Lebanon cannot call itself a state without answers to Beirut blast, says Justice Minister
No one has been held accountable for one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, which killed more than 220 people, injured thousands and devastated large parts of the Lebanese capital.
The explosion was caused by the detonation of nearly 3,000 tonnes of ammonium nitrate that had been improperly stored at the port for years, despite repeated warnings to Lebanese authorities.
The physical wounds are still present throughout Beirut, while the mental and emotional scars linger for its people every day, with justice still out of reach.
The tragedy exposed the deep-rooted corruption, negligence and dysfunction at the heart of Lebanon 's political and judicial systems.
Efforts to investigate the blast have been repeatedly obstructed by political interference, legal challenges and the removal of lead investigators, leaving victims' families still searching for answers five years later.
The current investigative judge Tarek Bitar has previously been threatened and faced challenges summoning senior figures he has fought to interrogate. He is finally making some progress after years of constant impediments - although a long road ahead remains.
'When you have a blast of the dramatic impact of the port blast, a state that is not able to give answers and ensure accountability to its citizens is a state not fulfilling its role,' said Justice Minister Adel Nassar.
'I understand the families, all the victims, that they want a decision as soon as possible. But I think they understand that the main criteria is to ensure he [Mr Bitar] completed his work and he got sufficient evidence supporting his findings,' Mr Nassar told The National in an interview at his office in Beirut, days before the fifth anniversary of the explosion.
Mr Nassar assumed the role earlier this year in the government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, himself a former judge and former chief of the International Court of Justice.
Mr Salam's team has sought to bring about reform in a country long plagued by institutional malaise, and the Premier has repeatedly said that accountability over the blast is one his key objectives.
'It's one of the priorities and nobody will accept that this major dramatic event remains without answers, without a trial, without a proper judicial system acting in this respect,' said Mr Nassar.
Justice delayed
Judge Bitar's investigation has been fraught with challenges from the start. He was not the original lead judge in the immediate aftermath of the explosion and, at one point, was stripped of his authority by Lebanon's then-top prosecutor Ghassan Oueidat — who himself had been charged in connection with the case. Mr Bitar also faced a barrage of lawsuits filed by senior officials seeking to avoid interrogation.
But in January he reopened the case again. Shortly after, his powers were reinstalled by Lebanon's new top prosecutor and some – although not all – top officials who resisted interrogation for months, if not years, eventually appeared for questioning.
Mr Oueidat, however, refused on Thursday to be notified of a hearing scheduled by Mr Bitar for questioning on Monday as a suspect in the case.
The investigation's reactivation has coincided with the arrival of a new president and a reform-minded government, raising cautious hopes for a shift in approach.
'Maybe there is a coincidence between my arrival to the ministry and the fact that he [Mr Bitar] is being able to conduct his work without obstacles,' said Mr Nassar.
"A coincidence?" The National asked. 'Why not?' the Minister responded, with a smile and shrug of his shoulders.
Mr Nassar said he has no formal role in the investigation, and that no good justice minister should have one in this case or any other.
'It's clear that the Ministry is not in charge of the investigation and is not supposed to interfere in the investigation. And I'm clearly not interfering," Mr Nassar said.
'My role is to ensure that the investigative judge will have all the tools he may require to continue his work and to prevent any political interference in his work."
He added: "I tried to support any requirements or demand he brought, I'm very happy that French investigative judges came to Lebanon to share information with him,' referring to a French judicial delegation that was on the ground two weeks after the blast and was allowed to share its findings with Mr Bitar once the investigation resumed.
The contents of the French findings are not known to Mr Nassar, but it is hoped the exchange of information between judicial officials will support the case.
'I made the contacts to ensure that they could come and share information. But I didn't even meet them, it's not my role to meet them.
'We really have to respect the separation of powers in Lebanon. In a democracy, you have a proper separation. I am a minister, I am not supposed to ask questions regarding the merit of a judge's work.'
Mr Nassar said he has ensured there is proper co-operation between Mr Bitar and Lebanon's top prosecutor. He also reiterated his solidarity with families of the victims.
