logo
What can they read?

What can they read?

A bookseller recently suggested that I read Incorrigible Optimists Club by Jean-Michel Guenassia (translated by Euan Cameron). It is a book about coming of age of a young boy in Paris in the late 1950s. This is an extraordinary time in the country. There is terrible violence in Algeria and conflicting opinions and strong emotions in France about the unfolding tragedy there - the post-war France is unsettled by the memories of the Nazi occupation; there are deep divisions among the youth and their parents about political order and global alliances; notions of liberty and freedom are being debated fiercely; and new ideas through extraordinary writings on existentialism from people like Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir and Camus are reaching a wide audience. The nearly 700-page book beautifully captures these threads from the perspective of a young boy, who is dealing with love, loss and family disputes - while playing foosball at a local bistro, reading compulsively and being in the presence of exiles from Soviet states and giants of modern French literature like Sartre and Kessel.
I have enjoyed the book immensely. But there was something else about the book that got me thinking. The book was widely praised by critics, but it also won a particular award, the Prix Goncourt des Lycéens. This particular literary award is voted for by French high school students. Each year, members of the Academie Goncourt (that dates back to 1882 and awards the Prix Gocourt, one of the most prestigious literary prize of French literature) choose 12 literary works, which are then discussed, debated, analysed and voted on by nearly two thousand high school students. The books that are chosen by the members of the academy are not necessarily targeted for young adults, but cover a range of genres in literature. The award is organised by the French Ministry of National Education in partnership with Fnac (a French media company that distributes the works of fiction). The French Ministry of National Education, describing the prize, says that "the high school students have approximately two months to read the novels with the help of their teachers. During this intense reading period, regional meetings are organized between authors and high school students. The Prix Goncourt des Lycéens is awarded by high school students themselves."
I wondered what it would take for something like this to take off in Pakistan. For the sake of argument, if we were to choose two thousand students from within the country, and similar to the rules set by the French ministry, so no school could participate for two years in a row, and somehow found a benefactor to buy two thousand copies of serious books of literature written by contemporary authors, would we still be able to do it? I was less convinced by the typical argument given that 'our kids are too busy on Instagram or TikTok' and hence do not read anymore. I think our youth are just as busy as high school students in France or Colombia or Kenya are. My conclusion was that the reason something like this is unlikely to take off not because of the youth, but because of the adults. The problem is that many of us (teachers included) are uncomfortable with literature and unsettled by the difficult, provocative and complex questions that literature asks us to confront. We are more interested in universal conformity than questions. If we pick up a textbook of English or Urdu literature, what kind of literature do we see there? Is it one that asks us deep questions about our past or present, our preconceived notions or worldview? Does it allow us to challenge the status quo? Or is it predictable and increasingly narrow in its intellectual and literary scope? What books (if any) do we ask our students in high school to read? Looking in the mirror, we may find that we are actually afraid of them having questions for us, and for the society at large.
It is easy to think about the 'great days' of the past and talk about how the kids these days are less 'cultured', but maybe the problem is somewhere else.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What can they read?
What can they read?

Express Tribune

timea day ago

  • Express Tribune

What can they read?

