New North Korean resort aims for 20,000 visitors
North Korea has officially opened the sprawling Wonsan-Kalma beach resort on its eastern coast, a project long championed by leader Kim Jong Un.
The resort, capable of hosting up to 20,000 visitors, features high-rise hotels, water parks, restaurants, and shopping centres along a four-kilometre stretch of beach.
The grand opening took place on 24 June 2025, with Kim Jong Un personally cutting the ribbon.
He was accompanied by his wife Ri Sol Ju and their daughter Kim Ju Ae, who is widely seen as his likely successor, according to CNN.
Kim expressed 'great satisfaction' after the resort. He described it as 'one of the greatest successes this year' and a 'proud first step' towards developing North Korea's tourism industry.
This signalled Pyongyang's growing ties with Moscow amid ongoing Western sanctions.
The resort is set to open to domestic tourists from 1 July 2025. However, details about eligibility, transportation, and when international tourists might be allowed remain unclear.
Currently, only Russian tourists have limited access to certain parts of North Korea. Russian travel agencies are already promoting tour packages to the Wonsan-Kalma zone, with prices around R30,000.
This suggests that Russians may be the first foreign visitors to enjoy the resort, reflecting the close relationship between North Korea and Russia.
Experts believe the initial visitors will likely be North Korea's domestic elite, including party officials and high-ranking figures.
This is due to the country's tightly controlled society and restricted domestic travel.
Dr Edward Howell, a North Korea specialist at the University of Oxford, notes that Western tourists are unlikely to visit due to strict social controls and ideological restrictions within the country.
Lim Eul-chul, a professor of North Korean Studies, sees the resort as part of Kim's broader strategy to seek economic breakthroughs through tourism.
This is despite the country's ongoing hardships and international isolation.
The resort's opening raises questions about its economic viability and who will visit. North Korea remains one of the world's poorest nations, with most resources devoted to military spending.
Tourism is one of the few sectors that can generate foreign currency legally, especially under UN sanctions.
However, the country's history with international tourism is fraught; the once-popular Mount Kumgang tours for South Koreans ended abruptly in 2008.
This was after a fatal shooting incident, and cross-border tourism remains suspended.
The Wonsan-Kalma resort is a curious symbol of contrast: a lavish, state-controlled tourist zone in a country where many face hunger and hardship.
It reflects North Korea's attempts to project an image of development and normalcy despite its isolation.
As Dr Howell puts it, 'Whether this resort will yield the economic benefits that Kim Jong Un desperately seeks in the long term is uncertain.
Wonsan-Kalma is hardly a tourist hotspot to begin with'.
Elliott Davies, director of Uri Tours, adds, 'North Korea has a niche appeal for those interested in offbeat travel experiences.
It's fascinating to see a beach resort shaped by North Korea's unique cultural backdrop'.
The Wonsan-Kalma beach resort is a grand showcase of North Korea's ambitions to boost tourism and earn foreign currency. Privileged domestic guests and Russian tourists will initially make up its visitor base.
The prospect of Western or South African tourists visiting remains remote, given the country's political climate and travel restrictions.
'The opening of a major beach resort like Wonsan-Kalma helps to reinforce the state media narrative of Kim's people-first policy.
It balances his focus on national defence,' said Rachel Minyoung Lee, a fellow at the Stimson Center.
'The ceremony of the Wonsan-Kalma resort reflects Kim Jong Un's vision of 'socialist civilisation'. It is part of his strategic effort to seek economic breakthroughs through tourism,' noted Lim Eul-chul.
This development offers a rare glimpse into the secretive nation's attempts to engage with the outside world, albeit under strict control and limited access.
