logo
Trade Deal Leaves Vietnam With Questions and One Big Challenge

Trade Deal Leaves Vietnam With Questions and One Big Challenge

Mint9 hours ago
(Bloomberg) -- With the dust far from having settled on this week's US-Vietnam trade agreement, one thing is clear: companies operating in what's become one of the most vibrant Asian economies are on notice to move up the value chain.
A key element of the deal first unveiled by US President Donald Trump is a differentiated tariff setting, with a 20% American surtax on Vietnamese-produced goods and a 40% levy on those trans-shipped from elsewhere through Vietnam. That's largely aimed at China, which produces many of the inputs companies operating in its southern neighbor use for assembling their products.
'It will be quite difficult for Vietnam,' Do Thi Thuy Huong, an executive board member of the country's main electronics association, said of the new tariff schedule. 'But it is a motivation for the country's economy — especially for the manufacturing sector, to develop more in an actual and substantial manner' and boost localization, she said.
After many disappointments, Vietnam emerged about a decade ago as a rapid-growth, export-led economy, with America as a prime customer. In recent years, policymakers in Washington actively encouraged the nation to take a bigger role in US supply chains, as a counter to China, its geostrategic rival. Trump's first trade war with Beijing saw Chinese businesses rush to relocate across the border.
Then came Trump's April 2 bombshell: a 46% 'reciprocal' tariff on Vietnam that shocked the nation of 101 million people. After the US president put that on pause for three months, Vietnamese negotiators rushed to reach a deal. While the new 20% and 40% levies leave Vietnamese exports with much higher barriers than before April, the country now stands out for sealing only the third arrangement yet that Trump has announced with any trading partner.
'Everyone right now is looking at Vietnam,' said Bernardo Bautista, country manager of the logistics and shipping company DHL Vietnam. 'Every day the news is changing, but what I can tell you is that the last three months have been very eventful for us — talking to a lot of customers' about diversifying their supply chains, he said.
Ho Chi Minh City-based Bautista added that companies had put expansion plans on pause, awaiting certainty on the trade rules, 'but so far it has been a very positive view.'
Questions abound. Vietnam said Thursday its trade negotiators were still working with their US counterparts to finalize the details of the agreement. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said his understanding was a deal had been 'finalized in principle.'
'It's important to stay calm and wait for more details,' said Ngo Sy Hoai, general secretary of the Vietnam Timber and Forest Product Association. Hoai noted that, besides the reciprocal tariffs on individual trading partners, Trump has been pursuing sectoral ones, and it's important to watch whether Vietnamese wood products will be affected.
A 20% levy would leave Vietnam sitting between the 10% rate secured by the UK and the current 30% rate China faces — though Chinese goods remain affected by the separate slew of increases in tariffs imposed by Trump in his first term, which were added to by former President Joe Biden.
Economists and business representatives said it will be also crucial to monitor what rates Vietnam's competitors get.
Duong Thi Ngoc Dung, vice chairwoman of Vietnam's Textile & Apparel Association, said she's on the lookout for what countries like India, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh end up with. 'If Vietnam faces a 20% tariff while other countries only get 10–15%, it will put significant pressure on us and make it harder for Vietnamese products to stay competitive,' she said.
The Southeast Asian nation has seen its sales to US markets surge in recent years, and it has become a major supplier of textiles and sportswear for companies such as Nike Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.
Across industries, companies' margins will be under pressure.
The new levy will 'hurt our business as customers will ask us to share it with them,' said Paul Yang, vice president of Yang Cheng Wooden Industries International, which makes indoor wood furnishings for the likes of Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Crate & Barrel Holdings Inc. 'Right now I am still waiting to hear from our customers.'
Much of its exports to the US are made up of items like Airpods, phones or other products assembled with Chinese components and then shipped on. Vietnam is a significant hub for both Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., with numerous suppliers establishing a presence there including key players like Foxconn, GoerTek Inc, and Luxshare Precision Industry Co.
'This deal will affect Vietnam's manufacturing for the short term,' said Huong at the Vietnam Electronics Industries Association. 'But for the long term, the economy will be more healthy.'
The degree of certainty provided by the deal, and Hanoi's demonstration of its determination to strike an agreement with its No. 1 export market, is also a positive, said Trinh Nguyen, a senior economist at Natixis.
'It means that Vietnam will continue to attract foreign direct investment, as it remains an attractive place to do business,' she said.
Pham Luu Hung, chief economist at SSI Securities, said the government is now likely to introduce targeted support measures, ranging from tax incentives and reductions in land-lease costs to direct financial assistance for investments in high-tech industries.
That, along with potentially delayed implementation of the higher tariffs, may limit the hit to gross domestic product to around 1% in 2025, Hung said.
The International Monetary Fund in April projected GDP gains exceeding 5% for the coming five years in Vietnam. How actual growth pans out may depend on how its companies respond to the altered trade landscape.
As Tran Phuoc Anh, Vietnam's ambassador to Singapore, recently put it, 'Vietnam understands, in this global race for capital, talent, and technology, we cannot afford complacency.'
--With assistance from Rthvika Suvarna and Malcolm Scott.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's visa curbs vs America's need for immigrant tech brains: Decoded
Trump's visa curbs vs America's need for immigrant tech brains: Decoded

