As Ted Cruz calls for a regime change in Iran, other Texas Republicans are more cautious
WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz is pushing for military strikes and a possible regime change in Iran, a hardline stance few in the Texas delegation have yet to embrace.
Texas' junior senator this week suggested the U.S. take a larger role in the conflict between Israel and Iran, something President Donald Trump is considering.
Trump has, during the last decade, pushed Republicans toward an isolationist agenda, compared to the hawkish days of former President George W. Bush, who sent troops to both Afghanistan and Iraq.
Trump has yet to announce a decision on military intervention. More specifically, he is debating, according to multiple news reports, whether to provide Israel with a 'bunker buster' bomb to destroy a nuclear enrichment site embedded within an Iranian mountainside.
'I may do it, I may not do it,' he told reporters outside the White House Wednesday.
Cruz said on his podcast that an American attack on Fordow 'makes a lot of sense.'
'There is a reasonable possibility that the president will choose to authorize a targeted bombing strike on the Fordow nuclear weapons research facility,' he told reporters later at the Capitol on Wednesday afternoon. Cruz also said he has shared his opinions with Trump directly.
Cruz also discussed the situation at length with conservative commentator Tucker Carlson.
The combative interview between Carlson, an isolationist who does not support intervention, and Cruz, a self-described 'noninterventionist hawk,' has become a flashpoint inside Trump's MAGA movement.
While Cruz said he does not currently support putting American troops on the ground, 'If the risk got severe enough, I would support that.'
U.S. Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Waco, who is supportive of a military strike, told the Tribune that in conversations with members of Congress, he has found the 'vast majority' of them are supportive of military action.
'I do admit that there are those that do not support it,' he said in a Wednesday interview.
The widest gap between Cruz and other Republicans is whether to seek a regime change.
Such a change, Cruz argued on Monday, would 'enhance American security massively' given the animosity Iran has for the United States.
'I am advocating that we use maximum pressure and economic sanctions to pressure the regime in a way that might encourage this regime to fall,' he said.
Texas' senior senator, John Cornyn, was more measured on the issue.
'I think that's up to the Iranian people,' he told the Tribune when asked about a regime change. 'Hopefully, they will take the opportunity that this may provide.'
Cornyn appeared to be in support of limited military intervention, characterizing the use of larger U.S. munitions as 'a continuation of the current policy' toward Israel. On Fox News a few hours later, though, Cornyn stressed that the United States does not need 'to take the lead in this effort.'
'Israel has a variety of options, and they seem to be doing a very effective job on their own with our support,' he said.
When pressed on whether Israel would be able to destroy the Fordow facility without American support, Cornyn said, 'I think they have multiple options,' including the deployment of Israeli ground troops.
Other Texas Republicans have yet to take an explicit position on military strikes but say they stand with both Trump and Israel.
'We need to be ready to trust and support the President's decision,' Rep. Dan Crenshaw, a Houston Republican and former Navy SEAL, said on Tuesday.
'I stand with President Trump as we will continue to support our friend and ally, Israel, as it rightfully takes action to defend itself,' Rep. Chip Roy, R-Austin, said last week.
Roy expressed support Tuesday for 'strategic limited support' for 'Israel's targeting & denial of Iranian nukes' but is in clear opposition of sending in 'ground troops, regime change, soccer fields, supplemental funding.'
Sessions, who was first elected to the House in 1996, has been a player in national politics through several U.S. military operations in the Middle East. But he's not fearing a wide war if America intervenes to strike the nuclear facility. He praised Israel's response, but without American military power, he said, the country 'cannot necessarily finish the fight.'
Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-Amarillo, appeared ripe for military confrontation.
Responding to Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's declaration 'the battle begins,' hours after Trump declared him an 'easy target,' Jackson said 'BRING IT.'
Three Texas Democrats, along with a bipartisan group in the Capitol's lower chamber, are urging the president to resist joining the fray without congressional approval. Reps. Greg Casar, Lloyd Doggett and Veronica Escobar have signed onto a resolution that would ask Trump to seek congressional approval if he decides to commit U.S. armed forces to Iran.
Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer.
