City Hall green lights Mayor Parker's $6.8B budget
Philadelphia legislators signed off Thursday on Mayor Cherelle Parker's $6.8 billion budget, including her centerpiece housing initiative.
Why it matters: Parker's plan makes big promises, including cuts to business and wage taxes, no tax increases for property owners, and more homes.
But it all comes with a big price tag, despite lingering questions about the potential loss of future federal funding.
By the numbers: Under the plan, overall spending will increase nearly 7.5% over last fiscal year. The new fiscal year starts July 1.
🏘️ Inside the plan: Legislators gave the green light to borrow $800 million for Parker's Housing Opportunities Made Easy initiative, which aims to build and preserve 30,000 housing units.
The initiative will fund a variety of new housing programs while expanding some existing ones.
Plus: The legislation allows the Parker admin to fast-track the sale of up to 1,000 parcels of city-owned land without legislative approval, which has bogged down some land sales.
💰Tax cuts: Workers in the city — both residents and non-residents — will see their wage taxes decline modestly over five years.
The intrigue: Businesses are the biggest winners. They'll see the city's business income and receipts tax (BIRT) slashed over 13 years.
BIRT's gross receipts portion will steadily decline until it's eliminated in 2039. Meanwhile, BIRT's net income portion will be cut by more than half by then.
The fine print: Due to legal challenges, the city is eliminating a BIRT tax break on the first $100,000 in gross receipts, which will hurt small businesses.
The big picture: Parker and her vision for the city appear to be winning over Philadelphians.
A Pew poll released this week found Parker enjoyed a 63% approval rating at the start of the year.
What else: City council approved legislation that will:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
21 hours ago
- New York Post
Eye-popping analysis of Trump's win shows Democrats are in serious trouble
Democrats are right to be worried about the party's shift to the left that Zohran Mamdani's surprise victory in New York City's mayoral primary implies. That's because the party was already on the outs with a majority of American voters, according to newly released data from the Pew Research Institute. Pew conducts a biennial poll known as the Validated Voter Survey — considered one of the best ways to understand what happened in the prior election, because its survey results are cross-indexed with each state's voter files. 3 Illustration of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris' electoral vote counts with the US map. Only respondents who are shown to have actually voted are counted. The headline results getting most of the media attention largely support prior findings from the 2024 exit polls and from Catalist, another gold-standard post-election analysis. Pew, like the other sources, finds Democrats hemorrhaged voter support among men, Hispanics and other non-white voters, costing Kamala Harris the presidency. The party's loss of support among men is especially sharp among non-white men, according to Pew. President Trump's victory margin among white men improved by 3 percentage points, from 17% to 20%, between 2020 and 2024. That is a strong improvement, but far from enough to explain why he went from losing by 4.5% in 2020 to winning by 1.5% in 2024. Rather, it was Trump's gains among non-white men that were truly game-changing. He lost black men by only 54 points, a 21-point improvement from his 75-point defeat in 2020. 3 Illustration showing President Trump's increasing share of Hispanic votes in presidential elections, compared to Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. He carried Hispanic men by 2 points, a 20-point improvement from his 18-point 2020 loss. He also gained 23 points among Asians and 29 points among voters of other races, gains that could not have occurred without huge increases with male voters. Progressives might point to Mamdani's strong showing in Hispanic and Asian neighborhoods and argue that it shows his economic populism can win many of those voters back. But it's worth noting that this showing comes among Democratic primary voters, a group well to the left of most Americans. We should recall that progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders easily won among Hispanics, according to exit polls in the 2020 Democratic Super Tuesday primaries. 3 Illustration of charts comparing the 2020 and 2024 election results for Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. That didn't prevent Hispanics overall from shifting significantly to the right in that November's general election. But even these stark figures understate the Democrats' challenge. The Pew results show that there was little change in voting by partisans between 2020 and 2024. Harris beat Trump by 89 points among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, just one point less than Biden's 90-point win in 2020. Trump won Republicans and GOP-leaning indies by 86 points, a point less than his 87-point advantage four years ago. These groups comprised 99% of the electorate in 2024 and 97% in 2020. Thus, Harris should have easily won — if the electorate's partisan composition mirrored 2020's. It did not, however. Republicans and GOP-leaning independents were 51% of the total electorate in 2024, up from 47% in 2020. Democrats and their affiliated indies dropped from 50% in 2020 to 48% in 2024. That 6-point shift in the partisan balance precisely mirrors Trump's 6-point improvement in his popular vote margin. In other words, Trump didn't win because he got disaffected Democrats and independents to vote for him; he won because he got those people to switch parties entirely. That is an historic achievement. No electorate in the 50-plus-year history of exit polling has ever favored the GOP. Going back by extension to the 1930s, partisan identification polls always showed Democrats with significant margins going into a general election. It's likely, then, that 2024 was the first presidential election since at least 1932 where more voters were Republicans than Democrats. Democrats simply do not know how to campaign in this type of environment. For nearly 100 years, all they had to do to win was rally the base and split independents. Harris did that, and lost anyway — because that equation no longer produces an electoral majority. In previous elections, Republicans adapted to their unfavorable terrain by running campaigns on Democratic turf. They had to prove they were no threat to the welfare