What Pakistanis Are Searching For On Google After India Executes 'Operation Sindoor'
'White Flag' to 'Operation Sindoor', Google in Pakistan was flooded with queries as India launched missile attack in the neighbouring country in response to Pahalgam massacre.
A string of searches were made by citizens of Pakistan after India carried out 'Operation Sindoor' in the early hours of Wednesday. For the unaware, India launched a series of strategic and targeted attacks against terror camps in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) a fortnight after the Pahalgam terror attack that ended the lives of 26 civilians. The objective was to dismantle launchpads and camps used by terror groups operating from across the Line of Control (LoC), Indian Army sources confirmed.
As social media platforms flooded with visuals of 'Operation Sindoor' carried by India, people of Pakistan scrambled to Google with a series of questions and queries they wanted answers for.
Sindoor or vermillion was used as a powerful reminder to the Pahalgam massacre. On April 22, terrorists targeted and killed men, some newly married, based on their religion. Sindoor is also worn as a symbolic pride by warriors headed to a battle.
Some other queries related to Sindoor included– 'What is operation sindoor", 'What is sindoor in English", 'Operation Sindoor wiki".
(Google Trends)
India Missile Attack
Queries from Islamabad, Punjab, and Sindh included search terms as follows: 'India launches missile", 'India missile attack", 'India fired missile Pakistan" among many others.
(Google Trends)
White Flag
White flag topped the search in several regions in Pakistan. White flag signifies a state of surrender used by soldiers in warfare by tying a white cloth or a handkerchief on their gun and showing it to their enemy or other army as a request for ceasefire. The firing or attack stops once the message of surrender is acknowledged. Peace and negotiations can be attempted or achieved with the symbolic white flag.
(Google Trends)
top videos
View all
India Declares War
'India declares war" was amongst the top keywords on Google in Pakistan. Related queries such as 'India Pakistan war today", 'war update" also showed up on Google Trends as the locals wondered if the tensions between the two nations could potentially escalate to a full fledged war.
Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
First Published:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
10 minutes ago
- Economic Times
CCI closes startup body's complaint against Google, refrains from probe
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has decided against launching a probe into the Alliance of Digital India Foundation's (ADIF's) complaint against tech giant Google's alleged anti-competitive practices in the practices in online advertising, and closed the startup body had essentially challenged Google's alleged dominant position and "purportedly abusive behaviour" in the online search advertisement and online display advertisement markets. In an order dated August 1, reviewed by ET, the antitrust regulator, however, said, 'ADIF hasn't pointed out any specific part of any policy or conduct of Google in support of its claim that the allegations made in the present matter also extend to Google's Online Display Advertising services'. 'Therefore, in light of there being no supporting evidence to such claim, the Commission does not deem fit to take cognizance of such claim of ADIF,' it for some other allegations by the ADIF, the regulator said it had addressed similar issues in certain earlier cases and 'no purpose would be served by inquiring into the same issue yet again without there being any material change in circumstances being pointed out'.The regulator added that re-investigating the same issue again 'would simply lead to a wastage of time and resources of the public exchequer'. The Commission has stressed that it has 'examined in detail the averments made by ADIF and the submissions thereto made by Google, on all the issues related to alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies' before reaching its conclusion. It also said that all the four instances of alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies as raised by ADIF in the present matter, 'have already been examined in substance and set to rest by the Commission in its previous decisions in Matrimony case (supra) and/ or Vishal Gupta case (supra)'. 'The Commission is not convinced with the reasons stated by ADIF for distinguishing its allegations from the issues examined in previous orders passed by the Commission. As per the clear language of Section 26(2A) of the Competition Act, the issues examined in the previous order may be 'the same' or 'substantially the same',' it said in the order. 'Therefore, the present matter is directed to be closed forthwith in terms of the provisions of Section 26(2A) of the Act,' it added.
