Hedge fund tycoon Hosking says rival Telegraph bid "ready to go"
Sky News has learnt that Jeremy Hosking, the prominent City figure who co-founded Marathon Asset Management, is pledging to inject £100m of his own money into the newspaper group if the self-styled 'British bid' of which he is part is successful.
Mr Hosking, who now runs Hosking Partners, has been working with Dovid Efune, the owner of the New York Sun, in an effort to gain control of the Telegraph for several months.
Money latest:
They have been thwarted, though, by an agreement reached with RedBird Capital Partners, the US-based investment firm, to buy the titles for £500m following a two-year battle which has plunged the Telegraph into a protracted state of limbo.
RedBird's bid includes tens of millions of pounds of funding from IMI, a state-backed Abu Dhabi vehicle, which cleared a key hurdle last week when the House of Lords voted against a 'fatal motion' which would have blocked the sovereign investment.
The outcome of the vote was not without fierce debate, with 155 peers supporting the ban.
IMI is controlled by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the vice-president of the United Arab Emirates and ultimate owner of Manchester City Football Club.
Speaking through Mr Efune, Mr Hosking said in a statement on Wednesday morning: "We have been following the latest developments closely and with the best outcome for all Telegraph stakeholders front of mind.
"We understand from the Lords debate last week that there is now a legal requirement for the government to formally investigate all the foreign government ties that may result in influence over the current preferred buyer.
"Should the buyer be deemed unsuitable, our "British Bid" is ready to go.
"We believe our current capitalization is more than adequate to replace the controlling shareholder's portion of the deal.
"My own personal commitment is £100m in equity capital."
Further details of the financing lined up by Mr Efune's consortium remain unclear, including the level of debt attached to his prospective offer.
The RedBird-led acquisition of the Telegraph remains subject to investigations by both Ofcom and the Competition and Markets Authority, which are likely to delay completion of the deal into next year.
Sky News previously revealed that Sir Leonard Blavatnik, owner of the DAZN sports streaming platform, and Daily Mail proprietor Lord Rothermere were preparing to buy minority stakes as part of the RedBird transaction.
Gerry Cardinale, the RedBird executive, who has spearheaded the latest iteration of its acquisition, has described the firm as "the right owner at the right time".
RedBird said in May that it was "in discussions with select UK-based minority investors with print media expertise and strong commitment to upholding the editorial values of the Telegraph".
The Telegraph titles' parent company was forced into insolvency proceedings in 2023 by Lloyds Banking Group, which ran out of patience with the Barclay family, their long-standing owner.
RedBird IMI, a joint venture between the two firms, paid £600m several months later to acquire a call option that was intended to convert into ownership of the Telegraph newspapers and The Spectator magazine.
That objective was thwarted by a change in media ownership laws - which banned any form of foreign state ownership.
Some peers argued last week that a 15% threshold was too high and that the legislation to permit it was dangerously ambiguous because it could allow for more than one state investor to aggregate their holdings in British newspapers.
A further statutory instrument will need to be approved in order to address this issue.
The Spectator, which had also been part of the same group, was sold last year for £100m to Sir Paul Marshall, the hedge fund billionaire, who has installed Lord Gove, the former cabinet minister, as its editor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Controversy over how to use frozen Russian assets to help Ukraine
The £38m superyacht Phi should be earning her owner about £563,000 a week, hosting ultra-rich holidaymakers on trips around the sparkling Mediterranean. Instead, she is stuck at a dingy mooring in Canary Wharf, shrouded in scaffolding, her smart blue paintwork peeling and her electrics failing. And that is where, for the foreseeable future, she will stay, after the Supreme Court last week dismissed an appeal against the vessel's continued detention. More than three years after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the judgment raised a question: what is the future of Russian assets frozen by the British state? In March 2022, Phi was in the UK having the finishing touches put to her plush interiors, which include an 'infinite' wine cellar, fluted leather wall panelling, an outdoor cinema and a freshwater swimming pool. Then Russia invaded Ukraine and the British government launched an aggressive round of sanctions against the Russian state and individuals connected to it. Since then, it has frozen £25bn of Russian-owned assets – including Phi. According to the judgment there is no evidence that her owner, Russian businessman Sergei Naumenko, has any connection to Vladimir Putin. He has not been sanctioned and internet searches reveal almost nothing about his life and business interests. The value of the Phi is dwarfed by that of other frozen Russian sovereign assets: held in Belgium, they are worth about £160bn. Nevertheless, former transport secretary Grant Shapps said detaining the yacht had 'turned an icon of Russia's power and wealth into a clear and stark warning to Putin and his cronies'. The Supreme Court's judgment, which also covered a case brought by the oil tycoon Eugene Shvidler, offered a more solid rationale: 'The very considerable income that Mr Naumenko claims that he could earn by chartering out the Phi to other wealthy people is likely to make its way to Russia,' it said. 'In this way it would be used to contribute to the Russian economy' – thus funding the Kremlin's war with Ukraine. Tom Keatinge, director of the Centre for Finance and Security at the Royal United Services Industry think tank, says this is typical of the government's approach to sanctions. In 2022, the focus was on taking headline-grabbing 'trophy' assets from big-name oligarchs. Now, this 'has shifted to a focus on how to seize for the benefit of Ukraine'. To an extent, this is working. The frozen funds have accrued interest, so even if the government can't use the assets directly, it can at least spend the interest they earn to benefit Ukraine. In June, the UK used £70m of interest payments received on frozen Russian funds to supply Ukraine with 350 missiles. UK government ministers have also stated an aim to direct the £2.5bn proceeds from Roman Abramovich's sale of Chelsea Football Club n 2022 to Ukraine. A government payment of £2.26bn into the Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration scheme, an international loan scheme designed to help Ukraine fund its war, will be repaid using profits from sanctioned Russian assets. However, physical assets, such as buildings and superyachts, are harder to manage. Phi is 'a mess', says Guy Booth, the vessel's captain. 