
A new art exhibition says we've gotten sexual identity all wrong
Set in the contemplative brick and stone space designed by architect Tadao Ando, 'The First Homosexuals: The Birth of a New Identity, 1869-1939' features 300 works assembled from the collections of more than 100 museums to better understand how restrictive ideas on sexuality and gender became culturally ingrained in society and the labels they came to be known by.
Included are Alice Austen's sapphic-coded Victorian-era photographs; Gerda Wegener's 1929 painting of her trans partner, Lili Elbe (the subject of the 2015 film 'The Danish Girl'); portraits of influential LGBTQ+ writers Gertrude Stein, James Baldwin and Oscar Wilde; and figure studies by the painter John Singer Sargent. The exhibition — and forthcoming book of the same name — emphasize a pivotal moment, when the West's notions around sexuality began with a misapplied label, which was then spread around the world as a strict binary.
'There is something specific about the West that sought to police the boundary between the two (homosexuality and heterosexuality), and so I wanted to do a show that looked at how that boundary emerged,' said curator Jonathan D. Katz, a founding educator in several pioneering queer studies programs in the US, who now teaches at the University of Pennsylvania. 'We came to realize that, of course, the clean line we wanted to draw between the West and the rest of the world was smudged by virtue of colonialism — and so that then became a big part of the exhibition as well.'
The first published instance of the words 'homosexual' and 'heterosexual' appeared in an 1868 letter between journalists Karl Heinrich Ulrichs and Karl Maria Kertbeny, two pivotal figures who defined modern ideas around sexuality. Kertbeny officially coined the two terms and advocated for the sexual and political freedom of homosexuals, refuting that it was a fringe identity. In the 1880s and '90s, German psychiatrists co-opted the word 'homosexual' but largely viewed it as a treatable sexual deviation, against Kertbeny's beliefs.
Before the late 19th-century, one's sexual proclivities were 'something you did, not necessarily something you were,' the show notes. The earliest works included in a section called 'Before the Binary' shows a number of late 18th-century neoclassical works that used classical themes to portray same-sex desire; artworks made in Peru, Japan and Burma (now Myanmar) that don't conform to modern ideas of sex and gender; racist depictions misunderstanding Native American Two-Spirit people; and a portrait of the the Chevalier d'Eon, who was officially recognized as a woman by King Louis XVI. (While she wasn't the first transgender person in Europe, few achieved her status or fame.)
'From the very get-go… queer and trans have been joined at the hip,' Katz said. 'This idea that we're now experiencing trans as if it's something novel is a complete, complete misunderstanding of history. In many other cultures, questions of sexuality and questions of gender were widely discussed and completely natural.'
As the idea of a sexual binary grew in the West it was transported to its colonies, fundamentally re-shaping many parts of the world, as explorers and settlers recasted divergence from heterosexuality as immoral.
When Katz began the project, he knew that colonialism transported the concept of homosexuality globally. 'What I didn't realize is how many pockets of the resistance there were to that understanding, and also how profoundly it changed Indigenous cultures,' Katz explained.
In the Pacific Islands, for example, which were largely claimed by Britain and France, colonists established strict laws around same-sex acts — which continue to impact LGBTQ+ rights in the region today — while fetishizing and sexually exploiting Indigenous communities there. In artworks from the era, that exoticizing eye can be seen in nearly any major institution of modern art through the Tahitian-era works of Paul Gauguin, who painted idyllic views of the island and its inhabitants while taking multiple child brides. At Wrightwood 659, the show hangs a 1935 work by David Paynter, a Sinhalese-British artist, of two young nude men on the beach, redolent of Gauguin's works but seen as a 'sardonic' take on the artist, according to the show.
Among the other featured artists who rebelled against the colonial gaze is the painter Saturnino Herrán, who imagined sensual figures of Mesoamerican cultures in heroic forms, with full lips and outfitted in loosely draped and knotted fabrics. Other photographs and paintings illustrate the erotic Orientalist tropes that both tempted Europeans and reinforced their desire to enforce Western values far and wide.
Katz considers art history to be a largely untapped archive of how we might understand sexuality — and one problem is that 'queer art history' continues to be considered niche, when in fact many major classical and modern artists expressed same-sex desire through their work.
