Third-party docking will not work on the new Nintendo Switch
Nintendo has locked down the new Switch 2's USB-C port with proprietary protocols and firmware-level encryption. That means all previously working third-party docks, that were popular for being compact or affordable, will now be obsolete. Even the official dock from the first-gen Switch doesn't make the cut. The new dock runs on a different 20V power profile and uses updated HDMI output standards, breaking plug-and-play convenience for gamers used to setting up in multiple rooms or on the go.
A few accessory makers have rushed out 'Switch 2-compatible' docks, but these options have proven hit-or-miss and often stop working after firmware updates. Why third-party docks no longer work
Nintendo's new system checks for dock authentication at both the software and hardware level. It uses firmware handshakes and encryption to verify that a dock is official before enabling TV output. Power delivery has also changed. Switch 2 needs a consistent 20V input that most third-party docks can't guarantee.
Using a non-certified dock might not just fail, it could brick your console, overheat components, or lead to connectivity issues that show up days or weeks later. There's also the looming risk of account bans if the system flags unsupported accessories during online play. While Nintendo says this is a safety move (to avoid repeats of bricked consoles from cheap docks), it also means you're locked into buying only official gear. Official guidance and user warnings
Nintendo's support pages now clearly state: Only the new Switch 2 dock is compatible. Older docks and third-party options, even if marketed for the Switch, aren't supported.
Users on Reddit and Discord forums report flaky video output, charging glitches, and even complete failures with early third-party Switch 2 docks. Some have turned to workarounds, but these involve firmware downgrades and cable swaps that come with their own risks. One common thread across all user experiences: If it's not official, it's unstable. What this means for gamers
If you've been relying on a third-party dock or charger for travel or second-room setups, it's time to budget for the official Switch 2 dock. At around ₹ 8,000– ₹ 10,000, it's a significant cost, but it's the only safe and fully supported option right now.
It also creates an e-waste problem. Many third-party docks now lie useless, adding to the pile of gadgets rendered obsolete by a single protocol change. Nintendo hasn't offered a trade-in or recycle program yet, which only makes the situation worse.
Nintendo's move to restrict docking options with the new Switch signals a stricter, more closed-off hardware ecosystem. If you're buying into the new generation, play it safe and stick to official docks and chargers, even if it costs more.
And if you're waiting for third-party solutions to catch up, keep an eye on firmware updates and certified releases, but steer clear of shortcuts in the meantime.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
9 hours ago
- Mint
Campus conundrum: Educators lack clarity on how to deal with AI in classrooms
Next Story Catherine Thorbecke A furore in Singapore has erupted over the issue and educators might be erring by barring AI tools that could help students. Although the impact of AI on education is far from clear, adaptation should be the aim. Resistance seems futile. The impact of AI on education is unclear but adaptation is key. Gift this article An artificial intelligence furore that's consuming Singapore's academic community reveals how we've lost the plot over the role the hyped-up technology should play in higher education. An artificial intelligence furore that's consuming Singapore's academic community reveals how we've lost the plot over the role the hyped-up technology should play in higher education. A student at Nanyang Technological University said in a Reddit post that she used a digital tool to alphabetize her citations for a term paper. When it was flagged for typos, she was then accused of breaking the rules over the use of Generative AI for the assignment. It snowballed when two more students came forward with similar complaints, one alleging that she was penalized for using ChatGPT to help with initial research, even though she says she did not use the bot to draft the essay. The school, which publicly states it embraces AI for learning, initially defended its zero-tolerance stance in this case in statements to local media. But internet users rallied around the original Reddit poster and rejoiced at an update that she won an appeal to rid her transcript of the 'academic fraud' label. It may sound like a run-of-the-mill university dispute. But there's a reason the saga went so viral, garnering thousands of upvotes and heated opinions from online commentators. It has laid bare the strange new world we've found ourselves in, as students and faculty are rushing to keep pace with how AI should or shouldn't be used in universities. It's a global conundrum, but the debate has especially roiled Asia. Stereotypes of math nerds and tiger moms aside, a rigorous focus on tertiary studies is often credited for the region's dramatic economic rise. The importance of education—and long hours of studying—is instilled from