Having more seats favours GPS
KUCHING: The increase in Sarawak's elected state representatives from 82 to 99 will consolidate the ruling Gabungan Parti Sarawak's (GPS) hold on power, says a political analyst.
Prof James Chin from the University of Tasmania said the large number of new seats would make it even more difficult for the Opposition to win a state election due to the dominance of GPS.
'With more seats at 99, this means the Opposition has to win 56 seats to replace the current government,' he said when contacted.
GPS secured a landslide victory in the last state election in 2021, winning 76 of 82 seats.
Chin said the increase in seats would also benefit Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB), the backbone of GPS.
'If you look at the distribution of seats, especially for PBB, the GPS-led government will want to carve out new Malay/Melanau-majority seats in areas where traditionally they don't have seats,' he said, adding that he expected these new seats to be created in the urban centres of Sibu, Miri and Kuching.
The Sarawak Legislative Assembly passed the Dewan Undangan Negeri (Composition of Membership) Bill 2025 at a special one-day sitting yesterday.
The Bill, tabled by state Tourism, Creative Industry and Performing Arts Minister Datuk Seri Abdul Karim Hamzah, proposed an increase of 17 elected representatives to bring the total to 99.
Abdul Karim said the redelineation will enhance accessibility to government, ensure the needs of the rakyat are more efficiently and effectively addressed, and improve service delivery.
He also said the proposal was in line with Article 113(2)(ii) of the Federal Constitution, which allows a review of electoral boundaries after an interval of not less than eight years.
He said given the vast geographical expanse of Sarawak and the extensive areas that assemblymen representing rural constituencies must cover, the proposed increase is both reasonable and necessary.
The last redelineation exercise in Sarawak took place in 2015, creating 11 new constituencies.
This followed the passing of the Dewan Undangan Negeri (Composition of Membership) Bill in November 2014, increasing its membership from 71 to 82.
Universiti Malaya's Prof Dr Awang Azman Awang Pawi said PBB is expected to get 10 of the 17 new seats, as it is the dominant party in GPS with 47 of the current 82 seats.
He said the Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP) would likely get three new seats, while two seats each would go to Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) and Progressive Democratic Party (PDP).
'PBB has been the backbone of the state government for over 50 years.
'Allocating more seats to PBB can be seen as recognising its role and positive record in governing the state,' said Awang Azman.
Abdul Karim said the Bill is a constitutional exercise done in the spirit of justice.
'This is not about redelineation of constituencies but increasing the number of representatives in this House from the present 82 to 99,' Abdul Karim added when winding up the debate on the Bill.
Abdul Karim also said the state government had no say in the redelineation of the 17 new state constituencies as this was the purview of the Election Commission.
He dismissed allegations by the Opposition that the seat increase was meant to strengthen GPS.
Persatuan Pemangkin Daya Masyarakat (ROSE) said the Bill's passing would have an effect on future elections, including the next state election due by 2027.
It called on voters to participate in the process as provided for in the Federal Constitution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BusinessToday
3 hours ago
- BusinessToday
Malaysia Supports AICHR's Push For Declarations On Environment And Development Rights
The ASEAN Foreign Ministers had an Interface with the Representatives of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR), on July 24 2024, in Vientiane, Lao PDR. Malaysia has welcomed the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights' (AICHR) efforts to draft two declarations focused on urgent human rights issues, environmental protection and inclusive development. Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan, speaking at the ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Interface Meeting with AICHR on Tuesday, said the proposed declarations were timely and necessary. The two documents are: ASEAN Declaration on the Right to a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment Declaration on Promoting the Right to Development and Peace, Towards Realising Inclusive and Sustainable Development 'These declarations highlight the urgent and pressing concerns of our people, especially those who are vulnerable to environmental harm, inequality and instability,' he said. Mohamad noted that the declarations reaffirm AICHR's commitment to advancing human rights in ways relevant to present and future challenges. He also expressed anticipation for AICHR's 2025 Annual Report, which is expected to highlight achievements, challenges and future direction. Marking 15 years of AICHR's existence, Mohamad urged the body to evolve and strengthen its impact while ensuring ASEAN centrality and unity. 'Efforts to promote and protect the well-being of our people should remain ASEAN-led and ASEAN-owned,' he said, adding that ASEAN's human rights work must align with the ASEAN Charter and the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration. He said this dialogue with AICHR comes at a critical time as ASEAN enters a new phase of integration under the 'ASEAN 2045: Our Shared Future' vision, adopted at the 46th ASEAN Summit in May. That vision recognises the promotion and protection of human rights as a pillar of community building. The meeting is part of the 58th ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting (AMM) and related events held in Kuala Lumpur under Malaysia's ASEAN Chairmanship 2025, themed 'Inclusivity and Sustainability'. Around 1,500 delegates are expected across 24 ministerial-level meetings involving ASEAN member states, Timor-Leste, dialogue and sectoral partners, and ASEAN Regional Forum participants. Related
