‘How Deep Is Your Love' Review: A Mischievous Documentary Dive Into an Unfamiliar Ecosystem
Having premiered at the True/False documentary festival before making its European bow in CPH:DOX, 'How Deep Is Your Love' is a warm, approachable entry in the growing eco-documentary subgenre that should net considerable distributor interest on the strength of its plaintive environmental message and its frequently dazzling imagery — as Mortimer's filmmaking abets the biologists' mission to capture and chronicle an iridescent array of never-before-seen creatures down below. It's not a doc that goes heavy on hard science, instead embracing its layman's perspective, as Mortimer's own running, conversational voiceover whimsically reflects on her own relative smallness and remove from this strange, silent world. The final effect, roughly akin to Jacques Cousteau fused with Mark Cousins, will bemuse some and beguile many.
More from Variety
How Do Political Docs Stay Alive in New Trump Era? Key Documentary Players Meet at CPH:DOX to Ponder Alternatives After 'Streamers Went to the Right'
'Tesla Files' Documentary Aims to Expose Inner Workings of Tesla and Question Elon Musk's Political Ambition (EXCLUSIVE)
True/False Film Fest Unveils 2025 Lineup Including Eight Sundance Docus (EXCLUSIVE)
A stretch of the Pacific Ocean spanning 1,700,000 square miles and administered by the International Seabed Authority (ISA), the Clarion-Clipperton fracture zone is about as remote a location as one can journey to on Earth — at least a 12-day maritime voyage from the nearest land — but a hotspot for oceanographers thanks to the richness and diversity of life on its seafloor. As they head toward its center, and survey the depths of its 'abyssal zone' (over two miles below the water's surface) via state-of-the-art cameras, the mostly British, millennial-aged team of scientists on the vessel joined by Mortimer doesn't feign know-it-all composure in the face of such familiarity: Their wonder is palpable and easily shared as various exotic, amorphous, luridly painted organisms float into view, identified with decidedly non-academic names like 'Psychedelic Elvis Worm' and 'Headless Chicken Monster.' (Officially naming a species, Mortimer learns, can take up to 14 years.)
There's something endearing about seeing the scientific world this far out of its depth, in all senses of the term, and Mortimer's interview style disarmingly makes the most of this rare leveling of the scales. 'If you had a chance to meet this arthropod, what would you ask him?' she asks one team member about the small, spindly whatchamacallit under scrutiny, cuing an oddball reverie about taking an underwater invertebrate out on a date. There's room for fantasy in a realm where facts are scarce. But there's work to be done too, much of it bittersweet, and soundtracked to the duly plangent strains of Portishead's 'Glory Box.' These extraordinary species must be captured to be studied — using, in amusingly stark contrast to the technological wizardry of the observational equipment, a mechanical device not unlike an arcade claw grabber — and of course die once brought to the surface.
'I feel a bit like the Nicole Kidman character in 'Paddington,'' grimaces one scientist about the essentially destructive nature of his study — and depending on your perspective, this sense of guilt is either amplified or mitigated by the larger-scale threat posed to the seabed by mining companies intent on extracting the precious mineral resources of the deep. Such industrial excavations risk wiping out untold (and, indeed, as yet unseen) natural wonders, though delegates of the ISA are unable to reach an agreement as to how to curb or monitor them.
Back on land, at the organisation's headquarters in Kingston, Jamaica, Mortimer's camera hovers outside stalemate meetings to which she's refused access: the sense of time drifting when there's none to waste is hard to avoid. In a climactic flourish of make-believe, the glowing creatures found on the expedition are airily superimposed on the drab offices and corridors of the ISA building — the film's final, playful but gently pointed reminder that we all share the same planet.
