Emperor penguin populations declining faster than expected
Some emperor penguin colonies have lost all their chicks from thinning ice plunging hatchlings into the sea before they were old enough. (Envato Elements pic)
PARIS : Emperor penguin populations in Antarctica have shrunk by almost a quarter as global warming transforms their icy habitat, according to new research today that warned the losses were far worse than previously imagined.
Scientists monitoring the world's largest penguin species used satellites to assess sixteen colonies in the Antarctic Peninsula, Weddell Sea and Bellingshausen Sea, representing nearly a third of the global emperor penguin population.
What they found was 'probably about 50% worse' than even the most pessimistic estimate of current populations using computer modelling, said Peter Fretwell, who tracks wildlife from space at the British Antarctic Survey (BAS).
Researchers know that climate change is driving the losses but the speed of the declines is a particular cause for alarm.
The study, published in the journal Nature Communications: Earth & Environment, found that numbers declined 22% in the 15 years to 2024 for the colonies monitored.
This compares with an earlier estimate of a 9.5% reduction across Antarctica as a whole between 2009 and 2018.
Warming is thinning and destabilising the ice under the penguins' feet in their breeding grounds.
In recent years some colonies have lost all their chicks because the ice has given way beneath them, plunging hatchlings into the sea before they were old enough to cope with the freezing ocean.
Fretwell said the new research suggests penguin numbers have been declining since the monitoring began in 2009.
That is even before global warming was having a major impact on the sea ice, which forms over open water adjacent to land in the region.
But he said the culprit is still likely to be climate change, with warming driving other challenges for the penguins, such as higher rainfall or increasing encroachment from predators.
'Emperor penguins are probably the most clear-cut example of where climate change is really showing its effect,' said Fretwell.
'There's no fishing. There's no habitat destruction. There's no pollution which is causing their populations to decline.'
'It's just the temperatures in the ice on which they breed and live, and that's really climate change.'
Emperor penguins, aka Aptenodytes forsteri, number about a quarter of a million breeding pairs, all in Antarctica, according to a 2020 study.
A baby emperor penguin emerges from an egg kept warm in winter by a male, while the female in a breeding pair embarks on a two-month fishing expedition.
When she returns to the colony, she feeds the hatchling by regurgitating.
To survive on their own, chicks must develop waterproof feathers, a process that typically starts in mid-December.
Fretwell said there is hope that the penguins may go further south in the future but added that it is not clear 'how long they're going to last out there'.
Computer models have projected that the species will be near extinction by the end of the century if humans do not slash their planet-heating emissions.
The latest study suggests the picture could be even worse.
'We may have to rethink those models now with this new data,' said Fretwell.
'We really do need to look at the rest of the population to see if this worrying result transfers around the continent,' he added.
But he stressed there was still time to reduce the threat to the penguins.
'We've got this really depressing picture of climate change and falling populations even faster than we thought but it's not too late,' he said.
'We're probably going to lose a lot of emperor penguins along the way but if people do change, and if we do reduce or turn around our climate emissions, then then we will save the emperor penguin.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
2 days ago
- Malay Mail
Snow blankets Atacama Desert, the world's driest, in rare weather event
SANTIAGO, June 27 — Residents of the world's driest desert, the Atacama in northern Chile, woke up Thursday to a jaw-dropping spectacle: its famous lunar landscape blanketed in snow. "INCREDIBLE! The Atacama Desert, the world's most arid, is COVERED IN SNOW," the ALMA observatory, situated 2,900 meters (9,500 feet) above sea level, wrote on X, alongside a video of vast expanses covered in a dusting of white. The observatory added that while snow is common on the nearby Chajnanator Plateau, situated at over 5,000 meters and where its gigantic telescope is situated, it had not had snow at its main facility in a decade. University of Santiago climatologist Raul Cordero told AFP that it was too soon to link the snow to climate change but said that climate modelling had shown that "this type of event, meaning precipitation in the Atacama desert, will likely become more frequent." The Atacama, home to the world's darkest skies, has for decades been the go-to location for the world's most advanced telescopes. The ALMA telescope, which was developed by the European Southern Observatory, the US National Radio Astronomy Observatory and the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, is widely recognized as being the most powerful. — AFP
Malay Mail
4 days ago
- Malay Mail
Rock on: How crushed stone could help fight climate change
BANGKOK, June 25 — From sugar plantations in Brazil to tea estates in India, crushed rock is being sprinkled across large stretches of farmland globally in a novel bid to combat climate change. The technique is called Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW) and aims to speed up the natural capture and storage of carbon dioxide—a planet-warming greenhouse gas. It is potentially big business with tech giants, airlines and fast fashion firms lining up to buy carbon credits from ERW projects to 'offset' or cancel out their own emissions. What is ERW? ERW aims to turbocharge a natural geological process called weathering. Weathering is the breakdown of rocks by carbonic acid, which forms when carbon dioxide in the air or soil dissolves into water. Weathering occurs naturally when rain falls on rocks, and the process can lock away carbon dioxide from the air or soil as bicarbonate, and eventually limestone. ERW speeds the process up by using quick-weathering rocks like basalt that are ground finely to increase their surface area. How effective is ERW? ERW is still a fairly new technology and there are questions about how much carbon it can remove. One US study found applying 50 tonnes of basalt to a hectare of land each year could remove up to 10.