Business Standard

time18 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Trump's visa curbs vs America's need for immigrant tech brains: Decoded

Meta's latest artificial intelligence venture, the Superintelligence Lab, is being led entirely by immigrant researchers, even as US visa policies remain unpredictable for foreign professionals. The team of 11 researchers, hired from top firms like OpenAI, DeepMind, Google and Anthropic, hails from India, China, South Africa, the UK and Australia. Each holds advanced degrees from US universities and has worked on some of the most sophisticated AI systems in use today. This comes at a time when the US government has toughened its stance on immigration. The Trump administration has introduced measures like prolonged visa processing times, heightened scrutiny of social media activity, and targeted ICE enforcement across cities with large immigrant populations. Immigrant expertise behind major AI breakthroughs From developing core algorithms to building multimodal and generative AI systems, the researchers joining Meta have worked at the heart of global AI innovation. 'Meta's Superintelligence Lab, led entirely by immigrant researchers, is the practical reality we needed to see. AI innovation is truly going borderless and India continues to serve as a strong hub of ready talent,' Praneet Singh, AVP – University Partnership at upGrad's study abroad division told Business Standard. 'It's quite paradoxical, though — while our talent is ready, mobility remains constrained. Despite policy shifts like STEM OPT extensions and improved green card processing, visa constraints and bureaucratic uncertainties continue to slow down global movement,' he added. AI talent is ready—but mobility is not Neeti Sharma, CEO of TeamLease Digital, said immigrant talent has long powered US tech leadership. 'It is not just about filling job vacancies—it's about bringing in diverse skill sets, expertise and perspectives that collaboratively bring out the best for any organisation,' she told Business Standard. But she pointed out that barriers to movement are growing. 'Delayed visa processing remains the biggest hurdle: long waits, restrictive caps, and policy uncertainty disrupt both career plans and hiring strategies,' she said. She added that talent also struggles with issues like cultural integration, credential recognition gaps, and stiff competition, which can slow down or discourage Indian AI professionals—even though they remain central to innovation hubs like Silicon Valley. India's AI education still catching up While India produces a large number of engineering graduates every year, experts say the country still lacks a consistent model for preparing them for top AI roles abroad. 'On the supply side, Indian universities have made commendable strides in STEM education, but AI roles today demand more than academic depth—they require hands-on, real-time problem-solving,' said Singh. Sharma agreed. 'While our institutions are making progress, we are still far away from creating a systemic model of AI learning and upskilling our new and existing workforce,' she said. 'To truly prepare students for global AI roles, universities need stronger industry ties, updated curricula, and more emphasis on applied research. Some institutes are innovating impressively—but scaling these nationally still remains a challenge,' Sharma added. Why the US risks losing AI talent While the US still leads in AI research demand, Sharma warned that current visa and policy delays could push talent elsewhere. 'US continues to top the table on requirements for AI talent. However, their policies, especially lately, haven't kept pace with the increase in demand. In fact, longer visa timelines and uncertainty around renewals have kept many tech companies on the edge,' she said. 'Countries like Canada and the UK have moved faster to build systems that actively attract tech workers. The US still has a strong pull, but there's room to make the path more predictable and welcoming for long-term contributors, especially from countries like India,' added Mayank Kumar, co-founder and CEO of BorderPlus. Meet Meta's AI dream team Meta's new hires include some of the most cited researchers and engineers in the AI field. They have contributed to systems like GPT-4o, Gemini, and foundational models used across text, voice, image and robotics. A few notable members of the lab: Trapit Bansal (India) – PhD from University of Massachusetts Amherst, known for work in reinforcement learning and chain-of-thought reasoning. Shuchao Bi (China) – PhD from UC Berkeley, co-developed the voice mode for GPT-4o. Huiwen Chang (China) – PhD from Princeton, led image generation for GPT-4o and developed Muse architecture. Ji Lin (China) – PhD from MIT, helped scale GPT-4o and o-series models with a focus on efficiency. Joel Pobar (Australia) – former infrastructure specialist at Meta and Anthropic, contributed to systems like HHVM and PyTorch. Jack Rae (UK) – PhD from UCL, developed Google's Gopher and Chinchilla models, worked on Gemini 2.5. Hongyu Ren (China) – PhD from Stanford, worked on robustness and post-training of o-series models. Johan Schalkwyk (South Africa) – Google Fellow, early developer of voice tech in Google's Sesame project. Pei Sun (China) – developed AI perception systems at Waymo, contributed to Gemini post-training. Jiahuai Yu (China) – PhD from UIUC, focused on multimodal learning across GPT-4 and o-series. Shengjia Zhao (China) – PhD from Stanford, co-created ChatGPT and GPT-4, known for work in AI safety and data synthesis. Each of them joins Meta at a time when tech companies are racing to build next-generation AI platforms, but also when immigration pathways remain anything but certain.

