Trump proposes 50% copper tariff, threatens 200% drug levy
We begin in the United States, where President Donald Trump said he would impose a 50% tariff on copper imports, CNBC reported. The announcement at a cabinet meeting caused copper prices to jump to a record high.
The US imports nearly half of the copper it uses. Trump ordered a probe in February into potential tariffs on copper on national security grounds.
Meanwhile, Trump also threatened to impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceutical imports. He said the levy on pharmaceuticals would be introduced 'very soon' but would not go into effect immediately. 'We'll give them a certain period of time to get their act together,' Trump said, apparently referring to drugmakers.
Pharmaceutical stocks appeared to shrug off the statement, as their prices remained relatively unchanged. The comments come as Trump wants to incentivise drug companies to move manufacturing to the US.
Staying in the United States, Trump has lashed out at his Russian counterpart and has resumed sending weapons to Ukraine, ABC reported. During the same cabinet meeting, the President said he was 'very unhappy' that Vladimir Putin had made no progress on peace talks with Ukraine since the pair had a phone call last week.
'We get a lot of bulls**t thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth," Trump told reporters. "He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless."
Trump hinted that he was considering further sanctions on Russia and confirmed the US would resume weapons shipments to Ukraine.
Donald Trump.
To the Middle East, where five Israeli soldiers were killed in an attack in northern Gaza, and 51 Palestinians were killed by Israeli strikes, the Associated Press reported.
The soldiers were killed by an explosive device detonated in Beit Hanoun, according to an Israeli security official. Militants also opened fire on the soldiers, injuring 14 in the attack.
Hamas officials at Nasser Hospital said 41 Palestinians were killed on Tuesday, and another 10 were killed in central Gaza.
The rising death toll comes as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visits the US for talks about a ceasefire plan. A new round of indirect peace talks between Israel and Hamas began on Sunday.
A Hamas supporter.
In market news, it was a mixed day on Wall Street, as anxiety over Trump's tariff comments overshadowed earlier hopes for clarity on US trade policy, Reuters reported.
The S&P 500 was flat, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.26%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq rose 0.21%.
Wall Street equities sold off on Monday after Trump warned of new tariffs on goods from key trading partners but steadied overnight. There was no rebound, however, as investors remained concerned about the President's new sector-specific tariff threats.
"There's still a lot of uncertainty about how the tariff story is going to play out. There are too many moving parts here," Paleo Leo managing director John Praveen said.
Finally this morning, former UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has joined investment bank Goldman Sachs as an adviser. The BBC reported that he would work part-time, advising the bank's clients on global politics and the economy.
Sunak resigned as Prime Minister in July 2024 but remains the Conservative MP for Richmond and Northallerton in Yorkshire. He previously worked for the bank in the early 2000s.
A condition of his employment prevents him from advising other governments or their sovereign wealth funds for the bank, or advising clients he had direct dealings with while Prime Minister.
His salary will be donated to The Richmond Project, a charity he founded alongside his wife to improve numeracy across the UK.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
15 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Defence spending is like insurance – how will NZ pay the higher premiums?
