
Tehreek-e-Insaf slams US strikes, demands APC
The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Sunday came out swinging against the United States for launching strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, calling it a dangerous escalation and demanding that the government urgently convene an All Parties Conference (APC) to forge a consensus-driven and unequivocal policy on an increasingly belligerent Israel, which it said is pushing the entire region to the brink of a devastating war.
Slamming the blatant violation of international law and Iran's sovereignty, the PTI decried Washington's actions and accused the coalition government of burying its head in the sand while the region teetered on the brink of a devastating conflict.
PTI Central Information Secretary Sheikh Waqas Akram warned that the flames of war have already reached Pakistan's doorstep, and the government's current "ostrich-like approach" was both futile and perilous.
He insisted the rapidly changing regional dynamics required swift, strategic, and united action.
PTI Senator Barrister Syed Ali Zafar said that the US attack on Iran's nuclear facilities was condemnable, saying the action was not only a violation of international norms, laws and UN resolutions but also a violation of the sovereignty of the Iranian state. "Such unilateral actions pose a serious threat to global peace and security, as well as the sovereignty of every country," the senator said.
Zafar said that the UN and the international community must intervene and resolve the issues quickly to prevent further tension in the region. "We stand with Iran and the Iranian people in this difficult time," he said.
The PTI information secretary underlined that Pakistan can undoubtedly weather the storm, just as it did against India, but the power elites must take the nation into confidence and forge a consensus-driven approach because Pakistan was currently caught between a rock and a hard place.
In light of the escalating crisis, the PTI spokesperson called for the immediate release of PTI Patron-in-Chief Imran Khan and his inclusion in strategic decision-making regarding the situation arising from Israel's unprovoked attack on Iran and the subsequent US strikes on the country.
Waqas praised Khan's foresight, noting that a week earlier, he had sent a message through his sisters to postpone the protest for two weeks due to the Iran-Israel conflict.
Meanwhile, he added that US President Donald Trump issued a deceptive signal, claiming he would not engage in the Israel war for the next two weeks.
He said that Khan's famous quote, "No one understands the West better than me", proved to be true.
PTI leader lashed out at the imposed government for its habit of flattery, which he said now had crossed the national boundaries and was visible internationally. He recalled that PTI patron-in-chief had stated on the floor of the House that Pakistan could partner with the US in peace, but not in war, as the country had already paid an immeasurable cost in terms of both lives and resources for siding with the US in its meaningless and unnecessary wars.
He pleaded that Israel could not have invaded Iran without the strong backing and support of the US, which was evident from the airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities even after Tehran was given a two-week ultimatum, simply at the behest of the Israeli premier.
The party said that the US not only violated Iran's sovereignty but also breached the UN Charter, an act that could have far-reaching and catastrophic consequences at both regional and international levels.
He maintained that the excuse for the Israeli attack on Iran was even more absurd than India's recent strike on Pakistan under the pretext of the Pahalgam attack. Waqas observed that the US and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) adopted a blatantly contradictory and biased approach towards the Muslim world in its pursuit of nuclear capability, while remaining conspicuously silent about Israel's widely acknowledged nuclear arsenal.
He demanded that the UN and OIC urge the IAEA to inspect Israel's nuclear sites and work toward a nuclear-free Middle East, rather than targeting Iran under false pretexts, just as was done with Iraq, despite the IAEA's repeated and clear stance that Tehran is nowhere near acquiring a nuclear weapon.
