‘XL Bully' that mauled girl, 9, in the FACE is returned to owner as she walks free from jail
Elizabeth Boot's dog, Rocky, attacked a 9-year-old at an address in Nottingham in January 4, 2024, a court heard.
3
The victim's injuries were so severe that she had to take time off school and is now left with permanent scarring.
However, over a year later, Rocky has been returned to his owner.
When the young girl was taken to hospital, Boot begged her and her mother not to tell the police about the attack in fears that her dog would be put down, Nottingham Crown Court was told.
The 33-year-old from Sneinton then proceeded to give false details about the incident in a bid to protect the dog, while the victim was being treated at the Queens Medical Centre (QMC).
Despite the child receiving multiple injuries, including a deep gash under her eye, Boot continued to give a false name and false details.
A dog behaviour expert has since analysed Rocky and produced a report concluding it would be safe for him to return home.
Handing her a 16-month jail term, suspended for 18 months, Judge Mark Watson said: "This was a frightening and scary incident, it must have been made worse by your response to it.
"Rather than show concern for the girl, you were more concerned about Rocky and the impact on you and your family.
"It was selfish behaviour and behaviour you should be ashamed of."
However, the judge concluded that due to it being a quick bite rather than the dog taking hold of and mauling the child, Rocky did not pose a danger to the public.
The case prosecutor, Devni Kitulagoda, said the girl was unsupervised with the dog when it suddenly jumped up and bit her just under her eye.
Boot was alerted to what was happening after hearing the child scream.
Kitulagoda continued to explain that Boot's partner then began shouting that Rocky was going to be put down and begged the mother and child not to say anything.
But Boot later pleaded guilty to being in possession of a dog that was dangerously out of control and injured a person.
Lucia Harrington, mitigating, said her client has children aged nine and 11 who both have ADHD and autism.
Harrington said explained that if Boot was to go into immediate custody, her children would have to be put into care.
As part of the suspended sentence order, the judge ordered the defendant to attend 15 rehabilitation session and also contribute £1000 towards the £12000 kennelling costs which had been incurred.
He also ordered a contingency destruction order.
This means Rocky will be destroyed if the owner is unable to keep it under control.
The conditions are as follows:
Pet gates to be fitted at the entrance of her home and her living room entrance.
If anyone under thee age of 16 visits her home, Rocky needs to be locked in a separate room.
The owner must attend sessions with a dog behaviour analyst.
Three young girls were also attacked by a 7st XL Bully in Norfolk earlier this year.
The horrifying incident saw Victoria Hewitt's pet, Karma, attack her two children and friend, aged 4, 8 and 11.
The attack saw the dog drag one of the children across the floor, biting her down to the bone.
A judge later sentenced Hewitt to an eight-month prison sentence suspended for 18 months.
These incidents come after a ban on XL Bullies was ruled by the High Court in December 2024.
Judges said that ministers has "sufficient evidence of an alarmingly high level of fatal attacks" by the dog breed when the crackdown was launched in 2023.
Fatal XL Bully attacks
A 10-year-old girl, locally named as Savannah, killed by her "new pet", and XL Bully, on Friday November 1, 2024.
Woman in her 50s mauled to death at home by two XL Bully dogs in Hornchurch, East London on May 21, 2024.
Esther Martin, 68, was looking after her grandson in Jaywick, Essex, when dogs Bear and Beauty attacked her on February 3, 2024.
Ian "Scouse" Langley, 54, was protecting his puppy when the animal pounced on him outside a home in Sunderland in October 2023.
Ian Price, 52, was viciously savaged in September 2023 by the beasts as he tried to protect his elderly mum from them after they escaped.
Jonathan Hogg, 37, was killed in May 2023 entered the dog's pen when it went for him, leaving bite wounds on his arm, leg and head.
Natasha Johnston, 28, was mauled to death while walking a pack of dogs in January 2023 was believed to have been killed by her own pet - an American Bully XL.
Shirley Patrick, 83, died 17 days after being mauled in a 'hellish', violent dog attack in December 2022.
Ian Symes, 34, who was known to friends as "Wiggy", died at a recreation ground in Fareham, Hampshire, after the savage attack in August 2022.
Joanne Robinson, 43, was fatally mauled by pet Rocco at her home in Rotherham, South Yorkshire in July 2022.
Keven Jones, 62, went into cardiac arrest after being bitten by Cookie-Doe at Chanel Fong's home in Wrexham, North Wales in May 2022.
Bella-Rae Birch, one, was mauled to death in March 2022 at her home by the American Bully XL.
Jack Lis, 10, was killed by a hulking XL Bully dog named Beast in November 2021 as he played at friend's home in Caerphilly.