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Here's why enrollments are falling in govt schools and how that can be fixed
Government schools in India offer numerous student-friendly benefits: free education, qualified and better-paid teachers, mid-day meals, free textbooks and uniforms, and low or zero fees. These should make them the natural first choice for most families, especially in rural and low-income communities. Yet, enrollment in government schools has been steadily declining, particularly in urban and semi-urban areas. Parents, even from modest backgrounds, are increasingly choosing private schools over public ones. Why is this happening despite the generous support extended to the public school system? The answer lies in a complex combination of perception, policy gaps, structural inequities, and, most importantly, an entrance exam system that unintentionally favours private institutions and urban students while leaving rural, government school students at a disadvantage. Government schools are often perceived as outdated, poorly managed, and meant for the underprivileged—regardless of their actual strengths. In contrast, private schools are viewed as disciplined, modern, and aspirational, even when many lack qualified faculty or sound infrastructure. This perception gap, amplified by advertising and peer influence, has convinced many parents to invest in private education, even when it stretches their household finances. The National Education Policy 2020 recommends mother tongue instruction until Grade 5, preferably Grade 8, to ensure better comprehension and conceptual clarity in the early years. Government schools generally adhere to this policy. However, many private schools advertise English-medium instruction from Class 1, often without qualified English teachers. Parents, hoping to secure early language advantage for their children, are easily persuaded. As a result, government schools are seen as less modern—even when they are following sound, evidence-based pedagogy. Without uniform enforcement of NEP across both public and private schools, this divide is bound to widen. Private schools, particularly those in cities and towns, market themselves as pathways to engineering and medical careers. Many introduce IIT or NEET-focused programmes from the primary school level, branding themselves as 'Techno Schools' or 'Junior Academies.' This premature focus on Maths and Science sidelines equally important subjects like languages, social studies, the arts, and ethical education. While this narrow approach may benefit students in competitive exams, it comes at the cost of emotional, civic, and holistic development. Government schools, by contrast, follow a more balanced curriculum, giving due importance to all subjects. Yet in a system where only STEM marks matter for college admissions, this comprehensive approach is undervalued. The national entrance exam structure reinforces this imbalance. Most entrance exams for engineering, medicine, and even some general degree programs test only Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Mathematics. Core subjects such as languages, history, geography, political science, and ethics are excluded entirely. This format is inherently biased toward private school students who are coached intensively in these few subjects, often from a very young age. Urban students benefit further from mock test series, foundation programmes, and English-medium content. Rural students attending government schools, however, study a broader syllabus aligned with national curricular frameworks. Their preparation, while more holistic, does not align with the narrowly focused demands of entrance tests. This systemic mismatch lowers their chances of success and further reinforces the notion that public schools are inadequate. The result is a social and academic injustice. Entrance exams, in their current form, help private schools thrive—by rewarding early coaching and selective learning. At the same time, they penalize children from public schools who have received a full, balanced education. In a country where nearly two-thirds of children rely on public education, this situation is neither fair nor sustainable. How the imbalance can be corrected To correct these imbalances, India must act decisively. Entrance exams must be reformed to test across all key school subjects, including languages, humanities, ethics, and reasoning. This would ensure that children are not penalized for receiving a broader education. NEP guidelines should be uniformly enforced in both private and public schools, particularly with regard to medium of instruction and curricular scope. Misleading early branding by private schools—such as IIT and NEET training from Class 1—should be regulated to protect the integrity of childhood education. Public school infrastructure must be upgraded to reflect the aspirations of a changing society. Teacher support, digital tools, and community participation through School Management Committees should be strengthened. Above all, success stories from government schools should be celebrated to rebuild public trust. Government schools remain the backbone of India's educational equity. But unless entrance exams, admission policies, and public messaging are aligned with the values and structure of public education, families will continue to shift away. It is time to change the narrative—from 'free and last-resort' to 'free and first-choice.' That can happen only when every subject is valued, every child is supported, and every school is given the opportunity to succeed. (The writer is Professor (retired), IIT Madras. He writes on education policy, curriculum reform and rural equity)
