logo
The cost of being: An international flight attendant who's studying part-time

The cost of being: An international flight attendant who's studying part-time

The Spinoff5 days ago
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a long-haul flight attendant who spends half the year overseas shares their finances.
Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here.
Gender: Female.
Age: 21.
Ethnicity: NZ European.
Role: Full-time international flight attendant, part-time uni student and casual barista.
Salary/income/assets: $58,000 (full-time job), $3,000 (casual work). We deserve more, especially for our long hours and unique working conditions. Hopefully we hear some positive Union news soon.
My living location is: Urban.
Rent/mortgage per week: My partner and I live in a one-bedroom apartment in a new building complex (we're the first tenants in our apartment!) and pay $695 per week between the two of us – $347.50 each. The complex has access to a full gym, movie room, rooftop BBQ space and a WFH space. Our two carparks are covered and secured.
Student loan or other debt payments per week: No student loan! I have been paying off my university per paper and I think it has helped me to feel a bit more secure knowing there is no debt there. It is hard though, paying a lot of money upfront. I did have some debt that was recently all paid off: I was paying $35 a week to a collection agency who was collecting on behalf of someone's insurance agency for their car I hit, after being hit myself.
Typical weekly food costs
Groceries: $75 per person if I spend a lot of nights at home in a week. It is hard, if I'm away for work, my partner and I pay for our own food. If i'm away many nights, we might just do a $40 'top up' shop. Also an extra $20 a week for our two cats :)
Eating out: Depends on where in the world I am! I'd say around $30 a week? Crew love to go out for dinner (especially if we've seen it on TikTok…). I prefer to hit the supermarket when I'm away, mainly for breakfast and lunches. Yoghurt is filling (and cheap!).
Takeaways: Honestly, about $40 a week at the moment. Not UberEats, I'll always walk from the hotel rather than pay for a delivery. I get sick of takeaways, but when you spend over 180 nights a year in a hotel, that's bound to happen.
Workday lunches: We get food on board! So it's all provided. There are plenty of options for crew – I usually opt for the salad/cold meal choice.
Cafe coffees/snacks: Airport coffee… I drink decaf and oat. Sometimes the flight crew shout us a coffee! Otherwise, I love a coffee and a walk. When I'm home, I try to make my own. $15.
Other food costs: A coffee subscription from Eightthirty. $16 a week, one bag per week.
Savings: About $200 per week – $75 in my emergency fund, $75 in my long-term savings and $50 to my university fees. I am trying to get my emergency fund to $5,000 this year, and it's currently at $2,675 – over halfway! I have lots of different accounts, so there is money incase anything goes wrong. With my casual job, all that money goes to my 'travel fund' so I can use my staff travel and go cool places – I'm very lucky in this regard.
I worry about money: Sometimes.
Three words to describe my financial situation: Cautious, mindful and positive.
My biggest edible indulgence would be: Bakery pastries. I LOVE a good croissant.
In a typical week my alcohol expenditure would be: $0!! Sober 2025 was my new year's resolution and so far, so good.
In a typical week my transport expenditure would be: $50 petrol. I'm lucky that when I drive to work, my car is usually parked there for a few days… Less commuting. I don't use public transport. If the system was good – like Sydney's – I would!
I estimate in the past year the ballpark amount I spent on my personal clothing (including sleepwear and underwear) was: $680. I don't love clothes shopping and I wear things until they break. Including shoes!
My most expensive clothing in the past year was: Doc Martens slides/sandals. I LOVE them. $380.
My last pair of shoes cost: As above!!
My grooming/beauty expenditure in a year is about: About $1000…. possibly more. I don't dye my hair, but I get it cut about three times a year. Most of my money here goes towards makeup. For work, and also I'm a sucker for a new launch.
My exercise expenditure in a year is about: There is a gym at home, which I use. I also try to go to pilates using ClassPass which is $75 a month.
My last Friday night cost: $15! A Coke Zero and an ice cream in Queenstown.
Most regrettable purchase in the last 12 months was: So much makeup that I don't actually enjoy.
Most indulgent purchase (that I don't regret) in the last 12 months was: My new phone. It's a new iPhone – my old one gave up and I decided to purchase a good one.
One area where I'm a bit of a tightwad is: Clothing. I only buy things I need.
Five words to describe my financial personality would be: Careful. Optimistic. Thoughtful. Sometimes splurging.
I grew up in a house where money was: Talked about, but not in detail. We never struggled but nor were we going on yearly holidays or anything like that.
The last time my Eftpos card was declined was: Last week, I forgot to transfer $$ from one account to another.
In five years, in financial terms, I see myself: Hopefully with a mortgage… I would love to buy my own home.
I would love to have more money for: Travel!!
Describe your financial low: When I had just moved out of home, and was learning how much the world cost. I had to figure it out quickly – but was scraping by for a few weeks.
I give money away to: Doctors Without Borders, and the SPCA.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government's Transport Policies Are Flawed
Government's Transport Policies Are Flawed