'It is one of the most terrible crimes that occurred. It is the duty of the state to give this file a full effort, because we cannot pretend we have a state, and at the same time, not be able to address this terrible blast,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Syria bloodshed gives US legislators pause over sanctions relief
Recent violence in Syria is fuelling a debate in the US Congress about whether Washington should end all sanctions against Damascus, a move pushed by President Donald Trump, or take a more incremental approach. Mr Trump has embraced President Ahmad Al Shara since his rebel group Hayat Tahrir Al Sham, until recently designated a foreign terrorist organisation, ousted former president Bashar Al Assad in December. Mr Trump last month ordered the lifting of sanctions against Syria. Many of these can be repealed through his executive powers, but eliminating them all would need Congress to repeal the 2019 Caesar Act. Syria has been gripped by violent clashes in Sweida in the south of the country, where forces loyal to Mr Shara's government have been accused of siding with the Bedouin to kill members of the Druze community. After a ceasefire that followed strikes by Israel, the Druze were accused of rekindling the fighting with new attacks. Among those killed was Hosam Saraya, an American of Syrian Druze descent, whose killing at the hands of gunmen was shown on social media. Given the instability, some lawmakers are pushing for a conditions-based lifting of sanctions. Republican Representative Mike Lawler last week introduced a bill that would amend the Caesar Act to allow it to be waived only if the Syrian government is not targeting civilians, among other provisions. 'The Al Shara Administration certainly has a lot of work to do to reintegrate Syria with the US and our allies,' said Mr Lawler, who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East and North Africa, as well as the Financial Services Committee. 'While this job should be difficult given the circumstances, it shouldn't be impossible.' But fellow Republican Congressman Joe Wilson, who also sits on the Middle East panel, wants a clean, unconditional repeal of the Caesar Act, saying that is in line with President Trump's agenda for Syria. 'I hope that the Financial Services Committee reconsiders this measure and takes more time to study and work on Syria sanctions. A clean repeal of the Caesar Act promotes stability,' he wrote on X. Representative Maxine Waters, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee, agrees with Mr Wilson's approach. She has introduced an amendment that would fully repeal the Caesar Act. The Syrian Emergency Task Force, which works to help build democracy in Syria and played a significant role in nudging the Trump administration to scrap sanctions, urged legislators to vote against Mr Lawler's bill. 'This bill undermines President Trump's new Syria policy and extends damaging sanctions until 2028 – sanctions meant for Assad, not the Syrian people,' the SETF said in a statement.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Hamas agrees to a 60-day truce in partial response to latest Gaza proposals
Hamas has given mediators a partial and initial response to proposals for a Gaza ceasefire and hostage deal but was expected to shortly hand them a final reply, sources told The National on Wednesday. They said Hamas has unconditionally agreed to a 60-day truce during which sufficient humanitarian assistance will enter Gaza, chiefly through the Rafah crossing with Egypt in the south of the war-battered enclave. Hamas has also agreed in principle to most of the maps Israel presented for the redeployment of its troops in Gaza, but wants them to pull out from Deir Al Balah in central Gaza – the theatre of a major continuing military operation by Israel – as well as Khan Younis in the south, the sources said. 'Hamas is reviewing the maps with other resistance factions in Gaza,' said one of the sources. 'We expect Hamas's final and full response within hours, but that can change.' The sources spoke as President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff was expected to arrive in Europe on Thursday and Qatar on Friday, a sign that in the past has been interpreted to mean a deal was within reach. However, optimism that mediators from Qatar, Egypt and the US were on the cusp of getting Israel and Hamas to agree to a deal has previously proved premature because of the intransigence of both Israel and Hamas. Israel's President Isaac Herzog struck an upbeat note on Wednesday during a visit to Gaza, telling soldiers there were 'intensive negotiations' about returning the hostages held there. He said he hoped the soldiers will soon 'hear good news', according to a statement from the President's spokesperson. Hamas, however, is yet to provide a final list of the names of the hundreds of Palestinians it wants released from Israeli prisons as part of the deal, they said. The list is likely to include high-profile Palestinians serving long jail terms whom Hamas wants freed but Israel insists on keeping them incarcerated, they said. They include Marwan Barghouti, a senior leader of the mainstream Fatah faction who is widely tipped to be a possible successor to President Mahmoud Abbas. Hamas was also expected to provide mediators with its final timeline for the release of 10 Israeli hostages and the remains of 18 others who died in captivity, according to the sources. Hamas has previously proposed the release of the hostages in batches throughout the 60-day truce to ensure Israel's compliance with the terms of the agreement, but it appears that Israel has rejected that timeline and suggested an alternative, which Hamas is reviewing. Hamas is believed to be holding around 50 hostages, of whom 20 are thought by the Israeli military to be alive. Beside the truce and flow of relief aid into Gaza, where starvation is claiming more and more lives, the key provisions