logo
Burundi's ruling party wins every seat in poll as rivals say democracy 'killed'

Burundi's ruling party wins every seat in poll as rivals say democracy 'killed'

Saudi Gazette13-06-2025

NAIROBI — The ruling party in Burundi has won all 100 seats in a parliamentary election that the opposition says has "killed" democracy in the central African state.
Giving the provisional results for last week's poll, electoral commission head Prosper Ntahorwamiye said the CNDD-FDD party secured more than 96% of votes in all provinces.
The election had seen only "some minor irregularities", he added.
The opposition Uprona party came second with a little over 1% of the vote. The party denounced the election as rigged, with its leader Olivier Nkurunziza telling the AFP news agency: "We have killed democracy."
The main opposition party, the National Congress for Liberty (CNL), fell into third spot, getting only 0.6% of the vote.
Campaign group Human Rights Watch (HRW) said the result showed that democracy had been "hollowed out" in Burundi.
It added that the CNDD-FDD, in power since 2005, "sought to dismantle all meaningful opposition", including from its biggest rival, the CNL.
Freedom of expression is limited in Burundi and critics say these polls followed a prolonged campaign of intimidation and harassment.
Election observers from the Catholic Church were turned away from some polling centers, according to HRW.
The African Union meanwhile has been criticized for praising the "climate of freedom and transparency" of the polls, which it declared were "peaceful".
Correspondents say there was little sign of celebrations in the main city of Bujumbura after the provisional results were announced on Wednesday.
The electoral commission said the results would be submitted to the Constitutional Court, which has to then certify them and provide the final results by 20 June.
Ntahorwamiye said there were "some minor irregularities — shortcomings that came about which have been resolved — because as you know, nothing is completely perfect".
In line with the Arusha Accords that brought an end to the bitter Burundian civil war more than two decades ago, the ethnic composition of the country's parliament has to mirror the proportions of Hutus, Tutsis and Twa people in the population at large.
After this month's vote count, the electoral commission announced that an additional 11 seats were to be created and filled to remedy an imbalance — which will bring the total number of MPs to 111. — BBC

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australian journalist wins unfair dismissal case over Gaza post
Australian journalist wins unfair dismissal case over Gaza post

Saudi Gazette

time3 days ago

  • Saudi Gazette

Australian journalist wins unfair dismissal case over Gaza post

SYDNEY — A journalist has won her case against Australia's national broadcaster, with a court ruling she was unfairly sacked over a social media post about the war in Gaza. Antoinette Lattouf said the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) cut short her stint as a fill-in radio presenter in December 2023 due to her political views, her race and after lobbying from pro-Israel groups. Hours before her sacking, Lattouf shared a post from Human Rights Watch (HRW) that was critical of Israel, a move that the ABC said breached its editorial policy. The ABC apologised to Lattouf after the ruling, saying that it had "let down our staff and audiences" in its handling of the matter. On Wednesday, Justice Darryl Rangiah ruled that the ABC sacked Lattouf for reasons including her opinions on the Israeli military campaign in Gaza. He rejected allegations the presenter — who is of Lebanese heritage — was fired because of her race. She was awarded damages of A$70,000 (£33,400, $45,400), but Justice Rangiah said he would hear arguments from both sides on further penalties. Speaking outside court, Lattouf said "punished for my political opinion", adding she will "have more to say in due time". Her dismissal triggered a wave of public outrage and created turmoil at the public broadcaster — raising questions over its independence and reviving concerns over how it supports staff, particularly those who are culturally diverse. Lattouf has been a regular contributor in Australian media for years, but also made a name for herself as an activist on issues like racism, discrimination in media and mental health. The ABC disputed that she was fired, because they had paid her contract in full, and said she had been removed from her duties not as punishment, but to protect the broadcaster's reputation. When opening his remarks, Justice Rangiah said the Israel-Gaza war has become the "most covered, contested and controversial news story in the world". The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage. At least 55,706 people have been killed in Gaza since then, including more than 15,000 children, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry. During the case, the ABC argued Lattouf was instructed not to post anything about the conflict but Justice Rangiah found Lattouf had been "merely advised not to post anything controversial", rather than being given a "direction". He said there was a clear "orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists to have Lattouf taken off air" right from the outset of her employment, which was causing consternation among senior ABC managers. When she re-shared the HRW post — which said Israel was using starvation as a tool of war, a claim the country denies — it was "bound to be controversial", Justice Rangiah said. Describing her decision as "ill-advised and inconsiderate of her employer", he said it turned the "consternation" of her bosses into "what can be described as a state of panic". "Within the hour, a decision was made that Lattouf would be taken off air," he said. He said ABC's former ABC chief content officer Chris Oliver-Taylor had "no more than a suspicion" that Lattouf "may" have breached some policy or guideline — but wanted to "mitigate the anticipated deluge of complaints and criticism" by firing her. And so, shortly after she finished her third morning as a presenter, Lattouf was told to pack up her things and leave. The policies she was alleged to have breached were not identified, nor was she given any opportunity to defend herself, the judge said. The decision to remove her from the airwaves was promptly leaked to the media, something Lattouf says left her reputation in tatters. She took her case to Australia's Fair Work Commission last year, and after a win there, to the Federal Court. There, Lattouf's team argued the ABC had been influenced by external pressure about her appointment. The court heard that ABC's former chair Ita Buttrose and former managing director David Anderson had forwarded several emails complaining about Lattouf to Oliver-Taylor. Justice Rangiah said the decision to sack Lattouf was Oliver-Taylor's alone, but Anderson's opinion of her had influenced him. In a statement, new ABC Managing Director Hugh Marks said it was clear the matter "was not handled in line with our values and expectations". "[It] has caused concerns to be expressed about the ABC's independence and integrity, which are critical to the great trust the Australian public places in us." There was "much to consider" in the wake of the decision, he said, adding that the company's social media guidelines have already been reviewed and replaced. Outside the court, Lattouf's lawyer said the ruling "goes right to the top of the ABC" and "undermines" its credibility, adding that "significant penalties" will be sought and claiming that the broadcaster continues to "blacklist" Lattouf. — BBC