3
3
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Pegswood 'bully' secretly bugged ex's home for five years
A "bully" who secretly bugged his ex-partner's home after tormenting her with domestic abuse during their relationship has been jailed for two years and nine Gauci, 53, hid seven listening devices in electrical sockets in the woman's home having made multiple threats to kill her during a campaign of controlling behaviour, Newcastle Crown Court woman said she had been living in "crippling" fear for years and felt "sick", paranoid and unsafe in her own of Pegswood in Northumberland, had admitted stalking but denied controlling and coercive behaviour, however jurors found him guilty of the second offence as well. Gauci was 30 and the woman 19 when they first got together in 2002, Judge Robert Spragg said, with the couple going on to have several lived separately with Gauci "like a yoyo" with his visits and in effect carrying on the life of a single man while she raised their children and waited for him, the judge she asked if would move in with her, Gauci, who ran a plumbing and heating business, refused and told her no man would want to be with her, the court heard. 'Check the sockets' In February 2016, the relationship ended and the woman started dating someone else, the court was Gauci, of Front Street, found out, he became "very jealous" and threatened to shoot her and bury her in the garden, the judge demanded the woman get back with him and then "forced" her to go to the supermarket where the other man worked and break up with him, the court judge said that was done to humiliate the woman and Gauci went on to threaten the and the woman resumed their relationship but his controlling behaviour become even worse, the court would search through her mobile phone when she was asleep, demand she video call him when she went to meet family so he could see who was there and would fly into rages, the judge relationship ended again in 2020 and two years later a friend advised her to check her electrical sockets, the courts were called and discovered listening devices in her kitchen, bedroom, living room and dining room which had been hidden there in 2017, the judge said. 'Shocking invasion' In a statement read to the court, Gauci's victim said she would "never be the same" and did not feel safe in her own said she lived in a "constant state of fear and stress" which was "crippling", adding it would always be an "open wound".The woman said she felt "sick and shocked" about the bugging and was unable to trust said Gauci had "taken everything" from her and would "bully and control" her. Judge Spragg said Gauci was "fuelled by jealousy" and sought to control every aspect of her life, culminating with the "sinister" planting of listening devices."It was a shocking invasion of her privacy," the judge said.A restraining order banning Gauci from contacting the woman was made to last indefinitely. Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Three Albanian men and a British woman are charged over spate of million-pound burglaries in Cheshire's Golden Triangle
Police have charged three Albanian men and a British woman in relation to a spate of high-value burglaries across swathes of England. Cheshire Police detectives swooped on three addresses in Walsall, Sutton Coldfield and Birmingham early on Wednesday and cuffed three men aged between 27 and 30 as well as a 33-year-old British woman. Endrit Nikolli, 27, Kristian Gropcaj, 30, George Pepa, 30, and Jade Tubb, 33, have all been charged with conspiracy to commit burglary between November 2024 and March 2025 and conspiracy to possess criminal property. These relate to 20 offences in Cleveland, Staffordshire, Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire and Cleveland, detectives said today. Nikolli has also been charged with an additional count of burglary in connection with a theft in Staffordshire on March 1 2024. Police have been probing dozens of alleged thefts across the country in which around £1m of high value goods were stolen - some allegedly in Cheshire's 'Golden Triangle', a trio of towns beloved by footballers and other celebrities. Nikolli, Pepa and Tubb, of Crabtree Road in Walsall and Gropcaj of Gas Street in Birmingham are in custody ahead of an appearance at Chester Magistrates today. A fourth Albanian man aged 28 was arrested in London on suspicion of conspiracy to commit burglary on Thursday. He remains in police custody. Morning raids were staged at addresses across the country earlier this week as part of Operation Ambler, a multi-force police investigation specifically targeting Albanian organised crime gangs. Dramatic footage showed uniformed officers shouting 'Police!' as they stormed into a house in the execution of Operation Ambler. In the stunning raids, a man was seen being handcuffed as he lies prone and shirtless in bed. Other clips showed men being led into the back of cage vans. Detectives from Macclesfield CID leading the operation allege that gangs have carried out a large number of 'sophisticated' burglaries that took place over several months at addresses all over the country. The raids would target 'high-value residential premises', police claim. Thieves are thought to have broken in via first-floor windows and doors as they carried out the raids, and went to 'great lengths' to do so across England. Criminals are said to have made off with more than £1million of high-value items in total - £400,000 of it from homes in Cheshire alone - some of which were allegedly recovered during the morning raids. In video released by Cheshire Police, officers wearing head torches could be seen raking through wardrobes as they sought to trace the stolen goods. Valuable-looking watches were dropped into evidence bags, while a mobile phone was placed into a specialist forensic evidence box. Detective Sergeant Laura Fox of Macclesfield CID said: '(Wednesday's) raids are the culmination of detailed investigations across multiple forces brought together into at least thirty-seven high value burglaries spread over a six-month period. 'Our investigation has shown us that these incidents have been carefully planned and coordinated, and they've gone to great lengths to continue their crime spree across the country. 'On each occasion the offenders have specifically targeted high value properties, breaking in via first floor windows and doors, and ransacking the premises to steal as much as possible. 'In total we believe that the value of the items stolen in the burglaries was more than £1 million, which includes more than £400,000 from the ten homes in Cheshire. 'I hope that (the) arrests provide some reassurance to the victims in the case and also act as a warning to other offenders.' And in a warning to thieves, her colleague Detective Inspector Dave Jarvis added: 'No matter where you live, or how much you try to hide, our officers will come for you, and you will be arrested.' Burglaries were once thought to be crimes of opportunity - but have allegedly become the preserve of organised crime gangs who go to great lengths to execute professional operations targeting lucrative homes. Last month, Cheshire Police issued an appeal for a burglary in Prestbury that saw three thieves drill a hole into a wall of a disused building in order to climb into the store next door. The thieves made off with £260,000 of high-value designer handbags from Dress Cheshire, whose owner Christine Colbert, 58, could only watch on helplessly as CCTV was livestreamed to her phone. She told MailOnline last month: 'This has been very well thought through - it's very frightening for me. 'I can't believe the lengths they have gone to. It used to be watches people wanted – now it's handbags and they are worth more second-hand than they are new.' Similarly, £1million of designer handbags were stolen in a raid in Alderley Edge in February. At this time, the incidents have not been linked to Albanian crime gang activity - but spates of incidents across Cheshire have prompted the rich and famous to beef up their security, hiring private contractors.
