BREAKING NEWS The Pickled Possum goes into receivership: Popular bar announces last drinks
The Pickled Possum, in Neutral Bay, is being offered for sale by an expressions of interest campaign with a price guide of around $2.5million.
The popular lower north shore institution will be sold as a package including the building and the business.
The Pickled Possum has been a popular karaoke bar since 1981.
More to come
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Jim Chalmers' admission about interest rate decisions
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has admitted he has no idea how his own departmental boss voted in the Reserve Bank's Tuesday board meeting that decided to deprive struggling Aussie borrowers of relief. The RBA's new monetary policy board voted six votes to three to leave the cash rate unchanged at 3.85 per cent - surprising financial markets, which had universally expected a cut. The government argues its changes to how the Reserve Bank decides interest rates make it more transparent, but the votes of individual board members are kept a secret, potentially making them faceless bureaucrats. Only three members are full-time employees of the federal government, including Reserve Bank Governor Michele Bullock, her deputy Andrew Hauser and Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson. The remaining six are part-time appointments drawn from academia and business, who collectively have the numbers to overpower the Reserve Bank's own permanent staff members who sit on the monetary policy board. They include former Coca-Cola Amatil chief executive Alison Watkins, who still sits on the boards of CSL Limited and Wesfarmers as a non-executive director. Chalmers has admitted he had no idea how Wilkinson voted, despite her representing his Treasury department and the views of the elected government. 'First of all, no. I don't know who voted in which way,' he said. 'Secondly, I don't discuss the Treasury Secretary's vote. And thirdly, I'm not aware of how Secretary Wilkinson voted on this occasion.' The Reserve Bank has, for the first time, published the vote of the new monetary policy board. But unlike the US Federal Reserve, the RBA doesn't say how each board member voted. Despite that, Chalmers argued the Reserve Bank was now being transparent. 'Obviously, it will be a source of some interest that the Reserve Bank board was not unanimous on this occasion, that there were different views expressed around the boardroom table,' he said. 'We know that because of the publication of these unattributed votes, I think that transparency is a welcome change. 'I'm grateful to the Reserve Bank, and particularly to the Governor of the Reserve Bank, for the role that she has played in making sure that those decisions are more transparent.' Ms Bullock on Tuesday argued that keeping votes anonymous would allow more frank discussion, without board members being lobbied. 'Our agreement with the Treasurer is that we will - and that was the recommendation of the review; the reason it was recommended that it was an unattributed vote was that it would mean that people weren't subject to lobbying, it would mean that people could speak freely and I think that's a really important point,' she said. Chalmers argued a split view meant there was proper debate. 'We want these to be decisions which are taken after a lot of deliberation and debate,' he said. 'The fact that the Reserve Bank board was split on this occasion, that there wasn't a unanimous view, is a signal that these decisions are deliberated and debated properly and that's a good thing. 'We want to make sure that people can participate in these Reserve Bank meetings openly, that the public knows whether the decision was taken unanimously or otherwise.' But the establishment of a new RBA monetary policy board also means the six part-time members could potentially use their numbers to dismiss the views of Reserve Bank staff who specialize in economic modeling. 'It's a good thing to have people around the table that will tease out and contest the views, whether it's of the Reserve Bank staff or the Governor or others,' Chalmers said.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump targets Brunei, Libya and Moldova with latest threat of US tariffs
Donald Trump continued to fire off letters threatening steep US tariffs on foreign exports, targeting countries including Brunei, Libya and Moldova. The US president had been scheduled to hike tariffs on dozens of countries today. Earlier this week he announced a fresh three-week delay, to 1 August, but started announcing new rates that countries would face unless they strike a deal with the White House. After announcing plans on Monday for US tariffs of up to 40% on goods imported from 14 countries, including Bangladesh, Japan and South Korea, Trump wrote to the leaders of a further six countries on Wednesday, and published each letter. He claimed exporters in Algeria, Iraq and Libya would face a US tariff of 30%, while exporters in Brunei, Moldova and the Philippines would face a 25% tariff. 'These Tariffs may be modified, upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your Country,' Trump wrote. A string of delays and rate changes have frustrated businesses in the US and around the world. On Tuesday, the president vowed to introduce US tariffs of up to 200% on foreign drugs and 50% on copper, propelling US prices of the latter to record highs. Trump's latest threats have heightened fears that his erratic trade strategy risks exacerbating inflation across the US, having repeatedly pledged on the campaign trail to bring down prices rapidly. Trump appears aware of this apprehension. 'I brought down costs more than any President in recorded history,' he wrote on social media late on Tuesday. 'The Crooked Democrats are using the opposite narrative, even though they know it is a total LIE.'
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labor's aged care reforms risk squeezing out poorer people, industry boss warns
Labor's changes to Australia's aged care system risk squeezing out elderly people with limited financial means, an industry leader has warned, as advocates call for action to strengthen the reforms. Tracey Burton, chief executive of Uniting will use a speech on the future of care for elderly people on Thursday to argue that equitable access for poorer Australians remains an unmet promise of changes passed by parliament last year. Following a royal commission and a taskforce report to the federal government, Labor introduced new rules requiring wealthier people to pay more for their care and boosting access to support services for people who choose to stay in their own home. Residents who can afford to pay for their own care do so using a payment known as a refundable accommodation deposit (RAD). The average RAD is $470,000, with the lump sum refunded to family members when a resident dies. Elderly people whose care is paid for by the government rely on a supported accommodation supplement, worth $70 per day. Changes from the new laws were due to come into force from 1 July, but were delayed by until November over concerns about implementation capacity. Burton told Guardian Australia the significant difference in value acts as a strong disincentive for homes to accept supported residents. 'If you've got one bed left, it is going to be a difficult financial decision for them,' she said. 'If there's not enough beds to go around, and somebody is going to contribute through the government supplement of $69 a day, compared to someone who will likely pay double that per day, it's a very difficult for providers to actually prioritise the people without means.' Burton wants the government to move more quickly than a planned review of the supplement, due to be completed by mid-2026. She will propose it be raised, or tied to mandated equivalent rate to the RAD. Uniting cares for nearly 8000 residents across 75 homes in NSW and the ACT and supports 8500 home care clients. Burton cited the case of an elderly man from the NSW Central Coast who was moved to a home in Sydney because no bed was available closer to his support network. 'The unintended consequence of people of means contributing more to their aged care is that they could get priority access over people who are relying on the government support,' Burton said. Occupancy in aged care in Australia's major cities is above 94%, according to the most recent research. In regional centres, it exceeds 92%. Demand is expected to surge. The country is on track for a doubling of people over 65 and a tripling of those aged over 85 within 40 years. Grant Corduroy, an aged care expert and member of Labor's expert taskforce, endorsed Burton's calls for action. 'The current accomodation supplement is inequitable for financially disadvantaged people compared to people who have the financial ability to pay,' he said. 'With increasing occupancy levels, where demand will soon start to outstrip supply, it means providers will have greater choice among the residents they accept. We don't want providers to be faced with having to make that choice based on financial reasons, rather than the needs assessment of a resident.' To incentivise providers to prioritise financially vulnerable residents, aged care homes that fall below 40% supported residents have their supplement rates reduced by 25%. The supplement review is expected to consider if it is priced in a way to incentivise providers to accept low-means residents. The minister for aged care, Sam Rae, said Labor was determined to make sure the accommodation supplement provided 'appropriate incentives so that people who need it most can access care, even if they aren't well off. 'The review of accommodation pricing will consult widely, and I look forward to receiving the report and learning how we can further improve care and support for older Australians doing it tough,' he said.