Many artists are deeply misunderstood to ironic effect — classical art is often upheld by the right wing to support their nationalistic beliefs (from Nazi Germany to thinly veiled X accounts today), though works from antiquity and the Renaissance are often blatant in their depictions of same-sex erotic desire.
'We have so naturalized a heteronormative perspective on art that we regularly turn queer art into straight art, and don't even notice it,' Katz said. 'It's a very weird thing as a professor of queer art history to be saying, 'I pray for the day when my field disappears,' but I do.'
The art world maintains this status quo, he added. Museums, beholden to boards, donors and corporate sponsors, often rotate the same artists — and water down the more complex parts of their lives — instead of deepening our collective understanding with new perspectives, he said.
Many artists in 'The First Homosexuals' have only just begun to be revisited in recent decades, including the Pre-Raphaelite painter Simeon Solomon, whose career ended in a sodomy scandal, and Marie Laurencin, an important French avant-garde painter of her time who created sapphic worlds without men.
'There are vast sums of money riding on what we do. And I think there's a mistaken understanding that talking about sexuality will diminish the value of work of art,' Katz said.
Despite a decade of increased representation in the arts, Katz warns that the contentious political climate and rollback of LGBTQ+ rights in the US threatens scholarship around queer history and art. The US has a long history of censored LGBTQ+ art, his own shows included: In 2010, he co-curated a landmark show on same-sex desire in American portraiture at the National Portrait Gallery; an exhibited video by David Wojnarowicz, featuring ants crawling on a crucifix, was removed after it was criticized by the Catholic League and Republicans, who deemed it offensive to Christians.
'We keep seeing cyclically that as queer history begins to assert itself, something comes along and, frankly, kills it,' he said.
Through 'The First Homosexuals,' Katz hopes to narrow the 'profound and absolute gulf' that has been created to distinguish heterosexual and queer identities, he said. After all, in the context of all of human civilization, it's a modern idea, and one that can be shifted again.
'There's nothing natural about sexuality,' he said. 'It has always been structured by history.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Hidden history underneath Carpenters' Hall reveals Founding Fathers' favorite snack
A preservation project at Carpenters' Hall led to a historic discovery that revealed our Founding Fathers' favorite snack. In this day and age, oysters are seen as a delicacy, but it wasn't always like that. "They were like the French fries of the 18th century," Carpenters' Hall Executive Director Michael Norris said. "People had them for breakfast, and there were vendors on the street, taverns sold them." "Philadelphia was the largest hub for oysters in the United States in the late 1880s," Fishtown Seafood Owner Bryan Szeliga said. "About 800 million oysters passed through Philadelphia either for local consumption or through wholesale and into other markets." The shells of those hundreds of millions of oysters had to go somewhere. So, back then, people got creative. "They just had so many shells," Norris said. "They didn't know what to do with them. Oyster shells were used to pave the streets and were used as ballasts on ships." Now, shards of oysters can be found all throughout the city, right under our feet, including at Carpenters' Hall. The historic brick building in Old City is known as the meeting place for the First Continental Congress back in 1774. In 2023, the site underwent a preservation project that led to the excavation of the building's perimeter by archeologists. "This is the area during that excavation when they found some pottery shards, some shards of oyster shells," Norris said. "George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson wrote about their oyster consumption, and many of those folks met here." Although oysters were a staple during the country's revolutionary era, the shellfish's history goes back well before then. "Our European settlers learned about oyster culture from the Native Americans who, obviously, had been harvesting for centuries long before we showed up," Norris said. In light of National Oyster Day on Tuesday, organizers welcomed people of all ages to Carpenters' Hall for the Shells of Liberty Oyster Bash. The event was in partnership with Carpenters' Hall, Fishtown Seafood and Triple Bottom Brewing. Aside from enjoying drinks and oysters, proceeds of the event went to the Delaware Estuary to help educate the community on the role oysters play in our environment. "They're really an important part of marine ecosystems environmentally because they help filter the water and keep things clean," Norris said. "We thought it would be really fun to celebrate the day and to recognize a product that was so pervasive and such an important part of colonial culture and colonial cuisine." It's a taste of history that's connecting us even centuries later.


