Heathrow chief asleep as airport closed
Thomas Woldbye was in bed as senior Heathrow staff decided to suspend operations because of a fire at a nearby electrical substation.
No flights operated at the west London airport until about 18:00 GMT on 21 March because of the blaze which started late the previous night.
The closure, which affected 270,000 journeys, was caused by "an unprecedented set of circumstances", Heathrow chairman Lord Deighton said, adding the airport's infrastructure will be made "more fit for the future".
Heathrow commissioned the inquiry into what happened, led by former transport secretary Ruth Kelly, who is an independent member of the airport's board.
The Kelly Review found that Mr Woldbye "was not involved" in the decision taken by the airport's chief operating officer Javier Echave at 01:15 on 21 March to suspend operations until 23:59.
Alerts known as F24 alarms were sent to Mr Woldbye's mobile at 00:21 and 01:52 to activate emergency procedures, and Mr Echave tried to call him several times.
The report stated: "Mr Woldbye first became aware of the incident at approximately 06:45 on 21 March, and received a debrief from Mr Echave."
Mr Woldbye expressed "his deep regret at not being contactable during the night of the incident", the review said.
The review recommended that Heathrow considers having a "second means of contact" to notify key individuals about critical incidents.
The Sunday Times first reported that Mr Woldbye slept as the major disruption unfolded on 21 March.
However, when asked by the Daily Mail, a Heathrow spokesperson described the Sunday Times' account of events as "ill-informed misinformation".
"Thomas, and his whole senior leadership team, were exactly where they were supposed to be during an incident of this scale," the spokesperson had said.
Heathrow shutdown cause still unknown, report says
'We warned of power issues before Heathrow outage'
How did a single fire bring down Europe's busiest airport?
The review concluded that the airport had responded "efficiently and smoothly".
The report found that the decision "to stop operations immediately was correctly made and essential to protect the safety and security of people" and decision-makers acted appropriately.
"The evidence confirms that Heathrow made the right decisions in exceptionally difficult circumstances. Whilst the disruption was significant, alternative choices on the day would not have materially changed the outcome," Ms Kelly said.
Looking at Heathrow's preparedness, the report's authors found the contingency plans in place "overall worked well".
Heathrow Reimagined, a pressure group campaigning for reforms in how the airport is regulated, said it was critical of the Kelly Review.
The group said: "The internal Kelly Review allows Heathrow to set and judge by its own standards.
"It fails to properly tackle the poor contingency planning and years of inefficient spending that left Heathrow vulnerable."
The review also examined whether the airport should have anticipated what impact a loss of power from the substation would have.
It found that Heathrow had "assessed its high voltage electricity supply as resilient due to it having three separate intakes from the National Grid, all with multiple connections to the airport and multiple transformers at the National Grid/SSEN substations providing redundancy in the event of failure".
The review states the airport had deemed what occurred in March as a "low likelihood event".
Lord Deighton said the Kelly Review was "thorough with clear recommendations which the management team will be taking forward".
March's shutdown cost airlines millions of pounds and stranded hundreds of thousands of passengers.
An interim report by the National Energy System Operator (Neso), published earlier this month, said the cause of the North Hyde substation fire remained unknown.
Heathrow's management has been criticised for the decision to close the airport and the long shutdown that followed as Neso said power had been restored seven hours before any flights resumed.
Neso's full report is expected to be published by the end of June.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
11 hours ago
- USA Today
How did a Bangladesh air force fighter jet crash into a school campus?
