logo
Why Israel and Hamas Won't Stop Fighting

Why Israel and Hamas Won't Stop Fighting

Hindustan Times6 days ago
TEL AVIV—Israel wrapped up its campaign against Iran in 12 days. It finished its fight with the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah in two months. But after nearly two years of fighting, Israel's war in Gaza continues.
More than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to the Gazan health ministry. A deadly hunger crisis has taken hold. Many of the roughly two million people trapped inside Gaza struggle daily to find food, shelter and medical care. Vast swaths of the Strip have been reduced to mounds of concrete and rebar.
The violence and hunger have eroded Israel's standing on the global stage. In the U.S. and Europe, large portions of the population have turned against the country. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Tuesday that the U.K. would recognize a Palestinian state in September unless Israel takes 'substantive steps' to end the war in Gaza, following a similar pledge by France.
Inside Israel, polls show a majority of Israelis say it is time for the war to end, as they watch the number of Israeli troops and hostages killed in Gaza rise. Many exhausted Israeli soldiers agree.
The strategic goals of the warring parties, however, seem nearly unbridgeable. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is seeking the complete surrender or elimination of Hamas. The one thing Hamas won't give up—despite the loss of most of its senior leadership and fighting capabilities and the suffering of the people of Gaza—is its existence as an armed group fighting Israel. Until one side gives in, the war is likely to grind on.
On Friday, after weeks of cease-fire talks in Doha, Qatar, and expressions of optimism from the White House that a deal was imminent, Israel and the U.S. recalled their negotiating teams. The talks, aimed at reaching a temporary cease-fire and the release of some of hostages, stalled amid familiar recriminations over which side was standing in the way of a deal.
Amir Avivi, a former Israeli defense official who is close to the current government, said Israel mistakenly believed it had a strong negotiating hand with Hamas after defeating Iran and Hezbollah and taking over most of the Gaza Strip. 'But it didn't happen,' he said.
The two sides couldn't come to terms on such seemingly small issues as who would distribute humanitarian aid, where Israeli troops would be stationed, the number of Palestinian prisoners to be exchanged for Israeli hostages and the opening of a border between Gaza and Egypt, Arab officials said.
Palestinians carry aid supplies on Tuesday in Beit Lahia, in the northern Gaza Strip.
After Palestinian Islamist militant group Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing nearly 1,200 people and taking another 251 hostage, Netanyahu vowed to eliminate Hamas. He hasn't backed off that goal in the 21 months since.
After the war with Iran, Netanyahu stressed that Israel's fight with Tehran has opened up historic diplomatic opportunities that likely require at least a temporary respite in the fighting in Gaza. On Thursday, though, he indicated Israel was holding firm in cease-fire talks with Hamas.
'If Hamas perceives our willingness to reach a deal as weakness, as an opportunity to dictate to us terms of surrender that will endanger the state of Israel, it is making a great mistake,' Netanyahu said
President Trump, Israel's most important backer, has called repeatedly for an end to hostilities. On Friday, he accused Hamas of obstructing a deal over fear of what happens to the group when it no longer has any hostages. He also said the U.S. would help get aid into the enclave, acknowledging that people there are starving.
Ghazi Hamad, a senior Hamas official, said in an interview Saturday night with Saudi news channel Al Arabiya that the group would continue to hold out for a deal that will lead to an end to the war and a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. In a speech on Sunday, Khalil al-Hayya, Hamas's top negotiator, called on civilians in neighboring Arab countries to break into Gaza to bring food, and to invade Israel.
Different goals
Israel's goals in both Lebanon and Iran were more modest, and its operations there were planned years in advance. It wanted the powerful Lebanese militia Hezbollah to pull back from its border with Israel and adhere to a United Nations resolution that called for its disarmament. In Iran, it sought to set back that nation's nuclear ambitions and ballistic missile capabilities. In neither case was it looking for the total destruction of those entities, let alone regime change.
Israel's military successes in Gaza, including killing the Oct. 7 mastermind Yahya Sinwar, haven't been enough to foreclose the possibility that Hamas will pop back up, declare victory and go back to ruling Gaza after the war ends, as it did during a two-month cease-fire implemented in January.
Hamas militants standing guard in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip, when hostages were handed over on Feb. 22.
Hamas has agreed to cede governing power and allow a technocratic committee to manage Gaza after the war, but it hasn't agreed to disband its armed wing, and Israeli leaders fear it will control Gaza from behind the scenes.
Israel's military estimates it has killed more than 20,000 militants, including nearly all of Hamas's top leaders in Gaza. But Hamas remains the strongest Palestinian force in Gaza, and it has recruited thousands of new fighters since the war began, according to Israeli and Arab officials.
If the goal is to wipe out all of Hamas's military and operational capabilities, the war is 'not a matter of weeks or months, it's a matter of years,' said Ofer Guterman, a senior researcher at the Tel Aviv-based Institute for National Security Studies.
