.

Why Trump's Abraham Accords have not meant Mideast peace
Why Trump's Abraham Accords have not meant Mideast peace

Boston Globe

time2 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Why Trump's Abraham Accords have not meant Mideast peace

The Middle East did not appear to be aware of any such advance. Even as Netanyahu met in Washington last week with Trump and other US officials, the Israeli military continued its devastating bombing of the Gaza Strip, the Houthis in Yemen attacked two cargo ships in the Red Sea, and a brutal civil war continued to rage in Sudan. Weeks earlier, Israel and the United States were bombing Iran, which was firing missiles in return. And Israeli forces remain on the ground in both Lebanon and Syria, in the aftermath of wars that ended just months ago. During the nearly five years since the Abraham Accords were signed, Trump, Netanyahu, and other US and Israeli officials have repeatedly referred to the agreements with the United Arab Emirates, Morocco, and Bahrain as a 'peace deal.' Advertisement Scholars who study the region say that is merely a turn of phrase, belying the fact that there has never been a war — or any violence at all — between Israel and the UAE or Bahrain. Morocco has also largely stayed out of the Arab-Israeli conflicts, aside from sending a token force to the 1973 war, more than 50 years ago. Advertisement 'It's got nothing to do with peace,' Hussein Ibish, a senior resident scholar at the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington, a research organization, said of the accords. 'Peace was the way it was branded and marketed. But that doesn't mean that it makes any sense. This was not an agreement that ends the war.' In effect, the deals bypassed the central conflict, between Israel and the Palestinians, declaring harmony between parties that were not fighting. Since then, the very phrase 'regional peace' has become an opaque and disputed term in the Middle East, said Abdulaziz Alghashian, a Saudi researcher and senior nonresident fellow at the Gulf International Forum. 'Who is involved in this 'regional peace'?' he said he had found himself asking supporters of the Abraham Accords. He said he realized that for some, it is a concept that relies on 'a complete avoidance of the Palestinian issue.' In a statement to The New York Times, the White House defended the legacy of the accords and said that the wars in the region had nothing to do with their efficacy. 'No amount of revisionist history or gaslighting from liberal activists and Democrat donors can undo President Trump's historic and transformative Abraham Accords, which brought peace to the Middle East,' the White House said. 'Only President Trump could have secured these peace deals, and he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize for all the work he has done to end wars and conflicts that no other world leader has been able to do.' US officials and lawmakers from both parties have presented the Abraham Accords as a game changer with the potential to transform the Middle East. The accords did allow for Israeli tourists and investors to pour into Dubai, the biggest city in the UAE, and technology and energy companies signed new deals. Advertisement Israel and some of the Gulf countries had already engaged in quiet trade and security cooperation, under the table. The accords brought that into the open and allowed it to expand. But that was not how the deals' signatories had presented them. 'The blessings of the peace we make today will be enormous,' Netanyahu declared from a White House balcony when the accords were announced. 'Ultimately, it can end the Arab-Israeli conflict once and for all.' Trump said at the same ceremony that the accords marked 'the dawn of a new Middle East,' speaking of a future in which 'people of all faiths and backgrounds live together in peace and prosperity.' After the news cameras were turned off, peace and prosperity did not, of course, sweep through the Middle East. Israel's occupation of the West Bank has deepened, rather than eased, as Emirati officials had hoped when they signed the deal, and members of Netanyahu's government want a long-term occupation of Gaza. The prospects for a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza, with Jerusalem as its capital, a goal of Arab leaders, appear dimmer than ever. The Abraham Accords were premised on the notion of Arab-Israeli cooperation while skipping past the Palestinians, but 'that was always a mistake, and it wasn't such a shock when Gaza proved it was a mistake,' said Marc Lynch, a political science and international affairs professor at George Washington University. 'Maybe it shocked some people — but it shouldn't have.' Advertisement The only potentially bright piece of conflict-related news in the Middle East recently is in Syria, where a civil war finally ended with rebels toppling Syrian dictator Bashar Assad. But their victory had nothing to do with the Abraham Accords, and it remains unclear whether they will deliver either lasting peace and stability within the country or peace with Israel. US and Israeli officials have frequently stated their desires and expectations for other countries, most importantly Saudi Arabia, to sign the accords. So far, that has fallen flat. Sudan, often cited as a candidate to be the next Arab country to join, has not established diplomatic relations with Israel. Years of overtures to persuade Saudi Arabia to join the accords have so far failed. The Biden administration took up that mantle fervently, pursuing a deal built on the United States granting major benefits to the kingdom. It never came to fruition, and analysts say the war in Gaza has made it much less likely. 'Inside the Gulf, there's no way it's going to expand,' at least under the same framework as the Abraham Accords, Alghashian said. Especially in Saudi Arabia, that idea is 'tainted' now, he said. Still, that has not stopped officials in Washington from recently turning their conversations about Middle East policy back to the Abraham Accords. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for doing the Abraham Accords in the Middle East,' Trump complained on social media last month, arguing that his efforts to forge peace have been underrecognized. But, he said, 'if all goes well,' new countries will sign on, asserting that the development would 'unify the Middle East for the first time in 'The Ages!'' Advertisement

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store