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Qatar says ‘we will need time' for Gaza ceasefire
DOHA: Negotiations for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas are continuing but 'need time', host Qatar cautioned on Tuesday, after US President Donald Trump voiced optimism about a possible breakthrough. A fresh round of indirect talks, after 21 months of fighting in Gaza, began on Sunday, with Qatar's foreign ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari confirming discussions had gone into a third day. 'I don't think that I can give any timeline at the moment, but I can say right now that we will need time for this,' Majed Al-Ansari told reporters at a regular briefing, when asked if a deal was close. Qatar, along with fellow mediators the United States and Egypt, has brokered back-and-forth talks aimed at a truce since the earliest days of the war, which erupted with Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel. With the exception of a week-long truce in November 2023 and a two-month halt that began in January 2025, the indirect talks, principally held in Doha and Cairo, have failed to end the hostilities. Trump, during Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Washington, earlier said the Doha talks were going 'very well' and that Hamas 'want to have that ceasefire'. Ansari declined to go into detail about the negotiations, but said they were focused on a framework for talks. 'What is happening right now is that both delegations are in Doha, we are speaking with them separately on a framework for the talks,' he said. 'So talks have not begun, as of yet, but we are talking to both sides over that framework,' he added. Ansari noted 'positive engagement' and said the fact that the negotiating teams hadn't left the Qatari capital was 'always a good sign'. Two Palestinian sources close to the discussions earlier told AFP the proposed deal included a 60-day truce, during which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and several bodies in exchange for Palestinians detained by Israel. However, they said, the group was also demanding certain conditions for Israel's withdrawal, guarantees against a resumption of fighting during negotiations, and the return of the UN-led aid distribution system. At the outset of the talks, Netanyahu said Hamas's response to a US-backed ceasefire proposal, conveyed through mediators, contained 'unacceptable' demands. – AFP
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Prabowo's BRICS debut puts Indonesia's Asean ties and US relations to the test, analysts say
JAKARTA: Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto's debut at the BRICS summit in Brazil marked a bold step in Jakarta's bid to elevate its global standing, though analysts warned the diplomatic milestone could strain ties with the rest of Asean, the United States and its allies. The summit – on July 6 and 7 in Rio de Janeiro – marked Indonesia's first participation as a full member of BRICS, founded by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. The 11-member grouping aims to amplify the Global South's influence by promoting cooperation among emerging economies. Cabinet Secretary Teddy Indra Wijaya said in a statement that President Prabowo viewed Indonesia's membership as a way to 'strengthen its position globally' and 'support global stability and prosperity' through broader international cooperation. A major draw for Indonesia lies in access to the New Development Bank (NDB), a multilateral lender created by BRICS members to fund infrastructure and development in emerging markets. Often seen as a rival to Western-led institutions such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the NDB offers loans with fewer political conditions. Associate Professor Yohanes Sulaiman of Jenderal Achmad Yani University told The Straits Times that the NDB's appeal is simple: 'Money without much scrutiny. Keep in mind that many Asian and African countries find the conditions (for non-NDB funding) to be too strenuous and cannot be used for pet projects.' He cited Indonesia's new capital city in East Kalimantan, the national free lunch programme and coastal infrastructure as examples of projects that require flexible, timely funding. Prabowo's pivot to BRICS also aligns with efforts to attract foreign investment through Indonesia's sovereign wealth fund, Danantara. During a June visit to St Petersburg, Danantara signed a €2 billion (US$2.35 billion) joint investment deal with the Russian Direct Investment Fund. Prabowo also expressed its gratitude to Russia for its backing of Indonesia's BRICS bid. In Brazil, Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs Airlangga Hartarto said Indonesia is ready to tap the NDB to support its green energy transition and sustainability goals. The bank currently manages 120 projects worth about US$39 billion, including clean energy, infrastructure, and sustainable development. Associate Professor Teuku Rezasyah at Padjadjaran University and President University noted that Indonesia stands to gain from the bank's 'flexible long maturities, customised grace periods and repayment terms, along with moderate interest rate risk compared with IMF, World Bank and the ADB'. He added that Indonesia could pursue 'heart-to-heart negotiations' with the NDB to tailor loans for priority sectors such as agriculture, food security, green energy, and infrastructure. Indonesia's entry into BRICS is already shifting the regional equation. Thailand has also expressed interest to join BRICS – a move backed by Prabowo during a visit to Bangkok in May. Prof Rezasyah said Indonesia's endorsement 'may produce a new caucus inside Asean, outside the already established Malay network involving Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei'. 