India's fintech sector ranks 3rd globally in H1 2025 funding round: Tracxn
India's fintech sector ranks 3rd globally in H1 2025 funding round: Tracxn

Business Standard

time18 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

India's fintech sector ranks 3rd globally in H1 2025 funding round: Tracxn

India's financial technology sector has ranked third in startup funding in the first half of 2025, even as overall capital inflows moderated. According to Tracxn's Geo Semi-Annual India FinTech Report H1 2025, Indian FinTech startups raised $889 million between January and June, behind only the United States and the United Kingdom. At $889 million, the funding figure marks a 26 per cent decline from the $1.2 billion secured in the second half of 2024 and a 5 per cent dip compared to the same period last year. However, early-stage funding climbed 10 per cent from H2 2024 to reach $361 million and a 9 per cent increase compared to H1 last year. In contrast, seed-stage investments slumped to $91.2 million, down 27 per cent from the previous half-year period. 'While the Indian FinTech sector has seen a temporary dip in funding, the steady momentum in early-stage investments and growing acquisition activity indicate that investor interest remains strong, particularly in scalable, innovation-led models,' said Tracxn Co-founder Neha Singh. M&A activity grows, fintech adds one new unicorn India's fintech sector also witnessed more mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity in the first half of the calendar year. The report recorded 16 M&A deals in H1 2025, up 45 per cent from the same period a year ago. Key transactions included Groww's $150 million acquisition of Fisdom and InCred Money's $35 million deal to buy Stocko. Despite the activity, no Fintech IPOs were recorded in H1 2025; however, one new unicorn did emerge during this period. One unicorn had emerged in H2 2024, while none had emerged in H1 2024. Bengaluru leads funding, Accel secures most deals Bengaluru remained the hub of FinTech innovation, drawing 55 per cent of the country's total funding, followed by Mumbai with 14 per cent. Peak XV, Angel List, and LetsVenture were among the most active investors overall. In early-stage rounds, Accel, Bessemer Venture Partners, and Peak XV led activity, while Blume Ventures, Venture Catalysts, and 100Unicorns dominated seed-stage funding. SoftBank Vision Fund, Lathe Investment, and Sofina topped the late-stage investment charts. US-based Accel led with 34 deals, while Blume Ventures expanded its domestic footprint with investments in seven new startups. RBI urges responsible fintech innovation In March, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) called on fintech firms and digital payment companies to pursue 'responsible innovation' while conforming to regulatory standards. RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra's meeting with leaders from the fintech and non-bank payments sector signalled a notable shift in tone, following a period of crackdowns on non-compliant firms under the former governor's tenure. In a sign of regulatory easing, the RBI also reversed some of its previous measures, such as lifting additional risk-weight requirements for bank loans to top-rated non-banking financial companies.