Use of American bunker-buster bomb looms over Iran conflict
Use of American bunker-buster bomb looms over Iran conflict

Al Arabiya

time18-06-2025

  • Al Arabiya

Use of American bunker-buster bomb looms over Iran conflict

A powerful American bunker-busting bomb is the only weapon capable of destroying Iran's deeply buried nuclear facilities, making it President Donald Trump's weapon of choice if he chooses to militarily back Israel. The GBU-57, a 30,000-pound (13,607 kg) warhead capable of penetrating 200 feet (61 meters) underground before exploding, is missing from Israel's arsenal despite its stated goal of preventing Iran from building a nuclear bomb. Why this bomb? In less than a week, the Israeli army has taken out Iranian military commanders and damaged numerous surface installations, raising more questions than answers. 'The regime's missile stockpiles, launchers, military bases, production facilities, nuclear scientists, military command and control has taken a very severe beating,' said Behnam Ben Taleblu, director of the Iran program at the Washington-based think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), a conservative-leaning group. 'But there are still outsized questions as to how efficacious of a strike Israel had against the beating hearts of Iran's nuclear program,' Taleblu said. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has reported no damage at Fordo, a uranium enrichment plant south of Tehran. Unlike the Natanz and Isfahan sites in central Iran, Fordo is buried deep underground, beyond the reach of Israeli bombs. 'All eyes will be on Fordo, which is buried under about 300 feet of rock in central Iran,' Taleblu said. Former US Army lieutenant general and Rand Corporation defense researcher Mark Schwartz insists that 'only the United States has the conventional capacity' to destroy such a site. And by 'conventional capacity,' he means the non-nuclear GBU-57 bomb. What are its capabilities? The US military says the GBU-57 -- also named Massive Ordnance Penetrator -- 'is designed to penetrate up to 200 feet underground before exploding,' navigating through rock and concrete. This differs from missiles or bombs that typically detonate their payload near or upon impact. 'To defeat these deeply buried targets, these weapons need to be designed with rather thick casings of steel, hardened steel, to sort of punch through these layers of rock,' said Masao Dahlgren, a fellow working on missile defense for the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington-based research center. The 6.6-meter-long GBU-57 also has a specialized fuse because 'you need an explosive that's not going to immediately explode under that much shock and pressure,' Dahlgren said. Design for this bomb began in the early 2000s, and an order for 20 units was placed with Boeing in 2009. How is it deployed? The only aircraft capable of deploying the GBU-57 is an American B-2 Bomber, a stealth aircraft. Some of these bombers were deployed in early May on Diego Garcia, the site of a joint UK-US military base in the Indian Ocean, but were no longer visible by mid-June, according to AFP's analysis of satellite imagery provided by Planet Labs. With their long-range capabilities, B-2s departing from the United States 'are able to fly all the way to the Middle East to do bombing runs. That's been done before,' Dahlgren said. Each B-2 can carry two GBU-57 bombs, and Schwartz said multiple bombs will likely be needed. 'They're not going to just be one and done,' he said. Schwartz added that the air superiority Israel has established over Iran reduces the risks faced by the B-2 bombers. What are the consequences? Such a US intervention would come with 'a lot of political baggage for America,' Taleblu said, emphasizing that the bunker-buster bomb is not the only way to address Iran's nuclear program. Without the GBU-57 bombs, and short of a diplomatic solution, Taleblu said Israelis could attack access to underground complexes like Fordo by 'trying to hit entrances, collapse what they can, cut electricity' and take other measures that have already been taken at Natanz.