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
It is time to release prisoners trapped by inhuman endless jail terms
The Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence, introduced in 2005 under the Labour government, was intended to protect the public from serious offenders deemed too dangerous for a fixed-term release. But nearly two decades on, this law stands as one of the most egregious stains on Britain's criminal justice system. Abolished in 2012 for its inherent flaws, it nonetheless continues to trap thousands of people in a cruel legal limbo, as a debate in the House of Lords today will no doubt highlight. It is long past time that every person still serving an IPP sentence be resentenced. The continued use of this now-defunct punishment is both unjust and, arguably, inhumane. At its core, the IPP sentence allowed judges to hand out indeterminate prison terms for offences that did not justify life imprisonment but were deemed serious enough to warrant extended supervision. Offenders were given a 'tariff' – the minimum time they must serve before being considered for release. Many of these tariffs were shockingly short, some as low as two years. Yet thousands remain in prison long after these tariffs have expired. Why? Because release is dependent not on time served, but on proving to the Parole Board that they are no longer a danger to the public – a nebulous, subjective, and often unreachable standard. This flips the basic presumption of justice on its head. In a fair system, the state must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt to imprison a person. Under IPP, once the tariff is served, the burden of proof shifts unfairly to the prisoner. It is no longer the state's job to justify incarceration; it is the prisoner's burden to earn freedom. This is particularly problematic when access to rehabilitative programmes, often required for parole, is limited or unavailable – especially in overcrowded prisons. The system sets people up to fail and then blames them for not succeeding. Moreover, the psychological toll of such indefinite punishment is catastrophic. Suicide and self-harm rates among IPP prisoners are significantly higher than average. Many live in a state of constant uncertainty and despair, unsure if they will ever be released, even decades after their offence. It is not unusual to find individuals still imprisoned for minor crimes – such as theft or assault – that would today warrant only a few years behind bars, yet they languish without a release date. The punishment no longer fits the crime, if it ever did. The injustice of the IPP system has been widely recognised. The House of Commons justice committee labelled it "irredeemably flawed" and called for all remaining IPP prisoners to be resentenced. The European Court of Human Rights has also condemned aspects of the sentence as incompatible with human rights obligations. Yet the government has so far refused to act decisively, citing public safety and political sensitivity. This is a failure of courage and leadership. Protecting public safety does not require trampling basic rights or holding people indefinitely for crimes long past. Dangerous individuals can be managed through proper risk assessment and robust parole conditions – not through perpetual punishment without end. Resentencing every IPP prisoner is not only fair, it is necessary. It would give judges the opportunity to reconsider the nature and severity of each offence and impose a proportionate, fixed sentence with clear guidance for release. For many, this would mean immediate or imminent freedom; for others, it would offer clarity, rehabilitation goals, and hope – something the current system wholly lacks. Justice demands consistency, proportionality, and transparency. The IPP sentence undermines all three. Some argue that resentencing might release dangerous individuals back into society. But the risk can be responsibly managed without recourse to indeterminate detention. Modern sentencing tools, community supervision, mental health support, and parole frameworks are all capable of mitigating risk. Perpetual incarceration without due process is not a solution – it is a violation. Britain prides itself on the rule of law, but this chapter of penal policy betrays that principle. IPP sentences should not only be consigned to history – they must be actively undone. Every person still caught in this Kafkaesque trap deserves a proper sentence, a path to rehabilitation, and a chance at freedom. Anything less is a continuation of a deep and unforgivable wrong.