For South Africans and others, it remains to be seen whether this ambitious project will become a genuine tourism destination or remain a symbol of Pyongyang's tightly managed image.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Court ruling on EFT payments: Car buyer's responsibility in cybercrime cases
In a case involving cybercrime, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that it is the duty of a buyer to ensure that the money is paid into the seller's correct bank account. Image: EPA Cybercrime has emerged as a focal point in a recent legal dispute before the Supreme Court of Appeal, which ruled that payment through electronic funds transfer (EFT) is only deemed complete once the funds are received by the correct account holder. This judgment followed legal proceedings between two car sale companies – with the one who bought two bakkies from the other only to discover after delivery of the vehicles that cybercriminals had intercepted the electronic payment made for the vehicles. None of the parties were prepared to take the financial loss, and the seller initially turned to the regional court in Louis Trichardt to get its R290,000 back – the price at which it sold the two bakkies. The lower court earlier ruled that Hyundai Louis Trichardt had to pay Northcliff Nissan the R290, 000 for the vehicles. The magistrate reasoned that the two car dealerships had a contract in place and, cybercrime or not, Northcliff Nissan was due payment for the two bakkies. Aggrieved with this judgment, Hyundai successfully turned to the Limpopo High Court, sitting in Thohoyandou, to appeal the lower court's verdict. But Northcliff Nissan took the matter on appeal to the SCA. The risk of erroneous payment due to the cybercrime was that of the payer in this instance, the SCA found. 'A debtor bears the risk of misdirected EFT payments and must ensure that the payment is made to the correct bank account,' it said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The court added that the onus of proof in contract disputes over payment lies with the payer (debtor). 'Cybercrime risks do not automatically shift liability to the payee, and the courts will not impose an overarching legal duty on creditors to protect debtors from cyber fraud,' the court said. The court was told that in October 2018, Hyundai purchased two Nissan bakkies from Northcliff Nissan for the sum of R145,000,00 each. Northcliff Nissan emailed the invoices for both vehicles to the buyer. The invoices provided details of the nominated bank account for payment of the purchase price for the bakkies. On the same day, Hyundai paid for one bakkie and emailed proof of payment to Northcliff Nissan, after which the bakkie was then delivered. A few days later, Hyundai made another payment and took delivery of the second bakkie. At that stage, no one realised that cybercriminals were at work. Approximately a week later, Northcliff Nissan told Hyundai that payment of the purchase price for the bakkies had not been reflected in its bank account. It then became clear to the parties that the emails had been intercepted and the bank account details on the invoices were altered by a cyber fraudster. The parties realised that they were victims of business email compromise (BEC), a cybercrime that has become popular in this technological age of electronic communication and payment. Cape Argus
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Putin's oil and gas man joins secretive Antarctic Treaty meeting in Milan
The Russian official — until recently in charge of the firm that has stitched together vast maps of South Pole hydrocarbons — is helping negotiate Putin's 'scientific' interests at the prestigious diplomatic gathering in Milan. It may not be insignificant that Russia's delegation at the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) in the Italian fashion capital includes Pavel Lunev. Until April 2023, Lunev had been head of the Russian state firm responsible for mapping Antarctica's oil, gas and other minerals — at least since the region's mining ban entered into force in 1998. That firm is owned by Rosgeo — the Kremlin's mineral explorer. Indeed, Lunev would land a weighty promotion after Rosgeo's seismic survey ship had once more headed via Cape Town to the Antarctic seabed in the austral summer of 2023 for another season of 'scientific research'. That event sparked environmental protests at the port city's V&A Waterfront — one of South Africa's most popular tourist destinations — and a letter of demand by 29 South African groups, which called on Pretoria to intervene. Pretoria's answer at the time? The Russian state mineral explorer was free to pursue its interests under the treaty's 'freedom of scientific investigation' principle — also allowed by the region's mining ban. Moscow's response? Giving Lunev a top job in Antarctica: that is, heading the Russian Antarctic Expedition, the state agency that executes Moscow's operational interests in the frigid southern frontier. Who is Pavel Lunev? A trained palaeontologist with tousled hair and a smile fit for the cover of Outside magazine, Lunev now appears in a suit and tie in a Russian press statement on the delegation's work in Milan — wearing a look that says, 'I'm not