A bookseller recently suggested that I read Incorrigible Optimists Club by Jean-Michel Guenassia (translated by Euan Cameron). It is a book about coming of age of a young boy in Paris in the late 1950s. This is an extraordinary time in the country. There is terrible violence in Algeria and conflicting opinions and strong emotions in France about the unfolding tragedy there - the post-war France is unsettled by the memories of the Nazi occupation; there are deep divisions among the youth and their parents about political order and global alliances; notions of liberty and freedom are being debated fiercely; and new ideas through extraordinary writings on existentialism from people like Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir and Camus are reaching a wide audience. The nearly 700-page book beautifully captures these threads from the perspective of a young boy, who is dealing with love, loss and family disputes - while playing foosball at a local bistro, reading compulsively and being in the presence of exiles from Soviet states and giants of modern French literature like Sartre and Kessel. I have enjoyed the book immensely. But there was something else about the book that got me thinking. The book was widely praised by critics, but it also won a particular award, the Prix Goncourt des Lycéens. This particular literary award is voted for by French high school students. Each year, members of the Academie Goncourt (that dates back to 1882 and awards the Prix Gocourt, one of the most prestigious literary prize of French literature) choose 12 literary works, which are then discussed, debated, analysed and voted on by nearly two thousand high school students. The books that are chosen by the members of the academy are not necessarily targeted for young adults, but cover a range of genres in literature. The award is organised by the French Ministry of National Education in partnership with Fnac (a French media company that distributes the works of fiction). The French Ministry of National Education, describing the prize, says that "the high school students have approximately two months to read the novels with the help of their teachers. During this intense reading period, regional meetings are organized between authors and high school students. The Prix Goncourt des Lycéens is awarded by high school students themselves." I wondered what it would take for something like this to take off in Pakistan. For the sake of argument, if we were to choose two thousand students from within the country, and similar to the rules set by the French ministry, so no school could participate for two years in a row, and somehow found a benefactor to buy two thousand copies of serious books of literature written by contemporary authors, would we still be able to do it? I was less convinced by the typical argument given that 'our kids are too busy on Instagram or TikTok' and hence do not read anymore. I think our youth are just as busy as high school students in France or Colombia or Kenya are. My conclusion was that the reason something like this is unlikely to take off not because of the youth, but because of the adults. The problem is that many of us (teachers included) are uncomfortable with literature and unsettled by the difficult, provocative and complex questions that literature asks us to confront. We are more interested in universal conformity than questions. If we pick up a textbook of English or Urdu literature, what kind of literature do we see there? Is it one that asks us deep questions about our past or present, our preconceived notions or worldview? Does it allow us to challenge the status quo? Or is it predictable and increasingly narrow in its intellectual and literary scope? What books (if any) do we ask our students in high school to read? Looking in the mirror, we may find that we are actually afraid of them having questions for us, and for the society at large. It is easy to think about the 'great days' of the past and talk about how the kids these days are less 'cultured', but maybe the problem is somewhere else.

Bradley Cooper and Gigi Hadid step out in Paris during Fashion Week after going Instagram official
Bradley Cooper and Gigi Hadid step out in Paris during Fashion Week after going Instagram official

Express Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Express Tribune

Bradley Cooper and Gigi Hadid step out in Paris during Fashion Week after going Instagram official

Bradley Cooper and Gigi Hadid appeared relaxed and content as they interacted with fans following a private dinner in Paris on Saturday evening. The Hollywood couple, currently in the French capital for Fashion Week, paused for photos and exchanged smiles as they returned from their night out. Hadid wore a light blue pinstriped halter-style top paired with light denim jeans. Her hair was neatly slicked back, sunglasses perched on her head. Cooper opted for loose grey trousers and a light denim shirt with espadrilles, complementing Hadid's outfit. Photo: Backgrid The couple, who began dating in 2023, have largely kept their relationship out of the public eye. However, Hadid recently confirmed the romance by sharing a birthday photo on Instagram last month, where she was pictured kissing Cooper beside her birthday cake. Hadid later spoke to Vogue in March, offering insight into her relationship. She said that being with Cooper gave her a 'normal experience of dating,' noting that he had reintroduced her to the theatre. Cooper was also seen attending the Louis Vuitton Men's Spring 2026 show earlier in the week. Though Hadid was initially reserved when approached, both stars eventually warmed to the small crowd gathered outside.

Brad Pitt's Los Angeles home burglarised
Brad Pitt's Los Angeles home burglarised

Express Tribune

time3 days ago

  • Express Tribune

Brad Pitt's Los Angeles home burglarised

Burglars broke into Brad Pitt's Los Angeles home on Thursday, ransacking the property and fleeing with stolen items while the Oscar-winning actor was travelling to promote his new racing thriller F1, US media reported. A Los Angeles Police Department spokesperson told NBC News that a break-in took place at a residence in the Los Feliz neighbourhood around 10:30PM (0530 GMT), without officially confirming who owned the home. Police sources told NBC News and the Los Angeles Times that three suspects climbed over a front fence and broke in through the home's front window before ransacking the location and fleeing with some belongings. The value of the stolen items has not been disclosed. Pitt was not home at the time, as he has been on a global promotional tour for his new movie F1. The 61-year-old actor attended the film's premiere in London this week. The property was purchased by Pitt in 2023 for $5.5 million, according to Variety magazine. Pitt is among the most recent celebrities to have their Los Angeles homes burglarized. About $500,000 of jewellery was allegedly stolen from the home of French striker Olivier Giroud of MLS side Los Angeles FC in a burglary in February. That same month, Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban's residence was reportedly burglarized. On the work front, Pitt has been grabbing headlines with his Formula One film. Formula One is hoping the film cements the appeal of the Netflix docu-series Drive to Survive that has boosted Formula One's popularity and growth worldwide and particularly in the key US market. "I think there's this perception that Drive to Survive turned America onto F1 but I think there's just so many more people out there that don't know anything about it," said director Joseph Kosinski. "So there's a lot of potential still there."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store