Israel has few new military options left to push Hamas to surrender. Israeli forces say they now control about 75% of the Gaza Strip. The military could move into the areas it hasn't yet taken over, but that would require the army to enter large population centers still under Hamas control and where Israeli officials believe the group holds hostages.
According to the U.N., only 425,000 of around two million people living in Gaza are currently in the humanitarian zone along Gaza's southern coast. Entering the big population centers would be one of Israel's biggest challenges to date.
As the war drags on, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza has grown, as have deaths attributed to starvation. On Sunday, Israel's army announced it would pause fighting in populated areas each day from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. to facilitate the flow of aid and secure safe routes for aid workers.
Israel could continue to fight Hamas indefinitely through tactical raids, airstrikes aimed at killing more of its leaders and operations to rescue hostages. Israel believes around 20 remain alive and that Hamas holds 30 bodies. The hostages have constrained the military's ability to take out Hamas strongholds.
Israeli security analysts said Israel could try to increase pressure on Hamas by sidelining or even assassinating its leaders in Doha and negotiating directly with Hamas operatives on the ground in Gaza to free the hostages. The U.S. and Israel could press to extradite to the U.S. Hamas's leaders in Qatar.
Those are the options left to pressure Hamas, said Avivi, the former Israeli defense official. 'This is maybe the last chance we have to release the hostages without taking risks that may endanger their lives,' he said.
Critics of Netanyahu say his unwillingness to accept existing alternatives for governing Gaza, such as the West Bank's Palestinian Authority, has deprived Israel of an important tool for forcing out Hamas. Netanyahu portrays the Palestinian Authority as terrorist sympathizers no different from Hamas.
Guterman, the national-security researcher who once served as a senior Israeli intelligence official, said the failure of Oct. 7 has made it emotionally and politically difficult to end the war without the ability to say an attack by Hamas will never happen again.
An Israeli military vehicle in June near the Israel-Gaza border.
'There is the factor of humiliation on the personal level of decision makers like Prime Minister Netanyahu and his ministers,' said Guterman. 'We have to fix the deterrence that was lost so nobody can do such a thing to Israel and just stay alive.'
Reputational hit
Israel's global reputation has taken a big blow as the war has dragged on. In the U.S., more than half of Americans now hold an unfavorable view of Israel, according to a Pew Research Center poll published in June. France has sought to ban or limit participation of Israeli defense companies in leading defense exhibitions. The U.K. has paused trade talks and joined Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway in sanctioning senior far-right ministers. Many Israelis say that when they travel abroad, they are afraid to say where they're from.
Last week, 28 countries signed a letter demanding an immediate cease-fire in Gaza, including the U.K., France, Italy, Canada, Austria, Spain, the Netherlands, Japan, Greece and Belgium.
Demonstrators in Tel Aviv on June 28 calling for the immediate release of hostages held in Gaza.
Outside of Israel, Jews who hold pro-Israel views have found themselves ostracized by both the progressive left and the far right.
Inside Israel, polls show more than 70% of Israelis want the fighting to end and the hostages to be freed. Even among voters for Netanyahu's right-wing Likud party, some 50% now say they support ending the war through a hostage deal, according to polling by the Israel Democracy Institute, a Jerusalem-based think tank.
Some of Netanyahu's far-right coalition allies have been doubling down, saying the country should focus exclusively on defeating Hamas militarily and stop negotiating temporary cease-fires. They argue that a total defeat of Hamas is more important for Israel's future than securing the freedom of the rest of the hostages through negotiations.
'The humiliating ceremony of negotiations with terrorists is over. Dear prime minister, now is the time for victory,' Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, a far-right leader in the government, wrote in an X post on Friday.
Israel's opposition, along with the majority of Israeli civilians and families of hostages, support an immediate negotiated end to the war, rather than the temporary cease-fire and two-phase deal Israel's government has been pushing for.
Israeli troops on June 26 carrying the coffin of one of the soldiers killed in an attack on their armored vehicle in Gaza.
Many Israelis worry about the toll the war is taking on soldiers, especially reservists who have had to leave their families and jobs for long stretches of time. More than 400 Israeli soldiers have been killed in Gaza since Israel's invasion of the Strip.
Israel has a very small standing army and relies on reservists for most of its troops. They are exhausted from fighting on expanding fronts in one of the longest stretches of war in the nation's history. Commanders say it is getting harder to recruit men for new fighting.
'Every day people now are killed, and for what?' said a reservist from the 98th commando division, who served in Gaza for months on end after Oct. 7. He has decided not to go back. He said the fighting endangers the lives of the hostages and that, in his view, it is impossible to completely destroy Hamas due to its use of guerrilla warfare.
'It's no longer a just war,' he said.
