Video of orcas in algae-infested pool sparks concern for their fate
France has been struggling to find a new home for mother and son after their owner, a marine park on the French Riviera, closed down over a law banning shows featuring marine mammals.
Founded in the city of Antibes in 1970, Marineland closed to the public in January following a drop in attendance and the 2021 law.
In February, the park's management submitted a request to urgently transfer the two orcas, also known as killer whales, and 12 dolphins to two parks in Spain, but the move was blocked by Spanish authorities saying the facilities were adapted for them.
"The situation at Marineland Antibes is an emergency," said Canada-based NGO TideBreakers in a social media post after publishing the video.
"Leaving them in a shut-down facility, confined to a crumbling, decrepit tank, is simply not an option," it said.
Should the two orcas fall ill, they "will likely be euthanized or succumb to the deteriorating environment," the group warned.
The video, shot by drone early this month, shows the two orcas and dolphins in tanks, the edges of which are green with algae, amid installations previously used for other marine animals in brackish water.
Contacted by AFP, the park management said that the orca and dolphin pools remained well-maintained and that about 50 employees were still working for the animals' well-being.
The algae visible in the images were a normal phenomenon, it said, explaining that algae pores present in the filtered seawater that fills the pools develop each spring as the water warms up.
They were not harmful to the animals and were regularly removed by brushing, management said.
This explanation was backed up by Mike Riddell, who managed the park for 26 years before being dismissed in an ownership change in 2006.
AFP pictures taken in May 2020 during a press visit showed similar fine algae covering the edges of the pool.
But the TideBreakers footage prompted strong reactions, which, according to the park's management, even included death threats against staff.
Officials said they share the NGO's concerns, but the park's attempts to find an emergency solution with the staff of France's environment minister, Agnes Pannier-Runacher, have come to nothing.
Contacted by AFP, ministry officials said authorities were "ensuring that the animals continue to be housed under good conditions, pending their future destination," and that the park was seeking "alternative solutions" moving forward.
"The only option left"
Animal rights groups want the orcas to be rehomed in a whale sanctuary where they will have more space to swim and will not be forced to breed or perform in shows, the BBC previously reported.
Lori Marino, president of the Whale Sanctuary Project, said their site in Nova Scotia is "the only option left," the BBC reported. Her group is bidding to rehome the orcas in the eastern Canadian province despite a previous offer being rejected by the French ministry for ecology earlier this year.
A petition is urging the French government to send Wikie and Keijo to the coastal refuge in Nova Scotia, and last October, three environmental icons — Dr. Jane Goodall, Dr. Sylvia Earle, and Jean-Michel Cousteau — signed a letter recommending that the orcas be relocated to the sea sanctuary.
Following the Spanish ban decision, Marineland had hoped to transfer the orcas to a park in Japan. But the move was blocked by the French government, which demanded a transfer to a European park with higher welfare standards.
However, a solution involving the only such facility, in Tenerife, Spain, was vetoed last month by the Spanish government, which said the facilities there "did not meet the requirements," according to French officials.
NGOs, including One Voice and Sea Shepherd, have requested permission to send specialists to Marineland to check on the orcas.
Born in captivity, the two mammals are unable to survive alone.
The longer-term solution, the French ministry and NGOs agree, should see the establishment of a marine sanctuary where orcas and dolphins could be cared for in semi-wild conditions.
Such a solution would cost $2.2-3.3 million per year, according to Riddell.
It is estimated that Wikie and Keijo still have decades to live, under adequate conditions.
