Court allows MACC to amend asset freeze notice for Daim's widow
The assets include two commercial properties at St Mary Axe and One Crown Court, three luxury residences at Bryanston Square, Bryanston Mews, and Lancaster Gate, two residential units at Gloucester Place, and a CAF Bank Limited (UK) account held by The Ilham Foundation.
Judge Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid granted the application after deputy public prosecutor Maziah Mohaide explained that the amendments involved adding details to the notice of motion dated May 30, 2025. These changes included updating property addresses, title numbers, and purchase values to comply with UK enforcement standards.
Meanwhile, lawyer Syed Afiq Syed Albakri, representing Na'imah, disclosed that six companies, including The Ilham Foundation, had sought to intervene in the MACC's asset freeze application. However, Maziah objected to their involvement.
Judge Azhar directed the prosecution to file an affidavit in response to the intervention request by July 25, with the six companies required to submit their replies by August 6. Case management was scheduled for August 8.
On May 22, MACC Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki confirmed that eight investigation papers were initiated based on new information from external agencies regarding undisclosed assets linked to Daim, his family, and proxies.
Azam stated that the latest findings revealed assets not declared during the 2023 probe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
Why are more wealthy mainland companies coming to Hong Kong for mediation?
An increasing number of wealthy mainland families have been opting to come to Hong Kong for mediation services to solve disputes instead of going to court, according to an expert. 'There is an increased demand for family mediation services in Hong Kong in recent years, particularly from [mainland] Chinese families,' said Ann Cooley, founder of Hong Kong-based Cooley Family Office, which has offered mediation services to help family offices handle their disputes for three decades. 'Hong Kong is going to benefit from such a trend because the city is an international mediation centre with many experts in this area,' Cooley said in an interview on Thursday. 'Being part of China and the Greater Bay Area means that many wealthy mainland families can take the high-speed train to travel to Hong Kong within an hour to meet their bankers to manage their wealth, as well as to find experts to resolve their family disputes,' she said. The hidden disputes of wealthy mainland families have come under the microscope recently with the legal battle surrounding the family of Zong Qinghou, the late founder of China's biggest beverage company, Hangzhou Wahaha Group, barely 12 months after his death. Three plaintiffs claiming to be his children sued chairwoman and CEO Kelly Zong Fuli in Hong Kong and Hangzhou in eastern Zhejiang province, demanding her to honour the late founder's will, which promised them trusts valued at US$700 million each. Before the lawsuit was filed, Kelly, 43, was known as the billionaire's only child. On Friday, the lawsuit by Jacky Zong Jicang, Jessie Zong Jiele and Jerry Zong Jisheng will come before the High Court in Hong Kong. Cooley said she believed similar court cases would be brought to Hong Kong, as many affluent families on the mainland had not prepared for a smooth transfer of wealth. 'We are living through an unprecedented wave of wealth transfer in Asia, particularly in mainland China, where first-generation entrepreneurs are passing the baton to the new generations,' she said. 'Many of these families have no experience in how to prepare for succession planning, which is why we are going to see more disputes in the years ahead.' Cooley said mediation was preferable to litigation because the cost was lower. Mediations allow for closed-door meetings to seek solutions that are accepted by all parties and there is no need for public disclosures. 'Mediation puts families in the driver's seat,' she said. 'I do not believe families should go to court unless it is the last resort.' In addition, many wealthy mainland families like to come to Hong Kong instead of litigating closer to home. 'These families do not want their friends in Beijing or Shanghai to know about their finances or their personal affairs,' Cooley said. 'Mediation can prevent their family matters from getting into the ess.' Some families use mediation to reach decisions on when and how to sell the family assets and how to move companies forward. 'Sometimes the younger generations want to use artificial intelligence or other technology in the operation of the companies, while the older generations want to do things in their own ways,' she said. 'Mediation can also help them find a solution.' And while court decisions had a stronger enforcement element, mediation agreements were reached voluntarily, which meant families were usually more committed to following through with them, she said. 'Most families are looking for harmonious outcomes rather than vengeful and destructive ones,' she said. 'That is why mediation, even without traditional enforcement power, often works better for keeping families together and moving forward.' - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
MACC officers acquitted of gang robbery charge
KUALA LUMPUR: The Sessions Court here has acquitted and discharged two Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers and a former officer of gang robbery, without calling for their defence.. Judge Izralizam Sanusi ordered Muhamad Haffiz Mohd Radzi, 35, Mohd Fahmee Mohamad Nor, 43, and former officer Azwan Asli, 40, to be freed on Monday (Aug 4) after finding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against them. In his judgment, he said the court took into account a police report lodged by the victim, who was the first prosecution witness (SP1), stating that the presence of three men at his house was related to an investigation into alleged money laundering offences. ALSO READ: Bukit Aman investigating MACC officers allegedly involved in gang robbery "SP1 claimed he felt threatened because the three accused informed him that he could be detained if he failed to cooperate with the investigation. "However, the court found that this did not amount to wrongful restraint, as the actions were carried out in the capacity of MACC officers," he said. Judge Izralizam said that based on the victim's testimony, he did not feel afraid of the three accused during the incident, as he claimed he had not committed any offence. "There is no evidence that the victim was threatened with a firearm by the three men, even though he alleged that one of them was carrying a firearm in his backpack,' said the judge, adding that the existence of the alleged firearm was not proven during the trial. ALSO READ: Two MACC officers, one other charged with robbery On Dec 13, 2023, the three accused were charged with jointly committing gang robbery against a man named Kun Gao, allegedly robbing him of cash, a silver suitcase, and a black Louis Vuitton bag. The offence was said to have been committed at a condominium on Jalan Ampang at about noon on Dec 10, 2021. The charge, framed under Section 395 of the Penal Code, carries a maximum sentence of 20 years' imprisonment and whipping upon conviction. A total of 17 prosecution witnesses were called to testify throughout the trial, which began in November 2024. – Bernama
The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
MACC officers acquitted in gang robbery case by Kuala Lumpur court
KUALA LUMPUR: The Sessions Court acquitted and discharged three Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers, including a former officer, of gang robbery charges after the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case. Judge Izralizam Sanusi ruled that the evidence did not support the allegations, leading to the officers' release without a defence being called. The accused—Muhamad Haffiz Mohd Radzi, 35, Mohd Fahmee Mohamad Nor, 43, and former officer Azwan Asli, 40—were charged in December 2023 with robbing a man named Kun Gao of cash, a silver suitcase, and a black Louis Vuitton bag. The alleged incident occurred at a condominium on Jalan Ampang in December 2021. Judge Izralizam noted that the victim's police report indicated the officers' presence was linked to a money laundering investigation. While the victim claimed he felt threatened, the court found no proof of wrongful restraint or use of a firearm. 'The actions were within the scope of MACC duties,' the judge stated. The charge under Section 395 of the Penal Code carries a maximum penalty of 20 years' imprisonment and whipping. Deputy Public Prosecutor Nor Aisyah Mohamed Zanyuin led the prosecution, while the defence team included lawyers Tan Sri Dzulkifli Ahmad and Azizzul Shariman Mat Yusoff. Seventeen witnesses testified during the trial, which began in November 2024. - Bernama
