GOP bill would ban SNAP recipients from buying junk food
Rep. Josh Brecheen, an Oklahoma Republican, sponsored the Healthy SNAP Act on Jan. 16. The bill would exclude junk food from benefits provided by the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) — the official name for food stamps — while requiring any SNAP-eligible foods to 'promote the health of SNAP recipients and reflect nutrition science, public health concerns, and cultural eating patterns.'
About 850,000 Marylanders use SNAP, according to the Maryland Department of Human Services.
'If someone wants to buy junk food on their own dime, that's up to them,' Breechen said. 'But what we're saying is, don't ask the taxpayer to pay for it and then also expect the taxpayer to pick up the tab for the resulting health consequences.'
Specifically, Brecheen's bill would exclude soft drinks, ice cream, prepared desserts such as cakes, pies and cookies and other similar foods. About 20% of SNAP benefits currently are used to purchase junk foods and sugary drinks, according to a fact sheet accompanying the legislation.
SNAP benefits may be used to buy fruits, vegetables, meat, dairy, bread, cereal, snack foods and non-alcoholic beverages. They cannot be used to buy items like alcohol, tobacco, vitamins and pet food.
Breechen noted that Trump cabinet picks such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Department of Health and Human Services nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — who has vowed to 'make America healthy again' — have advocated excluding junk food from SNAP benefits.
In 2024, Rubio and Sen. Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, led a bipartisan effort seeking to allow the government to collect more data on SNAP purchases. Their effort was designed to 'improve nutrition security and diet quality' to better inform Congress in setting policies for SNAP benefits. Booker and Rubio said in a joint statement at the time that poor nutrition is the leading factor for chronic disease.
'SNAP plays a crucial role in alleviating poverty and food insecurity, but needs to do better at improving nutrition security and diet quality for program participants,' Booker said in a July statement.
Breechen's bill to reform SNAP has support from a wide swath of Republicans — mostly representing southern states.
Similar bills have been introduced in the past and gone nowhere, but this year Republicans hold both chambers of Congress and the White House. That gives them better odds of passing changes to SNAP than in past sessions.
-----------
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Kennedy targets vaccination injury program
Health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is targeting a little-known but crucial program that underpins all childhood vaccinations. Kennedy took to social media and the show of conservative activist Charlie Kirk this week to rail against the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and pledge significant changes. 'The VICP is broken, and I intend to fix it,' he wrote on social platform X. 'I will not allow the VICP to continue to ignore its mandate and fail its mission of quickly and fairly compensating vaccine-injured individuals.' Attorneys and other experts say Kennedy is right that the program, which was created in 1986 in order to give quick payouts to families who can prove a child was injured from a vaccine, is badly in need of modernization. 'There's a lot of low hanging fruit that [Kennedy] can act on that would immediately alter the course of the vaccine program for the better,' said David Carney, a vaccine injury attorney in Philadelphia and president of the Vaccine Injured Petitioners Bar Association. Cases could be settled quicker, rather than going through a trial, Carney said. Kennedy could also press Congress to act on legislation that would increase the court staff, increase the pain and suffering caps, and add COVID-19 vaccines to the list of shots eligible for the program. It has too few staff available to handle a massive caseload, leaving patients waiting for years just to have their cases heard. It covers almost three times as many vaccines as when it was first created, but the number of 'special masters' who hear cases has stayed the same. Attorneys who argue vaccine injuries said the government has been more favorable to vaccines than petitioners in recent years, fighting against claims that would have previously been easily settled. 'It's not the fast, informal, petitioner-friendly program that Congress designed. It is very adversarial and litigious. That's absolutely, 100% true,' said Renée Gentry, director of the Vaccine Injury Litigation Clinic at George Washington University Law School. But there's fear the changes Kennedy wants will undermine the program, or tear it down entirely, risking driving drugmakers from the market and threatening access to childhood shots. Kennedy has long targeted the VICP, and his X post echoed many of his previous arguments. He did not elaborate on what changes he is making but said he is working with Attorney General Pam Bondi. He has previously said he wants to expand the program, making it easier for claimants to qualify for awards based on adverse events he claims are associated with vaccines but are not currently part of the program. People can prove injuries two ways, said Dorit Reiss, a vaccine law expert and law professor at UC San Francisco. Either you fit into the table of injuries, and then there's a presumption that the vaccine caused the harm, or you have to show causation for an injury outside the list. Kennedy has the power to add new injuries to the eligible list, like autism, which he has repeatedly linked to vaccines. In an interview with Tucker Carlson earlier in July, Kennedy also suggested vaccines are linked to numerous chronic ailments like diabetes and narcolepsy. 