Write to Dov Lieber at dov.lieber@wsj.com and Shayndi Raice at Shayndi.Raice@wsj.com
Why Israel and Hamas Won't Stop Fighting
Why Israel and Hamas Won't Stop Fighting
Why Israel and Hamas Won't Stop Fighting
Why Israel and Hamas Won't Stop Fighting
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Netanyahu Set To Unveil New War Plan, May Order 'Total Conquest Of Gaza'  Gaza Ceasefire
Netanyahu Set To Unveil New War Plan, May Order 'Total Conquest Of Gaza'  Gaza Ceasefire

News18

time21 minutes ago

  • News18

Netanyahu Set To Unveil New War Plan, May Order 'Total Conquest Of Gaza' Gaza Ceasefire

sraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is to propose fully reoccupying the Gaza Strip when he meets his security cabinet, Israeli media say."The die has been cast. We're going for the full conquest of the Gaza Strip – and defeating Hamas," local journalists quote a senior official to reports that the army chief and other military leaders oppose the plan, the unnamed official said: "If that doesn't work for the chief of staff, he should resign." Source: Reuters News18 Mobile App -

Netanyahu hints at expanded war in Gaza but former Israeli military and spy chiefs object
Netanyahu hints at expanded war in Gaza but former Israeli military and spy chiefs object

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Netanyahu hints at expanded war in Gaza but former Israeli military and spy chiefs object

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hinted at wider military action in devastated Gaza on Tuesday, even as former Israeli army and intelligence chiefs called for an end to the nearly 22-month war. The new pressure on Netanyahu came as Gaza's Health Ministry said the Palestinian death toll had surpassed 61,000. Health officials reported new deaths of hungry Palestinians seeking food at distribution points. As desperation mounts, the Israeli defense body coordinating aid announced a deal with local merchants to improve aid deliveries. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Former security officials speaking out included previous leaders of Israel's Shin Bet internal security service, Mossad spy agency and the military - and ex-Prime Minister Ehud Barak. In a video posted to social media this week, they said far-right members of the government are holding Israel "hostage" in prolonging the conflict. Netanyahu's objectives in Gaza are "a fantasy," Yoram Cohen, former head of Shin Bet, said in the video. "If anyone imagines that we can reach every terrorist and every pit and every weapon, and in parallel bring our hostages home - I think it is impossible," he said. Live Events Tougher military action possible Netanyahu announced Monday that he would convene his Security Cabinet to direct the military on the war's next stage, hinting that even tougher action was possible. That meeting has begun, according to an Israeli official familiar with the matter, speaking on condition of anonymity because there was no formal announcement. Netanyahu said his objectives include defeating Hamas , releasing all 50 remaining hostages and ensuring Gaza never again threatens Israel after the Hamas-led 2023 attack sparked the war. Israeli media reported disagreements between Netanyahu and the army chief, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, on how to proceed. The reports, citing anonymous officials in Netanyahu's office, said the prime minister was pushing the army, which controls about three quarters of Gaza, to conquer the entire territory - a step that could endanger hostages, deepen the humanitarian crisis and further isolate Israel internationally. Various reports have said Zamir opposes this step and could step down or be pushed out if it is approved. Israeli officials did not respond to requests for comment on the reports. Egypt's leader calls for war to end Egypt is a mediator in ceasefire talks, and its President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi said Israel's war in Gaza has become a "war of starvation, genocide and liquidation of the Palestinian cause." El-Sissi said the war no longer aims at achieving political aims or releasing the hostages. He reiterated his call for European governments and U.S. President Donald Trump to help stop the war and deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza's over 2 million people. Long lines of trucks waiting to enter Gaza from Egypt have been a recurring image of the war. Egypt has strong security ties with Israel. More aid-seekers killed Health officials in Gaza said Israeli forces opened fire Tuesday morning toward Palestinians seeking aid and in targeted attacks in central and southern Gaza, killing at least 25 people. Israel's military did not immediately comment. The dead included 19 in southern Gaza, 12 of them seeking aid near the Morag corridor and in the Teina area, some 3 kilometers (1.8 miles) from the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation hub east of Khan Younis, according to Nasser Hospital and the Health Ministry. The ministry doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians but says roughly half the dead have been women and children. It operates under the Hamas government. The U.N. and other international organizations see it as the most reliable source of casualty data. Elsewhere in central Gaza, Al-Awda hospital said it received the bodies of six Palestinians who were killed when Israeli troops targeted crowds near another GHF aid distribution site. The GHF said there were no incidents at its sites Tuesday. Several hundred Palestinians have been killed by Israeli fire since May while heading toward food distribution sites, airdropped parcels and aid convoys, according to witnesses, local health officials and the U.N. human rights office. Israel's military says it only has fired warning shots and disputes the toll. The Israeli defense body in charge of coordinating aid, COGAT, said on social media there will be a "gradual and controlled renewal of the entry of goods through the private sector in Gaza." It said a limited number of local merchants were approved for the plan. 