Raw Video: Mexican navy training ship hits Brooklyn Bridge
Italy's Trulli: From Past to Present
Judge weighing throwing out Sean "Diddy" Combs trial testimony
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
Heritage's canned cocktails review: They actually hit their moving target
Canned cocktails are a mixed bag. For years, the bar for these drinks was "well, it's better than nothing." A rising tide of hard seltzers and a general market shift away from beer helped improve quality, but there's still a hit-or-miss quality to the genre. That's especially true if you're trying to go beyond the classics. That's the line Heritage Distilling Company is walking. The Washington-based booze maker has put its craft spirits into custom cocktails in hopes of expanding its reach and making its vodkas, gins and bourbons easier to bring to a tailgate or beach. Did they hit that moving target? Let's see what we've got. Peachy Bourbon: A- I'm tackling this one in the ideal canned cocktail scenario; on a hot summer day at the pool. With a quick toss upside-down, we're ready to drink. The can is lightly carbonated. The smell off the top is peach rings and a little oaky goodness. The first sip is all those things. Bright peach, a little sweet bourbon and just enough bubbles to move things along. The fruit juice is tangy and sweet but feels more authentic than you'd get in a seltzer. The whiskey is minor, but blends well with those flavors. It's refreshing and crushable. If there's a downside, it's a sugary sweet finish that lingers a touch too long. A drier ending would be nice, but this remains a vibrant, easy to drink cocktail. That could be a bit of a problem since each can clocks in at 6.9 percent alcohol by volume. Three of these and swimming would be an issue. But, all said, it's a very solid drink -- especially for the summer. Gin Jam Fizzzz: B+ I'm drinking this one in another classic summer situation; post grass-cutting on a 90 degree day (and, admittedly, after crushing an Urban Chestnut Zwickel while standing barefoot on a freshly mowed lawn with two happy dogs around me. This was Dad Valhalla). I'm gonna try this one over ice, which leads to a surprising revelation. Gin Jam Fizzzz (cool name, I hate it) pours almost transparent with just a hint of earthy brown to it. That's weird for a drink that talks up its berries and jam content, but sure. It smells sharp, with the acid of the raspberries inside cutting through the gin wafting off the top. The first sip is... well, there's a lot going on. That jam flavor is front and center, mixing with the gin to give off refreshing summer vibes. Toward the end you get a little bit of herbal mint -- that's not on the cocktail description, but it sure feels like it's there. It's not overwhelming, but it signals the shift from "taste" to "aftertaste." You're left to linger on that a while, but it's pleasant and welcomes you back in for more. It's sweet but instead of balancing things out with dry or sour, you get just a hiccup of fresh herbs to bring everything together. It's a layer I didn't expect, especially considering how straightforward the Peachy Bourbon was (in a good way). That finish does dent the replay value a bit. This isn't a crushable hot day cocktail. It's a refreshing sipper. But Heritage managed to make it feel like a multiple step cocktail fresh out of the can, and that's no small challenge. Blood Orange Vodkarita: B Like the Fizzzz, this pours with an effervescent blast of carbonation. It's a light orange color and smells exactly as advertised with orange juice and vodka flavors. That combo is its own, different cocktail, so hopefully this vodkarita is bringing something new to the table. There's a little bit of Grand Marnier/margarita vibe, but I'm picking up more thin screwdriver/fuzzy navel from this than your standard Cinco companion. It's fruity, sweet and boozy. That's about all there is to it, but it's never excessive in any one direction, doesn't burn and is a can you could put down in about four minutes on a hot day. The label hangs its hat on being "extra refreshing" and that's a fair assessment. It's not reinventing anything despite an intriguing label, but it grows on you. While it lacks some of the complexity of Heritage's other canned cocktails, it still holds up fine on its own. Bonus! Heritage Blood Orange and Huckleberry flavored vodkas: B It's tough to judge flavored vodkas on anything more than their ability to a) taste like candy and b) hide the booze within. That's not throwing shade. Lord knows I've drank more whipped cream vodka and Mountain Dew cocktails than any grown man should (it tastes like Sour Skittles. No, I do not understand why). The Blood Orange brings bright, sweet citrus flavors that blend seamlessly with a powerful mixer or stand alone against the backdrop of tonic. In fact, that's a pretty breezy two-step summer cocktail on its own; I'm just mad at myself for not having tonic on hand. Or limes. Huh. The Huckleberry hits a blueberry/blackberry/grape center point that brings more sugary sweetness but lacks the fuller flavor of the orange. It's a little more boozy but, again, blends easily into a lazy person's cocktail. Both are easy sells for simple, crushable drinks. But both clock in at only 60 proof, which could be a deal breaker for some. Would I drink it instead of a Hamm's? This a pass/fail mechanism where I compare whatever I'm drinking to my baseline cheap beer. That's the standby from the land of sky-blue waters, Hamm's. So the question to answer is: on a typical day, would I drink Heritage's canned cocktails over a cold can of Hamm's? Yes. Heritage has something for both my drinking modes -- more complex craft cocktail vibes and crushable, boozy drinks. It hides its ABV well and brings bright, crisp flavors to the table. There's a lot to like here. This is part of FTW's Beverage of the Week series. Here, we mostly chronicle and review beers, but happily expand that scope to any beverage that pairs well with sports. Yes, even cookie dough whiskey.