Get tickets.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
38 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Iowa's civil rights protections no longer include gender identity as new law takes effect
Advertisement When Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed Iowa's new law, she said the state's previous civil rights code 'blurred the biological line between the sexes.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'It's common sense to acknowledge the obvious biological differences between men and women. In fact, it's necessary to secure genuine equal protection for women and girls,' she said in a video statement. Also taking effect Tuesday are provisions in the state's health and human services budget that say Medicaid recipients are no longer covered for gender-affirming surgery or hormone therapy. A national movement Iowa's state Capitol filled with protesters as the law went through the Republican-controlled Legislature and to Reynolds' desk in just one week in February. Iowa Republicans said laws passed in recent years to restrict transgender students' use of bathrooms and locker rooms, and their participation on sports teams, could not coexist with a civil rights code that includes gender identity protections. Advertisement About two dozen other states and the Trump administration have advanced restrictions on transgender people. Republicans say such laws and executive actions protect spaces for women, rejecting the idea that people can transition to another gender. Many face court challenges. About two-thirds of U.S. adults believe that whether a person is a man or woman is determined by biological characteristics at birth, an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted in May found. But there's less consensus on policies that target transgender and nonbinary people. Transgender people say those kinds of policies deny their existence and capitalize on prejudice for political gain. In a major setback for transgender rights nationwide, the U.S. Supreme Court last month upheld Tennessee's ban on puberty blockers and hormone treatments for transgender minors. The court's conservative majority said it doesn't violate the Constitution's equal protection clause, which requires the government to treat similarly situated people the same. Not every state includes gender identity in their civil rights code, but Iowa was the first to remove nondiscrimination protections based on gender identity, according to the Movement Advancement Project, an LGBTQ+ rights think tank. Incidents of discrimination in Iowa, before and after July 1 Iowans will still have time to file a complaint with the state Office of Civil Rights about discrimination based on gender identity that occurred before the law took effect. State law requires a complaint to be submitted within 300 days after the most recent incident of alleged discrimination. That means people have until April 27 to file a complaint about discrimination based on gender identity, according to Kristen Stiffler, the office's executive director. Advertisement Sixty-five such complaints were filed and accepted for investigation from July 2023 through the end of June 2024, according to Stiffler. Forty-three were filed and accepted from July 1, 2024, through June 19 of this year. Iowa state Rep. Aime Wichtendahl, a Democrat and the state's first openly transgender lawmaker, fears the law will lead to an increase in discrimination for transgender Iowans. 'Anytime someone has to check your ID and they see that the gender marker doesn't match the appearance, then that opens up hostility, discrimination as possibilities,' Wichtendahl said, naming examples such as applying for a job, going through the airport, buying beer or getting pulled over in a traffic stop. 'That instantly outs you. That instantly puts you on the spot.' About half of U.S. states include gender identity in their civil rights code to protect against discrimination in housing and public places, such as stores or restaurants, according to the Movement Advancement Project. Some additional states do not explicitly protect against such discrimination, but it is included in legal interpretations of statutes. Five years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled LGBTQ people are protected by a landmark federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in the workplace. But Iowa's Supreme Court has expressly rejected the argument that discrimination based on sex includes discrimination based on gender identity. Changing Iowa birth certificates before the law took effect The months between when the bill was signed into law and when it took effect gave transgender Iowans time to pursue amended birth certificates before that option was eliminated. Keenan Crow, with LGBTQ+ advocacy group One Iowa, said the group has long cosponsored legal clinics to assist with that process. 'The last one that we had was by far the biggest,' Crow said. Advertisement Iowa's Department of Transportation still has a process by which people can change the gender designation on their license or identification card but has proposed administrative rules to eliminate that option. Wichtendahl also said she has talked to some families who are looking to move out of state as a result of the new law. 'It's heartbreaking because this is people's lives we're talking about,' Wichtendahl added. 'These are families that have trans loved ones and it's keeping their loved ones away, it's putting their loved ones into uncertain future, putting their health and safety at risk.'