Best of Variety
The Best Albums of the Decade
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
New 'Superman' Beats 'Man of Steel' Opening Amid MAGA Backlash—With a Catch
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Official numbers for opening weekend for James Gunn's Superman movie have come in, marking a strong opening that has topped Zack Snyder's 2013 film Man of Steel as Warner Bros. looks to completely overhaul its comic book movie universe. However, fans of Snyder's film have pointed out that the opening box office numbers require some context. Newsweek reached out to Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) by email outside of normal business hours on Sunday afternoon for comment. Why It Matters A lot rides on the success of Gunn's film, which is meant to serve as the first entry in a new DC Comics movie universe. Warner Bros., as the company was known in 2013, tried to launch a new comics cinematic universe to compete with the wildly successful Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU). However, as opening weekend drew closer, several politically charged moments threatened to derail the movie's potential success. Gunn did not shy away from the fact that his movie would tackle politics, telling British newspaper The Times that "Superman is the story of America. An immigrant that came from other for me, it's mostly a story that says basic human kindness is a value and something we have lost." His comments prompted backlash from high-profile right-wing media personalities and "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) supporters, such as Fox News host Jesse Watters to jokingly say: "You know what it says on his cape? MS-13," and "Superman is fighting for truth, justice, and your preferred pronouns." Kellyanne Conway, the senior counselor to the president during the first Trump administration, also weighed in by saying: "We don't go to the movie theater to be lectured to and to have somebody throw their ideology on to us." Dean Cain, an ardent supporter of President Donald Trump who played Superman in the 1990s TV series Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman, during an interview with TMZ also criticized Gunn for making Superman "woke," saying: "I think bringing Superman into it... I think that was a mistake by James Gunn to say it's an immigrant thing, and I think it's going to hurt the numbers on the movie. I was excited for the film. I am excited to see what it is...I'm rooting for it to be a success, but I don't like that last political comment." People cross the street near billboards advertising the new "Superman" film in Times Square on July 9 in New York City. People cross the street near billboards advertising the new "Superman" film in Times Square on July 9 in New York City. CraigWhat To Know Man of Steel, the first entry in what is now known as the Synderverse part of the DC Extended Universe (DCEU), had a strong box office following the lukewarm success of the 2006 film Superman Returns but had very divisive reviews from critics. Fans were more open to the new interpretation, but failure to deliver a cohesive and engaging universe with further entries, which included Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice, Wonder Woman, and Justice League, prompted a major change of course, especially after Warner Bros. merged with Discovery to become Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD), and new CEO David Zaslav looked to resurrect the company's greatest assets. When Gunn, the writer and director behind the wildly successful and popular Guardians of the Galaxy series for Marvel, crossed the proverbial aisle and made The Suicide Squad, Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) seized on a major opportunity. Gunn and producer Peter Safran have now charted a new course for the company's superhero movies, starting with the Gods and Monsters phase of films. James Gunn attends the "Superman" Fan Event at Cineworld Leicester Square on July 02, 2025 in London, England. James Gunn attends the "Superman" Fan Event at Cineworld Leicester Square on July 02, 2025 in London, England. Samir Hussein/WireImage So far, Superman, starring David Corenswet in the title role alongside Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane and Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor, is off to a flying start, raking in $122 million domestically and $217 million for a global cumulative gross, according to Deadline. This narrowly beat out Man of Steel, which opened to around $116 million domestically and just over $200 million globally over four days, making Superman the best-ever opening for a solo Superman film, and the biggest opening for a film featuring Superman after Batman v. Superman, which had a monster $420 million worldwide opening, including $166 million domestically. However, fans of Man of Steel have been quick to point out on social media that adjusted for inflation, Snyder's entry performed better. On the Box Office subreddit, users posted an adjusted inflation total for each Superman movie, and with that calculation, Man of Steel made just shy of $160 million domestically and $295 million globally. An average film sees around 40 percent drop from week one to week two. Superman not only had a strong opening, but very positive critical response, with Rotten Tomatoes posting an 82 percent critics rating and a 95 percent audience rating compared to Man of Steel, which posted a 57 percent critics rating and 71 percent audience rating. What People Are Saying Writer and director James Gunn told The Times: "Yes, it's about politics, but on another level it's about morality. Do you never kill no matter what — which is what Superman believes — or do you have some balance, as Lois believes? It's really about their relationship and the way different opinions on basic moral beliefs can tear two people apart." He later said: "Superman is the story of America. An immigrant that came from other places and populated the country, but for me it is mostly a story that says basic human kindness is a value and is something we have there will be jerks out there who are just not kind and will take it as offensive just because it is about kindness. But screw them." "I'm telling a story about a guy who is uniquely good, and that feels needed now because there is a meanness that has emerged due to cultural figures being mean online." Gunn's brother, actor Sean Gunn who plays Maxwell Lord in the film, said, per Variety: "My reaction to [the backlash] is that it is exactly what the movie is about. We support our people, you know? We love our immigrants. Yes, Superman is an immigrant, and yes, the people that we support in this country are immigrants and if you don't like that, you're not American. People who say no to immigrants are against the American way." What Happens Next? Superman has two weeks before Marvel releases its much-promoted Fantastic Four: First Steps, which starts a new phase of the MCU and will tie into the mysterious and course-correcting Avengers: Doomsday, which will see Robert Downey Jr. return to the franchise in a new role as Doctor Doom.


USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
Why 'Superman' star Nicholas Hoult plays Lex Luthor as 'alpha' cult leader
He steals dogs and murders innocents. He's a terrible boyfriend. He's also the worst boss ever. Yet for some reason, people seem to dig the megalomaniacal Lex Luthor in 'Superman.' The billionaire tech bro is the kind of baddie that Nicholas Hoult loves to play. With guys who 'are very mixed up in their ideologies,' he can bring some understanding to their malevolence. 'There's an element of making those characters not likable, but palatable maybe,' says the British actor, who joins the ranks of Gene Hackman, Kevin Spacey and Jesse Eisenberg as on-screen Lexes. Hoult originally auditioned for Superman – a role that went to David Corenswet – but thought he might be a better Lex. Director James Gunn agreed: 'I waited for a couple weeks to let the rejection wear off and then I called him.' Then, Gunn surrounded Supes' arch nemesis with a number of colorful characters, including dangerous right-hand woman Angela Spica (María Gabriela de Faría), aka the Engineer, and Lex's influencer girlfriend Eve Teschmacher (Sara Sampaio). And because it's a cult of personality, Lex's fearsome posse follows him wherever his shenanigans lead: 'He's this generous, loving guy who his employees love when he is feeling good,' Gunn says. 'But when he's feeling bad, we all know this guy.' Join our Watch Party! Sign up to receive USA TODAY's movie and TV recommendations right in your inbox Nicholas Hoult's Lex Luthor is mean but has some feels in 'Superman' Lex Luthor has been a staple in Superman comics since 1940, and Hoult found inspiration in those stories where he was an 'alpha' male offended by the hero just existing as an alien on Earth. 'Because he puts in so much hard work for what he's developing and himself, it's even more frustrating that Superman is just naturally gifted and lauded and applauded for his abilities,' Hoult says. He also saw Lex as 'a cult-like leader,' who amasses 'a lot of followers. Throughout the film you see him get picked apart and lose that, but he's managed to sculpt this image that people do like.' Gunn adds that Hoult brought a predatory energy to the character: The first time we see him waiting for Superman to show up, 'he is like a tiger in a cage pacing back and forth.' But there's a lot of emotion to Lex as well. In one key moment, a tear streams down his face. 'I never saw him as a psychopath,' Hoult says. 'He's just got this deep, ingrained fear and hatred. Toward the end of the film, you see his plan ruined and him humiliated" as he suffers "all these things that are painful." María Gabriela de Faría's Engineer makes a formidable Man of Steel enemy One of Lex's most lethal weapons is a living one: Transformed by nanotechnology, the Engineer is an unpredictable foe for Superman and other heroes. She can shift into various different forms – like turning her hands into saws – and can hack into any computer system, even one that's Kryptonian. 'How does it feel to connect to the machine?' de Faría says. 'Is it painful? Is it pleasurable? Does it tickle? Every time she turned herself into something, it felt different, which made it really fun for me and also more realistic because I had something to play with my actual body.' Like Lex, the Engineer is determined and willing to go to extremes to get what she wants, and she sees her boss as 'just means to an end,' de Faría says. 'She is deeply hurt by the world and she's deeply afraid of the path the world has taken. She has suffered the consequences for herself and she's willing to change it to make it better. 'Lex reacts and acts from envy and from being power-hungry,' the Venezuelan actress adds. 'Angela does it out of fear, and I don't know if acting out of fear is any better because we can see that they have the same consequences: pretty much destruction and pain and suffering.' As Eve Teschmacher, Sara Sampaio is Metropolis' selfie queen Eve Teschmacher isn't exactly menacing, but she is overly loyal to her man. And Eve has an auspicious screen debut, taking a selfie in the highest levels of LuthorCorp tower while Superman is getting smashed by a powerful enemy. 