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lorne Gunter: Who knew Edmonton promotes 'forest bather' program to 'reduce stress and enhance wellness'
Turns out I've been a 'forest bather' all these years and didn't even know it. No, no. That doesn't mean I run starkers into the woods until I find a pond, then leap in for a cleansing dip. According to the City of Edmonton's new 'forest bathing' program (yes, the city actually set up such a program with guides and schedules and everything), bathing in the forest can be as simple as going for an 'exploratory walk' or drinking in all the sensations that surround us in the river valley. Don't you just get all tingly imagining standing in a grove of poplars and chanting a mantra right now? 'Om Mani Pädme Hum!' For a dozen years, since we rescued our beautiful dog Kali with the help of the Edmonton Humane Society, I've been going on long walks down by the North Saskatchewan River three or four times a week. Now that we have a second dog, Cooper, it's a great way to help him burn off energy. (He's a five-year-old border collie–blue heeler cross.) Our frequent walks are a great way to meet other dogs and dog owners. But the dogs and I also know a couple of long trails on which we are unlikely to encounter anyone else. A peaceful hour on one of these paths is very relaxing. I guess that means that all this time I've been a closet forest bather. Who knew? Unbeknownst to me, I've even occasionally used one of the city's approved forest-bathing glades. Twice a week until Sept. 18, the city is offering free 'forest therapy' sessions 'to reduce stress and enhance wellness.' They've hired guides to lead 'silent meditation, mindful sensory exploration and group and individual reflections.' All of this to 'increase connection to nature in our urban forest.' Seriously!? This is an activity that needs to be organized and guided? Isn't that level of formality self-defeating to the simple enjoyment of nature? In his famous 19th-Century book Walden; or, Life in the Woods, a 'reflection on simple living in natural surroundings,' I don't recall Henry David Thoreau talking about meeting up with his government guide at the marshalling point near the parking lot for the spiritual walk to Walden Pond. It's galling to think the city is hitting up taxpayers for this exercise. If you want to get together with a bunch of other meditators to explore the river valley, have at 'er. Just don't make me pay for it from a budget city council is always complaining is overstressed. But beyond the notion that 'forest bathing' is a tax-funded activity in Edmonton — and an overthought one at that — what makes this doubly upsetting is that this program was announced the same week council manipulated its agenda so it could cancel a hearing on residents' legitimate concerns about mega-infill projects in the middle of existing residential neighbourhoods. Talk about getting its priorities screwed up. Council also found time to extend the community revitalization levy for Downtown. That will increase taxes through 2044 to fund projects that have very little chance of revitalizing our city core. But council didn't have time to hear from residents concerned that the neighbourhoods they have made their lives in are being ripped apart by enormous developments on tiny lots with all the parking spilling onto the streets in front. Homes that people have pumped their live savings into are being devalued and their quality of life diminished so the city can push ahead with its unbalanced obsession for 'more homes everywhere.' The majority on council couldn't take the time this week to hear those concerns, but it did manage to find time to approve a seven-acre mountain bike park in the river valley (presumably far from the forest bathing sites). Any councillor with priorities as messed up as this deserves to be turfed out. lgunter@ Zoning bylaw debate poses some thorny issues for Edmonton council Lorne Gunter: Trickery at city hall so Edmontonians went home without being heard You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. The Edmonton Journal | The Edmonton Sun
Epoch Times
11 hours ago
- Epoch Times
This Budget-Friendly ‘Taco Tuesday' Meal Would Be Great Any Day