The Print
24 minutes ago
- The Print
Who is Maulana Sajid Rashidi, slapped by SP workers over inappropriate remark on Dimple Yadav
As a video of Rashidi's comment began to circulate on social media, a case was registered against him at Vibhuti Khand police station in Lucknow, on a complaint by SP worker Pravesh Yadav. After the show aired, a group of Samajwadi Party workers slapped Maulana Rashidi at a TV set in Noida. UP police sources told ThePrint that SP workers who slapped Rashidi have been identified as Shyam Singh Bhati, national secretary of the SP Advocate Sabha; Mohit Nagar, district president of the SP student wing, Gautam Budhha Nagar; Prashant Bhati, state secretary of the party's student wing; and Kuldeep Bhati, an SP worker. Lucknow: Maulana Sajid Rashidi is no stranger to controversy. The Delhi-based president of the All India Imam Association has been in the news many times for making provocative statements, especially during TV debates. Now, Rashidi finds himself facing another political storm over an inappropriate comment he made about Samajwadi Party (SP) MP Dimple Yadav, who is also the wife of former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Akhilesh Yadav. Speaking to ANI after the incident, Rashidi later defended his remarks. 'She (Dimple) didn't abide by Islamic beliefs while sitting in the mosque. Iqra Hasan's ears and nose are covered. On the other hand, there is Dimple Yadav … The question is, will Akhilesh Yadav file an FIR against the person who took this picture (of the mosque visit),' he said. 'I will also go to the police and submit the phone numbers from which I received threats. I will file a case against Akhilesh and Dimple Yadav because it is their workers who are sending threats,' he added. Reacting to the controversy, Dimple Yadav told reporters, 'It's good that an FIR was registered. It would have been better if they had protested when the incidents against women happened in Manipur. After Operation Sindoor, BJP leaders made indecent remarks against our armed forces officers. It would have been better if they had stood against it.' Following a police complaint by the TV news channel, a case has been registered at Noida's Sector 126 police station against Maulana Sajid Rashidi, Shyam Singh Bhati, Mohit Nagar and Kuldeep Bhati. Police are currently investigating the matter. Also Read: 'PDA' politics at play—Why Akhilesh expelled only three of eight 'rebel' SP MLAs Maulana Sajid Rashidi's controversial past President of the All India Imam Association, an organisation of Imams of mosques in India, Maulana Sajid Rashidi has been in the news many times in the past for his provocative religious and social statements, especially on television. At the time of the 2025 Delhi Assembly elections, he said he voted for the BJP to dispel fear among Muslims about supporting the party and to challenge the belief that Muslims don't support the BJP. BJP leader Amit Malviya even shared Rashidi's video online during the Delhi polls to claim that a large number of Muslims were supporting the BJP now. Rashidi later clarified that his real intention was to make the Muslim community politically independent. He also supported the controversial Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, calling it a revolutionary step to safeguard the rights of the Muslim community. He also accused those opposing the law of trying to provoke unrest and urged the government to check the properties of those opposing it. In response to the Pahalgam terror attack, he blamed Pakistan, saying its actions were tarnishing the image of Indian Muslims. He even said that, if necessary, he was ready to go to the border himself to teach Pakistan a lesson. In an interview with ANI in 2023, he made a controversial comment about 17th-century Maratha ruler Shivaji, downplaying his contributions. In 2023, he claimed that Mahmud of Ghazni was right to demolish the Somnath temple, alleging that 'wrong things' were happening there. He later apologised after a backlash and an FIR from the Somnath Trust. In 2024, he drew flak for comments made during a TV debate. Loni BJP MLA Nand Kishor Gurjar filed a complaint against him, accusing him of hurting the sentiments of Hindus. Back in 2022, Rashidi supported threats issued against then BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma over her controversial remarks on Prophet Mohammad. (Edited by Sugita Katyal) Also Read: In closed-door meet, Akhilesh sets record straight on alliance with Congress, Azam 'sahab'
