Apple loses fourth AI researcher in a month to Meta's superintelligence team
Bowen Zhang, a key multimodal AI researcher at Apple, left the company on Friday and is set to join Meta's recently formed superintelligence team, according to people familiar with the matter. Zhang was part of the Apple foundation models group, or AFM, which built the core technology behind the company's AI platform.
Meta previously lured away the leader of the team, Ruoming Pang, with a compensation package valued at more than $200 million, Bloomberg News has reported. Two other researchers from that group — Tom Gunter and Mark Lee — also recently joined Meta. AFM is made up of several dozen engineers and researchers across Cupertino, California, and New York.
In response to the job offers from Meta and others, Apple has been marginally increasing the pay of its AFM staffers, whether or not they've threatened to leave, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the moves are private. Still, the pay levels pale in comparison with those of rivals.
Spokespeople for Apple and Meta declined to comment.
Apple shares declined as much as 1.5% to $210.82, reaching a session low in New York trading. The stock was already down 15% this year through Monday's close.
The departures have thrown Apple's models team into flux. Pang played a central role in defining the department's road map and research direction, and multiple people within AFM now say its future is unclear. Additional engineers are actively interviewing for jobs elsewhere, according to the people. Another team member — Floris Weers — left for a startup in recent weeks.
The AFM team is critical to Apple's broader AI strategy. The group's work underpins the Apple Intelligence platform, which launched last year. But now the company is considering a shift toward using more third-party models.
Some Apple executives see its homegrown models as a stumbling block to catching up with AI rivals, the people said. And the uncertainty over whether to outsource the technology has hurt morale at the company and helped fuel the attrition.
Meta, meanwhile, is aggressively staffing up. The Facebook owner has offered gigantic compensation packages to AI talent across Silicon Valley, luring away workers from Apple, OpenAI and Anthropic.
In recent months, Apple started considering a move away from AFM models for a new version of its Siri voice assistant. The work includes powering Siri with OpenAI's ChatGPT or Anthropic PBC's Claude models.
The company is simultaneously working on a competing version based on new AFM models. While a final decision hasn't been made, Apple's exploration of outside options has triggered unease within AFM.
Internally, executives have sought to reassure the team members, saying their work remains important to Apple's AI strategy. They have told engineers that the company is committed to in-house model development, part of a broader desire to own critical underlying technologies, as the company has done with chips in recent years.
But Apple's own policies have made it harder for its AI team to keep up with competitors. The company has a longstanding commitment to privacy and generally favors handling AI tasks on devices — rather than in the cloud — so the data doesn't have to be processed somewhere out of the users' control. That approach limits AI capabilities because phones aren't as powerful as data centers.
Apple Intelligence mostly relies on an on-device model with 3 billion parameters, a measure of complexity and learning capacity. Competitors, in contrast, offer cloud-based systems with a trillion-plus parameters. Apple does have its own cloud model, but that's in the range of 150 billion parameters.
The AFM group is now overseen by Zhifeng Chen and reports to Daphne Luong, head of AI research at Apple. She answers to John Giannandrea, senior vice president of AI.
Gurman writes for Bloomberg.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
13 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Finally! iOS 26 fixes this annoying group message problem
I use group messages on my iPhone every single day. Between different friend groups, family messages, and hockey teams, I can barely go an hour without receiving some kind of group message — sometimes from the blue bubbles and sometimes from the dreaded green ones. Due to the group messages with various hockey teams, I end up in group chats with people I don't know almost every season (we use these threads to get a head count before the game). Before iOS 26, adding people in the thread to your contacts was a pain — not only did it require a bunch of extra steps, but it also required some degree of memory, a skill I'm sorely lacking. With Apple's significant iOS updates coming to the next version (the first with the new naming convention), you can now add people to your contacts list directly from a message thread, making it easier to identify who's who and store their information in your phone for future reference. Doesn't sound like a big deal to you? Let me explain why it's awesome. In iOS 18 (and other previous iOS versions), adding someone to your contacts was a tedious process. In the case of my hockey teams, we'd have everyone in the thread say their name in a message, making it so we know who each person is. Actually putting them in the contacts was frustrating. Here's what you had to do: Here's the step-by-step process in iOS 26: Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. That's it. If you're added to numerous group chats with strangers and would like to have those strangers enter your contact list, you'll be excited to download iOS 26 to your device. Of course, with the iOS 26 public beta already available, you don't even need to wait (as long as you're willing to deal with beta software and some of the kinks that come with it. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Business of Fashion
15 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
Introducing The Brain of Fashion