'Stained with humiliation and blood' Mohammed Qassas from Khan Younis said his young children are so hungry that he is forced to storm aid trucks, which rarely reach warehouses these days because they are stopped by hungry crowds. "How am I supposed to feed them? No one has mercy. This resembles the end of the world," he said Monday. "If we fight, we get the food. If we don't fight, we don't get anything." It has become routine to see men returning from aid-seeking carrying bodies as well as sacks of flour. Yusif Abu Mor from Khan Younis called the current aid system akin to a death trap. "This aid is stained with humiliation and blood," he said, adding that aid seekers run the risk of being shot dead by Israel's military or run over by trucks in the chaotic crowds. Israel's blockade and military offensive have made it nearly impossible to safely deliver aid, contributing to the territory's slide toward famine. Aid groups say Israel's week-old measures to allow more aid in are far from sufficient. Families of hostages in Gaza fear starvation affects them too, but blame Hamas. As international alarm has mounted, several countries have airdropped aid over Gaza. The U.N. and aid groups call such drops costly and dangerous for residents, and say they deliver far less aid than trucks. 'The entire world is watching' Palestinians gather daily for funeral prayers. "We are unarmed people who cannot endure this," shouted Maryam Abu Hatab in the yard of Nasser hospital. Ekram Nasr said her son was shot dead while seeking aid near the Morag corridor. "I had to go alone to carry my son," she said, tears in her eyes. "I collected the remains of my son like the meat of dogs from the streets." She added: "The entire world is watching. They are watching our patience, our strength and our faith in God. But we no longer have the power to endure." Economic Times WhatsApp channel )

UPSC Key: Rhisotope Project, Article 370 of the Constitution and Adivasi Rights
UPSC Key: Rhisotope Project, Article 370 of the Constitution and Adivasi Rights

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

UPSC Key: Rhisotope Project, Article 370 of the Constitution and Adivasi Rights

Important topics and their relevance in UPSC CSE exam for August 5, 2025. If you missed the August 4, 2025 UPSC CSE exam key from the Indian Express, read it here THE WORLD Israeli officials suggest annexing parts of Gaza as Doha ceasefire talks collapse Syllabus: Preliminary Examination: Current events of national and international importance Mains Examination: General Studies II: Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India's interests What's the ongoing story: Benjamin Netanyahu will convene his security cabinet this week to decide on Israel's next steps in Gaza following the collapse of indirect ceasefire talks with Hamas, with one senior Israeli source suggesting more force could be an option. Key Points to Ponder: • 'Israel's reported intent to fully occupy Gaza'-What goals does it aim to achieve and at what costs? • How other countries and other international bodies responded to the occupation plan? • What are the broader geopolitical symbolism of Netanyahu's plan to fully occupy Gaza? • To what extent occupation might entrench militant resistance or weaken Hamas? • Do you think that forced displacement actually serves counter-insurgency goals or exacerbate insurgency risk? • Compare the current Gaza crisis to previous ceasefire breakdowns. • How should India balance its long-standing position on Palestine with broader geopolitical alignments? Key Takeaways: • Israel's cabinet could authorise on Tuesday a complete military takeover of Gaza for the first time in two decades, media reported, despite international pressure for a ceasefire to ease appalling conditions in the besieged Palestinian territory. • Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is leaning towards an expanded offensive and taking control of the entire enclave after 22 months of war against militant group Hamas, Israeli Channel 12 reported. • A senior Israeli source told Reuters on Monday that more force was an option following the collapse of indirect ceasefire talks with Hamas. • Seizing the entire territory would reverse a 2005 decision by Israel to pull settlers and military out of Gaza while retaining control over its borders – a move right-wing parties blame for Hamas gaining power there. • It was unclear, however, whether a potential full takeover of Gaza would entail a prolonged occupation or a short-term operation aimed at dismantling Hamas and freeing hostages. • Israel's coalition government is regarded as one of the most right-wing in its history, with the cabinet including parties that seek to annex both Gaza and the West Bank and encourage Palestinians to leave their homeland. • The country's military has throughout the war pushed back against the idea of Israel trying to fully occupy Gaza and establish military rule there, which would require it to take over long-term governance. Do You Know: • The conflict was triggered by a Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, when gunmen stormed the border from Gaza, killing more than 1,200 people and seizing around 250 hostages according to Israeli tallies. • Israel's military campaign has devastated the tiny, crowded enclave, killing more than 60,000 people according to Palestinian health authorities. It has forced nearly all of Gaza's over 2 million people from their homes and caused what a global hunger monitor called last week an unfolding famine. • That has caused widespread international anger and prompted several European countries to say they would recognise a Palestinian state next month if there was no ceasefire. • Inside Gaza on Tuesday, Israeli gunfire and strikes killed at least 13 Palestinians, local health authorities said, including five people in a tent in Khan Younis and three aid seekers near Rafah in the south. • Palestinians living in the last fifth of the territory where Israel has not yet taken military control via ground incursions or orders for civilians to leave said any new move to occupy the area would be catastrophic. Other Important Articles Covering the same topic: 📍Israel to decide next steps in Gaza after ceasefire talks collapse Previous year UPSC Prelims Question Covering similar theme: 1. The term 'two-state solution' is sometimes mentioned in the news in the context of