'She's like the playful part of me that I don't get to show the world very often,' says Sampaio, a Portuguese actress/model (and Victoria's Secret angel). Lex's gal pal "has this childlike wonder about her, where everything is new. She doesn't really understand what's appropriate, like when Superman is being beaten behind her. She's like, 'Oh, this is a great photo!' ' But Eve puts up with a lot. Her beau doesn't have the best history when it comes to girlfriends – most wind up imprisoned in an interdimensional pocket universe – and Lex is often seen throwing pencils at her. Sampaio came up with a backstory for her loyalty (she comes from a small city, for example, but not from wealth), though even Eve has a breaking point. 'Security, money and power can create safety in a way. She sees that Lex can provide a lifestyle for her (and) she won't have to struggle again,' Sampaio says. 'When she realizes that safety actually is not really there, she makes sure she always has a plan B, that she can escape and take care of herself. But I think everyone gets excited about handsome, powerful rich guys sometimes.'
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Becoming active in adulthood can curb risk of dying from certain health issues by 22%, study finds
It's never too late to start exercising, according to a new study that found people who transition from inactive to active lifestyles in adulthood can reduce their mortality risks by 22 per cent. Health experts, scientists, and medical organisations agree that physical activity benefits both the body and the mind. What has been less clear is exactly how much exercise helps, which patterns of activity are most effective, and at which stages of life they are most important. The new study published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) aimed to answer those questions by identifying how physical activity during adulthood can influence the risk of dying from heart disease, cancer, and other health issues. Researchers analysed data from 85 studies of varying size. The number of participants per study ranged from 357 to over 6.5 million participants. Overall, the analysis found that exercising in adulthood can yield significant health benefits, reducing the risk of mortality by 20 per cent to 40 per cent. Specifically, adults who are regularly active can curb these risks by up to 30 per cent to 40 per cent. And even those who transition from an inactive to an active lifestyle can reduce their risk of death from any cause by approximately 22 per cent. Exercise does not appear to reduce all health risks equally. For example, it was tied to a 30 per cent to 40 per cent lower risk of death from heart disease, but the links to cancer mortality were less clear. Interestingly, not all types of exercise had the same effect on adults' health. The paper suggests that adults who work out in their spare time can reduce their health risks more than people who are active by happenstance at work or home. Some experts argue that the relationship between fitness and mortality risk is a little more nuanced than the latest study suggests. 'Based on these types of studies, we cannot very confidently say to what extent this lower mortality risk is due to the differences in activity or other factors that differ,' Marcel Ballin, who researches physical activity and health at Uppsala University in Sweden, told Euronews Next. That could include genetics and environmental exposures that influence people's health and well-being. For example, a study published in the European Journal of Epidemiology earlier this year found that genetics plays a significant role in mortality risk. While physical activity was relevant, longevity reflects people's overall health, not just that one factor, the study found. Ballin suggested the latest findings should be taken with a grain of salt. 'What we can say is that if you are belonging to a group that is more active than the average, and you're consistently being active or increasing your activity over time, it seems to be good for your mortality risk,' he said. 'But, we need to be more careful when attributing the lower mortality to the activity itself,' he added.