Online Safety Act ‘not up for negotiation' in US trade talks, says minister
There have been reports that, in the wake of lobbying from US-based tech giants, President Donald Trump would push the UK to water down online safety laws in exchange for a trade deal or relief from tariffs.
But when asked directly by MPs on the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee if the Act could be part of trade negotiations, parliamentary under-secretary for online safety Baroness Jones of Whitchurch said: 'The Prime Minister has made it absolutely clear that the Online Safety Act is not up for negotiation.
'It's not part of the trade deal discussions. We've made that clear, and the fact is that the Online Safety Act is a piece of legislation – it can't just be negotiated away.
'It's well through the process of being implemented, so it can't be changed, and we're happy to reassure everybody that we are sticking with the Online Safety Act.'
The online safety rules are currently being steadily rolled out and, once fully in place, will require platforms hosting user-generated content, such as social media sites, to protect users, in particular children, from illegal and harmful content, as well as put measures in place to ensure users do not encounter harm.
Those found in breach of the rules could face fines of up to £18 million, or up to 10% of global turnover – whichever is greater – and, in the most serious cases, sites could be blocked from the UK.
Giving evidence earlier in the session, Mark Bunting, from Ofcom, said that, had the Online Safety Act been in force during last summer's riots, which were sparked by misinformation spreading on social media in the wake of the Southport stabbings, platforms would have faced action from the communications regulator.
During an appearance before the committee in February, tech firms including Meta, TikTok and X had suggested very little would have been different had the online safety rules been in force, but Mr Bunting did not agree.
'I think we were very clear that we thought there were a number of questions that the tech firms would have had to answer had the duties been in force when those events took place,' he told MPs.
'Now, I don't want to go back and legislate events that happened before the duties were in force, but I think I can say that we don't think the companies are sufficiently, consistently or effectively responding to events of this kind, and, as the committee will probably be aware, we're working now on proposals for further measures in our codes of practice for companies to implement crisis response protocols, specifically in response to the events of last summer.
'It will expect companies to be doing a lot more and to be able to be much more accountable for their response than they have been in the past.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
13 minutes ago
- Reuters
US issues expedited permit for proposed Tennessee coal mine
July 8 (Reuters) - The Trump administration said it permitted a proposed coal mine in Claiborne County, Tennessee on Tuesday under an expedited process aimed at accelerating federal environmental reviews of energy projects. In a statement, the Department of the Interior said it granted approval for Hurricane Creek Mining LLC to mine coal on Bryson Mountain in Claiborne County, Tennessee. The mine will produce up to 1.8 million tons of coal over the next decade, the agency said. The site was previously mined at various times between the 1950s and 2010. The rushed permit is aligned with President Donald Trump's goal to increase coal mining as part of his energy dominance agenda. The project is on private land but under federal law must be permitted by Interior's Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement. Hurricane Creek Mining could not immediately be reached for comment. In April, Interior said it would implement an emergency permitting process for energy and mining projects, slashing approval times that typically take months or years to 28 days. The department took another action this week to support coal. Interior's Bureau of Land Management on Monday said it is taking public comment on opening up coal leasing on public lands in the Powder River Basin in Montana and Wyoming. Comments will be taken through August 7 on opening up lands that former President Joe Biden put off-limits to leasing.
Wales Online
22 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Small business owner 'gutted' as vandals target shop
Small business owner 'gutted' as vandals target shop A Welsh business owner faces being hundreds of pounds out of pocket after finding his shop 'smashed in' A Newport-based business found itself the target of a vandal (Image: Jay's Barbers ) An independent barber has been left counting the cost after his shop window was smashed in with a brick in a targeted act of vandalism. Jamie Cork, owner of Jay's Barbers in Newport, arrived at his shop on Saturday, July 5, to find the front window shattered and a brick left inside. The small business has been running for just over a year, without any previous issues. "I have never had any problems at all, so it caught me off guard," Jamie shared. "Since this has happened, I have been made aware that another business has had similar problems and it has been said on social media that some homes have been targeted in the area too." Jamie had closed the shop as usual at 6pm on Friday, July 4. When returning for his shift at 8am the following day, he discovered the damage. "My cousin had picked me up as I was cutting his hair. We drove past and I noticed that the window was smashed in. "I was just gutted," he said. "It's a small business and I work alone - it's just not something you expect to turn up to." Never miss a Newport story by subscribing to our newsletter here Article continues below He added that the window had played a key role in promoting the business. "I don't have a sign above the shop, so the window displayed all my details - the name, logo, contact, Instagram - and was a way to welcome people in. I've been leaving my window open now, just to show people that I am open." The cost of the damage, in addition to having the window boarded up, is estimated at hundreds of pounds. Despite the incident, the shop remains open for business as police investigate. The damage to the window, in addition to the temporary board will likely cost Jamie hundreds of pounds (Image: Jay's Barbers ) Article continues below A spokesperson for Gwent Police, said: "We had a call on 5 July reporting criminal damage where a window had been smashed. It happened sometime between 6pm on 4 July and 8am on 5 July. "An investigation is ongoing, anyone with any information can call Gwent Police on 101, quoting 2500213133, you can direct message on Facebook or X, or contact police online. Alternatively, you can call Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111 or visit
NBC News
37 minutes ago
- NBC News
Supreme Court allows Trump to move forward with mass firings at federal agencies
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed President Donald Trump at least temporarily to move ahead with plans to impose reductions in force and reorganize various government agencies. The court imposed an administrative stay in the case at the request of the Trump administration. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only justice to provide a written dissenting opinion. At issue is a ruling by California-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, who ruled in May that while the president can seek to make changes, there are limits when done wholesale. "Agencies may not conduct large-scale reorganizations and reductions in force in blatant disregard of Congress's mandates, and a President may not initiate large-scale executive branch reorganization without partnering with Congress," she wrote. The justices made clear Tuesday that their order is not about the legality of any individual agency reduction in force or reorganization plan, only the legality of Trump's executive order and an administration memo related to workforce plans. In her dissenting opinion, Jackson wrote, "this decision is not only truly unfortunate but also hubristic and senseless.' The decision affects 19 federal agencies as well as the White House-adjacent Office of Management and Budget, Office of Personnel Management and U.S. DOGE Service. Solicitor General D. John Sauer said in court papers that Illston's ruling is based on the "indefensible premise" that the presidents needs permission from Congress to carry out his duties as delineated in Article II of the Constitution. "Controlling the personnel of federal agencies lies at the heartland of this authority," he wrote. "The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the President does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers." The legal challenge was brought by various unions and nonprofit groups, including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, as well as certain local jurisdictions including the cities of Chicago and Baltimore. Their lawyers said that if the court granted Trump's request "statutorily required and authorized programs, offices, and functions across the federal government will be abolished" with some departments "radically downsized." As such, they urged that the court allow the litigation to conclude before deciding whether Trump can implement his plan.