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Firefighters rescue dog from Fort Lauderdale canal; credit 911 callers as true heroes
A group of Fort Lauderdale firefighters rescued a German shepherd from a canal Tuesday morning, but the first responders say the real credit belongs to the 911 callers who alerted them. "A life's a life. Whether it's an animal, whether it's a person," said Captain David Landers with Fort Lauderdale Fire Rescue. The incident happened at the start of the firefighters' shift behind Sweeting Park on Northwest 23rd Avenue. Firefighters from Station 47 responded to the call after a dog was spotted in the canal. Captain Landers said they made contact with the female dog before entering the canal. "We made contact with the puppy. She was docile, very frail," Landers said. "There's a little ledge there, so I didn't have to dive in the water or anything. I just had to take my shoes off and go down and grab her out," said Lieutenant Mason McConchie, who assisted in the rescue. The firefighters credited the good Samaritans who called 911 for making the rescue possible. "The callers are the true heroes because had they not had called nobody would've known the dog was in the water," Landers said. Fede Skinner and Aisha Fahmy, who made the call, said they had seen the dog multiple times earlier in the morning. "It's pretty scary because at some point the dog was in the middle of the road. And there was like three different cars that almost hit it. It was kind of terrifying, to be honest," said Fahmy. After the dog disappeared, they went for a walk in the park. "We're talking right here and out of the corner of my eye I see something fall in the water over there and it's the dog," said Skinner. "When I heard the splash I looked over. I was terrified. So I was really, really happy to like, see the dog be safe at the end," Fahmy added. Fort Lauderdale Police located the dog's registered owner, who lives in St. Cloud, Florida, and will be traveling to Fort Lauderdale to pick her up.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
6 All-Too-Familiar Signs You Grew Up In An 'Enmeshed Family'
Having a close, loving family is a goal for most people, and while some people clearly have that, not all do — even if it seems that way from the outside. This is known as enmeshment, which is a dysfunctional pattern that can show up in any relationship, but especially within a family system. 'A lot of times people will think of enmeshment as a positive thing ... sometimes enmeshment can appear like closeness, but really it's still a dysfunctional pattern,' said Danica Harris, a somatic therapist and coach based in Texas. 'When this is present in a family system, there are not good boundaries, which means that people don't have personal agency and autonomy in the way that they ought to,' Harris noted. This isn't to say you should have strict boundaries that push your family away (unless that's what is safest for you), it's a good thing to help your family members out when you're able or support them during tough times. But, there are some red flags that the kind of support your family needs from you is actually enmeshment. Here's what to know: 1. You make your family member's problems your own. 'Individual problems are family problems. Family problems are individual problems. There's just no distinction between an individual and the family system,' said Aparna Sagaram, a licensed marriage and family therapist, and owner of Space to Reflect in Philadelphia. The main difference between a healthy familial relationship and enmeshment is this, she noted. 'You can be there for family and listen and help out and do whatever you can, but then if you're part of an enmeshed family, then it feels like it's your responsibility to figure out how to help that family member,' Sagaram explained. There is no separation from you and the problem, and it becomes all-consuming, Sagaram added. 2. You feel guilty when you don't help a family member out. 'A big part of enmeshment is the guilt feeling,' said Sagaram. You may feel guilty for stepping away from your family, for instance, or for saying no to an outlandish request, she said. When you do try to create some space between yourself and someone's problem, you probably feel guilty 'because you feel responsible for the family problem or whatever that person's going through,' added Sagaram. Even if you are physically able to step away from it, emotionally stepping away is tough, and can add to those feelings of guilt, Sagaram said. Oftentimes, guilt is what keeps people stuck in enmeshed patterns and enmeshed dynamics, she noted. 3. You don't have any boundaries with your family. '[Enmeshment] basically comes down to family members having very weak or almost nonexistent boundaries with each other,' said Holly Humphreys, a licensed professional counselor with Thriveworks in Roanoke. As a result, family members are generally over-involved in each other's lives, which makes it really tough to create boundaries, Humphreys added. Think about it: If your mom insists on constantly asking for advice regarding a tough situation at work, it'll be hard to set a topic boundary with her. 