the affairs of (2018) (a) China (b) Israel (c) Iraq (d) Yemen Previous year UPSC Mains Question Covering similar theme: 📍'India's relations with Israel have, of late, acquired a depth and diversity, which cannot be rolled back.' Discuss. (2018) FRONT PAGE Champion of tribal rights, he played a pivotal role in Jharkhand struggle Syllabus: Preliminary Examination: Current events of national and international importance Mains Examination: General Studies I: Salient features of Indian Society What's the ongoing story: The three-time Jharkhand CM and JMM co-founder, who passed away on Monday, leaves behind a political legacy defined as much by the statehood movement and advocacy of Adivasi rights as it is by the legal troubles he faced. Key Points to Ponder: • Personality in News-Shibu Soren • Know Shibu Soren's role in the Jharkhand statehood movement. • What was Shibu Soren's impact on tribal land and resource rights? • Which articles in the Indian Constitution specifically protect the rights of Scheduled Tribes? • How has mining and industrial expansion affected Adivasi rights and livelihoods in India? • Do you think the mainstream political system has been inclusive of Adivasi concerns? Key Takeaways: • He had only brief stints in office as Union minister and Chief Minister because of recurrent legal troubles and coalition frictions, but Shibu Soren the politician left an indelible mark on the politics of Jharkhand as a key figure of the decades-long statehood movement that ultimately led to the carving out of the state from Bihar in 2000. • Soren, popularly known as 'Guruji', passed away at 81 in Delhi Monday, but the legacy of his politics continues with his son Hemant Soren, entrenched as Jharkhand CM after a convincing victory in the Assembly elections last year. • Soren, who belonged to the Santal tribe, was born on January 11, 1944, in the Nemra village of Ramgarh in the then Bihar province. He took to public life at a young age, forming the Santal Navyuvak Sangh at just 18, and fought moneylenders who lent to tribals at exorbitant rates. It was a fight fuelled by the anger at the death of his father Shobaran who was killed by moneylenders when Soren was a boy. • Soren was elected to the Lok Sabha in 1980 and became president of his party in 1986. He represented JMM from Dumka in 1989, 1991, 1996 and 2004. In 1998 and 1999, however, he lost the parliamentary election. Do You Know: • In 2000, when Atal Bihari Vajpayee was Prime Minister, Bihar was bifurcated to create Jharkhand from South Bihar, bowing to the long-standing demand in the region. The states of Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand were also created simultaneously. Other Important Articles Covering the same topic: 📍A journey from the margins 📍Fighting for adivasi rights to demanding a state: journey of Shibu Soren Previous year UPSC Prelims Question Covering similar theme: 2. With reference to the history of India, 'Ulgulan' or the Great Tumult is the description of which of the following events? (2020) (a) The Revolt of 1857 (b) The Mappila Rebellion of 1921 (c) The Indigo Revolt of 1859-60 (d) Birsa Munda's Revolt of 1899-1900 3. Under which Schedule of the Constitution of India can the transfer of tribal land to private parties for mining be declared null and void? (2019) (a) Third Schedule (b) Fifth Schedule (c) Ninth Schedule (d) Twelfth Schedule Previous year UPSC Mains Question Covering similar theme: 📍How did the colonial rule affect the tribals in India and what was the tribal response to the colonial oppression? (2023) 📍Examine the uniqueness of tribal knowledge system when compared with mainstream knowledge and cultural systems.(2021) 📍Why are the tribals in India referred to as 'the Scheduled Tribes? Indicate the major provisions in the Constitution of India for their upliftment. 📍What are the two major legal initiatives by the State since Independence addressing discrimination against Scheduled Tribes (STs)? (2017) 'It's unjustified': India hits back as Trump warns of new tariff hike Syllabus: Preliminary Examination: Current events of national and international importance. Main Examination: General Studies II: Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India's interests. What's the ongoing story: Trump India tariff hike, India Russian oil trade: New Delhi and Washington are yet to reach a trade deal, with differences over market access for American agricultural products among the key roadblocks. Key Points to Ponder: • What rationale did Trump give for targeting India with higher tariffs? • What is India's justification for its continued Russian oil imports in response to Trump's tariff threats, citing energy security and market decisions? • Know the implications of Trump's accusation that India 'profited' from staff-retail of Russian crude oil. • How has India invoked the notion of sovereign choice in rebutting U.S. criticism? Key Takeaways: • The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) issued the strong statement late on Monday evening, soon after Trump warned that he would raise the tariff on India 'substantially'. • 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian oil, they are then, for much of the oil purchased, selling it on the open market for big profits… They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the tariff paid by India to the USA,' he said in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social. • Meanwhile, addressing an event in New Delhi earlier in the day, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar spoke of the desire for a 'fair global order', and not one 'dominated by a few'. • The MEA, in its statement, also called out the US and European Union for continuing trade with Russia. This is the first time India has targeted the US government for procuring Russian commodities for their nuclear and automobile industry. It said that India, in fact, began importing from Russia since traditional oil supplies were diverted to Europe after the Russia-Ukraine conflict started. Do You Know: • On the sourcing of energy needs, India has maintained that it is guided by what is available in the markets and by prevailing global circumstances. • The MEA statement said India's imports were meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. 