Sweden jihadist jailed for life over Jordan pilot burned alive
The Swedish court was the first to try a person over the killing that sparked outrage around the world.
Judge Anna Liljenberg Gullesjo said "the investigation has shown that the defendant was at the execution site, uniformed and armed, and allowed himself to be filmed."
Although video evidence showed that another man lit the fire, the judge said the "defendant's actions contributed so significantly to the death of the victim that he should be considered a perpetrator".
Krayem, who is serving long prison sentences for his role in the Paris and Brussels attacks in 2015 and 2016, was given a life sentence for "serious war crimes and terrorist crimes"
On December 24, 2014, an aircraft belonging to the Royal Jordanian Air Force crashed in Syria.
The pilot, Maaz al-Kassasbeh, was captured the same day by IS fighters near the central city of Raqqa and was burned alive in a cage sometime before February 3, 2015, when a slickly-produced video of the gruesome killing was published, according to the prosecution.
Gullesjo said Krayem's actions consisted of "guarding the victim both before and during the execution and taking him to the cage where he was set alight while still alive".
The court also awarded compensation to the parents and siblings of the Jordanian pilot, amounting to 80,000 Swedish kronor ($8,200) each.
- 'Comfort' for family -
Prosecutors have been unable to determine the exact date of the murder, but the investigation has identified the location.
The 32-year-old jihadist remained silent throughout the hearings, which lasted between June 4 and June 26, though segments from interrogations with Krayem conducted during the investigation were read out and played during the trial.
The fact that the defendent did not speak did not "significantly impact the ruling, as the prosecution presented solid evidence, and the investigation was thorough," Gullesjo told AFP.
According to his lawyer, Krayem insisted he had spent only 15 to 20 minutes on-site, unaware of what was going to happen until he saw the cameras.
"This verdict somewhat comforts the family," the pilot's brother Jawdat al-Kassasbeh, who was a civil party to the case, told AFP.
"We thank Sweden and the impartial Swedish judiciary for their efforts in pursuing this case," the brother added.
He travelled from Jordan for the trial to testify to the pain, still raw, that he shares with his loved ones.
- No remorse -
The family's lawyer lamented in court that Krayem showed no empathy or remorse for his actions.
"Most people who witnessed what Maaz went through would undoubtedly need lifelong, or at least long-term, treatment to overcome the trauma that this causes in a normal individual," Mikael Westerlund told the court.
"Krayem, on the other hand, does not seem to have been traumatised, but inspired. Inspired to continue his terrorist activities, which led him to participate in and then be convicted of terrorist acts in Europe," Westerlund added.
Krayem, who is from Malmo in southern Sweden, was sentenced to 30 years in prison in France for helping plan the November 2015 Paris attacks and to life imprisonment in Belgium for the 2016 attacks at Brussels' main airport and metro station.
On March 12, France agreed to hand him over to Sweden for nine months, the time needed for the investigation and trial.
He must be returned to France by December 27 at the latest, the Stockholm court said Thursday.
"Jordanians will always remember this horrible crime," Jordanian government spokesman Mohammed Momani told AFP.
"This decision is a significant step towards achieving justice."
bur-nzg/rlp/tc
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
US and Europe See Putin Reining In Russia's Unruly Hybrid War
US and European officials say they're seeing a decline in suspected Russian state-backed sabotage acts this year, evidence that President Vladimir Putin's security services may be reining in a hybrid warfare campaign that's been blamed for attacks across Europe. The drop-off in operations, which have involved Russian intelligence agents paying proxies to target civilian infrastructure and individuals, has been attributed to a range of factors, according to the officials, who asked not to be identified discussing sensitive issues. A leading explanation is that Moscow may be tightening its grip on attacks entrusted to unreliable local criminals, some of which had got out of control and risked a major miscalculation, the people said.