'A new Indonesia-Thailand coalition inside BRICS may attract fellow Asean members such as Vietnam and Malaysia to also join BRICS,' he told ST. However, such a development may risk weakening Asean unity and relegating the bloc to 'the second tier' of importance for those who join BRICS, Prof Rezasyah warned. Muhammad Habib Abiyan Dzakwan, a researcher at Indonesia's Centre for Strategic and International Studies, said Jakarta must ensure it allocates sufficient diplomatic resources and political attention to maintain its presence and meaningful participation in Asean-led meetings and initiatives. Otherwise, its relations with the other Asean members could be impacted, he added. Still, Habib noted that most Asean states respect Indonesia's sovereign decision. 'Asean may just explore possible interfaces, economic partnership, or cooperation without permanent alignment,' he told ST. Benefits of collaboration with BRICS could include stronger representation for developing nations, quicker decisions in global institutions, and better access to technical cooperation, he added. Prof Yohanes agreed, noting that Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam are already BRICS partner countries that cooperate with the bloc but lack membership privileges. Thailand is now seeking to become a full member – a move that would grant it voting rights, a say in setting the bloc's agenda, and access to financing tools such as NDB funding. 'Everyone looks at BRICS in terms of providing more economic engagements, rather than as a statement against the US,' he said. 'Probably the only Asean country which might feel uneasy is the Philippines, and that is because they have been looking cautiously at growing closer relationships between China and both Indonesia and Malaysia,' he added, referring to ongoing tensions in the disputed South China Sea. BRICS is an economic grouping, Prof Yohanes emphasised. 'No country in South-east Asia is willing to deal with BRICS if they see it as a military alliance against the US or Europe.' The timing of Indonesia's BRICS move is complicated by rising global tensions. On July 7, US President Donald Trump threatened to slap a TEN per cent tariff on 'any country aligning themselves with the anti-American policies of BRICS', declaring 'there will be no exceptions'. The warning came after a BRICS joint statement that condemned US tariff hikes and military actions in Iran, labelling them harmful to global trade and supply chains. On July 8, Indonesia was among the first batch of countries to receive US 'reciprocal tariff' letters for failing to strike a deal in time to ward off the elevated tariffs announced by President Trump in early April. Indonesia faces a 32 per cent tariff, which may be revised if Jakarta reaches a deal with the US before Aug 1. The rate, among the highest in South-east Asia, matches earlier drafts. Although Indonesia insists it remains non-aligned with BRICS, analysts warned that the country could still face fallout. Prof Yohanes said: 'Obviously, the US, especially under Trump, will not look at this kindly, so we have to see how this goes in the future.' Prof Rezasyah noted that President Trump's threat could affect Jakarta's current tariff negotiations with Washington. 'It is very difficult for Indonesia to deal with Trump's latest threat, as it may lead to greater suffering in the Indonesian economy, especially when it deals with small and medium enterprises keen to market their products to the advanced economies.' Habib described the situation as precarious, saying 'unpredictable is such an understatement'. 'This threat of additional tariff would put Indonesia in an awkward and difficult position. It complicates the tariff negotiation we are currently finalising with the US,' he added. To navigate this, Habib advised a 'selective approach' to BRICS. 'Even better, if Indonesia could propose its own agenda to BRICS that is more inclusive and non-sensitive,' he said. He recommended that Jakarta work with BRICS and like-minded developed nations on global issues such as health and climate, which may be receiving less attention from the US and its allies. Prof Rezasyah cautioned that deeper ties with BRICS might strain Indonesia's relations with the US and its allies, especially over trade barriers. However, he said Indonesia's presence in BRICS could help prevent the grouping from becoming confrontational with the Group of Seven, the world's largest developed economies, given its status as a reliable US global partner. Despite the diplomatic risks, BRICS offers Indonesia a platform to boost exports, attract investment, and push its green agenda. However, translating summit speeches into practical outcomes will not be easy, analysts say. Jakarta must tread carefully – juggling global ambitions without alienating Asean neighbours or provoking the US. Analysts say the challenge is made harder by President Prabowo's unpredictable diplomatic style. Unlike past presidents, his foreign policy is driven more by personal instincts than the more stable, foreign ministry-led approach that Indonesia has followed since 1999, Prof Yohanes noted. He added: 'Currently they (BRICS countries) are trying to make deals with Washington, and obviously Indonesia prefers to stay 'non-aligned', but it is a delicate dance… it really depends on Prabowo's whims.' - The Straits Times/ANN
