Britain's WORST high streets revealed where a fifth of shops stand empty – is your hometown on the list?
Britain's high streets have been slowly declining amid the cost of living crisis, as banks, restaurants and huge chains all struggle to keep afloat.
1
A new report from Centre For Cities reveals that Newport, Wales has the highest proportion of empty shops in the UK, with 19% (almost one in five) of all of its shops boarded up.
This is over twice as high as Cambridge and London, which have the lowest rates of shop vacancies in the UK, with just 8.5% and 7.4% of shops vacant.
Bradford, Yorkshire, has the second highest number of shop vacancies, according to the report, with 18% (or one in six) of stores lying empty.
The seaside town of Blackpool has the UK's third worst high street, according to the data, with 17.6% of shops shut.
The report revealed that the towns and cities with the most shop vacancies have too many shops relative to the population.
For example, in Newport, Wigan and Middlesbrough, there are between 2.5 to 2.9 shops per every 1000 people in the high street's catchment area.
This is more than double the amount of shops per person than more successful high streets, such as in Brighton and Liverpool, where shop vacancies are below 10%.
The report also highlighted that towns such as Newport and Bradford are close to large cities, with Cardiff and Leeds attracting more shoppers.
Newport and Bradford lose nearly five percent of high street spending to their neighbouring cities, while Birkenhead looses 7.5% to nearby Liverpool.
Additionally, in cities where there is a huge shopping mall outside of the city centre, such as Meadowhall in Sheffield and the Metrocentre, many shoppers choose to spend their money there instead.
Co-op Faces Uncertain Future: 34 Stores at Risk Amid Financial Struggles
According to the report, successful high streets have pivoted away from retail to food, rising to the challenge of online shopping.
For example, in affluent cities such as York and Edinburgh £1 in every £4 is spent on food.
Meanwhile, in Bradford, Stoke and Wigan, this is only £1 in every £10.
Centre for Cities also suggested some changes that the Government should implement to turn the high streets around, including allocating £5 billion of its recently announced £113 billion investment to remake city centres with more office space, improved public realm and more shops.
It also advised building more home in city centre locations and prioritising making city centres attractive to residents over tourists.
Andrew Carter, chief executive of Centre for Cities, said: 'The high street has long been the bellwether of the local economy. Shuttered-up shops influence people's opinions about how successful their areas are.
'Our research shows the high street isn't failing everywhere. Where it is, the cause is not just cosmetic, it is economic. Policies relating to shopfronts, rents or parking miss the bigger picture.
'City centres that struggle are over-supplied with shops and under-supplied with people. If local residents don't have money to spend or a reason to be in the centre, high streets suffer – no matter what interventions are made.
'It is possible to revive the fortunes of struggling high streets. But it will require local and national governments to start by fixing the economy, and not just focussing on the high street itself.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Revealed: Yorkshire Water boss was paid extra £1.3m via offshore parent firm
The boss of Yorkshire Water, one of Britain's biggest water suppliers, has received £1.3m in previously undisclosed extra pay since 2023 via an offshore parent company, the Guardian can reveal. Nicola Shaw received £660,000 from Yorkshire Water's Jersey-registered parent company, Kelda Holdings, in the 2023-24 and the 2024-25 financial years. The size of the fees was not disclosed in the annual report of the regulated subsidiary, Yorkshire Water Services. The utility company at first refused to detail the pay Kelda Holdings had awarded Shaw, saying the parent company was a 'private entity registered in Jersey and subject to separate disclosure frameworks'. Only after the Guardian raised questions about the ability of MPs and bill payers to scrutinise the pay awarded did the company reveal the amount of the two payments. Yorkshire Water said it complied fully with the regulator Ofwat's requirements on pay disclosure and bonus payments, and that the extra payments relating to work for Kelda Holdings were paid by shareholders, not bill payers. Regulated water companies must report directors' pay in their annual accounts each year, but there is no obligation for parent companies to disclose their pay to the regulator or the public. Companies in some offshore secrecy locations, including Jersey, have no obligation to reveal executive pay. Water companies have come under intense scrutiny in recent years amid outrage over the sewage flowing into Britain's rivers and seas at the same time as significant bill increases. Politicians and campaigners have expressed their anger over the million-pound pay packages awarded to top executives, but the Guardian last week revealed that average pay for chief executives still rose by 5% in the 2024-25 financial year. The government moved in June to ban bonuses for the bosses of water companies guilty of the worst environmental breaches. Yorkshire was one of six companies caught by the bonus ban, after it agreed a £40m payment in March for excessive spills from storm overflows as a result of poor maintenance. It received another £850,000 fine on Thursday for pumping chlorinated water into a stream in 2017. Gary Carter, the national officer for GMB, a union representing water workers, said: 'This is another case of water companies not listening to the outrage and concerns of the public over the payment of unjustifiable salaries. 'The fact that this salary is hidden and not transparent just further undermines the reputation of water companies. This sort of behaviour has got to end.' Yorkshire's published accounts reported that Shaw's pay from that company had dropped by nearly a third in the 2024-25 financial year, from £1,028,000 the year before to £689,000. The accounts, however, also said that Shaw and the chief financial officer, Paul Inman, had received remuneration from Kelda Holdings, which 'is therefore disclosed in the financial statements of that company'. But Kelda Holdings has no duty to file accounts publicly because of Jersey's relatively lax laws, and Yorkshire at first declined to say what she was paid by the parent company. Singapore's government owns a third of Kelda Holdings, with the US investor Corsair Capital, Germany's DWS and the Australian pension fund SAS Trustee Corporation owning the rest. The refusal to disclose the pay did not appear to breach any rules, but it meant that MPs and bill payers had no way of knowing whether Shaw's total pay had increased since the bonus ban. The company said Shaw did not receive performance-related pay from Kelda Holdings, but did not share Kelda's accounts. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The revelation of the extra payments means that Shaw's total pay from Kelda Group for the two years were £1.7m and £1.3m. Inman received £440,000 from Kelda Group in 2024-25, on top of a salary of £662,000. A Yorkshire Water spokesperson said: 'We do not believe that any work our chief executive does on investor-related activities should be paid for by Yorkshire Water customers. For that reason, fees in 2024-25 for work such as investor engagement, financial oversight and management of the Kelda Group were £660k and were paid for by shareholders. 'This fee reflects the critical importance of the work during this period that was led by Nicola, and as a result, shareholders directly invested £500m into Yorkshire Water to support the delivery of critical investment over the next five years, with a further commitment of £600m before the end of March 2027.' The Labour MP for York Central, Rachael Maskell, said: 'With pipes bursting and rivers contaminated, it is shocking to learn that Yorkshire Water's boss has concealed her £1.3m award. When people across Yorkshire faithfully pay their water bills, they expect better. 'This behaviour makes the case why water should return to public ownership and those at the top held accountable for every penny spent and every benefit taken. I trust that Labour's expected audit reform and corporate governance bill will ensure transparency across utility companies, when introduced.'
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The British public deserves to know what Miliband discussed with Beijing
When the Government signed a deal on net-zero co-operation with Canada, the text of the memorandum was published. So too were the texts of deals with Ireland, Norway, South Korea and Chile. Five months after the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband signed a similar memorandum with the Chinese government, however, we are still in the dark as to precisely what was agreed. Chinese media have asserted that the Energy Secretary agreed to co-operation on power grids, battery storage, offshore wind power and carbon capture, among other areas; it is understood that Chinese investment in the UK was not discussed by Mr Miliband. The role of the Chinese state in Britain's net-zero ambitions may well be an uncomfortable issue for the Labour Government to discuss. While the Defence Secretary is insisting that Britain is 'ready to fight' over the future of Taiwan and the Foreign Secretary is explicitly referring to China as a 'sophisticated and persistent threat' that requires hundreds of millions of pounds in additional funding for the intelligence services, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been courting Chinese investment, and Mr Miliband's drive to meet his net-zero targets is heavily dependent on Chinese industry. Both the switch to electric vehicles and the decarbonisation of the energy grid will make heavy use of Chinese products. One study commissioned by the German defence ministry recently warned that this position at the heart of Western energy systems could result in Beijing enjoying the power to trigger remote shut-downs as 'an instrument of economic warfare'. Such concerns are less hypothetical than we might wish. Earlier this year, undocumented communication devices were located in Chinese-made power inverters exported to the United States, triggering fears that Beijing could use compromised equipment to 'physically destroy the grid'. This would be fully in line with the current approach of the People's Liberation Army to warfare as a clash between systems, and the extensive Volt Typhoon operation carried out by Chinese state-sponsored actors. Even given the understandable desire to avoid a sudden break with China, the delicacy of the balance between trade and reliance is such that the British public deserves to know what Mr Miliband has discussed with Beijing.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Fears that London house price fall will spread through UK
Fears are growing that a downturn in the prime London property market may spread across the country as a recent rise in stamp duty forces sellers to lower their asking prices. Evidence suggests the ultra-rich are renting rather than buying mansions in the capital to avoid the hated tax. Stamp duty is paid by buyers when they buy a property and in April two key thresholds were changed – meaning most homebuyers now pay it. Property portal Zoopla found that 83 per cent of buyers would pay stamp duty if they bought a home today, compared to 49 per cent before April. This has led more buyers to negotiate a price cut to compensate for the extra tax. Some 951,000 now pay the levy. That is still below a recent peak of 1.2million but the figure is set to rise sharply as more people are dragged into the tax net. More than a third – or £4.5billion – of the money raised by stamp duty comes from property deals in the capital. In London, where property prices are higher than the rest of the country, it now costs home movers up to £2,500 more than before April if they buy an average house costing £532,449. But the impact of the rise is most keenly felt in central London locations where prices are being slashed by up to 30 per cent to attract foreign buyers. The stamp duty charge on a £20million mansion in Belgravia or Mayfair is £2.3million for a UK purchaser. For a person not resident in the UK, acquiring a second home in the city, the bill is about £3.7million. This used to be seen as the price of admission to the London lifestyle. But now even the mega-rich are baulking at the bill. Property experts say the international set are now preferring to rent not buy in London. 'The annual rent on a £20million pad would be about £570,000,' said Neil Hudson of the Built Place consultancy. 'On that basis, if you were a UK purchaser, you could rent for four years for what you would have to pay in stamp duty alone.' There are concerns the downbeat mood in central London could spread nationwide. 'At the height of the boom in 2015, London's properties became overpriced and have been largely moving sideways ever since,' said Richard Donnell, head of research at Zoopla. 'This is bad news for the whole market since London has been the engine of house price growth, with the effects rippling out to other regions.'