state or to the other popular Democratic achievements. That infuriated hardline conservatives who want to roll back those big government expansions, but wiser heads knew it would be a fatal error. Democrats now face the challenge of showing they support Republican themes, like race-neutral policies and prioritizing economic growth over the Green New Deal. Harris couldn't pull it off, and Democrats like Mamdani will essentially charge right into that headwind by doubling down on policies that former Democratic voters reject. Presidential success or failure always matters, and perhaps Trump's term will end up going badly. That could save Democrats. Without that, however, they should understand that the political environment is moving sharply away from what their base wants. Viewed through that lens, the leftward lurch Mamdani's win implies shouldn't just scare Democrats: It should terrify them. Henry Olsen, a political analyst and commentator, is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
Trump won more than half of foreign-born Hispanics — still would have beaten Harris if every eligible person voted in 2024 election: analysis
President Trump won more than half of foreign-born Hispanic voters in the 2024 election and still would've beat former Vice President Kamala Harris had every eligible voter turned out to the polls, an analysis of his landslide victory concluded Thursday. A stunning 51% of Hispanic, naturalized US citizens voted for Trump over Harris, according to the Pew Research Center's 2024 election post-mortem. Trump, who on the campaign trail pledged to crackdown on illegal immigration and shore up the southern border, bested Harris among foreign-born Hispanics by 3 percentage points and performed 12 points better within the demographic than he did in 2020. Advertisement 3 Trump won a majority of foreign-born Hispanic voters in the 2024 presidential election. Gregory P. Mango After losing the overall Hispanic vote to former president Joe Biden in 2020 (61%-36%), Trump came within striking distance of topping Harris' 51% Latino vote total, garnering 48% from the demographic. By comparison, Trump received only 28% of the Hispanic vote during his first presidential election in 2016. Advertisement The Pew Research Center analysis, which surveyed almost 9,000 voters in the weeks after the 2024 election, found that Trump's coalition of support in his third presidential campaign was 'more racially and ethnically diverse' than ever before. The president carried 15% of Black voters (up from 8% in 2020), 40% of Asian voters (up from 30% in 2020) and maintained the same 55% support from white voters he received four years earlier. Slightly fewer eligible voters turned out to the polls in 2024 (64%) than did in 2020 (66%), and among those that did – a higher share of Trump's 2020 backers than Biden's 2020 supporters cast ballots, according to Pew. 3 Trump made major gains among Hispanic voters in the 2024 election. Getty Images Advertisement 3 More nonvoters would have broken for Trump than Harris. Getty Images But even if every eligible person in the country would have voted, Trump still would have won the 2024 presidential election, the analysis found. Among non-voters, 44% would have voted for Trump, while 40% said they would have backed Harris – shattering the longstanding political belief that higher turnout helps Democrats. Had these people participated in the 2024 election, Trump's margin of victory over Harris would have increased from 1.5 percentage points to 3 percentage points. Trump's historic 49.7%-48.2% victory over Harris last November saw him win the national popular vote for the first time and more Electoral College votes (312) than he won in 2016.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump won with major inroads among minority voters: Research
President Trump's election last fall was boosted by a more racially and ethnically diverse coalition of voters than in his previous two campaigns, according to a new analysis from the Pew Research Center. 'For the most part, voting patterns across demographic groups in the 2024 presidential election were not substantially different from the 2020 and 2016 elections,' Pew's analysts wrote in their report. 'But Donald Trump's gains among several key groups of voters proved decisive in his 2024 victory.' Trump, who lost his reelection bid in 2020 to former President Biden and was elected in 2016 despite losing the popular vote, bested former Vice President Kamala Harris by more than 2 million ballots last fall and won 312 Electoral College votes to Harris's 226. Pew found that, while Trump didn't win majorities among minority groups, he fared better among Hispanic voters, Black voters and Asian voters than he did four years earlier, despite Harris being the first Asian and first Black major party presidential candidate in history. Biden won Hispanic voters by 25 percentage points in 2020, but Trump nearly matched Harris with Hispanic voters, losing among the demographic by just 3 points. 'Again, these changes were primarily driven by changing turnout patterns: 9 percent of eligible Hispanic voters voted in 2020 but not in 2024, and these voters favored Biden in 2020 by roughly two-to-one (69 percent to 31 percent),' Pew's researchers noted. 'By contrast, among Hispanic eligible voters who voted in 2024 but not in 2020, 60 percent voted for Trump in 2024 and 37 percent voted for Harris.' Black voters, while remaining reliably Democratic, also shifted to Trump, from 8 percent in 2020 to 15 percent last fall. According to Pew, voter turnout also drove that shift. 'Increased shares of Black voters who favored Trump were driven not by individuals shifting their preferences, but by changes in who turned out to vote,' the researchers wrote. Asian voters also were more likely to back Trump over his Democratic rival in November than they were four years earlier, shifting from 30 percent for Trump in 2020 to 40 percent. 'Donald Trump's voters overall were more racially and ethnically diverse in 2024 than in his prior campaigns, reflecting gains among Hispanic, Black and Asian voters,' the Pew analysts wrote. 'Conversely, Kamala Harris's voters were somewhat less diverse than the voters who backed Joe Biden in 2020 or Hillary Clinton in 2016.' 'Despite these changes, there continue to be wide differences in the makeup of the partisan coalitions,' they added. Ballots for president are confidential, so Pew's study was based on surveys of 8,942 validated voters representative of the electorate for the cycles analyzed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