He added that Iran has consistently maintained that its nuclear programme is intended solely for peaceful purposes.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
22 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Israel-Iran conflict — how the world will change post-war
Listen to article The Iran-Israel short war of ballistic missile exchanges and air strikes is over. Yet the context under which this short war was fought had a deep effect on how independent states view the existing international environment. The challenge for the great powers, the regional hegemons and the medium and the ordinary powers that rally around them is simple: can this international environment in which international norms and laws are violated be allowed to endure? Does it need restructuring or can it be left unchanged? In the case of former there is all the likelihood of another sovereign state being bullied and attacked by a ruthless power; and in the case of latter the setting of a similar event can be prevented and unjust attacks on sovereign states may be stopped from reoccurring. Contextually, there is a greater realisation in the world that terrorism is being used as a pretext by individual states to further their national interests. Particularly in the case of Israel and India, two states that hold different interpretation on the matter of terrorism from rest of the world. Both states have demonstrated that diplomacy can be set aside, pushed back and unjust military action can be taken to punish states considered weak on flimsy grounds. Two matters of diplomatic significance, both related to India and Israel, suggest that there is hope that 'Islamophobia' that both these states suffer from may no more be the sickness with which the rest of the world may suffer. The American president's interference in the Indo-Pak conflict and his political preference to host Pakistan's military chief in White House is a clear message to India that Washington doesn't agree with the Indian position and its terrorism context that created the circumstances for its unwarranted aggression against Pakistan. The victim scale that had long been tilted in India's favour seems to be settling back in the balance and the US may have set the future global trend of no more viewing Pakistan from the Indian position of blaming Pakistan as a terrorist state. Add to this the recent diplomatic setback that India suffered in the meeting of the Defence Ministers in Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), when the Indian defence minister refused to sign a draft of joint statement which omitted a reference to the 22 April Pahalgam terror attack in occupied Kashmir. If there was evidence that India could share with the rest of the participating countries, surely the Indian position would have been strong in advocating the inclusion of this terrorist attack in the draft of the joint statement. Pakistan has consistently maintained the absence of such evidence and also maintained a consistent diplomatic posture that encouraged India to hold bilateral dialogue. But India believes more in bullying and subjugating Pakistan rather than treating it as an equal. In case of Israel, no American President has used the language that President Trump used when Israel violated the ceasefire agreement of which he was a guarantor. There is no doubt that President Trump is the most pro-Israel president that America ever had but when it came to the possibility of American interests being hurt, President Trump sounded determined to force Israel to change its behaviour against Iran. Tested and jolted by recent events, the international environment is not likely to remain the same. Wars are being fought in a manner unknown in previous history and how the nation states will change and adjust will determine what kind of international environment will prevail as we approach 2050. The lead up to 2050 and the pathway that leads the world there cannot be discussed without mentioning the role of the other three great powers in determining how the world travels on this pathway. Recent events prove that the US has failed to make the world safe. It has failed to construct the rules-based system in which international laws could be respected and it has also failed to ensure that states cooperate and not engage in conflicts. In case of America, it is sufficient to say that its thesis of end of history has not ended. The coming back of history is the new antithesis and under the return of great power competition this antithesis will be written by China and Russia. How America brought the world to the ending notion of its liberal order of internationalism is a topic that requires detailed answering and needs to be dealt with in a separate space and time. Here I would just like to conclude by giving some of the assumptions on how the world and the international system that runs it may be restructured given the context under which the recent wars have been fought. Dynastic politics will be on the decline and nation states ideas of freedom and liberty will not remain the same. More and more nationalism will hatch as authoritarianism will mate more frequently with ending civil liberties as more and more military preparedness will demand quashing of domestic dissent as national economies will reorganise to equip their militaries to adjust against the shifting military capabilities between the states and to maintain the fracturing balance of power. Military preparedness will trump political mindsets and create military mindsets and eventually more and more military states. Russophobia and China-phobia are considered as the greatest geopolitical threat of 21st Century. These two diseases from which the West suffers will contribute to how these great powers will challenge the international system together with the states that will rally around them. The US will regret mistreating the twenty-six years of unipolarity (1991-2017) by favouring realistic and militaristic foreign policy in promoting the order of liberal internationalism that only backfired. Disastrous foreign policy in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Lebanon, Yemen and Iran is what constituted the current international system of chaos and anarchy and which is hardly what the world deserved as America led it as a sole superpower. Nation states will no longer tolerate being at the centre of any American intrigue. Autocracies will demand intellectual climate that should support nationalism as guns will be preferred over butter in a national environment in which military preparedness will be expedited. States either grow or decay but in a reordered world fashioned by the Indian and Israeli military aggression most states will neither grow nor decay, they will spend more time, effort and resources to stay where they are as growth of militarism and not socialism will become the order of the day.


Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
What India calls ‘terrorism' is a legal struggle for rights: field marshal
Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir has said that India's portrayal of the Kashmiri freedom movement as terrorism is misleading, describing it instead as a legitimate and lawful struggle recognised under international law. 'What India labels as terrorism is, in fact, a legitimate and lawful struggle for freedom, recognised by international law,' said Field Marshal Asim Munir. Speaking at a commissioning parade held at the Pakistan Naval Academy on Saturday, the army chief urged the nation to remember the sacrifices of the Kashmiri people resisting India's 'illegal occupation' of Jammu and Kashmir. 'At such a time, we must not forget the sacrifices of our Kashmiri brothers who are struggling against Indian occupation,' he said. He accused India of deliberately escalating regional tensions just as Pakistan nears success in its fight against terrorism. Munir reaffirmed Pakistan's resolve to eliminate terrorism. 'We will take our fight against terrorism to its logical conclusion and rid the country of this menace once and for all,' he declared. Reiterating Pakistan's longstanding stance on Kashmir, the army chief said, 'Pakistan strongly supports a fair and peaceful solution to the Kashmir issue in line with UN resolutions and the aspirations of the Kashmiri people.' According to a statement issued by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), grand commissioning parade reflecting rich naval traditions was held at the Pakistan Naval Academy, Karachi, marking the commissioning of the 123rd Midshipmen and 31st Short Service Commission (SSC) Course. Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir, attended the ceremony as the chief guest. Upon his arrival at the academy, he was welcomed by Chief of the Naval Staff Admiral Naveed Ashraf. A total of 127 midshipmen were part of the commissioning term, including 19 from Bahrain, 4 from Iraq, and 2 from the State of Palestine. In addition, 23 cadets from the SSC Course were also commissioned. In his address, the chief guest congratulated the newly commissioned officers and their families. He praised the Pakistan Naval Academy for providing high-quality training not only to Pakistani cadets but also to those from allied nations. The participation of cadets from Bahrain, Iraq, Palestine, Djibouti, and Türkiye in the ceremony underscored the academy's international training standards. Highlighting the professionalism of the Pakistan Navy, he noted its critical role in securing global sea lines of communication as a key regional maritime force. He also referred to recent regional tensions, emphasizing that during Operation Bunyanum Marsoos, Pakistan's armed forces responded swiftly and decisively to threats from a numerically superior adversary, demonstrating the nation's firm resolve to defend its sovereignty and integrity. Earlier, in his welcome address, Commandant of the Pakistan Naval Academy, Commodore Tasawwar Iqbal, elaborated on the academic and professional development offered at the academy. He emphasized the academy's role in nurturing officers with strong faith, character, and dedication to the motherland. Later, the chief guest distributed awards among outstanding cadets: Midshipman Abdul Rehman received the Sword of Honour for overall best performance, Midshipman Shayan Hashmat was awarded the Academy Dirk, Officer Cadet Muhammad Uzair Abbas received the Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee Gold Medal, Officer Cadet Chaudhry Muhammad Aizaz Tahir of the SSC course was given the Commandant's Gold Medal and the Proficiency Banner was awarded to the Quarterdeck Squadron. The ceremony was attended by foreign dignitaries, government officials, officers of the Pakistan Navy and other armed forces, and families of the commissioning officers.


Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Punjab Assembly Speaker suspends 26 opposition members
The Speaker of the Punjab Assembly Malik Ahmed Khan on Saturday suspended 26 members of the opposition party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), for disrupting Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz's speech and causing chaos in the assembly session, according to Aaj News. The Assembly Secretariat confirmed that the suspension was issued under Rule 210(3) of the Assembly Rules, barring the members from attending the next 15 assembly sittings. During the session, opposition members shouted slogans, engaged in physical shoving, and tore official documents, violating the assembly's rules of conduct. The Speaker 'condemned' their behavior, saying such disorderly conduct damages the dignity and discipline of the House. He acknowledged that while protesting is a right of assembly members, it must follow the limits set by the Constitution and parliamentary procedures. The Speaker emphasized that maintaining order in the assembly is essential and will be strictly enforced. The suspended lawmakers include Malik Fahad Masood, Muhammad Tanveer Aslam, SSyed Riffat Mehmood, Yasir Mahmood, Kaleem Ullah, Ansar Iqbal, Ali Asif, Zulfiqar Ali Shah, Ahmad Mujtaba Chaudhary, Imtiaz Mehmood, Ali Imtiaz, Muhammad Ejaz Shafi, Sajjad Ahmad, and others. The suspension came after the opposition's loud protests disrupted the assembly during the Chief Minister's address, forcing the Speaker to take action to uphold the assembly's dignity and ensure smooth proceedings.