the earliest age. So how does this change in the AI era? The reality is that nobody has the answer yet. Despite promises from ed-tech leaders that we're on the cusp of 'the biggest positive transformation that education has ever seen,' the data on academic outcomes hasn't kept pace with the technology's adoption. There are no long-term studies on how AI tools impact learning and cognitive functions—and viral headlines that it could make us lazy and dumb only add to the anxiety. Meanwhile, the race to not be left behind in implementing the technology risks turning an entire generation of developing minds into guinea pigs. For educators navigating this moment, the answer is not to turn a blind eye. Even if some teachers discourage the use of AI, it has become all but unavoidable for many scholars doing research in the internet age. Also Read: You're absolutely right, as the AI chatbot says Most Google searches now lead with automated summaries. Scrolling through these should not count as academic dishonesty. An informal survey of 500 Singaporean students from secondary school through university conducted by a local news outlet this year found that 84% were using products like ChatGPT for homework on a weekly basis. In China, many universities are turning to AI cheating detectors, even though the technology is imperfect. Some students are reporting on social media that they have to dumb down their writing to pass these tests or shell out cash for such detection tools themselves to ensure they beat them before submitting their papers. It doesn't have to be this way. The chaotic moment of transition has put new onus on educators to adapt and shift the focus on the learning process as much as the final results, Yeow Meng Chee, the provost and chief academic and innovation officer at the Singapore University of Technology and Design, tells me. This does not mean villainizing AI, but treating it as a tool and ensuring a student understands how they arrived at their final conclusion even if they used technology. This process also helps ensure the AI outputs, which remain imperfect and prone to hallucinations (or typos), are checked and understood. Ultimately, professors who make the biggest difference aren't those who improve exam scores but who build trust, teach empathy and instil confidence in students to solve complex problems. The most important parts of learning still can't be optimized by a machine. The Singapore saga shows how everyone is on edge and whether a reference-sorting website even counts as a generative AI tool isn't clear. It also exposed another irony: Saving time on a tedious task would likely be welcomed when the student enters the workforce—if the technology hasn't already taken her entry-level job. Demand for AI literacy in the labour market is becoming a must-have and universities ignoring it would do a disservice to student cohorts entering the real world. We're still a few years away from understanding the full impact of AI on teaching and how it can best be used in higher education. But let's not miss the forest for the trees as we figure it out. ©Bloomberg The author is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Mint
10 hours ago
- Mint
Epic Games and Samsung settle lawsuit before the Galaxy Unpacked event
Epic Games and Samsung have reached a confidential agreement regarding a high-profile antitrust lawsuit that was about Samsung's Auto Blocker security feature. The dispute began in 2024 about Samsung's controversial 'Auto Blocker' security feature. Epic Games accused Samsung of restricting the installation of third-party app stores like Epic Games Store on Galaxy devices. The Auto Blocker feature was introduced with Samsung's One UI 6.0 to enhance the security of the device. It blocks messages containing malicious code, checks app security and prevents unauthorised commands via USB. However, Epic Games argued that this feature makes it harder for users to sideload apps on their devices and alternative app stores like Epic Games Store are not whitelisted by Samsung. Epic claimed that it is done to remove competition for their app stores, the Play Store and Galaxy Store. This lawsuit was filed in US federal court in San Francisco and named both Samsung and Google as defendants, alleging a coordinated effort to reduce competition in app distribution. Epic CEO Tim Sweeney shared a post on social media that the case against Samsung has been dismissed after a discussion between the two companies. Sweeny stated, 'We're dismissing our court case against Samsung following the parties' discussions. We are grateful that Samsung will address Epic's concerns.' Epic didn't elaborate on what discussions were made to reach this settlement. Or how Samsung is going to address these issues. The only hints are that Samsung could make a few changes in the OS like whitelisting the Epic Games Store on Galaxy devices. The settlement comes days before Samsung's major Galaxy Unpacked event, where the brand is going to launch its latest foldable devices. While Epic dropped its lawsuit against Samsung and withdrew related allegations against Google, a narrow case against Google will continue, focusing on Epic describes as ongoing efforts to discourage users from installing apps outside of Google Play.