'They are a necessity compelled by global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion (for them),' it said. • The Indian statement has been consistent since the war in Ukraine broke out in February 2022. It has been reiterated by Indian officials and ministers in public and in private to the American and European governments in the last three years. • 'The European Union in 2024 had a bilateral trade of Euro 67.5 billion in goods with Russia. In addition, it had trade in services estimated at Euro 17.2 billion in 2023. This is significantly more than India's total trade with Russia that year or subsequently,' it said. Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilisers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment, it said. • The escalation in rhetoric comes at a time when India has reconciled to the US administration planning penalties on India. New Delhi believes that Washington is considering the quantum of penalty and Trump's post was a warning to set the stage. So India didn't have a choice but to push back against Trump's statements. Other Important Articles Covering the same topic: 📍Against imperialism 📍EYE ON THE GOAL Previous year UPSC Mains Question Covering similar theme: 📍'What introduces friction into the ties between India and the United States is that Washington is still unable to find for India a position in its global strategy, which would satisfy India's National self-esteem and ambitions'. Explain with suitable examples. (2019) EXPRESS NETWORK Pollution boards can seek damages, bank guarantees for future, says SC Syllabus: Preliminary Examination: Current events of national and international importance. Mains Examination: General Studies III: Conservation, environmental pollution and degradation, environmental impact assessment. What's the ongoing story: In a significant decision aimed at empowering pollution control boards, the Supreme Court Monday held that they can seek compensation for restitution of damages already caused by polluting entities or demand bank guarantees to prevent any potential future environmental damage. Key Points to Ponder: • Know the significance of the Supreme Court's distinction between punitive penalties and compensatory damages in environmental governance. • How the SC's interpretation of Sections 33A and 31A realigns statutory powers of pollution control boards and impacts enforcement capabilities? • What is the relevance of the 'polluter pays' and precautionary principles in the context of the SC decision to empower Boards to demand bank guarantees ex ante? • How does the ruling change the regulatory toolkit available to pollution control boards? • What institutional reforms and subordinate legislation should follow to operationalise these powers effectively? Key Takeaways: • A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Manoj Misra set aside the Delhi HC Division Bench order which said the Boards are 'not empowered to levy compensatory damages in exercise of powers under Section 33A of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Section 31A of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 on the ground.' The HC held that such levy can be made only by courts, after taking cognisance of offences specified under the Acts. • The SC said, 'having considered the principles that govern our environmental laws and on interpretation of Sections 33A and 31A of the Water and Air Acts, we are of the opinion that that the Division Bench of the High Court was not correct in restrictively reading powers of the Boards. We are of the opinion that these regulators in exercise of these powers can impose and collect, as restitutionary or compensatory damages, fixed sum of monies or require furnishing bank guarantees as an ex-ante measure towards potential or actual environmental damage.' Do You Know: • The Delhi Pollution Control Board had approached the SC against the HC judgement which quashed the show cause notices issued by the Board to some residential complexes, commercial complexes and shopping malls which were allegedly constructed and were operating without obtaining the mandatory 'consent to establish' and 'consent to operate' under the Water Act and Air Act. • The SC judgment said, 'The Board's powers under Section 33A of the Water Act and Section 31A of the Air Act have to be read in light of the legal position on the application of the Polluter Pays principle… This means that the State Board cannot impose environmental damages in case of every contravention or offence under the Water Act and Air Act. It is only when the State Board has made a determination that some form of environmental damage or harm has been caused by the erring entity, or the same is so imminent, that the State Board must initiate action under' the provisions. Other Important Articles Covering the same topic: 📍SC says 'illegal' to grant green nod for projects after work has already begun EXPLAINED Six years without Article 370 Syllabus: Preliminary Examination: Indian Polity and Governance-Constitution, Political System, Panchayati Raj, Public Policy, Rights Issues, etc. Mains Examination: General Studies II: Indian Constitution—historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure. What's the ongoing story: It is now six years since the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution and the reorganisation of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories (UTs). Key Points to Ponder: • What is Article 370? • Which constitutional mechanism was used to interpret 'Constituent Assembly of the State' as Legislative Assembly? • Know the constitutional legality of abrogating Article 370 and Article 35A on the basis of the 2019 Presidential Orders. • What special status was given to Jammu and Kashmir? • What Article 370 of the Constitution said? • How was Article 370 enacted? • What happened in Aug 2019? • What did the Centre do in 2019? • What specific aspect of Article 370 has been contested before the Supreme Court? • What were the four key issues in the challenge to the decisions of the government? • What did the Supreme Court rule on the sovereignty of Jammu and Kashmir? • What did the Supreme Court said about Art 370? • What Supreme Court said on