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide per hectare over a four-year period. But scientists applying basalt to oil palm fields in Malaysia and sugarcane fields in Australia measured much lower removal rates. 'Field trials are showing that there have been overestimates of the amount and rate captured,' said Paul Nelson, a soil scientist at James Cook University who has studied ERW. Rates depend on variables including rock type and size, how wet and hot the climate is, soil type and land management. And measuring the carbon captured is difficult. The most popular technique measures 'cations', positively charged ions that are released from the rock during weathering. But those cations are produced regardless of which acid the rock has reacted with. 'If there are stronger acids than carbonic, then it will react with those,' said Nelson, so measurable cations are produced even when carbon dioxide is not captured. That doesn't mean ERW is pointless, said Wolfram Buss, a researcher on carbon dioxide removal at the Australian National University, just that it needs to be carefully calibrated and measured. 'There is no doubt that this technique works,' he said. 'However, to be sure how much carbon dioxide we actually remove, more funding is required to do fundamental studies.' Are there other benefits? The added rock increases soil alkalinity, which can boost crop growth, soil nutrients and soil formation. Basalt is both naturally abundant and often available as a byproduct of quarrying, lowering the costs of the process. Experts note that even if the rock reacts with other acids in the soil, failing to lock away carbon dioxide at that stage, it can still have planetary benefits. That is because acids in the soil would otherwise eventually wash into rivers and the sea, where acidification leads to the release of carbon dioxide. If the rock neutralises that acid in the soil, 'you've prevented carbon dioxide being released from the water into the atmosphere downstream', said Nelson. The scale of those possible 'prevented' emissions is not yet clear, however. What are the risks? ERW is broadly considered safe since it merely speeds up an existing natural process. However, some quick-weathering rocks have high levels of potentially poisonous heavy metals. Scattering finely ground rock also requires appropriate protective gear for those involved. But the main risk is that incorrect measurements overestimate captured carbon. Some projects are already selling carbon credits from ERW. If a company buys an ERW credit to 'offset' its emissions but the process captures less than projected, it could result in net higher carbon dioxide put into the atmosphere. Where is ERW being done? Projects are happening in most parts of the world, including Europe, North America, Latin America and Asia. Earlier this year, a project in Brazil announced it had delivered the first-ever verified carbon-removal credits from an ERW project. The process is being used or trialled in agricultural settings from tea plantations in India's Darjeeling to US soy and maize fields. What investor interest is there? An ERW startup—Mati Carbon, working in India—won the $50 million X Prize for carbon removal projects earlier this year. In December, Google announced what was then the world's biggest ERW deal, for 200,000 tons of carbon removal credits, to be delivered by the early 2030s by startup Terradot. The cost of the deal was not disclosed but a separate agreement by Terradot with a company representing firms including H&M sold 90,000 tons for US$27 million. — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
5 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Norway launches flagship large-scale carbon capture and storage project
The Longship project bears the English name for Vikings' wooden ships. (AFP pic) OSLO : Norway on Tuesday launched a flagship carbon capture and storage (CCS) project, a technology seen as crucial to curbing climate change but struggling to find a viable economic model. Bearing the English name for the Vikings' wooden ships, the Longship project involves capturing carbon dioxide emitted from a cement plant and later from an incineration plant, transporting it by ship to a terminal on Norway's west coast, and then injecting and storing it beneath the seabed. The project has received significant financial support from the Norwegian state, which will cover 22 billion kroner (US$2.2 billion) of the total estimated cost of 34 billion kroner for the installation and operation over the first 10 years. Norway has presented Longship as the 'world's first full-scale value chain' for capture and storage of carbon in the greenhouse gases that cause harmful climate change. 'This is not just an important moment for Norway, it is a breakthrough for carbon capture and storage in Europe,' Norwegian energy minister Terje Aasland said. For the capture component, the facility will be officially inaugurated Wednesday at a cement plant operated by Germany's Heidelberg Materials in Brevik, southeastern Norway. It will prevent 400,000 tonnes of CO2 from escaping into the atmosphere each year. Another part of the project, the Hafslund Celsio waste incineration plant near Oslo, is also expected to capture 350,000 tonnes of CO2 starting in 2029. The liquefied carbon dioxide will be transported by ship to the Oygarden terminal near Bergen, where it will be injected into a pipeline to be stored 110km offshore in a saline aquifer 2.6km below the seabed. The terminal has been in place since last year as part of the Northern Lights project – led by oil giants Equinor, Shell and TotalEnergies – which claims to be 'the world's first commercial CO2 transport and storage service'. Backed by the UN's intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) as a way of reducing the carbon footprint of industries hard to decarbonise, such as cement and steel, CCS technology remains complex and expensive. Without financial assistance, it is currently more profitable for industries to purchase 'pollution permits' on the European carbon market than to pay for capturing, transporting and storing their CO2. The total global carbon capture capacity currently amounts to only about 50 million tonnes, according to the International Energy Agency, equivalent to just 0.1% of global annual emissions.