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Techie moved to Bengaluru dreaming of cafe coding but WFH brought Zoom fatigue and existential crisis
Café Coding Dreams vs. Co-working Chaos When Tech Life Feels Like 'Slow Wi-Fi and Existential Dread' You Might Also Like: Job in Noida but are you ready to move to Bengaluru? Techie surprised by this interview question Mental Health in the Age of Remote Work The Illusion of Location and the Reality of Burnout What was once considered the golden ticket of the tech world—remote work from the comfort of home—has, for many in Bengaluru, become a quiet struggle dressed in the illusion of convenience. A recent Reddit post on r/bangalore has gone viral for capturing the raw, relatable disillusionment many tech workers are feeling. It begins with a deceptively light-hearted line: 'WFH in Bangalore: WiFi stable, but my mental health isn't.'In that one sentence, the Redditor summed up what hundreds in the city have silently endured—burnout without boundaries, productivity without peace, and an increasingly frayed relationship with the place once called India's innovation Redditor, who moved to Bengaluru chasing the romantic notion of 'café coding,' now finds himself tethered to his bed, using his overheating laptop as a makeshift hot water bag. 'Power cuts, noisy neighbors, Zoom fatigue,' he writes. And in one particularly biting line, he shares his attempt to seek structure: 'Tried a co-working space, paid ₹9k to hear 10 strangers pitch to VCs.'It's a scene that's both absurd and painfully familiar—open plans that sound great in theory, but in practice, offer no escape from noise or distraction. Between tech jargon echoing off shared walls and an overload of start-up pitches, peace and productivity seem further away than a poetic irony to the post's closing line: 'Tech life? More like slow Wi-Fi & existential dread.' In a city celebrated globally for its IT hubs and start-up energy, the emotional weight of working from home paints a far more subdued were quick to weigh in, with a mix of humour, empathy, and practical advice. 'You're not alone,' wrote one commenter. 'WFH in Bangalore can feel soul-crushing, even when the internet works.' They added, 'Sometimes you have to shake up your routine, find new spaces, or just accept that tech life isn't as glamorous as it looks on Instagram—but you're not failing for feeling this way.'Another pointed out the futility of the café fantasy: 'Who works from cafes if they actually want to be productive?' A valid question in a city where even a latte comes with background noise, inconsistent power, and overcrowded the complaints of noise and power cuts, the post opens up a broader conversation on mental health in the tech industry—especially for remote work ers. Isolation, monotony, and lack of physical movement often spiral into something more troubling than just 'a bad day.'One user reminded readers that while WFH has its downsides, it still offers relief from Bengaluru's infamous traffic and office stress. 'Imagine tackling code and traffic daily for those who are obligated to work from the office,' they tried offering a middle path—suggesting a better home setup with a UPS for power cuts, ergonomic furniture, and a dedicated workspace. 'Your posture will thank you in the long run,' they quipped, echoing a common refrain in ergonomic advice the most telling comment of all came from a user who wrote, 'Why are you in 'luru? Move near mountains or beaches.' It's a simple question that cuts to the core of a changing work philosophy. If remote work allows for flexibility, why stay where it hurts your peace?The Reddit thread, though framed in jest, reflects the mental strain of young professionals navigating a world where work and life have blurred irreversibly. For many, it's not the Wi-Fi that's unstable—it's their emotional bandwidth. And in a city built on code, maybe it's time to debug the bigger issue: burnout hiding behind broadband.