the legality of the abrogation of Article 370? • What Supreme Court said on the action that was taken under President's rule? • What was Karan Singh's Proclamation of 1949? • Why did Karan Singh make the proclamation? • What was the SR Bommai judgment, which the SC relied on in its Article 370 ruling? • What you know about landmark 1994 judgement in SR Bommai v Union of India? Key Takeaways: • The decision of August 5, 2019 was billed as the turning point that would usher in peace and development, and pave the way for the closer integration of the Kashmir Valley with the rest of India. • Since then, political activity has resumed in J&K, including the formation of a new government which is now pushing for full statehood. But the Pahalgam terror attack has added a new dimension to the security question. • The return of democratic representation was seen as a major milestone in the Centre's post-August 5 roadmap in J&K. But the political dynamics remain fraught with tensions and compromises. • The National Conference (NC) leads a government with reduced powers. Just before the election, control over police and services was given to the Lieutenant Governor, limiting the authority of the elected dispensation. • The Omar Abdullah Cabinet's first decision was a resolution for the restoration of statehood, after which the Chief Minister visited Delhi for meetings. The NC's cautiously worded resolution reaffirmed 'special status' and called for dialogue, while Mehbooba Mufti's PDP took a more aggressive line. • In an interview with The Indian Express, Omar conceded that the fight for Article 370 would not yield immediate results from those who 'took it away'. A senior Union government source said New Delhi views Omar as a 'pragmatic politician' who is capable of negotiating within the current structure. Do You Know: • The Centre's strongest argument for the 2019 decisions was that it would curb terrorism. Six years on, the data do show a significant decline in violence. • Only 28 terrorists have been killed in 2025 so far, down from 67 in 2024. Local recruitment has fallen drastically from 129 in 2019 to just 1 this year. In 2024, 28 civilians were killed; all 26 deaths reported this year have occurred in a single incident — the Pahalgam terror attack in April. • Incidents of stone throwing, hartals, abductions, and the snatching of weapons are down to zero. The Jammu region, which saw cross-border incursions and frequent attacks on security forces over the past three years, now reports far fewer encounters. • The Centre launched a new industrial scheme in 2021 promising incentives to attract investments. Proposed investments in J&K now total Rs 1.63 lakh crore, of which more than Rs 50,000 crore is in various stages of operationalisation. • Private investment in tourism remains sluggish despite incentives. Only five hotels have opted into the new industrial scheme. Projects like Radisson's 200-room hotel in Srinagar and JW Marriott's 150-room property in Pahalgam are exceptions. Officials cite limited availability of suitable land as a bottleneck. Other Important Articles Covering the same topic: 📍Six years on, standing still 📍If statehood is to be restored: legal path ahead Previous year UPSC Mains Question Covering similar theme: 📍To what extent is Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, bearing marginal note 'Temporary provision with respect to the State of Jammu and Kashmir', temporary? Discuss The future prospects of this provision in the context of Indian polity. (2016) ATTEMPT TO SAVE RHINOS BY GIVING THEM RADIOACTIVE HORNS Syllabus: Preliminary Examination: Current events of national and international importance. Mains Examination: General Studies III: Conservation, environmental pollution and degradation, environmental impact assessment. What's the ongoing story: A South African university launched an anti-poaching campaign on Thursday (July 31) with a unique approach – injecting radioactive isotopes into rhino horns. It claimed that the method is harmless for the rhinos and allows customs agents to detect trafficked horns. Key Points to Ponder: • The Rhisotope Project, aimed at deterring rhino poaching, is being conducted where? • How the isotope tagging works? • What are the potential ecological concerns of injecting radioactive isotopes into animal tissue? • Compare and contrast the Rhisotope tagging method with dehorning and other non lethal anti poaching strategies. • How can lessons from the Rhisotope Project inform conservation strategies in Indian rhino habitats? Key Takeaways: • According to the IAEA, radioactive isotopes or radioisotopes are the unstable form of an element that emit radiation to transform into a more stable form. The radiation can be traced, and typically causes changes in the substance it falls upon • Through a non-invasive procedure, rhino horns are tagged with low doses of radioactive isotopes, allowing for their ready detection by radiation portal monitors (RPMs) already deployed at borders, ports, and airports worldwide to identify unauthorised nuclear materials. • To test this system, the researchers used 3D-printed rhino horns with identical shielding properties to real keratin, which is the substance that makes up rhino horn. According to the university, the tests confirmed that individual horns could be detected inside full 40-foot shipping containers • The university also announced the results of the pilot phase undertaken last June, when it injected radioisotopes into 20 rhinos at the Waterberg Biosphere in Waterberg, Limpopo, about 250 kilometres north of Johannesburg in South Africa. A team from Ghent University, Belgium, monitored the health and conducted cytological examinations on 15 treated rhinos, comparing these results with five untreated animals. Do You Know: • According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature, the global rhino population was estimated to be about 500,000 at the start of the 20th century. It has since dwindled to 27,000, owing to the burgeoning demand for rhino horns. These horns are trafficked to Asian markets where they are used in traditional medicine, and also as as a status symbol. • South Africa, home to the world's largest rhino population, had lost over 10,000 rhinos