WIRED
3 hours ago
- WIRED
Google Will Use AI to Guess People's Ages Based on Search History
Aug 2, 2025 6:30 AM Plus: A former top US cyber official loses her new job due to political backlash, Congress is rushing through a bill to censor lawmakers' personal information online, and more. Photo-Illustration:Last week, the United Kingdom began requiring residents to verify their ages before accessing online pornography and other adult content, all in the name of protecting children. Almost immediately, things did not go as planned—although, they did go as expected. As experts predicted, UK residents began downloading virtual private networks (VPNs) en masse, allowing them to circumvent age verification, which can require users to upload their government IDs, by making it look like they're in a different country. The UK's Online Safety Act is just one part of a wave of age-verification efforts around the world. And while these laws may keep some kids from accessing adult content, some experts warn that they also create security and privacy risks for everyone. Russia's state-backed hacking group Turla is known for its bold, creative attacks, such as masking their communications via satellite or piggybacking on other hackers' attacks to avoid detection. The group, which is part of the Russian FSB intelligence agency, is now using its access to the country's internet providers to trick foreign officials into downloading spyware that breaks encryption, allowing Turla's hackers to access their private information. And that's not all. Each week, we round up the security and privacy news we didn't cover in depth ourselves. Click the headlines to read the full stories. And stay safe out there. Google Will Start Estimating Your Age Based on Browsing Data Google is rolling out an AI-powered age-estimation system to apply content protections to Search and YouTube, even for users who haven't provided their age. The system is launching in the EU, where digital safety regulations mandate that platforms take steps to protect minors from potentially harmful content. Instead of relying solely on user-input data, Google says it will infer age using a 'variety of signals' and other metadata to determine if a user should be shown restricted results. Privacy advocates say the move risks inaccuracies and raises questions about transparency and consent. Google claims the changes align with regulatory expectations and will help protect younger users from inappropriate content. Still, the idea that platforms can algorithmically infer personal traits like age—and restrict content based solely on those assumptions—adds a new wrinkle to long-standing debates over moderation, censorship, and digital privacy. Army Revokes Former CISA Director's West Point Appointment After Political Backlash Just 24 hours after naming Jen Easterly as West Point's Distinguished Chair in Social Sciences, the Army rescinded the appointment following far-right criticism. The former Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) director and academy alum had been lauded for her decades of service. But backlash erupted online after activist Laura Loomer claimed Easterly had ties to the Biden-era Disinformation Governance Board. Nina Jankowicz, who served as executive director of the board, denied having worked with Easterly in a post on BlueSky, calling the episode yet another example of how we're all living in 'the stupidest timeline.' Nevertheless, Army secretary Dan Driscoll canceled Easterly's contract and ordered a full review of West Point's hiring policies. The Army also suspended the practice of allowing outside groups to help select faculty. The reversal marks the second high-profile clash involving former CISA leaders and political pressure following Donald Trump's revocation of Chris Krebs' security clearance earlier this year. Congress Fast-Tracks Bill Letting Lawmakers Censor Info About Their Homes and Travel A bipartisan bill from US senators Amy Klobuchar and Ted Cruz could let lawmakers demand the removal of online posts showing their home addresses or travel plans, Rolling Stone reports. The proposal, which could pass by unanimous consent, is framed as a response to growing threats against public officials—especially after the assassination of Minnesota legislator Melissa Hortman last month. Watchdogs joined dozens of media outlets in warning that the bill could chill reporting and enable selective censorship. While the legislation includes a nominal exemption for journalists, critics say it remains vague enough to allow members of Congress to sue outlets or demand takedowns of legitimate news stories. 'The Cruz-Klobuchar bill would not provide [lawmakers] the protection they seek but would create a powerful new tool that would result in censorship of public discussion and press accountability for their actions,' Daniel Schuman of the American Governance Institute told Rolling Stone. He urged Congress to go 'back to the drawing board' and try crafting a bill that protects all Americans' privacy 'without undermining accountability for public officials.' Google Bug Let People Quietly Censor Articles From Search An alarming vulnerability in Google's Refresh Outdated Content tool allowed bad actors to selectively scrub individual URLs from search results, 404 Media reports. And there was no hacking required. Journalist Jack Poulson discovered the bug when two of his investigative pieces, including one about a tech CEO's domestic violence arrest, vanished from Google, even when searched by exact title in quotes. The exploit involved repeatedly submitting URLs with minor capitalization tweaks. This reportedly confused Google's indexing engine, which responded by de-listing not just the altered URLs but the original live articles too. Google confirmed the flaw and quietly rolled out a fix, saying it impacted only a 'tiny fraction of web pages.' Free press advocates warn the vulnerability could've enabled targeted, silent censorship, especially by powerful actors using reputation management tactics. 'If your article doesn't appear in Google search results,' Poulson said, 'in many ways it just doesn't exist.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Giorgio Armani Pushes Back at Italian Competition Authority's 3.5M-euro Sanction