Politico
38 minutes ago
- Politico
Senate rejects Susan Collins amendment to boost rural hospitals, raise taxes on wealthy
Democratic Rep. Dwight Evans said Monday he will not seek reelection 'after some discussions this weekend and thoughtful reflection,' opening up a solid-blue seat in Philadelphia. Evans faced mounting questions about his ability to serve after suffering a stroke last year and missing months of votes. He insisted until recently he still intended to run for reelection, though several primary challengers were already starting to make moves. 'Serving the people of Philadelphia has been the honor of my life,' Evans said in a statement. 'And I remain in good health and fully capable of continuing to serve. After some discussions this weekend and thoughtful reflection, I have decided that the time is right to announce that I will not be seeking reelection in 2026.' Evans, 71, has served in Congress since 2016. He succeeded Rep. Chaka Fattah, who resigned after being indicted on federal corruption charges, and is one of six Pennsylvanians on the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. His retirement announcement comes amid generational upheaval in the Democratic Party. Longtime Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) said earlier this year she wouldn't run again. The party base has looked to their leaders to mount a more vigorous response to President Donald Trump, with some in the party calling for primary challenges to senior leaders. Evans' retirement could kick off a fierce battle between establishment Democrats and progressives for the Philadelphia-area seat, and several possible candidates are already weighing campaigns. Democratic socialists have made headway in the city, particularly at the state level, and pro-Israel groups and the liberal Working Families Party are eyeing the race, according to multiple Democrats. 'This is completely wide open,' said a high-level Philadelphia Democrat who was granted anonymity to speak frankly. 'There is not one person I can see who I would deem the front-runner.' State Sen. Sharif Street, chair of the Pennsylvania Democratic Party, has expressed interest in running for Evans' seat. A second Democrat granted anonymity to speak freely said Street could kick off his campaign as early as Tuesday, though other Democrats said an official announcement could come later. State Rep. Morgan Cephas, who is close to the city's influential building trades unions, is eyeing the seat as well, as is progressive state Rep. Chris Rabb. 'Me and my team are strongly considering a bid,' Cephas told POLITICO Monday. 'But first and foremost I wanted to express my overwhelming gratitude to the work that Congressman Evans has done for the city of Philadelphia.' Rabb said in a text that 'I am seriously considering running for this seat.' State Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta, another progressive, said his supporters have 'encouraged me to consider a run.' But he said he has 'nothing to announce,' adding that 'today is about Dwight Evans' and 'honoring his legacy.' In a sign of how hotly contested the race could become, some Democrats are already attacking Street publicly and privately before he jumps into the contest. J.J. Balaban, a Democratic consultant who lives in Evans' district, said he opposes a potential bid by Street because in 2021 he worked with a powerful Republican to craft a proposed congressional redistricting map. His plan was not ultimately successful. 'Any good Democrat should hope it's not Sharif Street because of how he tried to sell out the Democratic delegation,' said Balaban. 'We would have fewer congressional seats if he had carried the day.' Street did not immediately respond to a request for comment. At the time, Street defended his work with Republicans, saying 'it's our job to negotiate the best that we can.' Street has made some recent efforts to make inroads with progressives, including by endorsing liberal Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner in his successful primary reelection campaign this year over a more moderate challenger. The extent to which Evans does — or doesn't — get involved in helping determine his successor will also shape the race. A Democrat familiar with Evans' thinking said he is 'going to wait and see what the field will look like' before deciding whether to endorse a candidate in the primary. 'Plenty of time to make a decision,' the person added. Rumors have swirled for months about Evans' future, and some Democrats speculated that he might step down in the middle of his term, which would have given power to the city's Democratic ward leaders to choose a nominee for a special election. But Evans said Wednesday that he 'will serve out the full term that ends Jan. 3, 2027.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk says he'll form the 'America Party' if Trump's 'insane' spending bill passes
Elon Musk said he will form a new political party if President Donald Trump's spending bill passes. Earlier on Monday, he vowed to defeat politicians who support the bill in their primaries. Musk has repeatedly criticized the Big Beautiful Bill. Elon Musk ramped up his fight against President Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill on Monday, vowing to form a new political party if it passes Congress. "If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day," Musk said in a post on X. "Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE." Earlier Monday, Musk vowed to defeat politicians who support Trump's bill, saying, "They will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." When reached for comment, the White House referred Business Insider to Trump's recent interview with Fox News' Maria Bartiromo that aired Sunday, ahead of the Tesla CEO's latest comments. When asked about their relationship, Trump said Musk was a "wonderful guy" but that his comments about the president were not "appropriate." He also defended the spending bill, saying it would cut taxes and improve border security. Musk, who stepped away from his work with the White House and DOGE last month, has been outspoken about his complaints with the bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination." Once the "first buddy" to the president, Musk and Trump publicly feuded earlier in June. It appeared to stem from Musk's public distaste for the Big Beautiful Bill. Musk has called out the bill for adding to the federal deficit and said it undermines the work DOGE did to cut back government spending. He also said over the weekend that the bill "gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." Trump previously called Musk "crazy" in response to his criticism of the bill and floated the idea of canceling his government contracts. The Tesla and SpaceX billionaire has previously floated the idea of creating a new political party. Earlier this month Musk posted a poll on X with the question, "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" Over 80% of people who responded said, "yes." In another tweet on Monday, Musk said the spending bill made it "obvious" that "we live in a one-party country — the PORKY PIG PARTY!!" "Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," he said. When Musk stepped back from DOGE, he said he was also planning to pull back on his political spending, and it's unclear if his spending intentions have changed. Read the original article on Business Insider