Scoop

timean hour ago

  • Scoop

Government's Transport Policies Are Flawed

The government is disingenuous about its road management policies, especially when it comes to pot holes and resurfacing costs. The government brought this about by allowing trucks to become heavier than NZ roads can take and travel faster than it is safe for them to go with the added side effect of causing more road damage. Vehicles over 3 tonnes pay just 14% of the cost of building and maintaining roads in NZ and do 93% 0f the damage to roads. Since the extra damage has occurred the government has had to add a further $4b for pot holes and resurfacing over three years to fix the problem. National coordinator for TRAC, Niall Robertson says, 'We have the biggest and heaviest trucks in the world and they are driving on the flimsiest roads in the world. This is an astounding fact, especially as KiwiRail are now doing just 9% of the freight task'. Robertson adds, 'Rail should be doing between 30 to 40% of the freight task but for some reason, this is not the case'. TRAC chair Guy Wellwood says that KiwiRail are expected to follow a business formula set by treasury, the major shareholder, but Wellwood says, 'The formula is not working because it ignores all of the advantages of rail while concentrating on a small fiscal goal which is irrelevant to most New Zealanders'. Robertson says, 'There is too much use of road transport and rail is not utilised enough. This is because there appears to be an endless stream of infrastructure money from road users, taxpayers and ratepayers, but KiwiRail have to justify every penny spent.' Robertson adds, 'That's why roads like SH2 from Gisborne to Napier remain open but the adjacent rail is mothballed'. Guy Wellwood says that SH2 is really not suitable for the amount of trucks on the road and rail is the best way to move freight in and out of this region, but this is dependent on KiwiRail resources and that they are putting their resources into other busier trunk routes and the Golden Triangle. Wellwood says, 'This is ridiculous and is why the below wheel infrastructure should not tied to KiwiRail's fortunes, but to the nation to provide an opportunity for another operator to run trains on this route for the good of the region, for rail customers, for greater road safety, to reduce greenhouse gases, to reduce road pollution, to reduce road maintenance and building costs and to decrease congestion on this difficult highway. Rail also provides sustainability and improves New Zealand's green credentials which are becoming increasingly important for trade.' Robertson says that if the connection on the Stratford to Taumarunui line was reopened it would be possible for rail to move up to 2000 tonnes of logs per day from the King Country to Port Taranaki. Robertson adds, 'On SH3 between Whanganui and Port Taranaki, there are up to 1000 log trucks per week which pass 5 or 6 schools in New Plymouth city alone on their way to the port. No wonder the roads are falling to pieces'. Wellwood says, ': KiwiRail need to up their game and start moving some of this tonnage. Why they haven't is a mystery to me'. Government policy tends to favour road infrastructure funding over rail, yet rail is the most suitable way to move 30% - 40% of all freight and should be funded accordingly, but due to climate of populist, but flawed thinking this is not happening. Robertson says, 'Large parts of the railway have been severely damaged due to neglect and political vandalism with little concern for the communities, businesses, ratepayers and taxpayers that these decisions affect!'

Westpac warns of multimillion-dollar ‘subscription trap'
Westpac warns of multimillion-dollar ‘subscription trap'

NZ Herald

time3 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Westpac warns of multimillion-dollar ‘subscription trap'

Barnes said the block was implemented after a spike in customer complaints and feedback on overseas subscriptions. Many were businesses based in Europe and the UK, he said. Barnes said it would only apply to businesses who misled customers and then made it extremely difficult to cancel recurring payments. Westpac said it had helped to stop more than $25m in unwanted charges being processed on to the cards of unwitting customers. Photo / 123RF 'These types of businesses aren't necessarily acting fraudulently, because they do disclose the subscription details in their fine print, but typically they don't offer this information up front,' Barnes said. 'It's not normally until the following month or two when [the customer] sees the recurring fee from a credit card account that they actually twig that something's not quite right.' He said it was an unethical way of making money but was seen in everything from gift boxes, shoes, clothing and accessories to sportswear and digital content. 'This is not just a case of someone signing up for a free trial and forgetting to cancel before the subscription kicks in. Typically, once someone has made a purchase through a merchant like this, they only realise they have signed up to a subscription when they see further charges on their credit card. 'When they contact the merchant to dispute the transaction, it can often be difficult and time-consuming to cancel the subscription, and sometimes the merchant may be completely uncontactable. Customers may eventually resort to cancelling their credit card to stop the payments, which can be disruptive and inconvenient. 'Blocking these types of payments is another way we can help protect customers, on top of initiatives like rolling out a confirmation of payee service and enhancing our fraud monitoring systems with biometric technology.' He said a block would also stop customers' details being made available to unscrupulous third parties online. Westpac was working with other banks on the problem. 'While this payment block has been working well so far, we encourage New Zealanders to be careful when transacting online, including reading the fine print when making purchases. 'If something doesn't look or feel right, take a step back and check whether the payment you're making is legitimate.' - RNZ

Lobbying Docs Show Govt's Weakness
Lobbying Docs Show Govt's Weakness

Scoop

time4 hours ago

  • Scoop

Lobbying Docs Show Govt's Weakness

Today's revelations of tobacco industry lobbying lay bare why Labour's Tobacco Transparency Bill is needed to stop governments putting the interests of the industry above people's health. Today's RNZ story shows the wide range of politicians, experts, and officials tobacco lobbyists Philip Morris targeted to influence regulations and garner support for their products, including targeting Winston Peters. 'Christopher Luxon's weak leadership has allowed Winston Peters and the tobacco industry ride roughshod over him by agreeing to a $200 million tax break for the tobacco industry,' Labour health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall said. 'Philip Morris even wrote legislation for NZ First to loosen the regulations around vaping. They note that Winston Peters is 'industry friendly and highly geared towards commercial interests in the sector. 'I launched a members' bill earlier this year to require disclosure of government contact with the tobacco industry, to make sure industry efforts to undermine New Zealanders' health are reported,' Ayesha Verrall said. The documents revealed today also show how vaping company JUUL targeted New Zealand as a market. 'It's gutting to think we might not have the youth vaping problem we have today if my Bill was in place in 2018 before any of this lobbying took place. 'Around the world, tobacco companies have a long history of influencing and weakening health policies to better suit their bottom line – and here we see evidence of it happening in New Zealand. 'It's time we get rid of the smokescreen and protect Kiwis from big tobacco's lobbying tactics – they have no place in health policy,' Ayesha Verrall said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store