outside right now.' Lunev previously told Daily Maverick that geological and geophysical surveys by Rosgeo's Polar Marine Geosurvey Expedition (PMGE) was 'no different from the work conducted by other members' signed up to Antarctica's environmental laws. Indeed, some of PMGE's work includes standard sciences such as glacial evolution. The Rosgeo subsidiary had also probed 'the glacial processes, dynamics and evolution of the ice sheet, and the stages of Antarctic glaciation' and 'the nature and foundation of the Earth's crust', said Lunev. However, recent developments also involve: A July 2024 Russian-Chinese Antarctic geology paper that suggests nothing about prospecting, but appears in the state mining journal. Paper author Professor German Leitchenkov, a PMGE collaborator who has extensively researched Antarctica's mineral 'potential', presented his research on sub-ice sampling at an international Antarctic science conference held in Chile in August 2024; PMGE's stated goals up to at least 2030, which include identifying the Southern Ocean's 'mineral raw material potential'; A 2022 PMGE petroleum geology paper, which describes the 'high oil and gas potential' in the D'Urville Sea off East Antarctica; A February 2020 Rosgeo statement, which used Cape Town port to announce 70 billion tons of hydrocarbons off East Antarctica (500 billion barrels or 15 times global annual oil consumption); and … Documented claims betraying the Russian state's geopolitical motivations: 'The works of the PMGE aimed at studying the geological structure and mineral resources of the Antarctic are of geopolitical nature. They ensure guarantees of Russia's full participation in any form of possible future development of the Antarctic mineral resources — from designing the mechanisms for regulating such activities up to their direct implementation,' PMGE revealed in 2017. Leitchenkov's joint paper in a July 2024 edition of the Russian state journal, the 'Exploration and Protection of Mineral Resources'. (Image: Screenshot) Westminster releases findings on Russian hydrocarbon surveys Meanwhile, Westminster's newly released findings on the UK's Antarctic interests, issued this month, devote a section to 'commercial mining' and the Russian activities uncovered by Daily Maverick. According to the report, 'the Russian state-owned vessel [Akademik] Alexander Karpinsky has conducted seismic surveys in Antarctic waters, identifying potential hydrocarbon reserves estimated at 70 billion tonnes' — an activity that 'raised serious concerns' during the inquiry. In addition to findings published in October 2021 and May 2022, in May 2024 Daily Maverick also revealed that the Karpinsky had spent six summers since 2011 surveying for oil and gas in an area counterclaimed by Argentina, Chile and the UK. Asked to explain the Russian activities during Westminster's May 2024 inquiry, UK Polar Regions head Jane Rumble claimed that 'Russia has been tackled on this before and, in fact, has assured the ATCM on multiple occasions that this is a science programme, so we'll keep it under review'. Just, in fact, two 'assurances' The June 2025 inquiry findings quote Rumble's claim. However, the ATCM database contains no record of any government, including Rumble's, 'tackling' Russia 'on this' matter. As for 'multiple assurances', Russia had offered just one by the time Rumble made her claim. It was offered nearly a quarter of a century before at the 2002 Warsaw ATCM — where the Russian delegation did argue scientific intent in a draft document published by Daily Maverick. Yet, this draft also refuses to rule out 'utilisation of the Antarctic mineral wealth' which may only occur 'in the indefinitely remote future'. Russia delivered one additional 'assurance' — on 24 May 2024, but only after Rumble had delivered her testimony on 8 May. A media firestorm erupted after Rumble's testimony, capped by Chilean president Gabriel Boric twice tweeting that Santiago would defend its claimed territory against oil exploitation. So, not everyone has approached Russia's self-declared interests in Antarctic oil and gas like a geopolitical wet-floor sign. In February 2024, Washington — the treaty depositary — placed the Karpinsky under energy sanctions. And the US delegation had led an initiative reaffirming Antarctica's mining ban at the 2023 ATCM in Helsinki, Finland. Ukraine, immediately after the 2024 ATCM in Kochi, India, said Russia was blocking environmental initiatives, which 'once again confirms that the true intentions of its presence in Antarctica is mining'. Russia also reaffirmed the ban in Helsinki and Rumble, in her inquiry defence, said that 'there isn't any evidence that would point to a breach of the treaty. You would need different equipment between surveying and actual exploitation. There is not a shift to it, but, yes, we are watching it very closely.' Rumble has not responded to queries sent since last year. This is 'manifestly prospecting … what the Russians are doing' Some experts disagree that the act of putting a symbolic signature on the reaffirmation of the mining ban refutes the documented reality of Rosgeo's activities. Westminster's inquiry findings, in fact, point out that the 'Article 7' mining ban 'prohibits 'any activity relating to mineral resources, other than scientific research''. While the ban does not define a 'mineral resource' activity, the inquiry findings do. 