to poaching over the last decade, with 103 losses reported by the South African Ministry of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment in the first quarter of this year. • While the project itself is not a cure-all or silver bullet to curb poaching, the researchers hope it will prove to be a great deterrent. It would certainly prove to be less disruptive to rhino behaviour compared to dehorning, in which rhinos' horns are removed to deter poaching. While a 2024 study published in the Science journal showed that dehorning rhinos reduced poaching by 78 per cent over seven years on eight reserves, another study the previous year established that this measure impacted their ability to socialise with their peers and noted reductions in the sizes of their home ranges. Other Important Articles Covering the same topic: 📍Explained: As tiger traders switch to rhino horn routes, enforcement plays catch-up Previous year UPSC Prelims Question Covering similar theme: 4. Consider the following statements: (2019) 1. Asiatic lion is naturally found in India only. 2. Double-humped camel is naturally found in India only. 3. One-horned rhinoceros is naturally found in India only. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 ECONOMY Amid slow EV growth, NITI proposes 'soft mandates' to boost adoption Syllabus: Preliminary Examination: Current events of national and international importance. Mains Examination: General Studies III: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways etc. What's the ongoing story: India will need 'soft' mandates – that could become more stringent over time – to accelerate electric vehicle (EV) adoption, the Centre's apex public policy think tank NITI Aayog has said in a new report. Key Points to Ponder: • The report titled 'Unlocking a $200 Billion Opportunity: Electric Vehicles in India' said what? • India's EV policy-know in detail • What exactly is NITI Aayog's recommendation for 'soft mandates' over pure incentive-driven policies? • Know the significance of targeting government fleets, public buses, and freight vehicles for EV mandates. • Compare EV adoption rates in India versus global benchmarks. Key Takeaways: • To meet the national target of 30 per cent EV sales by 2030, mandates on the sale of certain segments of vehicles such as public buses, freight fleets, and government vehicles could give the market the right signal, according to the report released on Monday. • Noting India's progress in EV adoption over the years, largely on the back of government incentives, NITI Aayog Member Rajiv Gauba said, 'It's alright to pat oneself on one's back, but we also have to acknowledge the fact that the adoption of EVs in India is at a slower pace than not only China, but also the US and the EU. Global penetration is about 17 per cent now, whereas we are at 7.6 per cent.' Do You Know: • The report titled 'Unlocking a $200 Billion Opportunity: Electric Vehicles in India' said it is 'evident that continuation of incentives alone may not help' India reach the 2030 target. 'As such it is time to give a stronger push for the shift by introducing some gentle mandates and disincentives which will help signal the required direction more firmly,' it said. • According to the report, India has the highest EV penetration rate in three-wheelers (16 per cent), followed by two-wheelers (5 per cent), buses (7 per cent), cars (2 per cent), and trucks (0.07 per cent). Other Important Articles Covering the same topic: 📍Electric Vehicles (EV) Schemes across India 2024: All you need to know Previous year UPSC Mains Question Covering similar theme: 📍How is efficient and affordable urban mass transport key to the rapid economic development in India? (2019) For any queries and feedback, contact Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X. Priya Kumari Shukla is a Senior Copy Editor in the Indian Express (digital). She contributes to the UPSC Section of Indian Express (digital) and started niche initiatives such as UPSC Key, UPSC Ethics Simplified, and The 360° UPSC Debate. The UPSC Key aims to assist students and aspirants in their preparation for the Civil Services and other competitive examinations. It provides valuable guidance on effective strategies for reading and comprehending newspaper content. The 360° UPSC Debate tackles a topic from all perspectives after sorting through various publications. The chosen framework for the discussion is structured in a manner that encompasses both the arguments in favour and against the topic, ensuring comprehensive coverage of many perspectives. Prior to her involvement with the Indian Express, she had affiliations with a non-governmental organisation (NGO) as well as several coaching and edutech enterprises. In her prior professional experience, she was responsible for creating and refining material in various domains, including article composition and voiceover video production. She has written in-house books on many subjects, including modern India, ancient Indian history, internal security, international relations, and the Indian economy. She has more than eight years of expertise in the field of content writing. Priya holds a Master's degree in Electronic Science from the University of Pune as well as an Executive Programme in Public Policy and Management (EPPPM) from the esteemed Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, widely recognised as one of the most prestigious business schools in India. She is also an alumni of Jamia Milia Islamia University Residential Coaching Academy (RCA). Priya has made diligent efforts to engage in research endeavours, acquiring the necessary skills to effectively examine and synthesise facts and empirical evidence prior to presenting their perspective. Priya demonstrates a strong passion for reading, particularly in the genres of classical Hindi, English, Maithili, and Marathi novels and novellas. Additionally, she possessed the distinction of being a cricket player at the national level. Qualification, Degrees / other achievements: Master's degree in Electronic Science from University of Pune and Executive Programme in Public Policy and Management (EPPPM) from Indian Institute of Management Calcutta ... Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store