NEW DELHI, July 22 (Reuters) - At least 25 children were among the 27 people killed when a Bangladesh Air Force plane crashed into a college and school campus in the capital city of Dhaka on Monday. Here is a look at what happened. HOW DID THE CRASH OCCUR? The fighter aircraft took off at 1:06 p.m. (0706 GMT) from the air force base in Dhaka's Kurmitola for a routine training mission, but experienced a mechanical failure soon after. The pilot attempted to divert the aircraft away from densely populated areas to minimize civilian casualties and damage, but his efforts were unsuccessful and the jet crashed into a building. WHERE DID THE PLANE GO DOWN? The two-storey building that the plane rammed into belonged to the Milestone School and College in Dhaka's Diabari area, located about 10 kilometres (six miles) from the air force base. Visuals from the scene showed the mangled remains of the aircraft dented into the side of the building, dismantling its iron grills and creating a gaping hole in the structure. More: Military jet in Bangladesh crashes into college killing nearly 20 HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE KILLED? The bodies of at least 27 people, including 25 children, a teacher, and the jet's pilot, were pulled out from the debris. More than 100 children and 15 other people were also injured, of whom 78 are still admitted in hospitals with burn injuries. WHICH AIRCRAFT WAS INVOLVED IN THE INCIDENT? The jet was an F-7 fighter aircraft - the final and most advanced variant in China's Chengdu J-7/F-7 aircraft family, according to Jane's Information Group. Bangladesh had signed a contract in 2011 for 16 such planes, and deliveries were completed by 2013. HOW HAVE AUTHORITIES REACTED? The Bangladesh Air Force has formed a high-level investigation committee to probe the cause of the accident. Muhammad Yunus, the head of the country's interim government, has also vowed to "take all necessary measures" to investigate its cause. In the meantime, the government says it is providing "all kinds of assistance" to those affected. (Compiled by Sakshi Dayal; Edited by Saad Sayeed)


Wall Street Journal
11 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Gold Futures Slip But Keep to One-Month Highs
0751 GMT – Gold futures soften as the U.S. dollar recoups some losses, though they remain at one-month highs. Futures are down 0.3% at $3,398.40 a troy ounce, but are up 1.1% on week after rallying on Monday on a slump in the dollar. Investor volumes in gold have picked up since the start of the week, with the precious metal emphatically breaking out of a tight trading range it has held since early July, Pepperstone's Chris Weston says in a note. For now, gold is taking its cues from the U.S. dollar, Weston says. Any U.S. dollar rallies should remain capped as the Aug. 1 U.S. tariff implementation deadline approaches and given central bank policy uncertainty due to the risk of an early shadow Federal Reserve chair nominee. This should be a boon for gold, Weston writes. ( 2343 GMT — Gold edges lower in early Asian trade on a possible technical correction after gold futures posted their best day in over a month on Monday. However, losses may be limited by lingering geopolitical tensions. Russia recently launched another wave of drone and missile strikes on Ukraine's Kyiv amid stalled cease-fire talks, while reaffirming its hardline conditions despite mounting international pressure, DHF Capital's Bas Kooijman says in an email. Also, tensions remain elevated in the Middle East, underpinning demand for safe-haven assets, the CEO and asset manager adds. Spot gold is 0.1% lower at $3,393.87/oz. (


Wall Street Journal
11 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Eurozone Bond Yields Edge Up, Reversing Monday's Falls
0638 GMT – Eurozone 10-year government bond yields rise in early trade, reversing Monday's significant falls which had no obvious macro catalyst, says Danske Bank's Frederik Romedahl in a note. 'Low volumes, light issuance this week and ongoing trade uncertainty might have been the factors driving the steady decline during the day,' the chief analyst says. Yields on Italian and French government bonds fell the most on Monday, dropping by 10.5 and 10.6 basis points, respectively, according to Tradeweb data. The 10-year German Bund yield is last up 1.2 basis points at 2.626%; the 10-year French OAT yield rises 1.9 basis points to 3.310%; and the 10-year Italian BTP yield is up 1.6 basis points at 3.494%. ( 0616 GMT – The U.S. Treasury yield curve has steepened recently, but it still isn't steep by historical standards, say LPL Financial's LPLA -3.49%decrease; red down pointing triangle Lawrence Gillum and Adam Turnquist in a note. Historically, the difference between the two- and 10-year Treasury yields is close to 100 basis points, albeit with a lot of variability, the strategists say. 'The 2-year/10-year spread is only at +0.55%, so we think the curve could further steepen throughout the year,' they say. Given this spread but with five times the interest rate risk, 'it doesn't make a lot of sense, in our view, to extend duration within portfolios.' The two-year Treasury yield last is up 1 basis point at 3.861%; the 10-year yield rises 1.3 basis points to 4.381%, according to Tradeweb. (