'Any activity relating to mineral resources,' the findings say, 'includes prospecting, exploration and exploitation for commercial purposes'. And it is Antarctic governance expert Professor Alan Hemmings, of New Zealand's University of Canterbury, who told Daily Maverick in a recent webinar that the 'Karpinsky has been engaged in what is manifestly mineral prospecting'. Hemmings explains: 'Article 7 prohibits mineral resource activities, and mineral resource activities were defined in an earlier treaty that didn't enter into force quite carefully. And among the things that constitute mineral resource activities was prospecting. 'That's what the Russians are doing.' Why is Russia in Milan? It is unclear what submissions the Russian delegation will be making at this year's ATCM, which concludes on Thursday, 3 July. Yet, since the details of these 'prospecting' activities have not been tabled at any ATCM, it is highly unlikely that Moscow's envoys are now in Milan to formally discuss that contentious matter. The agenda remains opaque because the meeting has been a closed-door event since the treaty was signed in 1959 and that is why the press is stopped from reporting on the live substance of the 10-day talks. This year, the Russian statement from Milan says, the discussions are expected to focus on matters such as science and tourism. Lucia Sala Simeon, the only journalist reportedly at 30 minutes of the 'public' opening plenary, noted that she was briefly allowed into the venue. 'I was accompanied by a member of staff — who kept a close eye on me,' notes the Milan-based reporter. 'I was the only journalist there.' She added: 'I had to leave the room and was escorted out; in the next few days, I would no longer be allowed inside the venue, not even in the lounge. So, I'll be staying outside in the garden, like a homeless [person].' Italy, South Africa — reactions, non-reactions Italy's foreign ministry has not responded to Daily Maverick's multiple queries first sent August 2024. Treaty party South Africa, under a revamped 'conservation'-focused delegation, in an interview said Pretoria's 'non-aligned' stance was an advantage in negotiating with the most obstructive actors at the consultative table. Thus, Russia and China, which have — among others — used their vetoes to block an emperor penguin rescue plan at recent ATCMs. South Africa says it supports emperor penguin protection. 'We want a much more active engagement with the Russian and Chinese delegations,' said South Africa's lead negotiator, Ashley Johnson. 'Perhaps we can edge them closer to a conservationist approach.' Rosgeo's defence of its activities, shared with Daily Maverick in October 2021, can be read here. However, Russian authorities have not responded to our repeated attempts to reach them since Lunev's most recent response in May 2022. The Russian delegation did not respond to queries on Sunday. DM
TimesLIVE
8 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
SANDF meets with Sandu over unpaid allowances for DRC deployment
The South African National Defence Force (SANDF) has held an urgent meeting with the South African National Defence Union (Sandu) after the union's public outcry over unpaid allowances for troops deployed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The SANDF said the meeting came after the union issued a statement and circulated a video on its social media platforms regarding outstanding allowances related to the SAMIDRC deployment under Operation Thiba, part of the Sadc Mission in the DRC. SundayTimes reported that soldiers have turned their anger on their own top brass over a pay dispute, saying they are owed at least R600,000 each. One of the aggrieved soldiers told the Sunday Times he and his fellow troops should have been paid R100,000 a month during their 15-month deployment as part of a Southern African Development Community force in the eastern DRC, but had received only R58,000. The SANDF expressed concern that Sandu had released the statement without first following the established process of direct engagement with it.. 'This occurred while the SANDF was still in the process of demobilising the deployed members and addressing payment-related and other administrative matters internally,' said SANDF spokesperson Rear-Admiral Prince Tshabalala. Tshabalala said the meeting focused on clarifying the status of outstanding allowances and emphasising the importance of effective and respectful communication between the SANDF and recognised unions, in line with the Bargaining Council framework. 'During the meeting, Sandu was cautioned that issuing public statements on unresolved internal matters without prior consultation may lead to misinformation and miscommunication, potentially undermining the morale of troops and affecting the command and control structures of the SANDF,' he said. However, despite these concerns, the meeting was conducted in a cordial and constructive spirit, he said. Tshabalala said both parties committed to continued engagement to resolve the outstanding issues. He added that a follow-up meeting would be scheduled.