When I first started writing The Business of Fashion in 2007 as a blog and occasional newsletter, it was simply a place for me to explore an industry that had always fascinated me. At the time, blogs and newsletters like mine were completely new to the fashion industry. At 6am London time, mine was the only fashion newsletter in your inbox. I was lucky to have been in the right place, at the right time. Soon, digital and social media would transform fashion and BoF would earn its place as the leading global resource for fashion professionals around the world. I learned a very important lesson from this little digital experiment: never be complacent. When breakthrough technologies emerge, rather than reject them, it is important to understand how you might use them. We are at another one of those technological inflection points now. The way people consume business analysis and information is changing, with the rise of new AI tools like ChatGPT. This is changing the expectations of our readers who increasingly expect clear, direct and accurate answers to specific research questions — delivered quickly and reliably. Today, we're excited to invite our BoF Professional community to test a new AI-driven research tool developed in partnership with — designed to help you engage even more deeply with BoF's award-winning journalism. The Brain of Fashion is our new generative AI tool, trained on BoF's archive of more than 45,000 articles, reports, case studies and profiles. It is designed to help you make faster, smarter decisions by answering your questions about the fashion, luxury and beauty industries with speed, relevance and depth. So how is this different from other more generalist AI tools on the market? Because The Brain of Fashion is trained exclusively on BoF's verified, fact-checked reporting, you can trust that the information provided is more accurate. Our answers link directly to the original BoF articles underlying each response, so you can dig deeper in your research. That said, The Brain of Fashion is launching in beta mode because as with all new technologies, we will need to continue to test and refine it in the coming months. Your feedback will play an essential role in how we take The Brain of Fashion forward. As a BoF Professional member, you can start exploring The Brain of Fashion and submitting your research requests today. We look forward to hearing your feedback, Imran Amed, Founder and Editor-in-Chief Use of Artificial Intelligence: We offer The Brain of Fashion to provide information from the BoF content library to answer your questions. This tool is powered by third party AI systems. We cannot guarantee the completeness and accuracy of the information provided. BoF and its affiliates are not liable for any actions taken based on such information.
The Hill
43 minutes ago
- The Hill
Asian markets are mixed after Wall St tumbles following poor US jobs report
BANGKOK (AP) — Shares in Asia are mixed after Wall Street had its worst day since May following the release of weak U.S. jobs data. Markets in Asia had already reacted on Friday to U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs on imports from many U.S. trading partners, posting moderate losses. The new import duties are set to take effect on Thursday. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index lost 1.6%, bouncing back from bigger losses, to 40,134.97. The Hang Seng in Hong Kong edged 0.2% higher, to 24,589.21, while the Shanghai Composite index was nearly unchanged at 3,562.18. In South Korea, the Kospi surged 0.7% to 3,140.92. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 shed 0.2% to 8,643.00. Investors' worries about a weakening U.S. economy deepened after the latest report on job growth in the U.S. showed employers added just 73,000 jobs in July. That is sharply lower than economists expected. The Labor Department also reported that revisions shaved a stunning 258,000 jobs off May and June payrolls. 'The labor market, once a pillar of resilience, is now looking more like a late-cycle casualty, as soft data begin to replace soft landings in market discourse,' Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management said in a commentary. U.S. futures edged 0.3% higher, however, early Monday. On Friday, the S&P 500 fell 1.6%, its biggest decline since May 21 and its fourth straight loss. It closed at 6,238.01, posting a 2.4% loss for the week. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.2% to 43,588.58, while the Nasdaq composite fell 2.2% to finish at 20,650.13. Internet retail giant Amazon fell 8.3%, despite reporting encouraging profit and sales for its most recent quarter. Technology behemoth Apple fell 2.5% after also beating Wall Street's profit and revenue forecasts. Both companies face tougher operating conditions because of tariffs, with Apple forecasting a $1.1 billion hit from the fees in the current quarter. Trump's decision to order the immediate firing of the head of the government agency that produces the monthly jobs figures raised concern over whether there might be interference in future data. The surprisingly weak hiring numbers led investors to step up their expectations the Federal Reserve may cut interest rates in September. The yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to 4.21% from 4.39% just before the hiring report was released. That's a big move for the bond market. The yield on the two-year Treasury, which more closely tracks expectations for Fed actions, plunged to 3.68% from 3.94% just prior to the report's release. The Fed has held rates steady since December. A cut in rates would give the job market and overall economy a boost, but it could also risk fueling inflation, which is hovering stubbornly above the central bank's 2% target. An update on Thursday for the Fed's preferred measure of inflation showed that prices ticked higher in June, rising to 2.6% from 2.4% in May. The Fed held rates steady again at its most recent meeting this week. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has been pressured by Trump to cut the benchmark rate, though that decision isn't his to make alone, but belongs to the 12 members of the Federal Open Market Committee. Businesses, investors and the Fed have been operating under a cloud of uncertainty from Trump's tariff policy. Companies have been warning investors that unpredictable policies, with some tariffs already in effect while others change or get extended, make it difficult to plan ahead. Walmart, Procter & Gamble and many others also have warned about import taxes raising costs, eating into profits and raising prices for consumers. In other dealings early Monday, U.S, benchmark crude oil lost 18 cents to $67.15 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, fell 23 cents to $69.44 per barrel. The U.S. dollar rose to 147.80 Japanese yen from 147.26 yen. The euro weakened to $1.1577 from $1.1598.