MILAN – The Giorgio Armani company is pushing back on the decision of the AGCM, the Italian Competition Authority, to fine the luxury brand for alleged misleading advertising. The authority is imposing sanctions of 3.5 million euros on Giorgio Armani SpA and G.A. Operations SpA for deceptive business practice linked with the companies' sustainability statements on their Armani Values and websites, which the AGCM claims are contradicted by the uncovered evidence of negligence in supply chain auditing. More from WWD The World's First Giorgio Armani-branded Beach Villas Are Coming to U.A.E. Italy's Wood Supply Chain Urges Swift Trade Deal With South American Trade Bloc Giorgio Armani Heads to Shelter Island for Mare 2025 Party The Italian brand said it will appeal the decision before the Regional Administrative Court. Proceedings were initiated by the AGCM in July last year, three months after G.A. Operations SpA, the manufacturing arm of the Giorgio Armani Group, had been put into judicial administration by a Milan court for alleged negligence in auditing its suppliers whose subcontractors allegedly engaged in sweatshop schemes and workforce exploitation. The probe was fully resolved and the judicial administration procedure lifted last February. In Friday's ruling for sanctions, the Italian Competition Authority said that the 'investigation revealed that the companies placed strong emphasis on their commitment to sustainability — particularly social responsibility, including worker welfare and safety — which has become a marketing tool used to meet growing consumer expectations. This is evidenced, among other things, by the very name of the company website ('Armani Values') as well as by certain documents collected during inspections. 'These clearly show the objective of 'enhancing the brand's positive perception in terms of sustainability … and, from a commercial standpoint … encouraging customers to make purchasing decisions that also reflect the 'values' conveyed through our products',' the authority wrote. In a responding statement issued Friday, Giorgio Armani SpA expressed 'disappointment and bitterness' at the decision of the Italian Competition Authority to conclude the proceedings initiated in July 2024 for alleged misleading advertising, resulting in sanctions against the companies. 'This decision disregards the decree by which the Court of Milan revoked, early, the judicial administration of G.A. Operations SpA, acknowledging that, after a thorough analysis of the control and supervisory systems long used by the Armani Group for its supply chain, 'the excellent result the Company is believed to have achieved was made possible – in a short timeframe — precisely because structured and tested supply chain control systems were already in place at the time the measure was applied',' it said. The Italian luxury company added that throughout the AGCM investigation, it complied with the latter's requests but couldn't 'establish a constructive relationship with them to fully understand the reasons for its position.' This development comes on the heels of a yearlong turmoil in the Italian high-end fashion supply chain which has faced allegations that it has frequently failed to uphold the principles of quality, work ethics and sustainability that the sector has long prided itself on. Such allegations that have swirled in media reports and on social media follow recent cases of alleged workers' exploitation, abuse and sweatshop schemes in the Italian fashion supply chain. The most recent links Loro Piana to sweatshop subcontractors that the brand failed to properly audit and follows earlier similar incidents for Valentino, Alviero Martini and Dior, in addition to Giorgio Armani. All brands have been put under judicial administration, with the latter two brands' probes fully resolved and the judicial administration procedures lifted. Last week the president of Camera Nazionale della Moda Italiana Carlo Capasa got vocal on the topic, defending the country's high-end fashion supply chain against those claims and so did Confindustria Moda president Luca Sburlati and Confindustria Accessori Moda president Giovanna Ceolini. Industry associations and trade unions are pressuring the Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy to define a country-wide mandatory protocol and policy to ensure the sector complies with fair work standards. A fashion roundtable held last week at the Ministry moved the conversation forward, although no advancement is expected before the end of the summer. As many of the claims of alleged work abuse have entailed companies based in the Lombardy region, the Milan Prefecture promoted in May a memorandum of understanding to tackle worker exploitation, undeclared work, tax evasion, and unfair contractual practices in the fashion supply chain. Confindustria Moda, Confindustria Accessori Moda and Camera Nazionale della Moda Italiana were among other entities which undersigned the non-legally binding memorandum, which defines an action plan to tackle those issues. Best of WWD The Biggest Legal Battles Shaping the Fashion Industry Today PETA Asks Lululemon About Slaughterhouse Practices China's Livestreaming Star Viya Fined $210 Million for Tax Evasion