Can India and the US strike a trade deal without clashing over agriculture?
Can India and the US strike a trade deal without clashing over agriculture?

First Post

time20 minutes ago

  • First Post

Can India and the US strike a trade deal without clashing over agriculture?

As India and the US push to finalise a trade pact before Trump's July 9 deadline, agriculture has emerged as the biggest roadblock. With disagreements over GM crops, dairy and ethanol, and concerns over rural livelihoods, both sides are locked in a tense standoff. Can they reach a deal without upsetting India's farmers? read more A farm worker holds rice sapling as he prepares to plant them in a field on the outskirts of Ahmedabad, India, July 22, 2024. File Image/Reuters India and the United States are racing to conclude an interim trade pact ahead of President Donald Trump's July 9 deadline but a long-standing hurdle threatens to block progress — agriculture. Despite nearing consensus on various industrial sectors, disputes around farm goods, including genetically modified crops, dairy imports and ethanol remain reportedly unresolved. The issue is not merely economic for India; it touches upon food security, rural livelihoods, and political sensitivities, all of which have major implications for the country's domestic stability. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why India's agriculture sector is non-negotiable Though farming and allied activities contribute a relatively modest portion — around 16 per cent — to India's GDP, the sector supports nearly half of the country's population of 1.4 billion. The farming community represents a dominant political constituency and has historically influenced policy decisions through sustained mobilisations. In 2021, the Indian government was compelled to withdraw major agricultural reforms following year-long nationwide protests. This past resistance still casts a shadow over current trade negotiations, as New Delhi remains wary of sparking fresh unrest by opening up its agricultural sector to foreign competition. India's farming structure is notably small-scale. The average size of a farm is just over a hectare, contrasting sharply with American agricultural operations, where the mean farm size exceeds 180 hectares. In India, most farms are manually operated or use outdated techniques passed down over generations, while US agriculture is highly mechanised and supported by advanced technology, including AI-based monitoring systems and large-scale machinery. US agricultural demands vs India's red lines A central point of contention is Washington's push for increased access to the Indian market for a range of American agricultural products. The US seeks to expand exports of various farm commodities — among them genetically modified (GM) corn and soybeans, wheat, poultry, dairy, rice, ethanol, and a variety of processed foods including canned peaches, frozen French fries, chocolates, cookies and citrus fruits. While India has indicated some openness to easing tariffs on selected imports such as dry fruits and apples, it has remained firm on rejecting access to GM grains, US dairy products, and ethanol. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Genetically modified crops form a significant part of US agricultural output. However, India does not currently allow the commercial cultivation of GM food crops due to concerns over ecological balance, food safety and the impact on smallholder farmers. Even as India imports edible oils made from genetically modified crops — such as soy and canola — it restricts GM crop cultivation. The commercial release of GM mustard, for example, remains on hold due to pending legal proceedings, and a previous attempt to introduce GM brinjal was blocked in 2010. Nonetheless, some flexibility is being explored. According to Bloomberg, Indian regulators may consider permitting select GM-derived by-products used in animal feed, such as soybean meal or distillers dried grains from corn-based ethanol production. These items would not directly affect human food chains but would still mark a departure from India's long-standing GM restrictions. Why dairy and ethanol are particularly sensitive India's dairy sector employs more than 80 million individuals, a figure that includes small-scale farmers, cooperatives, and vendors. The industry is largely unorganised and depends on herds that typically contain two to three animals per household. In contrast, US dairy farms operate on a vastly different scale, often managing hundreds of cattle with heavy reliance on mechanisation and feed practices that include animal by-products. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This latter point is a major concern in India, where dietary norms and religious sensitivities significantly influence food preferences. The potential entry of dairy sourced from cows fed with animal remnants has been met with strong resistance from Indian consumers and cooperatives like Amul, which have played a key role in shaping the country's self-reliant dairy ecosystem. Similarly, ethanol is another highly sensitive area. India has made substantial progress under its Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) initiative, aiming to reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels by blending petrol with domestically produced ethanol. Most of the ethanol used in India is derived from surplus sugarcane, rice and corn. Allowing the import of US ethanol would not only compromise this strategic energy programme but could also undermine the investments made by Indian distillers and agribusinesses. What each side is willing to concede With the deadline for reciprocal tariffs fast approaching, negotiators from both countries are working to close the deal. Sources indicated that the Indian delegation, led by Special Secretary Rajesh Agarwal, has had to extend its stay in Washington due to ongoing disagreements, particularly over agricultural tariffs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India has shown willingness to discuss reductions on industrial tariffs and provide access to the US in sectors where the political cost is lower — such as in automobiles, a long-standing American request. It has also pushed for broader access to US markets for Indian exports from labour-intensive sectors including textiles, leather, jewellery, plastics, and chemicals. The interim agreement is seen as a stepping-stone towards increasing bilateral trade volumes, with a shared ambition to double total trade to USD 500 billion by 2030 — a goal reiterated by Trump during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's February visit to the United States. Trump, speaking about the potential deal earlier this week, said: 'I think we are going to have a deal with India. And that is going to be a different kind of a deal. It is going to be a deal where we are able to go in and compete. Right now, India does not accept anybody in. I think India is going to do that, and if they do that, we are going to have a deal for much less tariffs.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why India is not backing down India's resistance to opening its agricultural market is deeply rooted in structural and strategic realities. The rural economy is vulnerable to global market shocks. Even modest tariff relaxations could disrupt domestic pricing and erode the safety net provided by public procurement and the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system — pillars that protect farmers from price crashes. Many experts argue that liberalising agricultural trade too quickly could expose India's fragmented farming community to the volatility of global commodity markets dominated by large multinational agribusinesses. These companies often benefit from generous subsidies and economies of scale unavailable to Indian farmers. Further complicating the negotiations is the demand from US exporters for greater parity. However, India's current agricultural tariff regime — ranging from zero to 150 per cent — is not exceptional. The US, too, maintains steep tariffs on specific imports, such as tobacco at over 350 per cent. Thus, criticisms of asymmetry in trade practices may not be entirely justified. India's position finds some backing under WTO norms, which allow member nations to protect sensitive sectors for reasons such as food security, rural development, and employment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nonetheless, the final decision may come down to political calculus more than legal boundaries. Farmers and labour unions mount pressure Opposition to agricultural liberalisation is growing beyond policy circles. On July 3, leaders of the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) held a press conference in Hyderabad, reaffirming their call for an all-India strike on July 9. The SKM, in collaboration with trade unions, is staging protests to oppose what it describes as 'anti-farmer, anti-labour, and anti-people' policies. Former Member of Parliament Vadde Sobhanadreeswara Rao voiced strong opposition to including agriculture in any trade agreement with the U.S. He and other SKM leaders also criticised the government's delay in enacting legislation to guarantee MSP as a legal right. The farmers' coalition has called for a full withdrawal of the National Policy Framework for Agricultural Marketing (NPFAM) and warned of further mobilisations if agriculture is compromised in trade talks. A way out? In light of these challenges, a compromise may be possible through selective market access rather than full liberalisation. One such mechanism could involve tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) — a system that allows a limited volume of imports at reduced tariffs, while maintaining higher duties on imports exceeding the quota. This model was recently adopted in the US-UK mini trade pact announced in May, where agriculture was kept out of contentious discussions. India may be open to marginally lowering tariffs on select low-risk items such as almonds, walnuts, apples, raisins, olive oil, spirits and wine — products that pose minimal threat to domestic producers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Such a calibrated approach could allow both sides to claim victory without triggering adverse political fallout in India. However, the extent of these concessions remains uncertain. A NITI Aayog policy paper has suggested tariff cuts on certain US agricultural products, but it is unclear whether this reflects the official stance of the Indian government or is merely a preliminary recommendation. Agriculture remains the thorniest issue in the India-US trade negotiations. With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store