By Stephen Hickson* of NZ Army Bushmaster 5.5 armoured vehicles. Photo: Supplied/ NZ Defence Force Analysis : Defence spending is like insurance - you have to pay for it but you hope you never have to use it. And the higher the risk you face, the higher your premium will be. New Zealand has now committed to paying those higher defence insurance premiums. The government's 2025 Defence Capability Plan , released in April, includes NZ$9 billion in extra funding over the next four years. That's a sizable increase on a current annual budget of just under $5 billion. Read more: The multibillion-dollar boost for New Zealand's military: What you need to know New Zealand is not alone, of course. Driven by geopolitical tensions and US President Donald Trump's demand that other countries spend a higher proportion of their GDP on defence, global military spending rose for the tenth year in a row to US$2718 billion (NZ$4530b) in 2024, with huge increases in Europe and the Middle East. How much "insurance" a country should buy in the form of defence spending will vary. Too little, and it cannot respond when it needs to; too much, and resources are needlessly wasted. For New Zealand, it is a matter of finding the right balance. The country needs to find the right balance for its spending on defence. Photo: Supplied/ NZ Defence Force Economically, however, defence spending is more complicated than simply buying weapons and recruiting more personnel. There can be benefits beyond basic security considerations. One involves what economists call "technology spillovers". Past innovations developed for military use - such as jet engines, GPS and the internet - often found important civilian applications. The challenge is to design defence investments to deliberately build skills and technologies with wider economic benefit: advanced manufacturing, cybersecurity or clean tech. New Zealand's defence plan includes this kind of spending, including between $100 million and $300m on cybersecurity. On the other hand, promises of new jobs from large projects are often overstated, with New Zealand's best known example being the "Think Big" policy of the 1970s. Rather, there can be job substitution as people move from civilian roles into military ones. A NZ Defence Force Vector Scorpion drone. Photo: You Tube / NZ Defence Force In the end, of course, increased defence spending must be funded - through higher taxes, more debt or reduced spending on other items. Higher GDP growth would make the expenditure more affordable, but even then we face the same tradeoffs. It's not possible to have lower taxes and debt as well as higher government spending. Most of the expenditure set out in the defence plan will be on equipment. But any increase in the output of the defence industry will likely crowd out other consumer and investment goods. While clearly an extreme example, one only has to look at how defence spending rose during WWII. The increase in military output came at the expense of other goods, leading to shortages and rationing. New Zealand doesn't face that scale of change, but there is still likely to be some shift in production from "butter to guns". We might also see a shift in how businesses spend their research and development money, towards military and away from civilian applications. New Zealand does not have a large defence industry and will need to import much of the new equipment. This implies a need for higher exports to pay for those imports, meaning fewer goods for New Zealanders to consume. A New Zealand Defence Force plane arrives in the Middle East earlier this year during the Iran-Israel conflict. Photo: Supplied / New Zealand Defence Force Most countries are understandably reluctant to cut spending on health, education and other things voters care about in order to boost defence. Hence, governments can be tempted to label new expenditures as "defence" when it could otherwise be classified as "updated infrastructure". Spending on dual-purpose capital works is likely to increase, therefore, with projects earmarked for defence more likely to be funded. The New Zealand defence plan already allows for housing, airfield and port facilities that can all have multiple uses. There are also ethical considerations. Many consumers prefer not to invest in the arms trade, but components used in weapons manufacture often have non-military uses as well. Similarly, many consumer items, such as phones, vehicles and food, can be purchased by the military but clearly have non-military uses. We may see more of the output of companies that also produce non-military items directed into defence. All of this can make it difficult to classify a company as a defence contractor, and may be challenging for large investors (such as superannuation funds) with ethical investment policies. At the same time, the cost of not investing in defence firms might also rise as demand for their products or services increases and they become better investments. Like people in general, countries prefer lower insurance premiums. But when risks increase, so too does the price of insurance. Voters will disagree on how much should be spent on defence, but that is largely a political question. What economics teaches us, however, is that if you want to reduce your insurance premium, then reduce your risk. And that is something easier said than done. *Stephen Hickson is a Lecturer in Economics and Director, Business Taught Masters Programme, University of Canterbury. This article was originally published by The Conversation .