'Even if you want to set boundaries, like, 'All right, I'm not going to take this problem on,' it takes practice to unlearn the feeling,' Sagaram said. Even if you set a boundary to not jump in and save the day, you're likely still thinking about the problem a lot. 4. You lack a sense of self. Within an enmeshed family, there are often blurred individual identities within the family, said Humphreys. This is known as emotional fusion, 'which is a struggle to differentiate their own feelings from others,' Humphreys explained. In some cases, kids in an enmeshed family may feel obligated to feel the same way their parents feel about a certain situation or a certain person, she added. So if your dad doesn't like your neighbor, you may also decide you don't like that neighbor (even if that person has been nothing but nice to you). This can make it hard to decipher how you actually feel, which makes it common for folks to struggle with their sense of identity and independence. This could look like difficulty making decisions without their parents' approval, said Humphreys. This is a learned behavior from growing up in a family where you were constantly expected to jump in and solve other folks' problems. 'You don't have space, you don't have the ability to think for yourself, because you're constantly thinking about everybody else,' added Sagaram. There wasn't time to think about what brought you joy when you were constantly checking in on family members to make sure they're OK. 5. You never disagree with family members. 'If someone grows up in a family system where there wasn't any conflict, that is kind of a sign to me that people weren't really able to differentiate from one another,' said Harris. In enmeshment, everyone does their part to uphold the family system, which likely doesn't involve much differentiation or question-asking, Harris added. It's normal to disagree with your parents, siblings, aunts and uncles — that's what makes a family a family. But, in the case of enmeshment, no one is allowed to have differing views or choices. 'A healthy relationship system allows you and me to be separate people while also being in connection with one another,' Harris said. 'An enmeshed family system says we all have to be the same to be in connection.' Differentiating would pose a threat to the family system and the roles each person plays. 6. There's too much emotional reliance. According to Humphreys, enmeshed families rely too heavily on each other emotionally, and this may be something that started when the kids in the family were young. 'This can be seen when parents rely too heavily on their children for emotional support,' said Humphreys. This often happens in families where there's a 'family secret of such' like a parent with substance abuse problems, she added. It's also common when a parent looks at their child as a therapist or 'best friend,' Humphreys noted. 'Whenever you hear parents say, 'Oh, my child is my best friend,' that's not a healthy boundary or relationship,' she said. While you want to have a good, close and fun relationship with your child, seeing them as a best friend is a blurring of boundaries, Humphreys said. Here's what to do if you are part of an enmeshed family. 'The enmeshed family system is a very complicated one, and it takes patience and time to unlearn some of those toxic dynamics,' Sagaram said. What's most important is taking it one step at a time and understanding how you actually want to show up in your family system versus how you think you should show up. 'Because there's rules, right? There's unspoken rules in enmeshed families, and recognizing what those unspoken rules are and then starting to challenge them in small ways, I think, is a really great way to break away from an enmeshed family,' Sagaram said. Key word: small. These don't have to be radical, huge changes, Harris added. Putting pressure on yourself to show up totally differently or never speak to certain people again can feel 'really flooding and overwhelming,' said Harris. Instead of going at this with an all-or-nothing mindset, simply start to make choices that align with what you actually want. This could be something like saying no to hosting a family dinner or telling your sister she needs to contribute money for your mom's birthday gift. 'That's going to create some shift, and you don't have to do anything huge — and it's OK to be scared and still do it,' Harris said. It can also be a challenge to find healthy relationships outside of your family because of the 'norms' of your upbringing. 'You want to look for a relationship that is reciprocal, whether it's a friendship, a work relationship, or significant other, if you are always the one giving, giving, giving and that's not reciprocated, you know that's that's an unhealthy relationship,' said Humphreys. It's easy to make anything the norm in your life, even if it's unhealthy — like enmeshment or an unhealthy relationship, and it takes a major shake up to make changes. 'You don't always have to give everything that you have to somebody. You are allowed to actually think about what you need and what you want,' said Humphreys. 'If you're not looking out for you, no one else is. That is your job as a person, is to look out for yourself.' Related... 7 Signs You Grew Up With Emotionally Immature Parents The 1 Thing Therapists Say Harms Your Happiness The Most 'Dry Begging' Is A Form Of Emotional Manipulation That Sounds All Too Familiar