Use of US bunker-buster bomb looms over Iran conflict
Use of US bunker-buster bomb looms over Iran conflict

Arab News

time18-06-2025

  • Arab News

Use of US bunker-buster bomb looms over Iran conflict

WASHINGTON: A powerful American bunker-busting bomb is the only weapon capable of destroying Iran's deeply buried nuclear facilities, making it President Donald Trump's weapon of choice if he chooses to militarily back GBU-57, a 30,000-pound (13,607 kg) warhead capable of penetrating 200 feet (61 meters) underground before exploding, is missing from Israel's arsenal despite its stated goal of preventing Iran from building a nuclear less than a week, the Israeli army has taken out Iranian military commanders and damaged numerous surface installations, raising more questions than answers.'The regime's missile stockpiles, launchers, military bases, production facilities, nuclear scientists, military command and control has taken a very severe beating,' said Behnam Ben Taleblu, director of the Iran program at the Washington-based think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), a conservative-leaning group.'But there are still outsized questions as to how efficacious of a strike Israel had against the beating hearts of Iran's nuclear program,' Taleblu International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has reported no damage at Fordo, a uranium enrichment plant south of Tehran. Unlike the Natanz and Isfahan sites in central Iran, Fordo is buried deep underground, beyond the reach of Israeli bombs.'All eyes will be on Fordo, which is buried under about 300 feet of rock in central Iran,' Taleblu US Army lieutenant general and Rand Corporation defense researcher Mark Schwartz insists that 'only the United States has the conventional capacity' to destroy such a by 'conventional capacity,' he means the non-nuclear GBU-57 US military says the GBU-57 – also named Massive Ordnance Penetrator – 'is designed to penetrate up to 200 feet underground before exploding,' navigating through rock and differs from missiles or bombs that typically detonate their payload near or upon impact.'To defeat these deeply buried targets, these weapons need to be designed with rather thick casings of steel, hardened steel, to sort of punch through these layers of rock,' said Masao Dahlgren, a fellow working on missile defense for the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington-based research 6.6-meter-long GBU-57 also has a specialized fuse because 'you need an explosive that's not going to immediately explode under that much shock and pressure,' Dahlgren for this bomb began in the early 2000s, and an order for 20 units was placed with Boeing in only aircraft capable of deploying the GBU-57 is an American B-2 Bomber, a stealth of these bombers were deployed in early May on Diego Garcia, the site of a joint UK-US military base in the Indian Ocean, but were no longer visible by mid-June, according to AFP's analysis of satellite imagery provided by Planet their long-range capabilities, B-2s departing from the United States 'are able to fly all the way to the Middle East to do bombing runs. That's been done before,' Dahlgren B-2 can carry two GBU-57 bombs, and Schwartz said multiple bombs will likely be needed.'They're not going to just be one and done,' he added that the air superiority Israel has established over Iran reduces the risks faced by the B-2 a US intervention would come with 'a lot of political baggage for America,' Taleblu said, emphasizing that the bunker-buster bomb is not the only way to address Iran's nuclear the GBU-57 bombs, and short of a diplomatic solution, Taleblu said Israelis could attack access to underground complexes like Fordo by 'trying to hit entrances, collapse what they can, cut electricity' and take other measures that have already been taken at Natanz.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store