'We have now this epidemic of immune dysregulation in our country, and there's no way to rule out vaccines as one of the key culprits,' Kennedy said. In order to add an injury to the list, Kennedy would have to go through the federal government's cumbersome notice-and-comment rulemaking process. Experts said it's usually a time consuming and expensive undertaking, and often the scientific reviews don't show enough evidence to prove if the vaccine caused harm or not. Kennedy could also unofficially start settling cases for more injuries without adding them to the list. Yet either change could risk bankrupting the program. Families are paid through a trust fund that's funded by an excise tax on vaccine makers, so there's a finite pot of money available. The program's fund covers lawyers' fees and the costs, even for losing cases. In exchange for the tax, vaccine makers have a limited liability shield. Petitioners file claims against the federal government, not the manufacturers, and families can get compensation without having to prove that drugmakers were negligent. Kennedy has suggested he wants to change that. 'The VICP has devolved into a morass of inefficiency, favoritism, and outright corruption as government lawyers and the Special Masters who serve as Vaccine Court judges prioritize the solvency of the HHS Trust Fund, over their duty to compensate victims,' Kennedy wrote. An HHS spokesman declined to say what, if any changes Kennedy is considering, saying the secretary's comments speak for itself. A popular anti-vaccine talking point is the desire to eliminate the vaccine makers' limited liability shield. But that's only something Congress can do. Kennedy does have the power to drop vaccines from the program. Right now, it covers 16 routinely recommended immunizations for children or pregnant women. But if a shot is no longer routinely recommended, it can be removed. In early June, Kennedy abruptly fired all members of the outside advisory group responsible for making vaccine recommendations. He appointed a new group of hand-picked replacements. If that group no longer recommends the HPV vaccine, for instance, Kennedy can revise the injury table to remove it. 'If he takes it away, then those people have no right to be in this program, and they're going to have to be stuck with civil litigation,' said Gentry, which is much more difficult and expensive.
UPI
23 minutes ago
- UPI
Senate heads into recess as Trump tells Schumer to 'go to hell'
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, speaks at a press conference calling on the administration to release the Epstein files in the U.S. Capitol building last week. File Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo Aug. 3 (UPI) -- The U.S. Senate began its month‑long recess Saturday night amid negotiations to advance the nomination of dozens of Donald Trump's pending nominees, as the president told Sen. Chuck Schumer to "go to hell" when the talks collapsed. Trump, in a post to his Truth Social platform on Saturday, had wanted the Senate to stay in session but accused Schumer of "political extortion" for allegedly demanding a billion dollars in funding in order to approve dozens of his remaining "highly qualified nominees" for appointment to the administration. A source familiar with Schumer's alleged demands told Axios that Schumer wants the White House to release withheld federal funding in exchange for passing a small batch of the nominees. "Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!" Trump said in his post. "Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our country." Schumer later shared Trump's post and quipped, "The Art of the Deal." He later added that Trump had "attempted to steamroll" the Senate into approving his "historically unqualified nominees." But the standoff has led Senate Republicans to express support for the possibility that Trump use recess appointments, a controversial constitutional mechanism that allows the president to "temporarily" fill vacant positions when the Senate is in recess. "The Senate should immediately adjourn and let President Trump use recess appointments to enact the agenda 77M Americans voted for," Sen. Roger Marshall posted on Saturday. Senate Republicans also indicated they might pursue a change to Senate rules after they return from recess to make it easier to pass through confirmations. Sen. Markwayne Mullin told Fox News that lawmakers would be moving forward with a rule change in September.
Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
Ghislaine Maxwell refuses to testify without pardon: 'Cannot imagine a less sympathetic figure'
Fox News contributor Mollie Hemingway and Wall Street Journal White House reporter Annie Linskey discuss Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions for testifying before Congress.