'The paint on her hull is peeling off because it's been constantly rubbing on the fenders in exactly the same place for three years. The technical spaces are a mess, and 40% of our onboard machinery is inoperable.' Although the government's Office for Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) has issued a special licence to allow maintenance of Phi, Booth says insurers won't provide cover, so he cannot take engineers on board. The Department for Transport has engaged with the insurance industry over the matter. So far, the government's options regarding tangible assets, such as Abramovich's £150m, 15-bedroom mansion on Kensington Palace Gardens, have been limited. Selling them off would be regarded as expropriation, which the government is eager not to be accused of, in order not to frighten off other international investors. Another option might be to ask oligarchs to voluntarily give up their assets. In June 2023, the government offered a route for sanctioned individuals who say they support Ukraine to 'donate their frozen funds for Ukrainian reconstruction'. However there was no offer of sanctions relief in return for such a donation. In his Mansion House speech in June, the foreign secretary, David Lammy, announced that London would host a Countering Illicit Finance Summit, which will bring countries together to work on an international solution. 'I think there could be potential in creating new laws to look at taking that from freezing to seizing, but it would need very careful balancing with property rights,' says Ben Cowdock, senior investigations lead at the Transparency International charity. 'At the moment, every country is doing something a little bit different.' In the meantime, Phi waits for the courts to decide her fate. Naumenko intends to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights, says Booth, although there is concern that she might not last if the wheels of justice turn slowly. To restore her to her former glory – with a new coat of paint, plus the electrical work and carpentry that should have been addressed during regular maintenance stops – would cost up to £8m, says Booth. There have, he adds, been a series of small fires on board, which present a risk to the residents and businesses around her mooring. Each time, 'we assemble on the quay and then we assess whether we're going to enter the ship and combat the fire, as we would if we were at sea, or whether it's better just to let it burn, and let the City of London firefighters deal with it'. A Department for Transport spokesperson welcomed Tuesday's ruling, saying: 'This decision reinforces the UK government's determination to disrupt Russia's economic war machine and return peace to Ukraine.' Photograph by Sophia Evans/The Observer
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
M5 drivers met with huge building in West Midlands
Drivers travelling along the M5 in the West Midlands have been met by a huge building next to the carriageway. Over the past two years, motorists will have noticed the energy-from-waste-facility rising from the ground in West Bromwich. The £400million plant is an imposing structure for drivers travelling along the bend of the motorway just south of Junction 1. READ MORE: The M5 junction hiding a secret passage that was once part of something much grander Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp, click the link to join Although it appears to be just metres from the M5 itself, the facility is actually located off the nearby A4182 Kelvin Way. Motorists driving past on the M5 will have noticed workers in high-vis clothing working at height on the giant building. Work on the plant began back in June 2021 and Sandwell Council says it should be completed by December 2025. The facility will convert 395,000 tonnes of non-recyclable waste destined for landfill or export into 44MW home-grown energy every year. More than 400 jobs are set to be created during construction of the facility, which will be operated by enfinium, while there will be more than 40 full-time jobs once operational. The plant, which is called enfinium Kelvin, will be able to generate enough electricity to power more than 95,000 homes. A spokesperson for Sandwell Council said: "enfinium Kelvin is an energy from waste facility currently under construction. "The facility will divert 395,000 tonnes of non-recyclable household and business waste that would have otherwise been sent to landfill or export. "enfinium Kelvin will use the residual waste to generate 44MW (gross) of partially renewable baseload energy per annum, equivalent to the needs of more than 95,000 UK homes and businesses."
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'My PIP is ending after two years - what do I do?'
A benefit claimant said their two-year Personal Independence Payment (PIP) award was coming to an end and admitted they didn't know what to do. They were not sure if the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) would be in touch, or if they'd need to reapply. With just a few weeks to go before the payments stopped, they took to Reddit to ask others for advice. READ MORE: 'I'm worried about my Universal Credit review - I can't tell the truth about some bank transfers' The post read: "Am I correct in thinking that if I was awarded PIP for two years, and it's to end in the next month or so, I will get a new form? "Or do I need to reapply without them contacting me?" READ MORE: 'My PIP assessment was draining and now I'm so worried it'll be a flat-out no' One helpful response read: "It depends whether it was a fixed award term or not. "Your letter should state this. I believe, if it was fixed, it's your responsibility to re-apply and you won't get renewal letters. "If it was an ongoing award, I would be surprised if you hadn't received a renewal letter at this late stage. "Mine is a five-year award ending in May 2028, and my letter says they will be in touch 'after May 2027' - that's the wording for comparison to check on your letter." Another said they thought the person would have received review forms by now if it was an ongoing award, adding: "It sounds like a fixed award and they will have to reapply. "Fixed short term awards are for conditions they expect to significantly improve in that time so they just end, whereas conditions which are expected to stay the same or get worse will have longer award lengths and be subject to reviews." According to Citzens Advice, the DWP "won't usually review an award and will let it end" if someone was awarded PIP for two years or less.