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Russia Must Release Ill Lawyer Maria Bontsler, Detained In Retaliation For Human Rights Work: UN Special Rapporteur
Geneva, 9 July 2025 The UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Russian Federation, Mariana Katzarova, today condemned the arrest and ongoing arbitrary detention of Maria Bontsler, a 64-year-old human rights lawyer from Kaliningrad, who suffers from a serious chronic medical condition. 'This is a deeply troubling case of judicial harassment and criminalisation of a lawyer for simply doing her job,' Katzarova said. 'Maria Bontsler's arrest and prosecution are politically motivated and represent yet another example of the continuing attack on the independence of the legal profession in Russia.' Bontsler was arrested on 29 May 2025 – two days before the Day of Russian Advocates on 31 May – and placed in pre-trial detention by the Leningradsky District Court of Kaliningrad. She was charged under article 275.1 of the Russian Criminal Code for alleged 'confidential cooperation with a foreign state, aimed at undermining the national security of the Russian Federation' – a charge carrying up to eight years in prison. For over 30 years, Bontsler chaired the now-dissolved regional Committee of Soldiers' Mothers, defending the legal rights of conscripts. Bontsler is also known for defending clients in politically motivated cases, including Igor Baryshnikov, a prominent political prisoner, who was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison for posting 'fake news' about the war in Ukraine. His health has rapidly deteriorated in detention, endangering his life. Just a week before her arrest, on 20 May 2025, the European Union sanctioned 28 Russian officials, including the judge in Baryshnikov's case, where Bontsler served as defence counsel. 'This timing raises serious concerns that Bontsler's arrest may be retaliatory,' the Special Rapporteur said. 'The charges allege she passed security-related information to a foreign State – claims that contradict her legal activities as a defence lawyer and remain unsubstantiated.' Maria Bontsler's hearings are held behind closed doors, and her lawyers are bound by non-disclosure related to state secrets. 'Her family remains in the dark and has not been allowed to visit,' the expert said. Since her detention, Bontsler, who suffers from severe chronic hypertension, has been denied essential medical care. Discharged from hospital the day before her arrest following a hypertensive crisis, she reported dangerously high blood pressure while in custody. Despite her complaints, she has received no treatment and lacks a blood pressure monitor. Her family has also been barred from providing any medication. She has reported being given insufficient food and water, and sustaining bruises during transportation following her arbitrary arrest. 'Denying medical treatment to a seriously ill detainee, alongside poor detention conditions, may constitute inhuman and degrading treatment,' Katzarova said. 'Russian authorities must ensure she receives adequate medical care immediately.' She stressed that article 275.1 of the Criminal Code is 'vague and overly broad,' enabling the criminalisation of legitimate international cooperation and advocacy. 'This repressive law must be repealed,' she said. 'Maria Bontsler must be released immediately, and all charges dropped,' the expert said. 'Her case exemplifies the escalating repression of lawyers and human rights defenders in Russia. Since yesterday, in different regions, law enforcement have undertaken searches and arrests of journalists and human rights defenders. This attack on civil society should end.' The Special Rapporteur has addressed the Government on this case.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Trump promised 200 deals by now. He's gotten 3, and 1 more is very close
By Phil Mattingly and David Goldman , CNN US President Donald Trump holds a chart titled 'Reciprocal Tariffs' during a press conference at the White House in Washington, DC, on 2 April 2025. Photo: AFP / Brendan Smialowski At the conclusion of his first 100 days in office in late April, President Donald Trump made a stunning statement about his progress on tariff negotiations: He had completed trade deals with 200 countries. More than two months later, Trump has announced just three of those agreements - with China , the United Kingdom and Vietnam. So what happened? Wednesday (US time) marks the day that Trump had set three months ago as a deadline for all countries to reach a deal or face higher "reciprocal" tariffs. Trump has since publicly acknowledged that pausing those "Liberation Day" tariffs until 9 July left insufficient time to negotiate with practically every country around the world. Trump had initially expected to complete more trade deals by Wednesday's deadline, but in recent weeks he's been convinced that landing those deals can't happen more swiftly, sources familiar with the matter tell CNN. That's why his public rhetoric has shifted in recent weeks to saying he would send out letters that set higher tariffs on America's trading partners , effectively getting results on the board while talks continue. So Trump agreed to push the deadline back to 1 August to give countries that are close to a deal a little more time for talks - particularly the European Union, which is on the verge of announcing a trade deal with the United States. EU and US trade negotiators are nearing a framework agreement that would set in place 10 percent tariffs and lay out the parameters for extensive trade discussions in the future, according to three officials familiar with the matter. The progress in negotiations with the EU, in particular, was a key consideration in extending the deadline beyond 9 July. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent pointed to the EU talks, as well as the view that several other key negotiations were in their final stages, as he advocated for more time, according to two people familiar with the matter. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Photo: AFP / AL DRAGO Trump still needs to sign off on any final agreement and talks between the two sides are ongoing, but the officials said the agreement would be announced before the end of the week. Olof Gill, trade spokesperson for the European Commission, confirmed in a press briefing on Wednesday that EU trade negotiators were in active discussions with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and that a deal was expected to be announced in the coming days. US businesses are under mounting pressure to import goods while President Donald Trump's higher tariffs are on pause, and they're simultaneously navigating increasingly complex filing rules when their cargo crosses the border. The progress marks a dramatic turn in Trump's long-standing, long-public disdain for the EU, a view that served as the backdrop to months of frustrating and intractable trade discussions this year. But Trump's tone - and behind the scenes, the tenor and tempo of the negotiations - shifted dramatically in the weeks since he threatened 50 percent tariffs on the EU in a morning social media post in late May. That unexpected and dramatic threat sparked an immediate response from the EU and set the stage for an urgent effort to reach some form of an agreement before Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs snapped into place. EU officials have been in the midst of briefing member countries about the framework and proposed negotiating process, one of the EU officials said, adding that despite the often-divergent equities of the bloc's nations, the deal has been presented as the best and likely only way to avoid a dramatic escalation in tariffs on 1 August. Trump's negotiators have maintained a hardline on the EU's push for exemptions to sectoral tariffs already in place or forthcoming, the officials said. For instance, a push to reduce Trump's 25 percent tariff on autos is a central late-stage focus of the discussions, as has an effort to cut the 50 percent levies on steel. US negotiators have indicated some willingness to consider key EU industries and products for possible rate reductions, including airplanes, alcoholic beverages and some agricultural products. But it would require Trump's final sign-off, the officials said. EU officials have also pledged to significantly increase purchases of US energy and defense sector goods. If a deal can't be reached, the EU has vowed to introduce countermeasures targeting billions of dollars' worth of US exports to the bloc. Those retaliatory steps have been due to come into force on 14 July. It is not yet clear if the EU will push back that date to account for Trump's extension of his "reciprocal" tariffs deadline to 1 August. "If no agreement is reached by the stated deadline, the EU is prepared to activate targeted and proportionate countermeasures in defence of its legitimate interest," Marie Bjerre, Denmark's minister of European affairs, reminded the European Parliament on Wednesday, noting that there were limits to the bloc's patience. Trump has been frustrated by a lack of progress on trade. During a cabinet meeting on Tuesday, he said his tariff threats have successfully brought trading partners to the table - but the deals other countries have offered the United States were unacceptable. "They say … 'We will give you total access, and you don't have to pay any tariffs, but please don't charge us tariffs,' and we don't like that deal," Trump said. "We're not hard-line, but it's about time the United States of America started collecting money from countries that were ripping us off - ripping us off - and laughing behind our back at how stupid we were." Trump this week has sent out several letters setting new tariffs, including 25 percent tariffs on Japan and South Korea. Other letters were expected to be publicised on Wednesday. Other deals have been harder to come by. India has long been viewed as the most likely major partner to sign onto a framework with the US. But Indian trade negotiators have hardened their positions in recent days, according to US officials. India is also a member of the BRICS group, so it's unclear what Trump's 10 percent tariff threat on BRICS countries on Sunday means for trade negotiations. South Korea had also been viewed for weeks as likely to reach an agreement, though Trump's auto tariffs remain a key sticking point in those talks, and Trump's letter on Monday may have thrown a wrench in those gears. Japan steadily moved further away from an outcome in recent weeks, and Trump cast significant doubt on talks that once seemed on a path to a certain agreement. Japanese trade negotiators, who just weeks ago were scrambling to lay the groundwork for an announcement by last month's Group of Seven summit, have delivered far more pessimistic messages in their public statements in recent days. Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said on Tuesday that despite "earnest and sincere discussions," Japan has been unable to reach a deal, according to remarks translated by CNN. "We deeply regret that the US government has imposed additional tariffs and announced plans to raise tariff rates," Ishiba said. Indonesia, Cambodia and Thailand have all delivered substantial offers to their US counterparts in the last two weeks in an effort to move to the front of the line for an agreement and were likely candidates for any near-term deal in the next few days, US officials said. Brazil has ramped up its efforts to secure an agreement, including bilateral talks at the end of last week designed to expand on an earlier offer to sharply reduce tariffs on certain US products, American administration officials said. The most prevalent point of contention among foreign trade teams has been a lack of clarity on what their US counterparts envision for any final agreement. But the biggest roadblock in the more expansive negotiations has been the existence - or promised imposition - of Trump's sectoral tariffs on autos, steel and pharmaceuticals, US officials said. CNN's Alayna Treene, James Frater and Anna Cooban contributed to this report. -CNN