PITTSBURGH—It's the rare grownup, teenager, or child who doesn't love a good taco (or three) every now and again, if not on each and every Tuesday as the social media trend dictates. In Pittsburgh, it's easy to scratch the itch for this classic Mexican hand food, as we have our pick of so many great places to fill up on meat- or vegetable-filled tortillas in and around city. They're available everywhere from food trucks and small storefronts to full-service restaurants and even a gas station-turned-Mexican grocery in Coraopolis (La Poblanita). Our mouths water at the thought of tacos because they taste great, of course, and are extremely versatile; they're a good choice for vegetarians, vegans and carnivores alike. You can tuck almost anything—meat, veggies, fruit, beans, cheese, and even the occasional leftover—into a corn or flour tortilla. They're also a kitchen darling because tacos are ridiculously easy to make at home, even if you don't normally like to cook. And tacos make good financial sense in these challenging economic times, because they usually feature less-expensive cuts of meat like ground beef, and also can be built with rice, corn and beans. A package of 30 corn tortillas at my local grocery store cost just $2.15—about 21 cents per three-taco serving. That's why I was excited when a copy of 'Sunny Days, Taco Nights' by Enrique Olvera (Phaidon Press, $40) landed in my mailbox. The acclaimed Mexican chef has been experimenting with tacos for well over a decade at his Mexico City restaurant, Pujol, growing more inventive as he developed a deeper understanding of and appreciation for the staple he and his staff worked with every day. The cookbook includes 100 succulent recipes for home cooks—both classics like barbacoa, Baja-style fish, and al Pastor tacos and 'originals' like ones featuring fried Brussels sprouts, rabbit, octopus, and bundled green beans and peanuts. In the book's foreword, co-author Alonso Ruvalcaba writes that a taco 'is the opposite of exclusive: It is genuinely for the masses—not just in words or a damn sign, but for real. For everyone.' To keep costs down for this latest installment in our budget-minded dinner series, I opted for a taco that was a little different but still in the 'classic' category because it includes ingredients you could find in most grocery stores and a super-simple preparation: cochinada tacos. Cochinado means 'filth' in Spanish, which sounds pretty unappetizing. In this case, it refers to the crispy bits and pieces of meat that collect at the bottom of a chorizo grill after many hours of cooking sausage. In Olvera's book, they're made with a combination of finely chopped beef cecina (a cured, air-dried beef similar to prosciutto) and 'green' chorizo made with spinach, pork, peanuts, nuts and raisins, among other things. I went a more traditional route, swapping regular ground beef and chorizo, though I kept the traditional garnishes of onion, lime juice and cilantro. The original recipe is probably tastier, but my version was pretty delish, too—crunchy, slightly spicy, and definitely craveable. The best part: The entire dish took less than 20 minutes, during which I prepared the guacamole served as an appetizer and also the spicy salsa de arbol to be spooned on top for some extra zing. The breakdown on cost: $2.42 for the guacamole, $2.16 for the salsa, $7.37 for six tacos, and $3.01 for a pan of nine brownies gently spiced with cinnamon and cayenne pepper. That adds up to just $14.96 for two, with leftovers, or about $7.50 per person for a three-course, really tasty meal. The biggest expense after the meat (which wasn't that costly since you use a total of 1 pound) was the avocado. In fact, I almost chucked it from the menu when the first store I stopped at was charging $2 apiece, which would have blown my $15 budget. Then I saw them for almost half the price at another store—whew! The classic Mexican appetizer was back on, with one change: To make the guac guilt-free, I served it with crisp-cut carrot sticks—a budget vegetable I always have in my refrigerator crisper—instead of tortilla or corn chips. For dessert, I gave in to my love of chocolate with a really fudgy brownie that used very little flour and only one stick of butter. As always in this series, I went into it with a plan, made careful choices, and took advantage of ingredients I already had on hand (and you probably do, too). I didn't have to factor into the cost garlic, vanilla, cumin, cinnamon, and cayenne. As prices continue to climb—can you believe a single Granny Smith apple or yellow onion now can cost a buck or more?—I imagine it will become harder than ever to create menus that are interesting, taste great and are easy on your wallet. But at least egg prices are finally coming down! Cochinada Tacos PG tested Makes 6 generous tacos. 2 tablespoons olive oil 8 ounces ground beef 8 ounces ground chorizo 6 corn tortillas 1/2 white onion, chopped Chopped cilantro 1/4 teaspoon salt Lime wedges Salsa, for serving (recipe follows) Heat oil in medium skillet over medium heat. Add beef and chorizo, and saute for 10 minutes or until they just begin to turn golden brown. Transfer 3/4 of the mixture to a plate, and cook the remainder of the mixture until it is dark brown, about 5 minutes. (This is the cochinada.) Heat a skillet over high heat for 5 minutes. Add tortillas, flipping them continuously for 2-3 minutes or until warmed through. Transfer to a plate. Top each tortilla with browned meat and a spoonful of cochinada. Serve with onion, cilantro, lime wedges, and salsa. Recipe adapted from 'Sunny Days, Taco Nights'