of the latest proposals include discussions on a long-term ceasefire and a full Israeli withdrawal. Hamas had wanted US guarantees that these talks would continue until an agreement is reached, but the sources said Hamas appears to have dropped that condition. Israel, moreover, insists the war in Gaza will not end until Hamas's military and governing capabilities have been fully dismantled and all the hostages released. It's also demanding that Hamas lays down its arms and its leaders leave the territory to live in exile with their families. Hamas has rejected Israel's demand that it surrenders its arms. Instead it suggested it was open to discussions on laying down its arms and storing them under international supervision when a long-term ceasefire is in place. It has agreed to the departure into exile of its leaders provided that they and their families are not targeted by Israel. The Gaza war was triggered when Hamas and its allies attacked southern Israeli communities, killing 1,200 and taking another 250 hostage. Israel's response has been a devastating military campaign that has killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians and injured more than twice that many, according to Gaza's health ministry. Nearly all the coastal enclave's 2.3 million residents have been displaced, more than once in many cases, and large swathes of built-up areas reduced to rubble.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Iran agrees to UN nuclear watchdog visit and signals conditional openness to US talks
Iran has agreed to host a technical team from the UN's nuclear watchdog to discuss future co-operation, its Deputy Foreign Minister said on Wednesday, while cautiously signalling openness to renewed talks with the US. The development comes after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian this month ended co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and said it could only be restored if the agency addressed Iranian concerns over its perceived bias. Kazem Gharibabadi, who is also Iran's lead nuclear negotiator, said the IAEA team would arrive in Tehran within two to three weeks to negotiate a 'new modality' for continued engagement. 'The delegation will come to Iran to discuss the modality, not to go to the [nuclear] sites,' Mr Gharibabadi told reporters in New York. 'Why are they insisting to send inspectors there if those facilities have been obliterated? There shouldn't be any request to go there, unless they are seeking to see how effective the attacks were.' Iran's nuclear facilities were severely damaged last month in US strikes. The Deputy Foreign Minister said Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation was still assessing the extent of the damage but offered no further details. The planned IAEA visit comes amid heightened mistrust between Tehran and the agency. Despite expressing 'dissatisfaction' with the IAEA's recent conduct, Mr Gharibabadi described the upcoming visit as a goodwill gesture. 'I hope that it would be welcomed and they would value such co-operation and good faith,' he said. He described scheduled talks on Friday in Istanbul with the E3 – Britain, France, and Germany – as 'very important', noting that the European countries had approached Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in a bid to 'manage the situation' and de-escalate tensions. The three European powers, along with China and Russia, remain signatories to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which offered Iran sanctions relief in exchange for curbs on its nuclear programme. The US withdrew from the deal in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term. 'We have very constructive and good relations with China and Russia … we have always co-ordinated our positions when it comes to the nuclear issue, the negotiations, even the aggression and also now the snapback,' Mr Gharibabadi noted. The E3 have warned they may move to trigger the 'snapback' mechanism under the nuclear deal, which would reinstate all previous UN sanctions on Iran if negotiations with the US do not resume or fail to yield results by the end of August. The snapback option would remain valid until October 18, when the Security Council resolution underpinning the deal is set to expire. 'On Friday, we will discuss on this issue with the Europeans to see that how we should prevent a snapback and how we should prevent more complicating the situation,' Mr Gharibabadi said. 'Possibly, they may come to the table ... with new ideas, we are open to that. We will listen to them to see what are their ideas in this regard, to see that how we can agree to prevent complicating more the situation.' While not ruling out renewed negotiations with Washington, Mr Gharibabadi emphasised that any future talks must come with clear guarantees, including assurances that Iran would not be targeted militarily during the negotiation process and that any eventual agreement would be reciprocal. 'The calls for negotiations have never stopped, even one or two days after the Israeli aggression, and even after the armed attack of the United States on our peaceful nuclear facilities, we have received requests and calls for negotiations,' he said. He added that even following the announcement of a 'so-called' ceasefire, Tehran continues to receive overtures for renewed talks. 'We have not rejected them, but there are some issues around the negotiations,' he said. Mr Gharibabadi said a lack of consistency from Washington was a key obstacle in the five rounds of indirect talks already held with US officials. 'One of the problems we had was the continuous change in the American position. Unfortunately, we would come to a common understanding at the negotiating table, and then 24 hours later we would hear a completely different position, either through the media or directly from US officials,' he said. 'Iran is not against diplomacy and the resumption of negotiations,' he continued.
